Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Hybrid fuzzy machine learning models optimized with meta-heuristics for accurate EEG-based neurological assessment
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 March 2026

Hybrid fuzzy machine learning models optimized with meta-heuristics for accurate EEG-based neurological assessment

  • Mahdiyeh Lak1,
  • Jasem Jamali1,
  • Nahid Adlband1,
  • Mehdi Taghizadeh1 &
  • …
  • Omid Mahdiyar1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1184 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Accurate and timely analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is critical for the assessment of neurological disorders such as coma and epileptic seizures. Conventional EEG analysis is often time-consuming, prone to human error, and limited by the availability of skilled specialists, highlighting the need for automated, reliable, and intelligent diagnostic systems. This study presents a unified hybrid framework that leverages meta-heuristic optimized machine learning approaches for the classification of EEG signals in multiple neurological conditions. Features were extracted from EEG signals, including time- and frequency-domain characteristics, statistical properties, and nonlinear metrics. Feature mapping and dimensionality reduction were performed using advanced optimization techniques such as Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) and the Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA), combined with Fuzzy-PCA and Auto-Encryption (AE) for robust feature representation. Classification was conducted using hybrid models including Fuzzy K-NN, FSVM, and DT-FIS, enabling accurate discrimination between different levels of consciousness and stages of epileptic seizures. Experimental results demonstrated high performance, achieving up to 99.53% accuracy for deep coma classification and 99.28% F1-score for seizure detection, with significant improvements in precision, recall, and robustness against feature variability. The proposed framework highlights the efficacy of combining hybrid learning models, fuzzy logic, and meta-heuristic optimization for EEG-based diagnosis, providing a scalable, automated, and highly accurate system for neurological assessment.

Data availability

The data used in the paper will be available upon request. Please contact [jasemjamali54@gmail.com](mailto: jasemjamali54@gmail.com).

Abbreviations

EEG:

Electroencephalogram (Brain electrical activity recording)

DT-FIS:

Decision tree-based fuzzy inference system (Proposed hybrid classifier)

SFOA:

Starfish optimization algorithm (Meta-heuristic for model parameter optimization)

WCA:

Water cycle algorithm (Meta-heuristic for feature reduction)

WCA-AE:

Water cycle algorithm-optimized auto-encoder (Feature mapping and dimensionality reduction)

CAD:

Computer-aided diagnosis (Automated diagnostic system)

LOSO:

Leave-one-subject-out (Patient-independent cross-validation)

GCS:

Glasgow coma scale (Clinical scale for assessing consciousness)

AUBMC:

American University of Beirut Medical Center (Source of the utilized EEG dataset)

WHO:

World Health Organization

CNN:

Convolutional neural network

GRU:

Gated recurrent unit

HHO:

Harris Hawks Optimization (Alternative meta-heuristic used in coma part)

FSVM:

Fuzzy support vector machine

PCA:

Principal component analysis

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Hashmi, S. A., Gundlapalli, R. & Zawar, I. Mortality in older adults with epilepsy: an understudied entity. Epilepsia Open. 10 (1), 15–30 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nalla, S. & Khetavath, S. A review on epileptic seizure detection and prediction. Intell. Manuf. Energy Sustain. Proc. ICIMES 2022 225–232. (2023).

  3. Wu, Y., Su, E. L. M., Wu, M., Ooi, C. Y. & Holderbaum, W. A review of machine learning and deep learning trends in EEG-based epileptic seizure prediction. IEEE Access (2025).

  4. Gramacki, A. & Gramacki, J. A deep learning framework for epileptic seizure detection based on neonatal EEG signals. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 13010 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pei, Y. et al. Toward the enhancement of affective brain–computer interfaces using dependence within EEG series. J. Neural Eng. 22 (2), 026038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adbfc0 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, J. et al. EEG-based multi-band functional connectivity using corrected amplitude envelope correlation for identifying unfavorable driving States. Comput. Methods Biomech. BioMed. Eng. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2488502 (2025).

  7. Zhang, X., Cheng, X. & Liu, H. TPRO-NET: an EEG-based emotion recognition method reflecting subtle changes in emotion. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 13491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62990-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shi, S. & Liu, W. B2-ViT net: broad vision transformer network with broad attention for seizure prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 32, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3346955 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, X. & Xu, S. Mitigating choice overload: the interactive effects of set size and overall preference revealed by hierarchical drift diffusion modeling and electroencephalography. NeuroImage 321, 121542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121542 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh, A., Roy, A. P., Patra, R. & Mondal, H. K. Designing efficient NoC-based neural network architectures for identification of epileptic seizure. SN Comput. Sci. 2 (5), 363 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kode, H., Elleithy, K. & Almazaydeh, L. Epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals using machine learning and deep learning techniques. IEEE Access. 12, 80657–80668 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.glasgowcomascale.org/faq/#faq-2.

  13. http://www.cdc.gov/masstrauma/resources/gcs.pdf.

  14. The Glasgow structured. Approach to assessment of the Glasgow Coma Scale. www.glasgowcomascale.org.

  15. Brunicardi, F. C. et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery 2-volume set 11th edition. (McGraw Hill, 2019).

  16. Jibon, F. A. et al. Epileptic seizure detection from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals using linear graph convolutional network and densenet based hybrid framework. J. Radiation Res. Appl. Sci. 16 (3), 100607 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tchinda, B. S., Tchiotsop, D., Nkengfack, L. C. D. & Tchinda, R. Diagnosis of epileptic seizures from electroencephalogram signals using log-Mel spectrogram and a deep learning CNN model. Heliyon 11 (6). (2025).

  18. Bhadra, R., Singh, P. K. & Mahmud, M. HyEpiSeiD: a hybrid convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit model for epileptic seizure detection from electroencephalogram signals. Brain Inf. 11 (1), 21 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minggang Liu, N., Zhao, K. H., Alharbi, X., Zhao, B. & Niu Dynamic Event-Triggered fuzzy adaptive hierarchical sliding mode optimal control for unknown nonlinear systems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-025-02124-8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, J., Niu, B., Xu, N., Zong, G. & Zhang, L. Self-triggered optimal fault-tolerant control for saturated-inputs zero-sum game nonlinear systems via particle swarm optimization-based reinforcement learning. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.109512 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiacheng Wang, Y., Chen, Q. & Zou Inferring gene regulatory network from single-cell transcriptomes with graph autoencoder model. PLoS Genet. 19 (9), e1010942 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y. et al. Identification of human microRNA-disease association via low-rank approximation-based link propagation and multiple kernel learning. Front. Comput. Sci. 18 (2), 182903 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saranya, D. & Bharathi, A. Automatic detection of epileptic seizure using machine learning-based IANFIS-LightGBM system. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 46 (1), 2463–2482 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kapoor, B., Nagpal, B., Jain, P. K., Abraham, A. & Gabralla, L. A. Epileptic seizure prediction based on hybrid seek optimization tuned ensemble classifier using EEG signals. Sensors 23 (1), 423 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhong, C. et al. Starfish optimization algorithm (SFOA): a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization compared with 100 optimizers. Neural Comput. Appl. 37 (5), 3641–3683 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, Y. et al. An enhanced starfish optimization algorithm via joint strategy and its application in Ultra-Wideband indoor positioning. Biomimetics 10 (5), 338 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nasir, M., Sadollah, A., Choi, Y. H. & Kim, J. H. A comprehensive review on water cycle algorithm and its applications. Neural Comput. Appl. 32 (23), 17433–17488 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Al Ghayab, H. R., Li, Y., Siuly, S. & Abdulla, S. A feature extraction technique based on tunable Q-factor wavelet transform for brain signal classification. J. Neurosci. Methods. 312, 43–52 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ke, H., Chen, Y., Li, M. & Li, J. Fault-tolerant control design for nonlinear multilateral teleoperation system with unreliable communication channels and actuator constraints. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybernet. 16, 1991–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-024-02373-3 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, M., Chen, Y. & Li, J. Event-Triggered Fault-Tolerant control for nonlinear multilateral teleoperation system with unknown environmental forces. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control. 35, 1831–1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7759 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ke, H., Zhang, F. & Li, J. Event-Triggered disturbance rejection Fault-Tolerant constrained consensus against agents’ number changing. J. Syst. Sci. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-025-4455-2 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yumeng Cao, B. et al. Adaptive neural event-triggered secure control for nonlinear mass against actuator faults and FDI attacks. Int. J. Syst. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2025.2530186 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. LongQin, Y., Ke, H. Y. & Li, J. N. Adaptive fault-tolerant head-tracking control for nonlinear unmanned surface vessels with actuator faults and drift angles. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.4058 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, N., Li, J. & Xiong, J. An integrated design of course-keeping control and extended state observers for nonlinear USVs with disturbances. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 13 (967). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13050967 (2025).

  35. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vieira, J. C., Guedes, L. A., Santos, M. R. & Sanchez-Gendriz, I. Using explainable artificial intelligence to obtain efficient seizure-detection models based on electroencephalography signals. Sensors 23 (24), 9871 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Oh, S. H., Lee, Y. R. & Kim, H. N. A novel EEG feature extraction method using Hjorth parameter. Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2 (2), 106–110 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cui, J., Guo, D., Chen, G., Cai, J. & Li, J. Event-triggered inverse control for parametric feedback systems with asymmetric dead-zone input. IEEE Access 13, 129359–129371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3590439. (2025).

  39. Zhan, X. et al. Differences between two maximal principal strain rate calculation schemes in traumatic brain analysis with in-vivo and in-silico datasets. J. Biomech. 179, 112456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112456 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hu, B., Wang, X., Ying, X. & Zhao, J. Dynamical modeling reveals the pivotal regulatory role of direct glutamatergic subthalamic-striatal projections in modulating basal ganglia activity during absence epilepsy. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 199, 116677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116677 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, X., Zhao, L. & Jin, J. A noise-tolerant fuzzy-type zeroing neural network for robust synchronization of chaotic systems. Concurrency Computation: Pract. Experience. 36 (22), e8218. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8218 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, H. et al. fNIRS biomarkers for stratifying poststroke cognitive impairment: evidence from frontal and Temporal cortex activation. Stroke https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.050269 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yizheng Wang, Y., Zhai, Y., Ding, Q. & Zou SBSM-Pro: support bio-sequence machine for proteins. Sci. China Inform. Sci. 67 (11), 144–159 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mahami, H. et al. Material recognition for automated progress monitoring using deep learning methods. https://arXiv.org/abs/2006.16344. (2020).

  45. Pulungan, A. F., Zarlis, M. & Suwilo, S. Analysis of braycurtis, Canberra and Euclidean distance in Knn algorithm. Sinkron: Jurnal dan. Penelitian Teknik Informatika. 4 (1), 74–77 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Aru, O. E., Achumba, I. E. & Opara, F. K. Exploration of the adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference system architecture and its applications. Am. J. Eng. Res. 5 (9), 181–188 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Bengio, Y. Deep Learning 1 (2). (MIT Press, 2016).

  48. Nasreddine, W. Epileptic EEG Dataset, Mendeley Data, V1 (2021).

  49. Abou-Abbas, L. et al. EEG oscillatory power and complexity for epileptic seizure detection. Appl. Sci. 12 (9), 4181 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Melek, M., Melek, N. & Golden Distance A new and comprehensive metric definition study facilitating classification performance evaluations. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 49, 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-025-00870-x (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Niedermeyer, E. Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011).

  52. Edfeldt, K., Edwards, A. M., Engkvist, O., Günther, J., Hartley, M., Hulcoop, D. G.,… Schapira, M. A data science roadmap for open science organizations engaged in early-stage drug discovery. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 5640 (2024).

  53. Gélisse, P., Benbadis, S. R., Crespel, A. & Tatum, W. O. Overcoming traps and pitfalls leading to misinterpretation of normal EEG variants and variation of the background activity. J. Neurol. 271 (7), 3869–3878 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Altıntop, Ç. G., Latifoğlu, F., Akın, A. K. & Ülgey, A. Quantitative electroencephalography analysis for improved assessment of consciousness levels in deep coma patients using a proposed stimulus stage. Diagnostics 13, 1383 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sun, X. et al. Consformer: consciousness detection using transformer networks with correntropy-based measures. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil Eng. 31, 2933–2943 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Qin, X., Xu, D., Dong, X., Cui, X. & Zhang, S. EEG signal classification based on improved variational mode decomposition and deep forest. Biomed. Signal. Process. Control. 83, 104644 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Manshouri, N., Maleki, M. & Kayıkçıoğlu, T. Classification of human vision discrepancy during watching 2D and 3D movies based on EEG signals. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 15, 430–436 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Melek, N. The importance of rhythm activity in epilepsy EEG signal classification (An Educational Article). Sakarya Univ. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 7 (2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis (2024).

  59. Manshouri, N. & Kayıkçıoğlu, T. Classification of 2D and 3D videos based on EEG waves. 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU) 2016, 949–952. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2016.7495898 (2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Kaz.C., Islamic Azad University, Kazerun, Iran

    Mahdiyeh Lak, Jasem Jamali, Nahid Adlband, Mehdi Taghizadeh & Omid Mahdiyar

Authors
  1. Mahdiyeh Lak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jasem Jamali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nahid Adlband
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehdi Taghizadeh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omid Mahdiyar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection, simulation and analysis were performed by Mahdiyeh lak, Jasem Jamali, Mehdi Taghizadeh, Nahid Adlband and Omid Mahdiyar. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jasem Jamali and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasem Jamali.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lak, M., Jamali, J., Adlband, N. et al. Hybrid fuzzy machine learning models optimized with meta-heuristics for accurate EEG-based neurological assessment. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35669-1

Download citation

  • Received: 28 September 2025

  • Accepted: 07 January 2026

  • Published: 03 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35669-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Epilepsy diagnosis
  • EEG signals
  • Feature reduction matrix
  • DT-FIS machine learning system
  • Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA)
  • Water Cycle Algorithm-automatic Encoder (WCA-AE)
  • Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO)
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics