Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of ventilation at 10 °C as the optimal storage condition for donor lungs in a murine model
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 February 2026

Evaluation of ventilation at 10 °C as the optimal storage condition for donor lungs in a murine model

  • Morgan A. Hill1,
  • Megan Tennant2,
  • Bailey Watts3,
  • Carl Atkinson4,
  • Richard O’Neil2,
  • Kathryn E. Engelhardt1 &
  • …
  • Barry C. Gibney1,5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell biology
  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Physiology

Abstract

Cold static preservation at 4 °C is the clinical standard for donor lung storage but is limited to 6–8 h of cold ischemia. Static storage at 10 °C has been shown to extend ischemia times and improve lung health. Given that lungs can maintain aerobic metabolism ex vivo, we hypothesized that adding ventilation at 10 °C would further prolong preservation by stimulating aerobic metabolism. Lungs were procured from C57Bl/6 mice and then stored for 24 h with ventilation at 10 °C (n = 4), statically at 10 °C (n = 4), or statically at 4 °C (n = 4). Respiratory mechanics were evaluated using a FlexiVent system. Cellular viability was assessed via flow cytometry. Complement shedding was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Histologic evidence of lung injury was assessed by H&E staining. Donor lungs stored with ventilation at 10 °C exhibited significantly reduced histologic injury scores compared to static storage at 4 °C (p = 0.0062). Ventilation also decreased complement C3 shedding (p < 0.01), apoptosis (p < 0.05), cytochrome c release (p = 0.0014), and ROS production (p = 0.0008) compared to statically stored lungs at 4 °C and 10 °C. Functionally, ventilated lungs demonstrated improved respiratory mechanics with lower airway resistance (p = 0.021) and increased compliance (p = 0.023) compared to static storage at 10 °C. Ventilating lungs at 10 °C compared to static cold storage appears to result in healthier and more functional lung tissue and may extend the preservation times of donor organs for lung transplantation.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Alcorn, J. Continuous distribution of lungs. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network website. Published August 2, (2019). https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov

  2. Kalra, A. et al. Bigger pies, bigger slices: increased hospitalization costs for lung transplantation recipients in the non–donation service area allocation era. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 169 (1), 316–326e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.01.045 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, A. L. et al. National utilization, trends, and lung transplant outcomes of static versus portable ex vivo lung perfusion platforms. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 168 (2), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.015 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halpern, S. E. et al. Lung transplantation after ex vivo lung perfusion versus static cold storage: an institutional cost analysis. Am. J. Transplant. 22 (2), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16794 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kent, J. et al. Cost effectiveness of commercial portable ex vivo lung perfusion at a low-volume US lung transplant center. Artif. Organs. 48 (11), 1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14816 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ali, A. et al. Static lung storage at 10°C maintains mitochondrial health and preserves donor organ function. Sci. Transl Med. 13 (611), eabf7601. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abf7601 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ali, A. et al. Extension of cold static donor lung preservation at 10°C. NEJM Evid. 2 (6), EVIDoa2300008. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2300008 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelnour-Berchtold, E. et al. Evaluation of 10°C as the optimal storage temperature for aspiration-injured donor lungs in a large animal transplant model. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 41 (12), 1679–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.025 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer, S. et al. Low-potassium dextran preservation solution improves lung function after human lung transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 121 (3), 594–596. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.109703 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adzick, N. S., Harrison, M. R., Glick, P. L., Villa, R. L. & Finkbeiner, W. Experimental pulmonary hypoplasia and oligohydramnios: relative contributions of lung fluid and fetal breathing movements. J. Pediatr. Surg. 19 (6), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(84)80349-8 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kitagawa, M., Hislop, A., Boyden, E. A. & Reid, L. Lung hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a quantitative study of airway, artery, and alveolar development. Br. J. Surg. 58 (5), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800580507 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harding, R. & Hooper, S. B. Regulation of lung expansion and lung growth before birth. J. Appl. Physiol. 81 (1), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.209 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brower, R. G. et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care Med. 27(8). Accessed August 1999. (1999). https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/fulltext/1999/08000/prospective,_randomized,_controlled_clinical_trial.15.aspx

  14. Wu, J. et al. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in alveolar macrophages contributes to mechanical stretch-induced lung inflammation and injury. J. Immunol. 190 (7), 3590–3599. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200860 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce, R. A. et al. Chronic lung injury in preterm lambs: disordered pulmonary Elastin deposition. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 272 (3), L452–L460. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1997.272.3.L452 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hsia, C. C. W. Signals and mechanisms of compensatory lung growth. J. Appl. Physiol. 97 (5), 1992–1998. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00530.2004 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ysasi, A. B. et al. Effect of unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis on postpneumonectomy lung growth. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 305 (6), L439–L445. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00134.2013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett, R. D. et al. Deformation-induced transitional myofibroblasts contribute to compensatory lung growth. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 312 (1), L79–L88. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00383.2016 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Filipovic, N. et al. Mapping Cyclic stretch in the postpneumonectomy murine lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 115 (9), 1370–1378. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00635.2013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Date, H. et al. Changes in alveolar oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration and oxygen consumption during lung preservation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 105 (3), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(19)34232-1 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Akashi, A. et al. Attenuation of warm ischemic injury of rat lung by inflation with room air: assessment of cellular components and the surfactant in the Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in relation to changes in cellular adenosine triphosphate. Transplantation 55 (1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199301000-00006 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakuma, T. et al. Lung deflation impairs alveolar epithelial fluid transport in ischemic rabbit and rat lungs. Transplantation 69 (9), 1785–1793. https://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/fulltext/2000/05150/lung_deflation_impairs_alveolar_epithelial_fluid.10.aspx (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali, A. et al. Successful 3-day lung preservation using a Cyclic normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion strategy. EBioMedicine 83, 104210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104210 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeCampos, K. N., Keshavjee, S., Slutsky, A. S. & Liu, M. Alveolar recruitment prevents rapid-reperfusion–induced injury of lung transplants. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 18 (11), 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-2498(99)00082-0 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, H. K. et al. Cyclic stretch increases mitochondrial biogenesis in a cardiac cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 505 (3), 768–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.182 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. McAdams, R. M. et al. Cyclic stretch attenuates effects of hyperoxia on cell proliferation and viability in human alveolar epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 291 (2), L166–L174. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00386.2005 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng, P. et al. Lung inflation with hydrogen during the cold ischemia phase alleviates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting pyroptosis in rats. Front. Physiol. 12, 699344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.699344 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shah, R. J. et al. Plasma complement levels are associated with PGD and mortality after lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir Crit. Care Med. 189 (12), 1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201312-2252OC (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Westall, G. P. et al. C3d and C4d deposition early after lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 27 (7), 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2008.03.016 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kulkarni, H. S. et al. Local complement activation is associated with primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. JCI Insight. 5 (17), e138358. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.138358 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, C. et al. A novel injury site–natural antibody–targeted complement inhibitor protects against lung transplant injury. Am. J. Transpl. 22 (3), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16873 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schütte, H., Hermle, G., Seeger, W. & Grimminger, F. Vascular distension and continued ventilation are protective in lung ischemia/reperfusion. Am. J. Respir Crit. Care Med. 157 (1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9706029 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Singer, M. et al. Dangers of hyperoxia. Crit. Care. 25 (1), 440. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03815-y (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shepard, J. W. Jr, Dolan, G. F. & Yu, S. Y. Factors regulating lamellar body volume density of type II pneumocytes in excised dog lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 53 (3), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1982.53.3.555 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ijland, M. M., Heunks, L. M. & van der Hoeven, J. G. Bench-to-bedside review: hypercapnic acidosis in lung injury—from permissive to therapeutic. Crit. Care. 14 (6), 237. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9238 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jessica Forcucci, M.D., and Ellen Riemer, M.D., for their expert assistance in the blinded histopathological grading of the H&E slides. We would also like to acknowledge Konrad Rajab, MD, for his contributions during the early stages of this project, including concept development and support in obtaining initial resources.

Funding

This work was funded by SCTR UL1-TR001450 and supported by the NIH Pulmonary Focused Foundations in Innovation and Scholarship (PUFFINS) T32 HL144470. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Morgan A. Hill, Kathryn E. Engelhardt & Barry C. Gibney

  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Megan Tennant & Richard O’Neil

  3. College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Bailey Watts

  4. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Carl Atkinson

  5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtney Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA

    Barry C. Gibney

Authors
  1. Morgan A. Hill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Megan Tennant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bailey Watts
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carl Atkinson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard O’Neil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kathryn E. Engelhardt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Barry C. Gibney
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MAH made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and analysis of the data, interpretation of the data, and drafted and revised the work. MT made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and analysis of the data, interpretation of the data, and drafted and revised the work. BW made substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of the data, interpretation of the data, and helped draft the work. RO made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, interpretation of the data, and revised the work. CA made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, interpretation of the data, revised the work. KE made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, interpretation of the data, and drafted and revised the work. BG made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and analysis of the data, interpretation of the data, and drafted and revised the work. All authors have approved the submitted version and have agreed to both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry C. Gibney.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) following the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (IACUC Protocol ID 2022 − 01479).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, M.A., Tennant, M., Watts, B. et al. Evaluation of ventilation at 10 °C as the optimal storage condition for donor lungs in a murine model. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35943-2

Download citation

  • Received: 08 September 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 04 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35943-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lung transplantation
  • Organ preservation
  • Murine model
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing