Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Synergistic nitrification inhibitors with best management practices can achieve higher yield and nitrogen use efficiency in semi-arid saline-alkali soils
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 15 January 2026

Synergistic nitrification inhibitors with best management practices can achieve higher yield and nitrogen use efficiency in semi-arid saline-alkali soils

  • Zixin Zeng1,
  • Linmei Wu2,
  • Jiahuan Liu3,
  • Zengyuan Li1,
  • Bei Li1,
  • Zhiping Duan1 &
  • …
  • Weifeng Zhang1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 622 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

High yield and high nitrogen use efficiency are blocked by various abiotic stress, especially in arid, salinity and irrigation deficiency agricultural production system. While systematic solutions are crucial strategies, the translation of problem-solving approaches into field-scale practical applications remains insufficient. This study aimed at designing a high yield and high efficiency production system by combined enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) and best agronomic practices. The effects were examined through a 3-years (from 2020 to 2022) maize field experiment in a typical region, Hangjinhou Banner, inner Mongolia, China. The results show that 15–18 Mg ha−1 yield (80% of yield potential) can be realized under various stress conditions by adopted the new designed system. In this system, nitrogen (N) fertilizer input can be reduced from 380 kg ha−1 (higher yield practice) to 250 kg ha−1 (balance above-ground uptake), fertilization times can be reduced from 3 to 1, and the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) can be increased to over 57.9%. The key is to reduce nutrient losses, prolong nutrient supply and control nutrient concentration by using enhanced efficiency fertilizer and increase crop yields from 13.5 to 15 Mg ha−1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effects of different fertilizer combinations on the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize in Jiangsu Province, China

Article Open access 11 April 2025

Agricultural management practices in China enhance nitrogen sustainability and benefit human health

Article 02 April 2024

Next-generation enhanced-efficiency fertilizers for sustained food security

Article 21 July 2022

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wickens, G. E. Ecophysiology of Economic Plants in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands, 5–15 (eds Wickens, G. E.) (Springer, 1998).

  2. Prăvălie, R. Drylands extent and environmental issues. A global approach. Earth Sci. Rev. 161, 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, W. D. & Chen, Y. C. Regulation of agro-ecosystems in semi-arid (dry) areas. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Sci. Technol. 04, 1–7 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, Z. D., Zhu, T. J. & Cai, X. M. Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: the Hetao irrigation District, inner Mongolia. Agric. Water Manage. 277, 108095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108095 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beek, C. L., Meerburg, B. G., Schils, R. L. M., Verhagen, J. & Kuikman, P. J. Feeding the world’s increasing population while limiting climate change impacts: linking N2O and CH4 emissions from agriculture to population growth. Environ. Sci. Policy. 13, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.11.001 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, J. H. et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327, 1008–1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, X. A plan for efficient use of nitrogen fertilizers. Nature 543, 322–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/543322a (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, J., Sun, S. K., Wu, P. T., Wang, Y. B. & Zhao, X. N. Evaluation of crop production, trade, and consumption from the perspective of water resources: A case study of the Hetao irrigation district, China, for 1960–2010. Sci. Total Environ. 505, 1174–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.088 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, W. B. et al. Study on index system of optimal fertilizer recommendation for spring corn in Hetao irrigation area of inner Mongolia. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 45, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.011 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J. Y. et al. Understanding yield gap and production potential based on networked variety-density tests and hybrid-maize model in maize production areas of Inner Mongolia. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. https://doi.org/10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.16015 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, J. et al. Determination of input threshold of nitrogen fertilizer based on environment-friendly agriculture and maize yield. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agricultural Eng. 32, 8. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.12.020 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Y. et al. Effects of three types of soil amendments on yield and soil nitrogen balance of maize-wheat rotation system in the Hetao irrigation Area, China. J. Arid Land. 11, 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0005-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Du, J. et al. Nitrogen balance in the farmland system based on water balance in Hetao irrigation district. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Y. Q., Liu, G., Hong, M., Wu, Y. & Chang, F. Effect of optimized nitrogen application on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in Hetao irrigation area. Acta Sci. Circum. 39, 7. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2018.0321 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, N. et al. Effects of the different stage of nitrogen fertilizer application on maize yield in cultural pattern of one hole double plants. J. North. Agric. 048, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2020.01.05 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, J. et al. Wheat straw mulching with nitrification inhibitor application improves grain yield and economic benefit while mitigating gaseous emissions from a dryland maize field in Northwest China. Field Crops Res. 265, 108125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108125 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jin, L. B. et al. Effects of integrated agronomic management practices on yield and nitrogen efficiency of summer maize in North China. Field Crops Res. 134, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.008 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou, L. F. et al. Drip irrigation lateral spacing and mulching affects the wetting pattern, shoot-root regulation, and yield of maize in a sand-layered soil. Agric. Water Manage. 184, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.01.008 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ren, B. Z., Huang, Z. Y., Liu, P., Zhao, B. & Zhang, J. W. Urea ammonium nitrate solution combined with urease and nitrification inhibitors jointly mitigate NH3 and N2O emissions and improves nitrogen efficiency of summer maize under fertigation. Field Crops Res. 296, 108909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108909 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, T. Y. et al. Exploring optimal nitrogen management practices within site-specific ecological and socioeconomic conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 241, 118295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118295 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gao, Y., Wu, P. T., Zhao, X. N. & Wang, Z. K. Growth, yield, and nitrogen use in the wheat/maize intercropping system in an arid region of Northwestern China. Field Crops Res. 167, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.07.003 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. Crop yield gaps: their Importance, Magnitudes, and causes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Ittersum, M. K. & Cassman, K. G. Yield gap analysis—Rationale, methods and applications—Introduction to the special issue. Field Crops Res. 143, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.012 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Assefa, Y. et al. Analysis of long term study indicates both agronomic optimal plant density and increase maize yield per plant contributed to yield gain. Sci. Rep. 8, 4937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23362-x (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fernández-Crespo, E., Camañes, G. & García-Agustín, P. Ammonium enhances resistance to salinity stress in citrus plants. J. Plant. Physiol. 169, 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.04.011 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hessini, K. et al. Interactive effects of salinity and nitrogen forms on plant growth, photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment in maize. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 139, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.005 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mousavi Shalmani, M. A. et al. Nitrification inhibitor application at stem elongation stage increases soil nitrogen availability and wheat nitrogen use efficiency under drought stress. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 69, 2020–2037. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2132387 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sanz-Cobena, A., Sánchez-Martín, L., García-Torres, L. & Vallejo, A. Gaseous emissions of N2O and NO and NO3 – leaching from Urea applied with Urease and nitrification inhibitors to a maize (Zea mays) crop. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 149, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.016 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ju, X. T. & Christie, P. Calculation of theoretical nitrogen rate for simple nitrogen recommendations in intensive cropping systems: A case study on the North China plain. Field Crops Res. 124, 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.08.002 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yue, S. C. et al. Validation of a critical nitrogen curve for summer maize in the North China Plain. Pedosphere 24, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(13)60082-X (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guo, J. M. Optimizing nitrogen management for high-yielding maize (Zea maysl.) in Northwest China by using controlled-release fertilizer (2016).

  34. Zhang, F. S. et al. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedol. Sin. 045, 915–924 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hartmann, T. E. et al. Nitrogen dynamics, apparent mineralization and balance calculations in a maize – wheat double cropping system of the North China plain. Field Crops Res. 160, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.014 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shang, Y. P. et al. Effects of green manure application methods on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and yield of maize in Oasis irrigation area. Acta Agron. Sinica. 50, 686–694 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Srivastava, R. K., Panda, R. K., Chakraborty, A. & Halder, D. Enhancing grain yield, biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of maize by varying sowing dates and nitrogen rate under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res. 221, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.019 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu, L. et al. Nitrogen transformation and plant growth in response to different urea-application methods and the addition of DMPP. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil. Sci. 177, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201100390 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu, J. J., Dou, F. F., Phillip, F. O., Liu, G. & Liu, H. F. Effect of nitrification inhibitors on photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism in ‘Sweet sapphire’ (V. vinifera L.) grape seedlings. Sustainability 15 (2023).

  40. Xia, L. L. et al. Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 23, 1917–1925. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13455 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lu, J. S. et al. Nitrogen fertilizer management effects on soil nitrate leaching, grain yield and economic benefit of summer maize in Northwest China. Agric. Water Manage. 247, 106739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106739 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Akiyama, H., Yan, X. & Yagi, K. Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 16, 1837–1846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02031.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gu, B. J. et al. Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature 613, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05481-8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, C. R. et al. Nitrogen stabilizers mitigate nitrous oxide emissions across maize production areas of china: A multi-agroecosystems evaluation. Eur. J. Agron. 143, 126692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126692 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. You, L. C. et al. Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices. Nat. Commun. 14, 5747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41504-2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Qiao, C. L. et al. How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. Global Change Biol. 21, 1249–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12802 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, X. L., Lu, Y. L., Tong, Y. A. & Yin, X. F. A 5-year lysimeter monitoring of nitrate leaching from wheat–maize rotation system: comparison between optimum N fertilization and conventional farmer N fertilization. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 199, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.019 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, T. Y. et al. Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers are not a panacea for resolving the nitrogen problem. Global Change Biol (2018).

  49. Gao, Y. X. et al. Ammonium nutrition increases water absorption in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) under water stress. Plant. Soil. 331, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0245-1 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ye, J. Y., Tian, W. H. & Jin, C. W. Nitrogen in plants: from nutrition to the modulation of abiotic stress adaptation. Stress Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-021-00030-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barth, G. et al. Performance of nitrification inhibitors with different nitrogen fertilizers and soil textures. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil. Sci. 182, 694–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201800594 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vogel, C. et al. Effects of a nitrification inhibitor on nitrogen species in the soil and the yield and phosphorus uptake of maize. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 136895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136895 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jing, J., Zhang, F., Rengel, Z. & Shen, J. Localized fertilization with P plus N elicits an ammonium-dependent enhancement of maize root growth and nutrient uptake. Field Crops Res. 133, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.009 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Li, S., Liu, Y., Sha, Z., Li, S. & Yang, Q. Adding nitrification inhibitors to N fertilisers induces rhizosphere acidification and enhances P acquisition: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Agron. 151, 126967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126967 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, X. L. et al. Optimising nitrogen fertilisation: A key to improving nitrogen-use efficiency and minimising nitrate leaching losses in an intensive wheat/maize rotation (2008–2014). Field Crops Res. 206, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.016 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sha, Z. P. et al. Effect of N stabilizers on fertilizer-N fate in the soil-crop system: A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 290, 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106763 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, J., Six, T. & van Kessel, C. J. Adv. Agron. Vol. 87, 85–156 (Academic Press, 2005).

  58. Ju, X. T. et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 3041–3046. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813417106 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ding, W. et al. Estimating regional N application rates for rice in China based on target yield, Indigenous N supply, and N loss. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114408 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu, H. J. et al. Evaluation on the responses of maize (Zea Mays L.) growth, yield and water use efficiency to drip irrigation water under mulch condition in the Hetao irrigation district of China. Agric. Water Manage. 179, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.031 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang, T. B., Zou, Y. F., Kisekka, I., Biswas, A. & Cai, H. J. Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize’s yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area. Agric. Water Manage. 243, 106497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106497 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Research Project on Synergist Formulations Based on Different Application Scenarios.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Research Project on Synergist Formulations Based on Different Application Scenarios.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Zixin Zeng, Zengyuan Li, Bei Li, Zhiping Duan & Weifeng Zhang

  2. Bayannur Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Linhe, 015400, China

    Linmei Wu

  3. Wuwei Jincang Bioscience Co., Ltd, Wuwei, 733000, China

    Jiahuan Liu

Authors
  1. Zixin Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linmei Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiahuan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zengyuan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bei Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhiping Duan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weifeng Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z. Zeng wrote the main manuscript text, collected and analyzed the data and built the figures and tables; L. Wu involved in the experiment design and collected the data; J. Liu, Z. Li, B. Li and Z. Duan wrote the manuscript; W. Zhang: Writing – wrote the manuscript and his project has funded the publication fee of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weifeng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, Z., Wu, L., Liu, J. et al. Synergistic nitrification inhibitors with best management practices can achieve higher yield and nitrogen use efficiency in semi-arid saline-alkali soils. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36007-1

Download citation

  • Received: 12 September 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 15 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36007-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (EEFs)
  • DMPP
  • One-time application
  • Drought stress
  • Nitrogen use efficiency
  • N surplus
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene