Abstract
Although slow maxillary expansion is commonly used, numerous studies have demonstrated that the increase in dental arch width is primarily due to buccal tipping of the lateral teeth, often accompanied by recession of the vestibular alveolar process. This investigation addresses whether buccal shields inserted in a modified expansion plate can improve tooth movement, prevent vertical resorption of the alveolar process, and produce skeletal changes. For this purpose, frontal- and lateral cephalograms, along with cast models of 40 patients (17 males and 23 females; age: 10.28 ± 1.65) were studied. All patients were treated with slow maxillary expansion, and according to the plate used, patients were divided randomly into 2 groups:- 1st group, 20 patients were treated with a modified plate, called the Basal Expanding Plate (BEP), and – 2nd group, 20 patients were treated with a Traditional Expansion Plate (TEP). Measurements included the alveolar process height, inter-alveolar width, distance between the apex of the meso-buccal root of the upper first molar on two sides, and distance between the top of the meso-buccal cusp of the first upper molar bilaterally. were studied. Blinding was applied only for data analysis. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analyses using t-tests to detect significant group differences. The results revealed significant differences in basal width (BEP:2.62 ± 1.32, TEP:-1.87 ± 1.82), tooth root movement whereas it was buccal movement in BEP group (3.70 ± 2.40) and palatal movement in TEP group (-22.2 ± 3.63), and alveolar process dimensions between the two groups after treatment whereas it increased in BEP group in both sides (1.77 ± 1.65, 1.37 ± 1.22) while it decreased in TEP group in both sides too (-0.82 ± 0.81, -1.00 ± 0.84). Also, the difference was significant in S–N: Go-ME angle, whereas it decreased in the BEP group(-0.03 ± 3.02) and increased in the TEP group (0.40 ± 3.36). Based on the results, it can be concluded that the buccal shields of the basal expansion plate can improve the type of tooth movement, the inter-alveolar width and the height of the vestibular alveolar process during the maxillary dental arch expansion.
Trial registration ISRCTN69542858 (27/11/2023)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used and analyzed during the current research are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Abbreviations
- BEP:
-
Basal expansion plate
- TEP:
-
Traditional expansion plate
References
Adkins, M. D., Nanda, R. S. & Currier, G. F. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 97(3), 194–199 (1990).
Evangelista, K. et al. Three-dimensional assessment of craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency after rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective study. Orthodontics Craniofacial Research. 23(3), 300–312 (2020).
Karad A. Clinical orthodontics: current concepts, goals and mechanics. 2014.
Sandikçiolu, M. & Hazar, S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 111(3), 321–327 (1997).
Araújo, M.-C., Bocato, J.-R. & de Almeida, M.-R. Tomographic evaluation of dentoskeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion using Haas and Hyrax palatal expanders in children: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent 12(10), e922 (2020).
Farronato, G. et al. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 33(2), 185–189 (2011).
Godoy, F., Godoy-Bezerra, J. & Rosenblatt, A. Treatment of posterior crossbite comparing 2 appliances: a community-based trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 139(1), e45–e52 (2011).
Rabah N, Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Mahmoud G. Assessment of patient-centered outcomes when treating maxillary constriction using a slow removable versus a rapid fixed expansion appliance in the adolescence period: a randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2022;14(3).
Petrén, S. & Bondemark, L. Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Orthodon. Dentofacial Orthopedics. 133(6), 790 (2008).
Nagrik, A. P. & Bhad, W. A. A clinical comparison of maxillary expansion: TransForce transverse appliance versus NiTi palatal expander. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 3(2), e61–e65 (2014).
Ciambotti, C., Ngan, P., Durkee, M., Kohli, K. & Kim, H. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 119(1), 11–20 (2001).
Wong, C. A., Sinclair, P. M., Keim, R. G. & Kennedy, D. B. Arch dimension changes from successful slow maxillary expansion of unilateral posterior crossbite. Angle Orthod. 81(4), 616–623 (2011).
Erdinç, A. E., Ugur, T. & Erbay, E. A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 116(3), 287–300 (1999).
Kecik, D., Kocadereli, I. & Saatci, I. Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 131(2), 202–215 (2007).
Huynh, T., Kennedy, D. B., Joondeph, D. R. & Bollen, A.-M. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 136(3), 331–339 (2009).
Bukhari, A., Kennedy, D., Hannam, A., Aleksejūnienė, J. & Yen, E. Dimensional changes in the palate associated with slow maxillary expansion for early treatment of posterior crossbite. Angle Orthod. 88(4), 390–396 (2018).
Kuhlberg A, Nanda R. Principles of biomechanics. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. W. B. Saunders Company, : Philadelphia Elsevier; 2005. p. 1–16.
Greenbaum, K. R. & Zachrisson, B. U. The effect of palatal expansion therapy on the periodontal supporting tissues. Am. J. Orthod. 81(1), 12–21 (1982).
Brunetto M, Andriani JdSP, Ribeiro GLU, Locks A, Correa M, Correa LR. Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: a clinical trial study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2013;143(5):633–44.
Owen, A. H. III. Morphologic changes in the transverse dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Am. J. Orthod. 83(3), 200–217 (1983).
Fränkel R. Technik und Handhabung der Funktionsregler. (No Title). 1984.
Brieden, C. M., Pangrazio-Kulbersh, V. & Kulbersh, R. Maxillary Skeletal and Dental Change With Fränkel Appliance Therapy: —an implant study. Angle Orthod. 54(3), 226–232 (1984).
Lindauer S. Orthodontic Treatment Planning Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. W.B. Saunders Company: Phila delphia; 1996. p. 26.
Shundo, I., Kobayashi, Y. & Endo, T. Short-term treatment effects of quad-helix on maxillomandibular expansion in patients with maxillary incisor crowding. Odontology 100, 76–86 (2012).
Defraia, E., Marinelli, A., Baroni, G. & Tollaro, I. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 30(1), 57–60 (2008).
Kharbanda OP. Orthodontic Diagnosis. Orthodontics: Diagnosis and Management of Malocclusion and Dentofacial Deformities, E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009. p. 207–8
Yi, L., Jeon, H. H., Li, C., Boucher, N. & Chung, C.-H. Transverse growth of the maxillo-mandibular complex in untreated children: A longitudinal cone beam computed tomography study. Sensors. 21(19), 6378 (2021).
Lanteri, V. et al. Comparison between RME, SME and Leaf Expander in growing patients: a retrospective. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 19, 199 (2018).
Frank, S. W. & Engel, G. A. The effects of maxillary quad-helix appliance expansion on cephalometric measurements in growing orthodontic patients. Am. J. Orthod. 81(5), 378–389 (1982).
Brin, I. et al. Skeletal and functional effects of treatment for unilateral posterior crossbite. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 109(2), 173–179 (1996).
Shoaib, H., Hafez, A. & Fouda, M. Expansion Changes By Removable Quad Helix Appliance On Constricted Maxilla In Growing Patients. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 11(11), 171–177 (2017).
Akkaya, S., Lorenzon, S. & Üçem, T. T. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 21(2), 175–180 (1999).
Paoloni, V. et al. Comparison of the dento-skeletal effects produced by Leaf expander versus rapid maxillary expander in prepubertal patients: a two-center randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Orthod. 44(2), 163–169 (2022).
Ladner, P. T. & Muhl, Z. F. Changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment when maxillary expansion is a primary goal. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 108(2), 184–193 (1995).
Van de Velde, A., De Boodt, L., Cadenas de Llano-Pérula, M., Laenen, A. & Willems, G. Short term effects of interceptive expansion treatment: a prospective study. Eur. J. Orthod. 43(3), 324–331 (2021).
Fränkel, R. & Fränkel, C. Clinical implication of Roux’s concept in orofacial orthopedics. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 62, 1–21 (2001).
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the participation of the patients.
Funding
This study received Damascus University funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Suzan Ahmad Ibraheem: contributed in collection of data; data analysis/interpretation and writing of the manuscript. Mohamed Youssef: contributed in study design, data analysis and writing of the manuscript
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ibraheem, S.A., Youssef, M. The effectiveness of the basal expansion plate in comparison with the traditional expansion plate during the slow maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36482-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36482-6
