Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Updated seismotectonic framework of Abu Dabbab Egypt based on focal mechanisms and stress inversion
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

Updated seismotectonic framework of Abu Dabbab Egypt based on focal mechanisms and stress inversion

  • Mona Abdelazim1,
  • Salah Elhadidy Youssef2,
  • Hanan Gaber1,
  • Gad-Elkareem A. Mohamed2,
  • M. Sami Soliman2,
  • Mohamed H. Yassien2,
  • Mona Hamada1 &
  • …
  • Shimaa H. Elkhouly1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Natural hazards
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

The Abu Dabbab seismic zone is located along Egypt’s Red Sea margin, stands out as one of the most active seismic regions in the Eastern Desert. Characterized by frequent micro earthquakes, swarm like activity, and notable historical events. To enhance understanding of its tectonic framework, 408 earthquakes (Ml 0.7–3.0) recorded in 2004 were analyzed using digital waveform data from a temporary local seismic network consisting of ten vertical short period seismometers. Focal mechanisms were determined from P-wave first-motion polarities and classified using ternary plots. The analysis revealed a diverse range of faulting styles normal, strike slip, reverse, and oblique with clear depth dependent patterns. Shallow events (0–5 km) were dominated by normal and strike slip faulting, intermediate depths (5–10 km) showed increased reverse and oblique components, while deeper events (> 10 km) were primarily normal faulting. Stress tensor inversion across three depth intervals indicated a multiphase stress regime: shallow depths exhibited alternating faulting styles due to localized stress variations; intermediate depths revealed a heterogeneous stress field with mixed faulting regimes; and deeper levels showed a dominant normal faulting regime, consistent with the extensional tectonics of the Red Sea Rift. Overall, the stress field is shaped by NE–SW compression and SE–NW extension, with deformation concentrated along NW–SE and NE–SW trending faults. These findings underscore the combined influence of regional rift-related extension and local factors such as magmatic intrusions and crustal heterogeneity in driving seismicity at Abu Dabbab. This study yields important insights into depth dependent stress patterns and active faulting, enhancing seismic hazard assessments and highlighting the region’s potential as a sustainable geothermal energy source within a tectonically dynamic environment.

Similar content being viewed by others

Episodic transient deformation revealed by the analysis of multiple GNSS networks in the Noto Peninsula, central Japan

Article Open access 12 June 2023

Insights into the seismogenesis and tectonic implications of an isolated intraplate earthquake (M4.0) on February 17, 2025, in Delhi

Article Open access 30 January 2026

Reservoir impoundment-triggered seismicity in Brazil: the case of M4.0 Nova Ponte earthquake

Article Open access 14 December 2023

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Fairhead, J. D. & Girdler, R. W. The seismicity of Africa. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 21(4), 537–549 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daggett, P. H. et al. Microearthquake studies of the Northeastern margin of the African plate. Ann. Geol. Surv. Egypt 10, 989–996 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daggett, P. H. et al. Seismicity and active tectonics of the Egyptian Red Sea margin and the northern Red Sea. Tectonophysics 125, 313–324 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan, P. & Swanberg, C. A. Heat flow and the geothermal potential of Egypt. Pure Appl. Geophys. 117(1/2), 213–226 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boulos, F. K., Morgan, P. & Toppozada, T. R. Microearthquake studies in Egypt carried out by the geological survey of Egypt. J. Geodyn. 7(3), 227–249 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hosny, A., El Hady, S.M., Mohamed, A.A., Panza, G.F., Tealeb, A., El Rahman, M.A. In: Magma Intrusion in the Upper Crust of Abu Dabbab Area, Southeast of Egypt, from Vp and Vp/Vs Tomography, . RendicontiLincei,20 1–19, (2009).

  7. Hassoup, A. Microearthquakes and magnitude studies on earthquake activity at Abu Dabbab region, Eastern Desert Egypt. Thesis M.Sc., Fac. Sci., Cairo Univ., 1–169, (1985).

  8. Hassoup, A., Denton, P., Maguire, P. & Hassib, G. Relocation of swarm events in the June 1987 earthquake sequence from the lake Aswan area in Egypt. Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 1242–1257 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Badawy, A., El-Hady, Sh. & Abdel-Fattah, Ak. Microearthquakes and neotectonics of Abu Dabbab, Eastern desert of Egypt. Seismol. Res. Lett. 79(1), 55–67 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hussein, H. M., Moustafa, S. S. R., Elawadi, E., Al-Arifi, N. S. & Hurukawa, N. Seismological aspects of the Abu Dabbab region, Eastern desert. Egypt. Seismol. Res. Lett. 82(1), 81–88 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. El-Hady, S. M. Geothermal evolution of the red sea margin and its relation to earthquake activity master’s thesis (Cairo University, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim, M. E., Yokoyama, I. Probable origin of Abu Dabbab earthquakes swarms in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Bull. IISEE 32 (1998).

  13. Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC). Identification of earthquake sources and estimation of magnitudes and recurrence intervals Internal Report High and Aswan Dams Authority, Egypt, p. 135, (1985).

  14. Hosny, A., El-Sayed, M. & Youssef, M. Structural lineament analysis and tectonic implications for the northwestern part of Egypt using remote sensing and GIS techniques. NRIAG J. Geophys. 11(2), 105–118 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abdelazim, M., Samir, A., El-Nader, I. A., Badawy, A. & Hussein, H. Seismicity and focal mechanisms of earthquakes in Egypt from 2004 to 2011. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 5(2), 393–402 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ali, S. M. & Badreldin, H. Present-day stress field in Egypt based on a comprehensive and updated earthquake focal mechanisms catalog. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176(11), 4729–4760 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gomaa, M. et al. The investigation of geodynamics parameters in the south of Egypt using geodetic and earthquake activities. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 12(1), 132–142 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Julian, B. R. Evidence for dyke intrusion earthquake mechanisms near Long Valley caldera, California. Nature 303, 323–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/303323a0 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, D., Foulger, G. R. & Julian, B. R. Non-double-couple earthquakes. 2. Observations. Rev. Geophys. 364(98), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1029/98rg00717 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hacıoğlu, Ö. et al. The effect of active extensional tectonics on the structural controls and heat transport mechanism in the Menderes Massif geothermal province: Inferred from three-dimensional electrical resistivity structure of the Kurşunlu geothermal field (Gediz Graben, western Anatolia). Geothermics 85, 101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.07.006 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hacıoğlu, Ö., Başokur, A. T. & Diner, Ç. Geothermal potential of the eastern end of the Gediz basin, western Anatolia, Turkey revealed by three-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data. Geothermics 91, 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.102040 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. El-Hadidy, S. Crustal structure and its related causative tectonics in northern Egypt using geophysical data. In: ph.D. Thesis. Ain Shams Univ, (1995).

  23. Suetsugu, D. Practice on source mechanism. IISEE lecture note, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 104, (1998).

  24. Snoke, J. A., Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C. & Kisslinger, C. FOCMEC: Focal mechanism determinations. Int. Handbook Earthq. Eng. Seismol. 85, 1629–1630 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delvaux, D. & Sperner, B. Stress tensor inversion from fault kinematic indicators and focal mechanism data: the TENSOR program. New Insights Into Structur. Interpret. Model. 212, 75–100 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gephart, J. W. & Forsyth, D. W. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 89(B11), 9305–9320 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael, A. J. Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 89(B13), 11517–11526 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Angelier, J. Inversion of earthquake focal mechanisms to obtain the seismotectonic stress IV: A new method free of choice among nodal planes. Geophys. J. Int. 150(3), 588–609 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maury, J., Cornet, F. H. & Dorbath, L. A review of methods for determining stress fields from earthquakes focal mechanisms; Application to the Sierentz 1980 seismic crisis (Upper Rhine graben). Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 184(4–5), 319–334 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hardebeck, J. L., & Michael, A. J. Damped regional‐scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 111(B11), (2006).

  31. Wallace, R. E. Geometry of shearing stress and relation to faulting. J. Geol. 59(2), 118–130 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Angelier, J. Tectonic analysis of fault slip data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 89(B7), 5835–5848 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lund, B. & Townend, J. Calculating horizontal stress orientations with full or partial knowledge of the tectonic stress tensor. Geophys. J. Int. 170(3), 1328–1335 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Toker, M. The structural coupling to rupture complexity of the aftershock sequence of the 2011 earthquakes in Lake Van Area (Eastern Anatolia, Turkey). Mühendislik Bilimlerive Tasarım Dergisi 9(1), 27–51 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Toker, M., Yavuz, E. & Balkan, E. Focal mechanisms and bouguer-gravity anomalies of the 2025 earthquake cluster in the Santorini-Amorgos region (Southern Aegean Sea, Greece): Evidence for shallow extensional magmatism. J. Seismolog. 29(4), 943–961 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Heidbach, O. et al. Global crustal stress pattern based on the world stress map database release 2008. Tectonophysics 482(1–4), 3–15 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Frohlich, C. Triangle diagrams: ternary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 75(1–3), 193–198 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Frohlich, C. Cliff’s nodes concerning plotting nodal lines for P. Sh Sv. Seismol. Res. Lett. 67(1), 16–24 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Frohlich, C. & Apperson, K. D. Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries. Tectonics 11(2), 279–296 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elsayed, H. M. H. Multi-scale seismic hazard assessment for Egypt. (2018).

  41. Khalifa, A., Bashir, B., Alsalman, A. & Öğretmen, N. Morpho-tectonic assessment of the abu-dabbab area, eastern desert, egypt: Insights from remote sensing and geospatial analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 10(11), 784 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Great Thanks to the scientific staff of the Egyptian National Seismic Network Lab. for their invaluable support and for providing continuous facilities that ensured the quality of data and the successful completion of this work. I would like to express special thanks to Prof. Sayed Shaaban, Head of the Egyptian National Seismic Network Lab., Prof. Khaled Abd Ellah Mohamed, and Dr. Mohamed Taha for their exceptional guidance and assistance throughout this study.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Egyptian National Data Center (ENDC), National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Elmarsad Street, Helwan, Cairo, 11421, Egypt

    Mona Abdelazim, Hanan Gaber, Mona Hamada & Shimaa H. Elkhouly

  2. Seismology Department, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Elmarsad Street, Helwan, Cairo, 11421, Egypt

    Salah Elhadidy Youssef, Gad-Elkareem A. Mohamed, M. Sami Soliman & Mohamed H. Yassien

Authors
  1. Mona Abdelazim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salah Elhadidy Youssef
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanan Gaber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gad-Elkareem A. Mohamed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Sami Soliman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohamed H. Yassien
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mona Hamada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shimaa H. Elkhouly
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A. wrote the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and approved the final version. M.A. contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software development, data analysis, manuscript review and editing. H.G. The corresponding author is responsible for submitting the competing interests statement on behalf of all authors and contributed to methodology, manuscript review, data analysis and editing. S.E. contributed to methodology, data preparation, manuscript review and editing. S.H. is responsible in data preparation, analysis, visualization, original draft preparation and manuscript review. G.E., M.S., M.Y. and M.H. were responsible for data preparation, analysis, visualization, and original draft preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanan Gaber.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelazim, M., Youssef, S.E., Gaber, H. et al. Updated seismotectonic framework of Abu Dabbab Egypt based on focal mechanisms and stress inversion. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36922-3

Download citation

  • Received: 22 October 2025

  • Accepted: 17 January 2026

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36922-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Seismicity
  • Focal mechanism
  • Stress tensor
  • Abu Dabab
  • Egypt
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing