Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 January 2026

Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection

  • Chaitra H. N.1,
  • Shwetha N.2,
  • Adarsh Rag S.3,
  • Chandra Singh4 &
  • …
  • Rangaswamy Y.2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Early and accurate detection of lymph node metastases is crucial for improving breast cancer patient outcomes. However, current clinical practices, including CT, PET imaging, and microscopic examination, are time-consuming and prone to errors due to low tissue contrast, varying lymph node sizes, and complex workflows. To address the limitations of existing approaches in lymph node segmentation, feature embedding, and classification, this study proposes a novel framework Graph-Pruned Lymph Node Detection Framework (GPLN-DF) that integrates a Dynamic Graph Convolution (DGC) autoencoder with Node Attribute-wise Attention (NodeAttri-Attention) for accurate lymph node segmentation. This segmentation is further refined using Comprehensive Graph Gradual Pruning (CGP) to reduce unnecessary parameters and computational costs. After segmentation, Hessian-based Locally Linear Embedding (HLLE) is applied for effective feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, preserving the geometric structure of lymph node regions. Finally, a Graph Neural Network (GNN) classifier enhanced with CGP is used to classify the segmented lymph nodes as metastatic or non-metastatic based on the extracted features. This comprehensive framework addresses challenges such as small lymph node size, shape variability, low contrast in medical imaging, and high computational burden. The model was evaluated on the CAMELYON17 dataset, achieving a classification accuracy of 98.65%, surpassing existing models in segmentation precision and classification performance.

Data availability

The data used in this paper is collected from Kaggle. The dataset is available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mahdihajialilue/camelyon17-clean.

References

  1. Xu, Q. et al. Difficulty-aware bi-network with Spatial attention constrained graph for axillary lymph node segmentation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65 (9), 192102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3079-8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kos, K. et al. Tumor-educated Tregs drive organ-specific metastasis in breast cancer by impairing NK cells in the lymph node niche. Cell. Rep. 38 (9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110447 (2022).

  3. Jayapal, S. & Annamalai, R. Graph neural network with Hessian-Based locally linear embedding for cancer metastasis analysis in lymph nodes using deeplab segmentation. IEEE Access. 13, 46448–46458. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3546716 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xuan, P. et al. Dynamic graph convolutional autoencoder with node-attribute-wise attention for kidney and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. Knowl. -Based Syst. 236, 107360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107360 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, W., Laville, A., Deutsch, E. & Sun, R. Deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection: a review. Front. Immunol. 16, 1526518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526518 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iuga, A. I. et al. Automated detection and segmentation of thoracic lymph nodes from CT using 3D foveal fully convolutional neural networks. BMC Med. Imaging. 21 (1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00599-z (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. et al. Deep regional metastases segmentation for patient-level lymph node status classification. IEEE Access. 9, 129293–129302. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3113036 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fan, J. et al. Weakly supervised state space model for multi-class segmentation of pathology images. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 500–509 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72111-3_47

  9. Fang, G., Ma, X., Song, M., Mi, M. B. & Wang, X. Depgraph: Towards any structural pruning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 16091–16101 (2023).

  10. Yu, S., Mazaheri, A. & Jannesari, A. Auto graph encoder-decoder for neural network pruning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6362–6372, (2021).

  11. Cheng, H., Zhang, M. & Shi, J. Q. A survey on deep neural network pruning: Taxonomy, comparison, analysis, and recommendations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 46 (12), 10558–10578. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3447085 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, Y., Liu, W., Yi, S., Yang, H. & He, Z. Filter pruning-based two-step feature map reconstruction. Signal. Image Video Process. 15 (7), 1555–1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-01888-4 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, A. & Plumbley, M. D. Efficient CNNs via passive filter pruning. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 33, 1763–1774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLPRO.2025.3561589 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, Y. & Li, E. Robust locally nonlinear embedding (RLNE) for dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional data with noise. Neurocomputing 596, 127900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127900 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, F., Zou, Z., Liu, J. & Lin, Z. Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image via multistructure unified discriminative embedding. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3128764 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, L. et al. Semantic sketch segmentation with graph neural networks. ACM Trans. Graph. 40 (3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450284 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Agarwal, R., Ghosal, P., Sadhu, A. K., Murmu, N. & Nandi, D. Multi-scale dual-channel feature embedding decoder for biomedical image segmentation. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 257, 108464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108464 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Su, L., Du, Y. & GCUNet: A GNN-Based Contextual Learning Network for Tertiary Lymphoid Structure Semantic Segmentation in Whole Slide Image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06129 (2024).

  19. Liu, Z. et al. Axillary lymph node metastasis prediction by contrast-enhanced computed tomography images for breast cancer patients based on deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 136, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104715 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma, A. L., Sharma, K., Srivastava, U. P. & Ghosal, P. U. S. T. Automated Skin Lesion Segmentation Using Swin Transformer. In 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Advanced Computing and Communication (ISACC), pp. 25–30 (2025)., pp. 25–30 (2025). (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISACC65211.2025.10969397

  21. Chen, C., Li, K., Zou, X., Li, Y. & Dygnn Algorithm and architecture support of dynamic pruning for graph neural networks. In 2021 58th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1201–1206 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC18074.2021.9586298

  22. He, W., Wu, M., Liang, M., Lam, S. K. & Cap Context-aware pruning for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pp. 960–969 (2021).

  23. Chen, Z. et al. Neural network pruning through regular graph with edges swapping. Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35 (10), 14671–14683. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3280899 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gurevin, D. et al. Algorithm-architecture pruning framework for graph neural network acceleration. In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp. 108–123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA57654.2024.00019

  25. Lalit, M., Tomancak, P., Jug, F. & Embedseg Embedding-based instance segmentation for biomedical microscopy data. Med. Image Anal. 81, 102523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, Y., Pang, S., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, J. Fluid classification with dynamic graph Convolution network by local linear embedding well logging data. Phys. Fluids. 36 (2). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187612 (2024).

  27. Liu, R., Liu, Y. & Liu, J. L. L. C. E. Locally Linear Contrastive Embedding. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pp. 517–520, (2024). (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651534

  28. Liu, C. et al. Comprehensive graph gradual pruning for sparse training in graph neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35 (10), 14903–14917. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3282049 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. The CAMELYON17 dataset is available. at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mahdihajialilue/camelyon17-clean accessed on July 2025.

  30. Jena, P. P. et al. EPO-SEB: a novel attention-enhanced hybrid model for accurate histopathological image segmentation. Connect. Sci. 37 (1), 2508357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2025.2508357 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, N. Y. & Liu, C. X. Efficient tumor detection and classification model based on ViT in an End-to-End architecture. IEEE Access. 12, 106096–106106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3424294 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fourkioti, O., De Vries, M., Jin, C., Alexander, D. C. & Bakal, C. C. A. M. I. L. Context-aware multiple instance learning for cancer detection and subtyping in whole slide images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05314 (2023).

  33. Wang, J., Mao, Y., Cui, Y., Guan, N. & Xue, C. J. BAHOP: Similarity-based Basin Hopping for A fast hyper-parameter search in WSI classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11161 (2024).

Download references

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. The Authors received NO FUNDING for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India

    Chaitra H. N.

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India

    Shwetha N. & Rangaswamy Y.

  3. Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

    Adarsh Rag S.

  4. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Nitte (Deemed to be University), NMAM Institute of Technology Nitte, Mangalore, India

    Chandra Singh

Authors
  1. Chaitra H. N.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shwetha N.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adarsh Rag S.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chandra Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rangaswamy Y.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.H.N. and S.N. developed the core methodology and implemented the Dynamic Graph Convolution and Comprehensive Graph Pruning framework. A.R.S. supervised the project, guided the study design, and contributed to the integration of the GNN classifier. C.S. conducted dataset preparation, preprocessing, and experimental validation. R.Y. contributed to the analysis of results and interpretation of clinical significance. All authors contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript, approved the final version, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adarsh Rag S..

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

H. N., C., N., S., S., A.R. et al. Dynamic graph convolution with comprehensive pruning and GNN classification for precise lymph node metastasis detection. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37193-8

Download citation

  • Received: 05 October 2025

  • Accepted: 20 January 2026

  • Published: 30 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37193-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Pruning
  • Segmentation
  • Embedding
  • Dynamic graph convolution
  • Lymph node
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer