Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Smart, automated junctional tourniquets leveraging AI-driven ultrasound guidance
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 February 2026

Smart, automated junctional tourniquets leveraging AI-driven ultrasound guidance

  • Sofia I. Hernandez Torres1,
  • Theodore Winter1,
  • Isiah Mejia1,
  • Carlos Bedolla1,
  • Benjamin Alexander1,
  • James P. Collier III1,
  • Michael D. Lopez1 &
  • …
  • Eric J. Snider1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Tourniquets are commonly used devices for hemorrhage control; however, their effectiveness is reduced in anatomical junctions such as the neck and inguinal region. Junctional tourniquets specifically require precise placement to be effective. This precision can be enabled with ultrasound technology to help locate and occlude the major vessels in the junctional regions properly. However, interpretation of ultrasound requires highly skilled personnel, who may not necessarily be available in emergency situations. To overcome this hurdle, we have developed two ultrasound-enabled, AI-driven junctional tourniquet prototypes. AI models can aid in guiding the end-user to the correct location and determine occlusion during and after pressure application. Proof-of-concept functionality of the developed prototypes integrated with AI models was successfully tested in a durable, ultrasound-compatible femoral tissue phantom and compared against commercially available tourniquet devices. Overall, time to occlusion was comparable between the tourniquet prototype designs and traditional junctional tourniquets, while each AI model achieved high performance metrics for this application. As such, the combination of AI and ultrasound can prove to be a viable solution to prevent further hemorrhaging at the point of injury.

Data availability

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because they have been collected and maintained in a government-controlled database that is located at the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research. As such, data can be made available through the development of a business agreement with the corresponding author. Requests for the datasets should be directed to Dr. Eric J. Snider, eric.j.snider3.civ@health.mil.

References

  1. Jones, A. R., Miller, J. & Brown, M. Epidemiology of trauma-related hemorrhage and time to definitive care across North America: making the case for bleeding control education. Prehospital Disaster Med. 38(6), 780–783 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eastridge, B. J., Holcomb, J. B. & Shackelford, S. Outcomes of traumatic hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death from injury. Transfus. (Paris). 59, 1423–1428 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Picard, C. Hemorrhage control, a fundamental skill: A review of direct pressure, dressings, wound packing and bandages for life-saving. Can. J. Emerg. Nurs. 40, 26–28 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patel, T. H. et al. A U.S. Army forward surgical team’s experience in operation Iraqi freedom. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 57, 201 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eilertsen, K. A., Winberg, M., Jeppesen, E., Hval, G. & Wisborg, T. Prehospital tourniquets in civilians: a systematic review. Prehospital Disaster Med. 36, 86–94 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beekley, A. C. et al. Prehospital tourniquet use in operation Iraqi freedom: effect on hemorrhage control and outcomes. J. Trauma. 64, 28–37 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goolsby, C. et al. Stop the bleed education consortium: education program content and delivery recommendations. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 84, 205 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Oostendorp, S. E., Tan, E. C. T. H. & Geeraedts, L. M. G. Prehospital control of life-threatening truncal and junctional haemorrhage is the ultimate challenge in optimizing trauma care; a review of treatment options and their applicability in the civilian trauma setting. Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 24, 110 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winstanley, M., Smith, J. E. & Wright, C. Catastrophic haemorrhage in military major trauma patients: a retrospective database analysis of haemostatic agents used on the battlefield. J. R Army Med. Corps. 165, 405–409 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spiegel, S. & Baker, A. M. EMS junctional hemorrhage control. In StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2024).

  11. Smith, S. et al. The effectiveness of junctional tourniquets: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 86, 532–539 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Humphries, R., Naumann, D. N. & Ahmed, Z. Use of haemostatic devices for the control of junctional and abdominal traumatic haemorrhage: A systematic review. Trauma. Care. 2, 23–34 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kragh, J. F. et al. Performance of junctional tourniquets in normal human volunteers. Prehosp Emerg. Care. 19, 391–398 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, J. et al. Testing of junctional tourniquets by medics of the Israeli defense force in control of simulated groin hemorrhage. J. Spec. Oper. Med. Peer Rev. J. SOF Med. Prof. 16, 36–42 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kragh, J. F. et al. Junctional tourniquet training experience. J. Spec. Oper. Med. Peer Rev. J. SOF Med. Prof. 15, 20–30 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schauer, S. G., April, M. D., Fisher, A. D., Cunningham, C. W. & Gurney, J. M. Junctional tourniquet use during combat operations in afghanistan: the prehospital trauma registry experience. J. Spec. Oper. Med. Peer Rev. J. SOF Med. Prof. 18, 71–74 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Flecha, I., Naylor, J. F., Schauer, S. G., Curtis, R. A. & Cunningham, C. W. Combat lifesaver-trained, first-responder application of junctional tourniquets: a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Mil Med. Res. 5, 31 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaymak, Ş. et al. Results of combat medic junctional tourniquet training: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Turk. J. Trauma. Emerg. Surg. 30, 20–26 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gaspary, M. J. et al. Comparison of three junctional tourniquets using a randomized trial design. Prehosp Emerg. Care. 23, 187–194 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weiser, G. LST-A novel junctional tourniquet: A study of feasibility and effectiveness. Chin. J. Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2025.04.004 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Drew, B., Bennett, B. L. & Littlejohn, L. Application of current hemorrhage control techniques for backcountry care: part One, tourniquets and hemorrhage control adjuncts. Wilderness Environ. Med. 26, 236–245 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Agarwal, R., Niezgoda, J., Niezgoda, J., Madetipati, N. & Gopalakrishnan, S. Advances in hemostatic wound dressings: clinical implications and insight. Adv. Skin. Wound Care. 35, 113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonanno, A. M., Graham, T. L., Wilson, L. N. & Ross, J. D. Novel use of XSTAT 30 for mitigation of lethal non-compressible torso hemorrhage in swine. PLOS ONE. 15, e0241906 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kheirabadi, B. S., Scherer, M. R., Estep, J. S., Dubick, M. A. & Holcomb, J. B. Determination of efficacy of new hemostatic dressings in a model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine. J. Trauma. 67, 450–459 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pikman Gavriely, R. et al. Manual pressure points technique for massive hemorrhage Control-A prospective human volunteer study. Prehosp Emerg. Care. 27, 586–591 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garrick, B., Hillis, G., LaRavia, L., Lyon, M. & Gordon, R. 330 effectiveness of common femoral artery compression in elimination of popliteal blood flow. Ann. Emerg. Med. 68, S126–S127 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Avital, G. et al. Toward Smart, automated junctional Tourniquets—AI models to interpret vessel occlusion at physiological pressure points. Bioengineering 11, 109 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dicle, O. Artificial intelligence in diagnostic ultrasonography. Diagn. Interv Radiol. https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.211260 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cho, J., Lee, S. & Yi, J. Ultrasound Standard Liver Section Classification Independent of Imaging Device. in 19th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) 1–8 (2025). 1–8 (2025). (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM64595.2025.10857488

  30. Zhou, Y. T., Yang, T. Y., Han, X. H. & Piao, J. C. Thyroid-DETR: thyroid nodule detection model with transformer in ultrasound images. Biomed. Signal. Process. Control. 98, 106762 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bassiouny, R., Mohamed, A., Umapathy, K. & Khan, N. An interpretable neonatal lung ultrasound feature extraction and lung sliding detection system using object detectors. IEEE J. Transl Eng. Health Med. 12, 119–128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hernandez Torres, S. I. et al. Real-Time deployment of ultrasound image interpretation AI models for emergency medicine triage using a swine model. Technologies 13, 29 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Noordin, S., McEwen, J. A., Kragh, J. F., Eisen, A. & Masri, B. A. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91, 2958–2967 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kainz, B. et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. Npj Digit. Med. 4, 1–18 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Park, S. et al. Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of carotid artery compressibility via point-of-care ultrasound in determining the return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 202, 110302 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mujkic, R., Haller, K. & Kollmann, C. Energy consumption of ultrasound devices during routine applications and opportunities to save energy and costs. Eur. Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11822-8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wadhwa, M., Choudhury, T., Raj, G. & Patni, J. C. Comparison of YOLOv8 and Detectron2 on Crowd Counting techniques. in 7th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Smart Technologies (ISAS) 1–6 (2023). 1–6 (2023). (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAS60782.2023.10391466

  38. Tan, M., Pang, R., Le, Q. V. & EfficientDet Scalable and efficient object detection. Preprint at (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.09070

  39. Tian, Y., Ye, Q. & Doermann, D. YOLOv12: attention-centric real-time object detectors. Preprint at (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.12524

  40. Guo, Z., Ding, C., Hu, X. & Rudin, C. A supervised machine learning semantic segmentation approach for detecting artifacts in plethysmography signals from wearables. Physiol. Meas. 42, 125003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Holland, L., Torres, H., Snider, E. J. & S. I. & Using AI segmentation models to improve foreign body detection and triage from ultrasound images. Bioengineering 11, 128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hatamizadeh, A. et al. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision 574–584 (2022).

  43. Hernandez-Torres, S. I., Boice, E. N. & Snider, E. J. Using an ultrasound tissue Phantom model for hybrid training of deep learning models for shrapnel detection. J. Imaging. 8, 270 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. CAE Healthcare. FAST Exam Ultrasound Training Model - Medical Skills Trainers. (2022). https://medicalskillstrainers.cae.com/fast-exam-ultrasound-training-model/p

  45. Mitsuhashi, N. et al. BodyParts3D: 3D structure database for anatomical concepts. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D782–D785 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A. & Qiu J. Ultralytics (2023). YOLOv8.

  47. Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J. & Zisserman, A. The Pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 88, 303–338 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge MAJ Guy Avital of the Israeli Defense Force for his advice and subject matter expertise on this research effort. The authors also acknowledge David Berard for initial assistance in the BaTS prototype design and flow loop setup.

Funding

This work was funded by the United States Department of Defense Domestic Preparedness Support Initiative. This project was supported in part by an appointment to the Science Education Programs at National Institutes of Health (NIH), administered by ORAU through the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (T.W., B.A., J.C., I.M., and M.L.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Organ Support and Automation Technologies Group, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA

    Sofia I. Hernandez Torres, Theodore Winter, Isiah Mejia, Carlos Bedolla, Benjamin Alexander, James P. Collier III, Michael D. Lopez & Eric J. Snider

Authors
  1. Sofia I. Hernandez Torres
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theodore Winter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isiah Mejia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Bedolla
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjamin Alexander
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James P. Collier III
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael D. Lopez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Eric J. Snider
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.H.T. and E.J.S. conceptualize the initial idea; Prototype devices were design and fabricated by T.W., I.M., B.A., J.P.C.; Ultrasound images were captured and curated by S.H.T., T.W., I.M., C.B., and E.J.S.; AI model development was performed by S.H.T., T.W., and E.J.S.; Prototype testing and characterization was conducted by S.H.T., T.W., I.M., C.B., B.A., and M.L.; Data analysis and figure generation was by S.H.T., T.W., I.M., J.P.C., and E.J.S.; All authors wrote the manuscript test and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Snider.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Eric J. Snider is an inventor on a filed patent application owned by the U.S. Army related to the automated junctional tourniquet technology (filed October 24, 2024). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Army Medical Department, Department of the Army, DoD, or the U.S. Government.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez Torres, S.I., Winter, T., Mejia, I. et al. Smart, automated junctional tourniquets leveraging AI-driven ultrasound guidance. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37467-1

Download citation

  • Received: 03 July 2025

  • Accepted: 22 January 2026

  • Published: 01 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37467-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing