Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
LIMK2 inactivation suppresses mechanical stimulation-induced dermal fibroblast differentiation and resistance to apoptosis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 February 2026

LIMK2 inactivation suppresses mechanical stimulation-induced dermal fibroblast differentiation and resistance to apoptosis

  • Megumi Ishii1 na1,
  • Kazuya Kuroda1 na1,
  • Naoya Otani1,
  • Ryota Nakamura1,
  • Takaki Oue1,
  • Kenichiro Kawai2,
  • Shinsuke Matsuzaki3,4 &
  • …
  • Tateki Kubo1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell biology
  • Molecular biology

Abstract

Abnormal scar formation is a clinical challenge with limited therapeutic options. Mechanical stimulation is implicated in abnormal scarring. Accordingly, the present study investigated the role of LIMK2, a component of the Rho/ROCK/LIMK/cofilin pathway, in cell differentiation and apoptosis in response to mechanical stimulation and proliferation in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). In normal HDFs, expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a marker of differentiation into myofibroblasts, significantly increased with mechanical stimulation; however, this change was not observed when LIMK2 was inactivated. Mechanical stimulation increased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and decreased that of the pro-apoptotic protein BAX in controls, but these effects were not observed with LIMK2 inactivation. Moreover, fibroblast proliferation was inhibited with LIMK2 inactivation. These findings suggest that LIMK2 inactivation suppresses mechanical stimulation-induced myofibroblast differentiation and resistance to apoptosis, and also inhibits HDF proliferation, highlighting LIMK2 as a potential therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of abnormal scars.

Similar content being viewed by others

Smac-mimetics reduce numbers and viability of human osteoclasts

Article Open access 19 February 2021

ROCK-dependent mechanotransduction of macroscale forces drives fibrosis in degenerative spinal disease

Article 29 May 2025

Propolis compound inhibits profibrotic TGF-β1/SMAD signalling in human fibroblasts

Article Open access 26 July 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Huang, J. et al. Dermal extracellular matrix molecules in skin development, homeostasis, wound regeneration and diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 128, 137–144 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grinnell, F. Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction. J. Cell Biol. 124, 401–404 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu, M. et al. A cyclical magneto-responsive massage dressing for wound healing. Small 20, 2400644 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeon, Y. R. et al. Antifibrotic effects of high-mobility group box 1 protein inhibitor (Glycyrrhizin) on keloid fibroblasts and keloid spheroids through reduction of autophagy and induction of apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4134 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, C.-C. et al. An updated review of the immunological mechanisms of keloid scars. Front. Immunol. 14, 1117630 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakazono-Kusaba, A., Takahashi-Yanaga, F., Morimoto, S., Furue, M. & Sasaguri, T. Staurosporine-induced cleavage of α-smooth muscle actin during myofibroblast apoptosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 119, 1008–1013 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández-Bule, M. L., Toledano-Macías, E., Pérez-González, L. A., Martínez-Pascual, M. A. & Fernández-Guarino, M. Anti-fibrotic effects of rf electric currents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 10986 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C. & Brown, R. A. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 349–363 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, X.-H. et al. Force activates smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter activity through the Rho signaling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1801–1809 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuroda, K. et al. Altered actin dynamics is possibly implicated in the inhibition of mechanical stimulation-induced dermal fibroblast differentiation into myofibroblasts. Exp. Dermatol. 32, 2012–2022 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, C. et al. Biological effects of cellular stretch on human dermal fibroblasts. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 66, e351–e361 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Messadi, D. V. et al. Expression of apoptosis-associated genes by human dermal scar fibroblasts. Wound Repair Reg. 7, 511–517 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaneko-Kawano, T. & Suzuki, K. Mechanical stress regulates gene expression via Rho/Rho-kinase signaling pathway. JPFSM 4, 53–61 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maekawa, M. et al. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285, 895–898 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guan, G., Cannon, R. D., Coates, D. E. & Mei, L. Effect of the Rho-Kinase/ROCK Signaling Pathway on Cytoskeleton Components. Genes (Basel) 14, 272 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rees, R. W. et al. Y-27632, a Rho-kinase inhibitor, inhibits proliferation and adrenergic contraction of prostatic smooth muscle cells. J. Urol. 170, 2517–2522 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abe, H. et al. The Rho-kinase inhibitor HA-1077 suppresses proliferation/migration and induces apoptosis of urothelial cancer cells. BMC Cancer 14, 412 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, X. et al. The Rho-kinase inhibitor inhibits proliferation and metastasis of small cell lung cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 66, 221–227 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sumi, T., Matsumoto, K. & Nakamura, T. Specific Activation of LIM kinase 2 via Phosphorylation of Threonine 505 by ROCK, a Rho-dependent Protein Kinase *. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 670–676 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gong, C. et al. LIM kinase 2 activates cardiac fibroblasts and exacerbates postinfarction left ventricular remodeling via crosstalk between the canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways. Pharmacol. Res. 208, 107347 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, L. et al. Asporin inhibits collagen matrix-mediated intercellular mechanocommunications between fibroblasts during keloid progression. FASEB J. 35, e21705 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brissett, A. E. & Sherris, D. A. Scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Facial Plast. Surg. 17, 263–272 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nobe, K. et al. Rho A and the Rho kinase pathway regulate fibroblast contraction: Enhanced contraction in constitutively active Rho A fibroblast cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 399, 292–299 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fujiwara, T. et al. Direct contact of fibroblasts with neuronal processes promotes differentiation to myofibroblasts and induces contraction of collagen matrix in vitro. Wound Repair Regen. 21, 588–594 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maharam, E. et al. Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation. Bone Res. 3, 15015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, E. et al. Transplantation of cyclic stretched fibroblasts accelerates the wound-healing process in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Cell Transplant 23, 285–301 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hippenstiel, S. et al. Rho protein inactivation induced apoptosis of cultured human endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 283, L830-838 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shibata, R. et al. Rho-kinase inhibition reduces neointima formation after vascular injury by enhancing Bax expression and apoptosis. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 42, S43 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Del Re, D. P., Miyamoto, S. & Brown, J. H. RhoA/Rho Kinase Up-regulate Bax to Activate a Mitochondrial Death Pathway and Induce Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis*. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 8069–8078 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chua, S. et al. Cyclic stretching boosts microRNA-499 to regulate Bcl-2 via microRNA-208a in atrial fibroblasts. J. Cell Mol. Med. 25, 3113–3123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wlodkowic, D., Telford, W., Skommer, J. & Darzynkiewicz, Z. Apoptosis and beyond: Cytometry in studies of programmed cell death. Methods Cell Biol. 103, 55–98 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mardilovich, K. et al. LIM kinase inhibitors disrupt mitotic microtubule organization and impair tumor cell proliferation. Oncotarget 6, 38469–38486 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, R. et al. LIM kinase inhibition reduces breast cancer growth and invasiveness but systemic inhibition does not reduce metastasis in mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 30, 483–495 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mardilovich, K. et al. Elevated LIM kinase 1 in nonmetastatic prostate cancer reflects its role in facilitating androgen receptor nuclear translocation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14, 246–258 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rybin, M. J. et al. A dual aurora and lim kinase inhibitor reduces glioblastoma proliferation and invasion. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 61, 128614 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Crane, A. M. & Bhattacharya, S. K. The Use of Bromodeoxyuridine Incorporation Assays to Assess Corneal Stem Cell Proliferation. In Corneal Regenerative Medicine: Methods and Protocols (eds Wright, B. & Connon, C. J.) 65–70 (Humana Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, C., Akaishi, S. & Ogawa, R. Mechanosignaling pathways in cutaneous scarring. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 304, 589–597 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chamseddin, B. H. & Le, L. Q. Management of cutaneous neurofibroma: current therapy and future directions. Neurooncol. Adv. 2, i107–i116 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Z.-C. et al. The roles of inflammation in keloid and hypertrophic scars. Front. Immunol. 11, 603187 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Limandjaja, G. C., Niessen, F. B., Scheper, R. J. & Gibbs, S. Hypertrophic scars and keloids: Overview of the evidence and practical guide for differentiating between these abnormal scars. Exp. Dermatol. 30, 146–161 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nishimura, K., Blume, P., Ohgi, S. & Sumpio, B. E. Effect of different frequencies of tensile strain on human dermal fibroblast proliferation and survival. Wound Repair Regen. 15, 646–656 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Santos, G. L., Hartmann, S., Zimmermann, W.-H., Ridley, A. & Lutz, S. Inhibition of Rho-associated kinases suppresses cardiac myofibroblast function in engineered connective and heart muscle tissues. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 134, 13–28 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, J. et al. Long-term explant culture: An improved method for consistently harvesting homogeneous populations of keloid fibroblasts. Bioengineered 13, 1565–1574 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, Q. et al. Collagen gel contraction assays: From modelling wound healing to quantifying cellular interactions with three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 101, 151253 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grada, A., Otero-Vinas, M., Prieto-Castrillo, F., Obagi, Z. & Falanga, V. Research techniques made simple: analysis of collective cell migration using the wound healing assay. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, e11–e16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K19615, 20H03848, 22K09881, 23H03066 and 24K12848 and The Osaka Medical Research Foundation for Intractable Diseases Grant Numbers 29-1-18 and 30-2-35.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Megumi Ishii and Kazuya Kuroda have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 C11, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

    Megumi Ishii, Kazuya Kuroda, Naoya Otani, Ryota Nakamura, Takaki Oue & Tateki Kubo

  2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan

    Kenichiro Kawai

  3. Department of Child Development and Molecular Brain Science, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan

    Shinsuke Matsuzaki

  4. Department of Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Science Technology, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan

    Shinsuke Matsuzaki

Authors
  1. Megumi Ishii
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuya Kuroda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naoya Otani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ryota Nakamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takaki Oue
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kenichiro Kawai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinsuke Matsuzaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tateki Kubo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The first and second authors equally contributed to this work. M.I., K.Ku., S.M. and T.K. designed, performed and interpreted all the experiments. K.Ku., K.Ka. and S.M. developed AAV vectors and performed experiments with the vectors. M.I., N.O., R.N. and T.O. performed mechanical stimulation experiments. K.Ka. and T.K. supervised and interpreted the data. M.I., K.Ku. and T.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tateki Kubo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishii, M., Kuroda, K., Otani, N. et al. LIMK2 inactivation suppresses mechanical stimulation-induced dermal fibroblast differentiation and resistance to apoptosis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37610-y

Download citation

  • Received: 21 April 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 05 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37610-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing