Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A comparative evaluation of time-series models for forecasting inpatient deaths and discharges against medical advice
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

A comparative evaluation of time-series models for forecasting inpatient deaths and discharges against medical advice

  • Cheng Pang1,2 na1,
  • Dexi Jiayong3 na1,
  • Dandan Jiang3,
  • Yi Wang1,2,
  • Naishi Li1,2,4 &
  • …
  • Dan Ren3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health care
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research

Abstract

Forecasting inpatient mortality (IM) and discharges against medical advice (DAMA) provides essential insights for healthcare quality monitoring and hospital management. This study compared six time-series forecasting methods—ARIMA, Grey Model, NNETAR, LSTM, Prophet, and Chronos, a pretrained probabilistic model—to predict monthly IM and DAMA in two tertiary hospitals in China from January 2018 to December 2024. Model performance was evaluated using RMSE, MAE, MAPE. Chronos demonstrated the best predictive accuracy for IM across both hospitals, achieving the lowest MAPE values (26.96–33.37%) and outperforming traditional and deep learning approaches (Diebold–Mariano test, p < 0.05). For DAMA forecasting, Chronos performed optimally (MAPE = 5.52%) in the hospital with higher and more stable DAMA volumes, whereas NNETAR yielded relatively superior results (MAPE = 11.29%) in the hospital with smaller and more irregular time series. LSTM consistently showed limited generalizability, likely due to small sample sizes and model complexity. These findings indicate that pretrained models such as Chronos can deliver robust and scalable forecasting performance even with limited data, while simpler neural networks like NNETAR may better handle low-volume, noisy data. Implementing these models in hospital management systems could enhance the timeliness and precision of quality monitoring, enabling proactive responses to adverse clinical and operational trends.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Barbazza, E., Klazinga, N. S. & Kringos, D. S. Exploring the actionability of healthcare performance indicators for quality of care: a qualitative analysis of the literature, expert opinion and user experience. BMJ Qual. Saf. 30, 1010–1020 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alfandre, D. J. I’m Going Home: Discharges Against Medical Advice. Mayo Clin. Proc. 84, 255–260 (2009).

  3. Saia, M. et al. Hospital readmissions and mortality following discharge against medical advice: a five-year retrospective, population-based cohort study in Veneto region, Northeast Italy. BMJ Open. 13, e069775 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ni, J. et al. Discharge against medical advice after hospitalization for sepsis: Predictors, 30-Day Readmissions, and outcomes. J. Emerg. Med. 65, e383–e392 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambasta, A., Santana, M., Ghali, W. A. & Tang, K. Discharge against medical advice: ‘deviant’ behaviour or a health system quality gap? BMJ Qual. Saf. 29, 348–352 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kumah, A. Poor quality care in healthcare settings: an overlooked epidemic. Front. Public. Health. 13, 1504172 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dalili, H., Shariat, M. & Sahebi, L. Time series analysis for forecasting neonatal intensive care unit census and neonatal mortality. BMC Pediatr. 25, 339 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rodea-Montero, E. R. et al. Trends, structural changes, and assessment of time series models for forecasting hospital discharge due to death at a Mexican tertiary care hospital. PLOS ONE. 16, e0248277 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, N. Y. et al. Discharge against medical advice in trauma patients: Trends, risk factors, and implications for health care management strategies. Surgery 176, 942–948 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, R., Cheng, W. X., Suganthan, P. N. & Yuen, K. F. Inpatient discharges forecasting for Singapore hospitals by machine learning. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 26, 4966–4975 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Avinash, G., Pachori, H., Sharma, A. & Mishra, S. Time series forecasting of bed occupancy in mental health facilities in India using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 15, 2686 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Besong, A. E. et al. Significance of the ARIMA epidemiological modeling to predict the rate of HIV and AIDS in the Kumba health district of Cameroon. Front. Public. Health. 13, 1526454 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, X. et al. Grey modelling and real-time forecasting for the approximate non-homogeneous white exponential law BDS clock bias sequences. Sci. Rep. 14, 17897 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Talkhi, N., Fatemi, A., Ataei, N., Jabbari Nooghabi, M. & Z. & Modeling and forecasting number of confirmed and death caused COVID-19 in IRAN: A comparison of time series forecasting methods. Biomed. Signal. Process. Control. 66, 102494 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saranya, M. S. & Vinish, V. N. A comparative evaluation of streamflow prediction using the SWAT and NNAR models in the meenachil river basin of central Kerala, India. Water Sci. Technol. 88, 2002–2018 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, Y. et al. Deep learning models for hepatitis E incidence prediction leveraging Baidu index. BMC Public. Health. 24, 3014 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sembiring, I., Wahyuni, S. N. & Sediyono, E. LSTM algorithm optimization for COVID-19 prediction model. Heliyon 10, e26158 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ansari, A. F. et al. Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series. Preprint at (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2403.07815

  19. Al-qaness, M. A. A., Ewees, A. A. & Fan, H. Abd El Aziz, M. Optimization method for forecasting confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China. J. Clin. Med. 9, 674 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gaur, A., Gilham, E., Machin, L. & Warriner, D. Discharge against medical advice: the Causes, consequences and possible corrective measures. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 85, 1–14 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cecil, E., Bottle, A., Esmail, A., Vincent, C. & Aylin, P. What is the relationship between mortality alerts and other indicators of quality of care? A National cross-sectional study. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 25, 13–21 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lim, B. & Zohren, S. Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 379, 20200209 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brigato, L. et al. Position: There are no Champions in Long-Term Time Series Forecasting. Preprint at (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2502.14045

  24. Liu, X. & Wang, W. Deep time series forecasting models: A comprehensive survey. Mathematics 12, 1504 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Youssef, A. et al. External validation of AI models in health should be replaced with recurring local validation. Nat. Med. 29, 2686–2687 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Andric, M. & Dragoni, M. Machine learning and statistical insights into hospital stay durations: the Italian EHR case. Preprint at (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2504.18393

  27. Sakib, M. & Siddiqui, T. Multi-Network-Based ensemble deep learning model to forecast Ross river virus outbreak in Australia. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 37, 2352015 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the referees and the editors for their valuable comments.

Funding

The study was supported by the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2024-RW630-01) and the Natural Science Foundation of Xizang Autonomous Region (XZZR202402111(W)). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Cheng Pang and Dexi Jiayong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Records, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Cheng Pang, Yi Wang & Naishi Li

  2. Collaborating Center for the WHO Family of International Classifications in China, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Cheng Pang, Yi Wang & Naishi Li

  3. Department of Medical Records, People’s Hospital of Xizang Autonomous Region, Lhasa, 850000, China

    Dexi Jiayong, Dandan Jiang & Dan Ren

  4. Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Naishi Li

Authors
  1. Cheng Pang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dexi Jiayong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dandan Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naishi Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dan Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Cheng Pang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Mainly Writing, Funding acquisition; Dexi Jiayong: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Revising; Dandan Jiang: Data curation, Writing – review & editing; Yi Wang: Investigation, Writing – review & editing; Naishi Li: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing; Dan Ren: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Ren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (approval number I-25PJ1221) and the Ethics Committee of People’s Hospital of Xizang Autonomous Region (approval number ME-TBHP-24-067). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because the study used a retrospective study design.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, C., Jiayong, D., Jiang, D. et al. A comparative evaluation of time-series models for forecasting inpatient deaths and discharges against medical advice. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37913-0

Download citation

  • Received: 11 October 2025

  • Accepted: 27 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37913-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Deaths numbers
  • Discharge against medical advice numbers
  • Time-series
  • Forecasting
  • Hospital management
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics