Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A cross-sectional comparison of nursing knowledge attitudes and practices in adverse event management based on simulation training experience
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 February 2026

A cross-sectional comparison of nursing knowledge attitudes and practices in adverse event management based on simulation training experience

  • Yi Shen1 na1,
  • Ye Wang1 na1,
  • Shiyu Wu2,
  • Rumei Yang1,
  • Ming He3 &
  • …
  • Qi Ma4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health care
  • Health occupations
  • Medical research

Abstract

Effective nurse management of Adverse Nursing Events (ANEs) is crucial for patient safety. This study aimed to investigate nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (self-reported clinical practice) regarding ANE management and compared KAP differences between nurses with and without clinical scenario simulation course (CSSC) training. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 931 nurses selected using convenience sampling from August 1st to August 15th 2024, across five hospitals in China. Data were collected using a self-designed KAP questionnaire. A total of 931 valid responses were collected. The knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 7 (6, 8), 46 (40, 50), and 50 (42, 50), respectively. In unadjusted comparisons, nurses with CSSC training had higher knowledge, attitude, and practice scores than those without training (all P < 0.001). Knowledge positively correlated with attitude (r = 0.628, P < 0.001), and practice (r = 0.671, P < 0.001). Attitude correlated with practice (r = 0.876, P < 0.001). Nurses demonstrating adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and practices towards the management of ANE, those who received CSSC training scored significantly higher across all domains. Therefore, CSSC may be considered as a component of in-service patient-safety education; however, the observed differences should be interpreted as associations and require confirmation in longitudinal or experimental studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Nurses knowledge attitude and practice in preventing osteoporosis complications in China

Article Open access 04 August 2025

Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

Article 02 April 2025

Knowledge attitudes and practices of healthcare professionals regarding diabetes self management education and support

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

KAP:

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices

ANE:

Adverse nursing events

CSSC:

Clinical scenario simulation course

References

  1. Advances in Patient Safety. In. in Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. (eds Hughes, R. G.) (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2008).

  2. Palese, A. et al. Multi-level analysis of National nursing students’ disclosure of patient safety concerns. Med. Educ. 52, 1156–1166 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tan, J. et al. A Chinese and Western medication adherence scale in patients with chronic kidney disease. Patient Prefer Adherence. 13, 1487–1495 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shi, X. et al. Factors associated with nursing students’ mental health-related stigma: A multisite cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ. Today. 142, 106346 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, F. & Suryohusodo, A. A. Knowledge, attitude, and practice assessment toward COVID-19 among communities in East Nusa Tenggara, indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Front. Public. Health. 10, 957630 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saragih, I. D., Tarihoran, D., Lin, W. T. & Lee, B. O. Outcomes of scenario-based simulation courses in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ. Today. 136, 106145 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schram, A. et al. Patient safety culture improvements depend on basic healthcare education: a longitudinal simulation-based intervention study at two Danish hospitals. BMJ Open. Qual 11, (2022).

  8. Abbas, J. R. et al. Virtual reality in simulation-based emergency skills training: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Resusc. Plus. 16, 100484 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saragih, I. D., Suarilah, I., Hsiao, C. T., Fann, W. C. & Lee, B. O. Interdisciplinary simulation-based teaching and learning for healthcare professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Educ. Pract. 76, 103920 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalra, A. et al. Super Divya to the rescue! Exploring nurse mentor supervisor perceptions on a digital tool to support learning and engagement for simulation educators in Bihar, India. BMC Med. Educ. 22, 206 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weil, G. J., Fischer, P. U. & Krentel, A. Lessons from Large-Scale tolerability and acceptability studies of triple drug mass drug administration performed to support policy change and accelerate elimination of lymphatic filariasis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 106, 13–17 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abu-El-Noor, N. I., Abu-El-Noor, M. K., Abuowda, Y. Z., Alfaqawi, M. & Böttcher, B. Patient safety culture among nurses working in Palestinian governmental hospital: a pathway to a new policy. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 550 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katz, M. G., Rockne, W. Y., Braga, R., McKellar, S. & Cochran, A. An improved patient safety reporting system increases reports of disruptive behavior in the perioperative setting. Am. J. Surg. 219, 21–26 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yesilyaprak, T. & Demir Korkmaz, F. The relationship between surgical intensive care unit nurses’ patient safety culture and adverse events. Nurs. Crit. Care. 28, 63–71 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abate, M., Tadesse, N. & Mitiku, K. Level of compassionate health care service provision and its associated factors among health professionals working in public hospitals of addis ababa: health professionals’ perspective. Heliyon 8, e09160 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez-Moreno, C., Vélez-Vélez, E., Garrigues Ramón, M. & Rojas Alfaro, M. García-Carpintero Blas, E. Patient safety in surgical settings: A study on the challenges and improvement strategies in adverse event reporting from a nursing perspective. J. Clin. Nurs. 33, 2324–2336 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kakemam, E. et al. Nurses’ perceptions of patient safety competency: A cross-sectional study of relationships with occurrence and reporting of adverse events. PLoS One. 19, e0297185 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, L., Jia, J., Hou, S., Dou, Z. & Song, R. Effect of breathing meditation training on nursing work Quality, occurrence risk of adverse Events, and attention level of operating room nurses. Altern Ther. Health Med (2024).

  19. Huang, L. et al. Second victim experiences of health care learners and the influence of the training environment on postevent adaptation. Mayo Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual. Outcomes. 8, 232–240 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tate, K. et al. Contextually appropriate nurse staffing models: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open. 14, e082883 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Yi Shen and Ye Wang these authors contributed equally as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nursing Department, Luwan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200200, China

    Yi Shen, Ye Wang & Rumei Yang

  2. Department of the Personnel Section, Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200200, China

    Shiyu Wu

  3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200200, China

    Ming He

  4. Department of VIP Ward, Luwan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200200, China

    Qi Ma

Authors
  1. Yi Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ye Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiyu Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rumei Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ming He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qi Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yi Shen and Ye Wang carried out the studies, participated in collecting data, and drafted the manuscript. Ming He and Rumei Yang performed the statistical analysis and participated in its design. Yi Shen and Qi Ma participated in acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and draft the manuscript. Yi Shen, Ye Wang, Shiyu Wu, Rumei Yang, Ming He and Qi Ma read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiyu Wu or Rumei Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from the Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch Ethics Committee, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine (LWEC2024018) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. I confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, S. et al. A cross-sectional comparison of nursing knowledge attitudes and practices in adverse event management based on simulation training experience. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39781-0

Download citation

  • Received: 21 November 2025

  • Accepted: 07 February 2026

  • Published: 11 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39781-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Nurse
  • Knowledge
  • Attitude
  • Practice
  • Adverse nursing events
  • Clinical scenario simulation course
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing