Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
DeepStackVEGF a stacking ensemble deep learning framework for vascular endothelial growth factor prediction
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 March 2026

DeepStackVEGF a stacking ensemble deep learning framework for vascular endothelial growth factor prediction

  • Farman Ali1,
  • Majdi Khalid2,
  • Abdulmohsen Algarni3,
  • Naif Waheb Rajkhan4,
  • Othman Asiry5 &
  • …
  • Meng-Ze Du6,7,8 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 804 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics

Abstract

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) plays a central role in angiogenesis, regulating both physiological processes such as wound healing, tissue repair, and bone formation, and pathological events including tumor progression, metastasis, and diabetic retinopathy. Due to its crucial role in vascular biology, VEGF serves as an important therapeutic target in anti-angiogenic drug development and precision medicine. However, conventional experimental methods for VEGF identification are costly and time-consuming, emphasizing the need for efficient computational approaches. To address this challenge, we introduce DeepStack-VEGF, an advanced deep learning framework designed for accurate and robust VEGF prediction. The model integrates diverse sequence-derived features, including physicochemical descriptors, sequential patterns, evolutionary information, and secondary structure motifs, further enhanced by pretrained embeddings from UniProt and ProtBert. Feature optimization was achieved using Support Vector Machine–Recursive Feature Elimination. DeepStack-VEGF employs a stacking ensemble of three architectures including Feedback Generative Adversarial Network Gated Recurrent Unit and Capsule Convolutional Neural Network each contributing distinct representational capabilities. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that the fused feature set and stacking ensemble substantially outperform individual models, achieving superior accuracy, robustness, and generalization. By combining deep learning with biological insight, DeepStack-VEGF provides a reliable and scalable computational framework for VEGF identification, supporting rational drug discovery, anti-angiogenic therapy design, and precision medicine applications.

Similar content being viewed by others

Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic perspectives

Article Open access 19 May 2025

VEGF-B prevents excessive angiogenesis by inhibiting FGF2/FGFR1 pathway

Article Open access 18 August 2023

Biology and therapeutic targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor A

Article 25 July 2023

Data availability

We have made all datasets, feature extraction sets, and classifier codes freely available on GitHub at the following link: https://github.com/Farman335/DeepStack-VEGF

References

  1. A. M. Byrne, D. J. Bouchier‐Hayes, J. H. J. J. o. c. Harmey, and m. medicine, "Angiogenic and cell survival functions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)," vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 777–794, 2005.

  2. Hu, K. & Olsen, B. R. J. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration. Bone 91, 30–38 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, K. E. & Wilgus, T. A. J. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in the regulation of cutaneous wound repair. Adv. Wound Care 3(10), 647–661 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shinkaruk, S., Bayle, M., Lain, G. & Deleris, G. J. C. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), an emerging target for cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents 3(2), 95–117 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. L. Formica, H. G. Awde Alfonso, S. D. J. P. R. Palma, and Perspectives, "Biological drug therapy for ocular angiogenesis: Anti‐VEGF agents and novel strategies based on nanotechnology," vol. 9, no. 2, p. e00723, 2021.

  6. K. R. Khrapko et al., "Methods of DNA sequencing by hybridization based on optimizing concentration of matrix-bound oligonucleotide and device for carrying out same," ed: Google Patents, 1996.

  7. Pagano, K. et al. Identification of a novel extracellular inhibitor of FGF2/FGFR signaling axis by combined virtual screening and NMR spectroscopy approach. Bioorg. Chem. 136, 106529 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zaha, D. C. J. Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. World J. Clin. Oncol. 5(3), 382 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alsini, R. et al. Deep-VEGF: Deep stacked ensemble model for prediction of vascular endothelial growth factor by concatenating gated recurrent unit with two-dimensional convolutional neural network. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.2323144 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ali, F. et al. VEGF-ERCNN: A deep learning-based model for prediction of vascular endothelial growth factor using ensemble residual CNN. J. Comput. Sci. 83, 102448 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Khalid, F. Ali, W. Alghamdi, A. Alzahrani, R. Alsini, and A. Alzahrani, "An ensemble computational model for prediction of clathrin protein by coupling machine learning with discrete cosine transform," J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., pp. 1–9, 2024.

  12. Ali, F. et al. Identification of defensins using transformer-derived protein embeddings and discrete cosine transformation-enhanced evolutionary features with generative adversarial capsule bidirectional temporal convolutional neural network. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148336 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ali, F. et al. DBPPred-PDSD: Machine learning approach for prediction of DNA-binding proteins using Discrete Wavelet Transform and optimized integrated features space. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 182, 21–30 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasegawa, K., Moriwaki, Y., Terada, T., Wei, C. & Shimizu, K. Feedback-AVPGAN: Feedback-guided generative adversarial network for generating antiviral peptides. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 20(06), 2250026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Madhu, G., Mohamed, A. W., Kautish, S., Shah, M. A. & Ali, I. Intelligent diagnostic model for malaria parasite detection and classification using imperative inception-based capsule neural networks. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 13377 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.-Y. Lin, "A Comparative Evaluation of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Transformer-Based Informer Model for Predicting Rice Leaf Blast," Purdue University, 2024.

  17. U. Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(D1), D204–D212 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. K. Burley, H. M. Berman, G. J. Kleywegt, J. L. Markley, H. Nakamura, and S. Velankar, Protein Data Bank (PDB): the single global macromolecular structure archive," Protein crystallography: methods and protocols, pp. 627-641, 2017.

  19. Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49(D1), D412–D419 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alghamdi, W. et al. A deep learning model for epidermal growth factor receptor prediction using ensemble residual convolutional neural network. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 33676 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. He, X. et al. PhaseNet: A computational framework for identifying phase-separating proteins based on protein language model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.149044 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Almusallam, N. et al. Multi-headed ensemble residual CNN: A powerful tool for fibroblast growth factor prediction. Results Eng. 24, 103348 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali, F. et al. AFP-CMBPred: Computational identification of antifreeze proteins by extending consensus sequences into multi-blocks evolutionary information. Comput. Biol. Med. 139, 105006 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ali, F. et al. DEEP-EP: Identification of epigenetic protein by ensemble residual convolutional neural network for drug discovery. Methods 226, 49–53 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Ahmad, S. Akbar, M. Hayat, F. Ali, and M. Sohail, "Identification of antioxidant proteins using a discriminative intelligent model of k-space amino acid pairs based descriptors incorporating with ensemble feature selection," Biocybernet. Biomed. Eng., 2020.

  26. Ahmad, A. et al. Deep-AntiFP: Prediction of antifungal peptides using distanct multi-informative features incorporating with deep neural networks. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 208, 104214 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khan, A. et al. Prediction of antifreeze proteins using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 1–10 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sikander, R., Ghulam, A. & Ali, F. XGB-DrugPred: Computational prediction of druggable proteins using eXtreme gradient boosting and optimized features set. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 1–9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Alsini et al., "Deep-VEGF: deep stacked ensemble model for prediction of vascular endothelial growth factor by concatenating gated recurrent unit with two-dimensional convolutional neural network," pp. 1–11, 2024.

  30. S. Hasnat, F. A. Shifa, S. Murshed, S. T. Ahmed Rumee, and M. M. Mahbub, "A Framework for Accurate Prediction of Plastic-Degrading Enzymes using Convolutional Neural Networks," bioRxiv, p. 2024.10. 20.619257, 2024.

  31. Z. Chen et al., 2018 iFeature: a python package and web server for features extraction and selection from protein and peptide sequences Bioinformatics vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 2499–2502,

  32. Wang, H. & Hu, X. J. B. Accurate prediction of nuclear receptors with conjoint triad feature. BMC Bioinformatics 16(1), 1–13 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, F. et al. "Computational analysis and prediction of PE_PGRS proteins using machine learning. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20, 662–674 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao, L., Li, J., Zhang, B. & Jiang, X. Combining knowledge distillation and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 32031 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ayimbila, F. et al. Exploring the binding interaction of 1, 4-naphthoquinone derivative–human serum albumin complex by biophysics and molecular simulation. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 19249 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chowdhury, A. S., Reehl, S. M., Kehn-Hall, K., Bishop, B. & Webb-Robertson, B.-J.M. Better understanding and prediction of antiviral peptides through primary and secondary structure feature importance. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chowriappa, P., Dua, S., Kanno, J. & Thompson, H. W. Protein structure classification based on conserved hydrophobic residues. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 6(4), 639–651 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rayhan, F. et al. iDTI-ESBoost: Identification of drug target interaction using evolutionary and structural features with boosting. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 17731 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Ghulam, Z. N. K. Swati, F. Ali, S. Tunio, N. Jabeen, and N. Iqbal, "DeepImmuno-PSSM: Identification of Immunoglobulin based on Deep learning and PSSM-Profiles," 2023.

  40. M. Khalid et al., "An ensemble computational model for prediction of clathrin protein by coupling machine learning with discrete cosine transform," pp. 1–9, 2024.

  41. Mall, R., Kaushik, R., Martinez, Z. A., Thomson, M. W. & Castiglione, F. Benchmarking protein language models for protein crystallization. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 2381 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Rahu et al., "UBI-XGB: Identification of ubiquitin proteins using machine learning model," vol. 8, pp. 14–26, 2022.

  43. Ali, F. et al. Leveraging deep learning for epigenetic protein prediction: A novel approach for early lung cancer diagnosis and drug discovery. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 13(1), 28 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Khan, J. Uddin, F. Ali, A. Banjar, and A. Daud, "Comparative analysis of the existing methods for prediction of antifreeze proteins," Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst., p. 104729, 2022.

  45. Lin, X. et al. AFPDeepPred: A deep learning framework for accurate identification of antifreeze proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 65(22), 12256–12267 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ali, F. et al. Deep-CABPred: Deep learning model for predicting functional chlorophyll ab binding proteins in trait-based plant ecology using hybrid embedding with semi-normalized temporal convolutional networks. Ecol. Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103400 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Khan, Z. U., Ali, F., Ahmad, I., Hayat, M. & Pi, D. iPredCNC: Computational prediction model for cancerlectins and non-cancerlectins using novel cascade features subset selection. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 195, 103876 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sikander, R., Ghulam, A. & Ali, F. XGB-DrugPred: Computational prediction of druggable proteins using eXtreme gradient boosting and optimized features set. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 5505 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. S. Zouari et al., "Deep‐GB: A novel deep learning model for globular protein prediction using CNN‐BiLSTM architecture and enhanced PSSM with trisection strategy," 2024.

  50. M. Ullah, A. Iltaf, Q. Hou, F. Ali, and C. Liu, "A foreground extraction approach using convolutional neural network with graph cut," in 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC), 2018, pp. 40–44: IEEE.

  51. Kabir, M. et al. Prediction of membrane protein types by exploring local discriminative information from evolutionary profiles. Anal. Biochem. 564, 123–132 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ali, F., Ahmed, S., Swati, Z. N. K. & Akbar, S. DP-BINDER: Machine learning model for prediction of DNA-binding proteins by fusing evolutionary and physicochemical information. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 33(7), 645–658 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ali, F. et al. AFP-CMBPred: Computational identification of antifreeze proteins by extending consensus sequences into multi-blocks evolutionary information. Comput. Biol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105006 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zouari, S. et al. Deep-GB: A novel deep learning model for globular protein prediction using CNN-BiLSTM architecture and enhanced PSSM with trisection strategy. IET Syst. Biol. 18(6), 208–217 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hasegawa, K. et al. Feedback-AVPGAN: Feedback-guided generative adversarial network for generating antiviral peptides. J. o. B. 20(06), 2250026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. M. Huh, S.-H. Sun, and N. Zhang, "Feedback adversarial learning: Spatial feedback for improving generative adversarial networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 1476–1485.

  57. Almusallam, N. et al. An omics-driven computational model for angiogenic protein prediction: Advancing therapeutic strategies with Ens-deep-AGP. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 282, 136475 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. F. Ali, A. Masmoudi, T. Alkhalifah, F. Alturise, W. Alghamdi, and M. Khalid, "IR-MBiTCN: Computational prediction of insulin receptor using deep learning: A multi-information fusion approach with multiscale bidirectional temporal convolutional network," Int. J. Biol. Macromol., p. 143844, 2025.

  59. Mahdi, E. T., Al-Barzinji, S. M. & Awad, W. K. Object detection using capsule neural network: An overview. Babylon. J. Mach. Learn. 2024, 157–164 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vijayakumar, T. Comparative study of capsule neural network in various applications. J. Artif. Intell. 1(01), 19–27 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. K. Sun et al., "CACNN: Capsule attention convolutional neural networks for 3D object recognition," IEEE Transac. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2023.

  62. R. Dey and F. M. Salem, "Gate-variants of gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural networks," in 2017 IEEE 60th international midwest symposium on circuits and systems (MWSCAS), 2017, pp. 1597–1600: IEEE.

  63. Merkelbach, K., Schaper, S., Diedrich, C., Fritsch, S. J. & Schuppert, A. Novel architecture for gated recurrent unit autoencoder trained on time series from electronic health records enables detection of ICU patient subgroups. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 4053 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. R. J. a. p. a. Rana, "Gated recurrent unit (GRU) for emotion classification from noisy speech," 2016.

  65. A. Banjar, F. Ali, O. Alghushairy, and A. Daud, "iDBP-PBMD: A machine learning model for detection of DNA-binding proteins by extending compression techniques into evolutionary profile," Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst., p. 104697, 2022.

  66. Xie, P. et al. Toward high-efficiency, low-resource, and explainable neuropeptide prediction with MSKDNP. Brief. Bioinf. 26(5), bbaf466 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 62501110 2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Grant No. 2020TQ0138

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Farman Ali

  2. Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, 21955, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

    Majdi Khalid

  3. Department of Computer Science, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Abdulmohsen Algarni

  4. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdul Aziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Naif Waheb Rajkhan

  5. Department of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Othman Asiry

  6. School of Health and Medical Technology, Chengdu Neusoft University, Chengdu, 611844, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China

    Meng-Ze Du

  7. School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

    Meng-Ze Du

  8. Qingyuan People’s Hospital, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, B24 Yinquan South Road, Qingyuan, 511518, Guang Dong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Meng-Ze Du

Authors
  1. Farman Ali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majdi Khalid
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulmohsen Algarni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Naif Waheb Rajkhan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Othman Asiry
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Meng-Ze Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

**Farman Ali:** Drafted and composed the manuscript, contributed to the interpretation of results. **Majdi Khalid:** Performed the experiments, assisted in data acquisition. **Abdulmohsen Algarni:** Conducted validation analyses, contributed to data verification. **Naif Waheb Rajkhan:** Substantively revised the manuscript, contributed to critical editing. **Othman Asiry:** Reviewed the manuscript, contributed to critical feedback, and interpretation. **Meng-Ze Du:** Supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Farman Ali or Meng-Ze Du.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

No human or animal subjects are involved in this work.

Consent for publication

All authors agree on the publication of the paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, F., Khalid, M., Algarni, A. et al. DeepStackVEGF a stacking ensemble deep learning framework for vascular endothelial growth factor prediction. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40134-0

Download citation

  • Received: 17 October 2025

  • Accepted: 10 February 2026

  • Published: 11 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40134-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keyword

  • Deep learning
  • Stacking ensemble learning
  • Pre-trained language model
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer