Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
DGOU classification guided cement diffusion strategy in unilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 February 2026

DGOU classification guided cement diffusion strategy in unilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

  • Donghui Cao  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-5038-22791,2,
  • Xusheng Li1,
  • Wenbo Gu1,
  • Yanrong Tian1,2,
  • Yu Yang1,2,
  • Zhe Liu1,2,
  • Xiao Zhang1,2,
  • Hanlin Zhang3,
  • Haiqiang Ma4,
  • Hongyang Zhao5,
  • Binjie Fan1,2,
  • Tengyao Niu1,2,
  • Yulong Nan1,2,
  • Pengcheng Mao1,2,
  • Xi Zhu1 na1 &
  • …
  • Haifeng Yuan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-17481 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Anatomy
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

The optimal cement diffusion pattern in unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains debated. This multicenter retrospective study investigated whether crossing the vertebral midline with bone cement is necessary under the DGOU classification. A total of 440 patients with single-level OVCFs treated by unilateral PKP (2020–2023) were categorized into OF1, OF2, or OF3 types based on the DGOU classification and further divided into crossing and non-crossing groups according to postoperative CT. Outcomes included VAS, ODI, and radiographic parameters. In OF1 fractures, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. However, for OF2 and OF3 fractures, the crossing group demonstrated significantly better ODI scores at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.001) and improved vertebral height maintenance (P < 0.001), without increasing complications. These findings suggest that achieving cross-midline cement diffusion may not be necessary for stable OF1 fractures, but it is associated with significantly better mid- to long-term functional and radiographic outcomes in unstable OF2/OF3 fracture types.

Similar content being viewed by others

A novel puncture approach via point “O” for percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with L4 or L5 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

Article Open access 07 November 2022

Influence of thoracolumbar kyphotic Cobb angle on prognosis after PKP surgery

Article Open access 22 December 2025

A novel assessment system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Article Open access 14 May 2025

Data availability

Summary data can be obtained from the corresponding or first author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Johnell, O. & Kanis, J. A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA. 17, 1726–1733 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morin, S. N., Leslie, W. D., Schousboe, J. T. & Osteoporosis Rev. JAMA 334, 894–907 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ensrud, K. E. & Schousboe, J. T. Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures. N Engl. J. Med. 364, 1634–1642 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alsoof, D. et al. Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fracture. Am. J. Med. 135, 815–821 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeitlin, J., Parides, M. K., Lane, J. M., Russell, L. A. & Kunze, K. N. A clinical prediction model for 10-year risk of self-reported osteoporosis diagnosis in pre- and perimenopausal women. Arch. Osteoporos. 18, 78 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cosman, F. et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA. 25, 2359–2381 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Si, L., Winzenberg, T. M., Jiang, Q., Chen, M. & Palmer, A. J. Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in china: 2010–2050. Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA. 26, 1929–1937 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ballane, G., Cauley, J. A., Luckey, M. M. & El-Hajj Fuleihan, G. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA. 28, 1531–1542 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lorentzon, M. & Cummings, S. R. Osteoporosis: the evolution of a diagnosis. J. Intern. Med. 277, 650–661 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, P. A., Froyshteter, A. B. & Tontz, W. L. Meta-analysis of vertebral augmentation compared with Conservative treatment for osteoporotic spinal fractures. J. Bone Min. Res. 28, 372–382 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, E. Z. et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus Conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Spine 41, 653–660 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, D. H., Gu, W. B., Zhao, H. Y., Hu, J. L. & Yuan, H. F. Advantages of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Osteoporos. 19, 38 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, C., Anastasopoulou, C. & Sapra, A. Biochemical Markers of Osteoporosis. In StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2025).

  14. Chevalier, Y. et al. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study. Spine 33, 1722–1730 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, X. et al. A finite element analysis on different bone cement forms and injection volumes injected into lumbar vertebral body in percutaneous kyphoplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 23, 621 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, K. & Liebschner, M. A. K. Evolution of vertebroplasty: a Biomechanical perspective. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 77–91 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blattert, T. R. et al. Nonsurgical and surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures: recommendations of the spine section of the German society for orthopaedics and trauma (DGOU). Glob Spine J. 8, 50S–55S (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schnake, K. J. et al. Classification of osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine fractures: recommendations of the spine section of the German society for orthopaedics and trauma (DGOU). Glob Spine J. 8, 46S–49S (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burguet Girona, S. & Ferrando Meseguer, E. Maruenda Paulino, J. I. Minimally invasive surgical treatment options for osteoporotic vertebral fractures OF4. Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Traumatol. 66, 86–94 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Denis, F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8, 817–831 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liebschner, M. A., Rosenberg, W. S. & Keaveny, T. M. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine 26, 1547–1554 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cho, A. R., Cho, S. B., Lee, J. H. & Kim, K. H. Effect of augmentation material stiffness on adjacent vertebrae after osteoporotic vertebroplasty using finite element analysis with different loading methods. Pain Phys.. 18, E1101–1110 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, J., Zhang, L. & Yang, H. L. Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Phys.. 16, 447–453 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baroud, G., Crookshank, M. & Bohner, M. High-viscosity cement significantly enhances uniformity of cement filling in vertebroplasty: an experimental model and study on cement leakage. Spine 31, 2562–2568 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, Y. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral approach kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis. Jt. Dis. Relat. Surg. 35, 491–503 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rohlmann, A., Nabil Boustani, H., Bergmann, G. & Zander, T. Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. J. Biomech. 43, 2963–2969 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J. et al. A comparative analysis of three distinct approaches for the management of type A1 traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 6-year follow-up. J. Orthop. Surg. 20, 856 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yao, G., Shen, Y. X., Li, M. & Cai, B. [Biomechanical effects of different bone cement diffusion patterns after vertebroplasty:finite element analysis]. Zhongguo Gu Shang China J. Orthop. Traumatol. 34, 732–737 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lin, L. et al. Biomechanical changes of different cement volumes at the thoracolumbar vertebrae in osteoporotic compression fractures: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 26, 773 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, B., Chen, G., Yang, X., Fan, T. & Chen, Z. Percutaneous kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell’s disease: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Glob Spine J. 12, 308–322 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Röder, C. et al. Cement volume is the most important modifiable predictor for pain relief in BKP: results from SWISSspine, a nationwide registry. Eur. Spine J. Soc. 22, 2241–2248 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lv, N. et al. Study on the influence of balloon dilation mode on the intravertebral cleft of osteoporotic fracture. BMC Surg. 22, 351 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng, X., Long, H. Q., Xu, J. H., Huang, Y. L. & Li, F. B. Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Spine J. 25, 3439–3449 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lv, Z. et al. Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty versus unipedicular approach vertebroplasty for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 48, 552–558 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yeom, J. S. et al. Leakage of cement in percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 85, 83–89 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Heini, P. F. & Dain Allred, C. The use of a side-opening injection cannula in vertebroplasty: a technical note. Spine 27, 105–109 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Krueger, A., Bliemel, C., Zettl, R. & Ruchholtz, S. Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur. Spine J. 18, 1257–1265 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clark, W. et al. Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Lond. Engl. 388, 1408–1416 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jones, J. R., Ehrenfried, L. M., Saravanapavan, P. & Hench, L. L. Controlling ion release from bioactive glass foam scaffolds with antibacterial properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17, 989–996 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Ningxia Natural Science Foundation (2023AAC03543, 2024AAC05082, 2025AAC030812), 2024 Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region key research and development plan to introduce special projects(2024BEH04159).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally to thsi work: Donghui Cao and Xusheng Li.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spinal Orthopedics, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China

    Donghui Cao, Xusheng Li, Wenbo Gu, Yanrong Tian, Yu Yang, Zhe Liu, Xiao Zhang, Binjie Fan, Tengyao Niu, Yulong Nan, Pengcheng Mao, Xi Zhu & Haifeng Yuan

  2. The First Clinical College of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China

    Donghui Cao, Yanrong Tian, Yu Yang, Zhe Liu, Xiao Zhang, Binjie Fan, Tengyao Niu, Yulong Nan & Pengcheng Mao

  3. Orthopedics Department, People’s Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China

    Hanlin Zhang

  4. Orthopedics Department, The Third People’s Hospital of Yinchuan City, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, China

    Haiqiang Ma

  5. Department of Spinal Orthopedics, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, Qinghai Province, China

    Hongyang Zhao

Authors
  1. Donghui Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xusheng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenbo Gu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanrong Tian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhe Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiao Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hanlin Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haiqiang Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hongyang Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Binjie Fan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tengyao Niu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yulong Nan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Pengcheng Mao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Xi Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Haifeng Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Author Contributions: D.C. : study concept and design, and desk review. X.L. : initial writing. W.G. : methodology. Z.L. : validation. X.Z. : formal analysis. Y.T. : statistical analysis. Y.Y. : revision of the manuscript. H.Z. : data curation. H.M. : statistical support. H.Z. : data curation. B.F. : writing - original draft. T.N. : visualization. Y.N. & P.M. : revision of manuscript. X.Z. : project administration. H.Y. : primary writing, revision of the manuscript, study concept and design, statistical support, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have made substantive contributions to this study and manuscript, and all have reviewed the final paper before its submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xi Zhu or Haifeng Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent for the surgical procedure (PKP) and associated standard postoperative care, including follow-up imaging. For the retrospective analysis of anonymized data from these routine clinical records, specific informed consent was waived by the Ethics Review Committee of Ningxia Medical University General Hospital.

Institutional review board statement

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ningxia Medical University General Hospital (KYLL-2025-2434). All imaging data were obtained with the informed consent of the patients.

Author disclosures: All authors declare that they have no disclosures of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, D., Li, X., Gu, W. et al. DGOU classification guided cement diffusion strategy in unilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40167-5

Download citation

  • Received: 30 October 2025

  • Accepted: 11 February 2026

  • Published: 16 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40167-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
  • Percutaneous kyphoplasty
  • Unilateral puncture
  • DGOU classification
  • Bone cement diffusion
  • Midline
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing