Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of recurrence and progression in cardiac patients
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 March 2026

The development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of recurrence and progression in cardiac patients

  • Sarah T. Clarke  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-14051,2,
  • Michael R. Le Grande  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-61311,2,
  • Barbara M. Murphy  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-58191,2,
  • Robert Hester  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-80262 &
  • …
  • Alun C. Jackson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-13991,2,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 532 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

One in two cardiac patients fear having another heart event or their cardiac condition worsening. Assessment of fear of recurrence and progression (FoRP) is critical to effective clinical care and chronic disease management. The current study aimed to develop and validate a measure of cardiac-FoRP - The Fear of Cardiac Recurrence and Progression Inventory (FCRPI). Items were generated by reviewing relevant literature and were refined in collaboration with key informants. The item pool (44 items) was administered to 241 adults (mean age = 64.52; 50% female) with a history of an acute coronary event, cardiac surgery, or chronic cardiac condition. Exploratory factor analysis identified the underlying factor structure and Rasch analysis assessed fit and reduced the item set. The final FCRPI comprised 29 items across five fear subscales relating to: deteriorating health, requiring further treatment, disengagement and loss of agency, impacts on intimacy, and impacts on work and finance, and two fear response subscales: avoidance and hyperawareness. The FCRPI demonstrated excellent internal consistency, and criterion and discriminant validity, and a clinically significant cut-off score of 39 was identified. The FCRPI offers both research and clinical utility by providing a validated tool to assess cardiac-specific FoRP and guide tailored interventions and patient-centred care.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, S.T.C, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Herschbach, P. et al. Fear of progression in chronic diseases: psychometric properties of the fear of progression questionnaire. J. Psychosom. Res. 58, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.02.007 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herschbach, P. & Dinkel, A. Fear of progression. Recent. Results Cancer Res. 197, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40187-9_2 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. in Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (2022).

  4. Mutsaers, B. et al. Identifying the key characteristics of clinical fear of cancer recurrence: an international Delphi study. Psychooncology 29, 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5283 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lebel, S. et al. From normal response to clinical problem: definition and clinical features of fear of cancer recurrence. Supportive Care Cancer: Official J. Multinational Association Supportive Care Cancer. 24, 3265–3268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3272-5 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simard, S. et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J. Cancer Surviv. 7, 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0272-z (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharpe, L., Michalowski, M., Richmond, B., Menzies, R. E. & Shaw, J. Fear of progression in chronic illnesses other than cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a transdiagnostic construct. Health Psychol. Rev. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2039744 (2022).

  8. Almeida, S. N., Elliott, R., Silva, E. R. & Sales, C. M. D. Fear of cancer recurrence: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of patients’ experiences. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 68, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.001 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pradhan, P., Sharpe, L. & Menzies, R. E. Towards a stepped care model for managing fear of cancer recurrence or progression in cancer survivors. Cancer Manag Res. 13, 8953–8965. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.S294114 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, S. T., Murphy, B. M., Hester, R. & Jackson, A. C. Fear of recurrence and progression in people with heart disease: risk factors and implications for emotional support. Behav. Sci. 15, 479 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke, S. T. et al. Conceptualizing fear of progression in cardiac patients: advancing our Understanding of the psychological impact of cardiac illness. Heart Mind 8, 29-39 (2024).

  12. Jackson, A. C. et al. Unraveling the complexity of cardiac distress: A study of prevalence and severity. Front. Psychiatry. 13, 808904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.808904 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony, S. et al. Fear of recurrence of atrial fibrillation: translating a cancer fear model to the atrial fibrillation patient experience. Front. Psychiatry. 13, 915327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915327 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke, S. T., Murphy, B. M., Hester, R. & Jackson, A. C. How does illness uncertainty impact recovery among patients with cardiac conditions? Br. J. Card Nurs. 17, 1–8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xiong, J., Qin, J. & Gong, K. Association between fear of progression and sleep quality in patients with chronic heart failure: A cross-sectional study. J. Adv. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15657 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiong, J., Qin, J., Zheng, G., Gao, Y. & Gong, K. The relationship between symptom perception and fear of progression in patients with chronic heart failure: A multiple mediation analysis. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad024 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhen, J. et al. Fear of recurrence in elderly patients with coronary heart disease: the current situation and influencing factors according to a questionnaire analysis. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 22, 419. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02853-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fait, K. et al. Cardiac-disease-induced PTSD and fear of illness progression: capturing the unique nature of disease-related PTSD. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 53, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.02.011 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muschalla, B., Glatz, J. & Linden, M. Heart-related anxieties in relation to general anxiety and severity of illness in cardiology patients. Psychol. Health Med. 19, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2013.774428 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, Y., Li, J., Qin, J., Zhou, S. & Gong, K. The sleep patterns and influencing factors of chronic heart failure patients in china: A latent profile analysis. Nat. Sci. Sleep. 17, 571–581. https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.S509059 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, C. et al. Fear of progression and quality of life in patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study on the multiple mediation of psychological distress and resilience. BMC Nurs. 24, 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02688-8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, Y. et al. Fear of progression in Chinese patients after cardiac valve replacement: profiles, influencing factors, and mechanisms. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 24, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae178 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Y., Ma, H. X., Liu, S. S. & Gong, Q. Correlation among anxiety and depression, fear of disease progression, and social support in coronary heart disease. World J. Psychiatry. 14, 1708–1717. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1708 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, Z. et al. A qualitative study exploring the experiences and needs of fear of disease progression in patients after open-heart surgery. J. Psychosom. Res. 188, 111980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111980 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mehnert, A., Herschbach, P., Berg, P., Henrich, G. & Koch, U. [Fear of progression in breast cancer patients–validation of the short form of the fear of progression questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF)]. Z. Psychosom. Med. Psychother. 52, 274–288. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2006.52.3.274 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sharpe, L. et al. The development and validation of the worries about recurrence or progression scale (WARPS). Br. J. Health Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12707 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. & Young, S. L. Best practices for developing and validating scales for Health, Social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front. Public. Health. 6, 149–149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Le Grande, M. R. et al. Development of a short form of the cardiac distress inventory. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 23, 408. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03439-w (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mishel, M. H. The measurement of uncertainty in illness. Nursing research (1981).

  30. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16, 606–613 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. & Lowe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weathers, F. W. et al. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, (2013). www.ptsd.va.gov.

  33. Harris, P. A. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 377–381 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jackson, A. C. et al. The cardiac distress inventory: A new measure of psychosocial distress associated with an acute cardiac event. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 22, 460. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02897-y (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics (Pearson, 2013).

  36. Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assess. Res. Evaluation. 10, 1–9 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Timmerman, M. E. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychol. Methods. 16, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Holgado–Tello, F. P., Chacón–Moscoso, S. & Barbero–García, I. Vila–Abad, E. Polychoric versus pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Qual. Quant. 44, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Methods. 4, 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. & Ullman, J. B. Using multivariate statistics. Vol. 6pearson Boston, MA, (2013).

  41. Finch, W. H. Using fit statistic differences to determine the optimal number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 80, 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Linacre, J. M. Correlations: point-biserial, point-measure, residual, https://winsteps.com/winman/correlations.htm%3E (n.d).

  43. Boone, W. J. & Staver, J. R. In Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Springer, 2020).

  44. Wright, B. Unidimensionality coefficient. Rasch Meas. Trans. 8, 385 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Marais, I. in Rasch Models in Health 111–130 (2012).

  46. Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (Psychology, 2013).

  47. Linacre, J. M. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J. Appl. Meas. 3, 85–106 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fisher, W. Jr & Reliability Separation, Strata Statistics. Measurement Transactions (1992).

  49. Taber, K. S. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ. 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Linacre, J. M. DIF - DPF - DTF - bias - interactions concepts, < (2023). https://www.winsteps.com/winman/difconcepts.htm

  51. Mokkink, L. B. et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 10 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22 (2010).

  52. Hayes, A. F. & Coutts, J. J. Use Omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods Measures. 14, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Çorbacıoğlu, Ş., Aksel, G. & K. & Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 23, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fluss, R., Faraggi, D. & Reiser, B. Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biometrical Journal: J. Math. Methods Biosci. 47, 458–472 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence For Nursing Practice, 9th EditionWolters Kluwer,. (2018).

  56. Chen, W. H. et al. Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual. Life Research: Int. J. Qual. Life Aspects Treat. Care Rehabilitation. 23, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0487-5 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns. Psychol. 34, 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. & Babin, B. J. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global PerspectivePearson Education,. (2010).

  59. Ozakinci, G., Swash, B., Humphris, G., Rogers, S. N. & Hulbert-Williams, N. J. Fear of cancer recurrence in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients: an investigation of the clinical encounter. Eur. J. Cancer Care. 27 https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12785 (2018).

  60. Liu, J. J., Butow, P. & Beith, J. Systematic review of interventions by non-mental health specialists for managing fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors. Supportive Care Cancer: Official J. Multinational Association Supportive Care Cancer. 27, 4055–4067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04979-8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jackson, A. C., Grande, L., Higgins, M. R., Rogerson, R. O., Murphy, B. M. & M. & Psychosocial screening and assessment practice within cardiac rehabilitation: A survey of cardiac rehabilitation coordinators in Australia. Heart Lung Circ. 26, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.04.018 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. We thank the Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association for endorsement of the research project and assistance with participant recruitment, and Heart Support Australia and cardiac rehabilitation providers around Australia for participant recruitment.

Funding

This research is supported through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (S.T.C).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, Australia

    Sarah T. Clarke, Michael R. Le Grande, Barbara M. Murphy & Alun C. Jackson

  2. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Sarah T. Clarke, Michael R. Le Grande, Barbara M. Murphy, Robert Hester & Alun C. Jackson

  3. Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Republic of China

    Alun C. Jackson

Authors
  1. Sarah T. Clarke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael R. Le Grande
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara M. Murphy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Hester
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alun C. Jackson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T.C., M.R.L.G., B.M.M., R.H. and A.C.J.; methodology, S.T.C., M.R.L.G., B.M.M. and A.C.J.; data curation and analysis, S.T.C and M.R.L.G; writing—original draft preparation, S.T.C.; writing—review and editing, S.T.C., M.R.L.G., B.M.M., R.H. and A.C.J.; supervision, B.M.M., R.H. and A.C.J.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah T. Clarke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Supplementary Material 2 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, S.T., Le Grande, M.R., Murphy, B.M. et al. The development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of recurrence and progression in cardiac patients. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40353-5

Download citation

  • Received: 17 November 2025

  • Accepted: 12 February 2026

  • Published: 16 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40353-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Fear of recurrence and progression
  • Cardiac rehabilitation
  • Cardiac recovery
  • Psycho-cardiology
  • Psychological measurement
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing