Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Disambiguation of multiple nutrient deficiency stresses in coconut using compositional nutrient diagnostic norms powered by machine learning algorithms
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 March 2026

Disambiguation of multiple nutrient deficiency stresses in coconut using compositional nutrient diagnostic norms powered by machine learning algorithms

  • Neeshma N.1,
  • Kiran Karthik Raj1,
  • Pratheesh P. Gopinath2,
  • Rani B1,
  • Naveen Leno1,
  • Visveswaran S1 &
  • …
  • Fathima Fairoosa K. T.1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 571 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Environmental sciences
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Crosscutting technologies to resolve several stress factors should be exploited to address multiple nutrient deficiencies in standing crops. Executing translational research is vital for the long-term sustenance of soil‒plant‒human interrelationships. Constructing compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) norms powered by machine learning algorithms as a high-fidelity standard to disambiguate multiple nutrient deficiency stresses was the objective of the research. Compositional nutrient diagnosis norms can be used as the diagnostic standard to disambiguate multiple nutrient deficiencies in West Coast Tall (WCT) variety of coconut. CND technique was adopted to abridge the complicated task of disambiguating multiple nutrient deficiencies and their interconnection with biotic stresses. The data from 120 coconut fields were integrated into a comprehensive database to devise diagnostic standards. Nutrient indices derived from independent samples identified Mg as the primary limiting nutrient, followed by K, while deficiencies of P, S, B, and Zn occurred in a subset of palms. The CND approach provides a decisive diagnostic framework by resolving the ambiguity associated with multiple, co-occurring nutrient stresses, enabling simultaneous identification of the most critical limiting nutrient in standing crops and hierarchical ranking of nutrient constraints according to the magnitude of relative imbalance. The CND norms could serve as a valuable diagnostic tool to reconcile multiple deficiencies in coconut, which may help in developing nutrient management plans. It has the capacity to address various nutrient deficiencies in coconuts and has the relative advantage of operating a small, robust, and compact database to facilitate an inclusive approach to detect nutrient disproportions.

Data availability

The dataset used for the research can be accessed in the cloud-based Mendeley Data repository. Link to access: https://data.mendeley.com/preview/bwjh84dnk4 (https://doi.org/10.17632/bwjh84dnk4.1)90.

References

  1. Samarasinghe, C. R. K. et al. Genotypic selection approach made successful advancement in developing drought tolerance in perennial tree crop coconut. Sci. Hortic. 287, 110220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110220 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. CDB [Coconut Development Board]. Area, Production and Productivity Statistics 2023–24. https://coconutboard.gov.in/Statistics.aspx (2024).

  3. Xu, X. et al. Machine learning algorithms realized soil stoichiometry prediction and its driver identification in intensive agroecosystems across a north-south transect of eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 906, 167488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167488 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khaledian, Y. & Miller, B. A. Selecting appropriate machine learning methods for digital soil mapping. Appl. Math. Model. 81, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.12.016 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sugianto, H. et al. First things first: Widespread nutrient deficiencies limit yields in smallholder oil palm fields. Agric. Syst. 210, 103709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103709 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raj, K. K., Pandey, R. N., Singh, B. & Talukdar, A. 14C labeling as a reliable technique to screen soybean genotypes (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) for iron deficiency tolerance. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 322, 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06708-1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raj, K. K., Pandey, R. N., Singh, B., Meena, M. C. & Talukdar, A. Mobilization of iron from calcareous vertisol to minimize iron deficiency chlorosis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 67(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2019.00038.0 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parent, L. E. & Dafir, M. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.117.2.239 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Lima Neto, A. J., Natale, W., Rozane, D. E., de Deus, J. A. L. & Rodrigues Filho, V. A. Establishment of DRIS and CND standards for fertigated ‘Prata’ banana in the Northeast, Brazil. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22(1), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00687-7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis 219–221 (Prentice Hall of India Ltd., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walkley, A. J. & Black, I. A. Estimation of soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 31, 29–38 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain, F. & Malik, K. A. Evaluation of alkaline permanganate method and its modification as an index of soil nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 84, 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143191 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, I. T. Determining total, organic and available forms of phosphate in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39–45 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hesse, P. R. A Text Book of Soil Analysis 520 (John Murray Publishers Ltd., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Massoumi, A. & Cornfield, A. H. A rapid method for determining sulphate in water extracts of soils. Analyst 88(1045), 321–322 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haddad, K. S. & Evans, J. C. Assessment of chemical methods for extracting zinc, manganese, copper, and iron from New South Wales soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 24(1–2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629309368779 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta, U. C. A simplified method for determining hot-water soluble boron in podzol soils. Soil Sci. 103(6), 424–428 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chesnin, L. & Yien, C. H. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 15, 149–151 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roig, A., Lax, A., Cegarra, J., Costa, P. & Hernandez, M. T. Cation exchange capacity as a parameter for measuring the humification degree of manures. Soil Sci. 146(5), 311–316 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khiari, L., Parent, L. E. & Tremblay, N. Selecting the high‐yield subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agron. J. 93(4), 802–808. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.934802x (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gopinath, P.P., Prasad, R., Joseph, B. & Adarsh, V, S. GRAPES: General Rshiny Based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics. http://www.kaugrapes.com/home.version 1.1.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4923220 (2021).

  22. Bendaly Labaied, M., Serra, A. P. & Ben Mimoun, M. Establishment of nutrients optimal range for nutritional diagnosis of mandarins based on DRIS and CND methods. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 49(20), 2557–2570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1526944 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rashid, M. et al. Carbon-based slow-release fertilizers for efficient nutrient management: Synthesis, applications, and future research needs. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 21, 1144–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00429-9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woittiez, L. S., Slingerland, M., Rafik, R. & Giller, K. E. Nutritional imbalance in smallholder oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 111(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9919-5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pal, D. K., Wani, S. P., Sahrawat, K. L. & Srivastava, P. Red ferruginous soils of tropical Indian environments: A review of the pedogenic processes and its implications for edaphology. CATENA 121, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.023 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mangalassery, S., Kalaivanan, D. & Philip, P. S. Effect of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil aggregation and biochemical characteristics in a weathered tropical soil. Soil Tillage Res. 187, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.12.008 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pandey, V. Acid Soils and Their Management: A review. Department of Soil Science, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India, 65–83 (2020).

  28. Mathew, J. et al. Effectiveness of site-specific management practices on the amelioration of soil acidity in the coconut growing entisol and ultisol of humid tropics. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22, 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00715-6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alhaji, M. M. et al. Effect of mineralogy on physico-chemical and some geotechnical properties of soils developed over granite, schist, and migmatite gneiss: A case study of Minna, Central Nigeria. Arab. J. Geosci. 14(22), 2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08689-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. López, J. E. & Saldarriaga, J. F. Surface coapplication of dolomitic lime with either biochar or compost changes the fractionation of Cd in the soil and its uptake by cacao seedlings. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 4926–4936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01469-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Šimanský, V., Juriga, M., Jonczak, J., Uzarowicz, Ł & Stępień, W. How relationships between soil organic matter parameters and soil structure characteristics are affected by the long-term fertilization of a sandy soil. Geoderma 342, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.020 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meena, A. K. et al. Comparing the organic carbon fractions in composts of agricultural wastes at different temperatures and stages. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01477-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Swarnam, T. P., Velmurugan, A., Pandey, S. K. & Roy, S. D. Enhancing nutrient recovery and compost maturity of coconut husk by vermicomposting technology. Bioresour. Technol. 207, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.046 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chandrakala, M., Ks, A. K. & Sujatha, K. Soil heterogeneity: A comparative assessment of soils from two different AESR, southern India. Ann. Plant Soil Res. 24(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2021.10119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hameed Khan, H. & Krishnakumar, V. Soil productivity and nutrition. In The Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera L.) - Research and Development Perspectives 323–442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2754-4_8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosolem, C. A. & Steiner, F. Effects of soil texture and rates of K input on potassium balance in tropical soil. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 68(5), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12460 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chukwu, E. D., Udoh, B. T., Afangide, A. I. & Osisi, A. F. Evaluation of soil quality under oil palm cultivation in a coastal plain sands area of Akwa Ibom State Nigeria. Soil Secur. 10, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100087 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meetei, T. T., Devi, Y. B. & Chanu, T. T. Ion exchange: The most important chemical reaction on earth after photosynthesis. Int. Res. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 6, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.9734/irjpac/2020/v21i630174 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shanmugam, K, S. Sulphur nutrition of coconut. Indian Coconut J. 22–28. (2016).

  40. Emeh, C., Igwe, O. & Onwo, E. S. Potential effect of environmental pollution on the degree of dissolution of iron and aluminum oxides in lateritic soils. Environ. Earth Sci. 78(8), 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8259-3 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dhaliwal, S. S., Naresh, R. K., Mandal, A., Singh, R. & Dhaliwal, M. K. Dynamics and transformations of micronutrients in agricultural soils as influenced by organic matter build-up: A review. Environ. Sustain. 1, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shukla, A. K. et al. Assessing multimicronutrients deficiency in agricultural soils of India. Sustainability 13(16), 9136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169136 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kumar, D. et al. Integrated nutrient management in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): An assessment of soil chemical and biological parameters under subtropical humid climate. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22(2), 2695–2706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00837-5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Singh, M. V. Micronutrient deficiencies in crops and soils in India. In Micronutrient Deficiencies in Global Crop Production 93–125 (Springer Netherlands, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6860-7_4.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhat, R. & Sujatha, S. Soil fertility status and disorders in arecanut (Areca catechu L.) grown on clay and laterite soils of India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 45(12), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2014.907910 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ismail, K., Ismail, A. A. & Husin, M. A. Influence of integrated nutrient management on yield of coconut (cocos nucifera) on sandy soils. Asian J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 6(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.38177/ajast.2022.6106 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. de Mello Prado, R. & Rozane, D. E. Leaf analysis as diagnostic tool for balanced fertilization in tropical fruits. In Fruit Crops 131–143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00011-3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Magat, S. S. Coconut leaf nutrient levels of bearing dwarf varieties and physiological critical and adequacy levels in crop nutrition management. Cord 19(02), 34. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v19i02.371 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gondek, M., Weindorf, D. C., Thiel, C. & Kleinheinz, G. Soluble salts in compost and their effects on soil and plants: A review. Compost Sci. Util. 28(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2020.1772906 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nirukshan, G. S., Ranasinghe, S. & Sleutel, S. The effect of biochar on mycorrhizal fungi mediated nutrient uptake by coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) seedlings grown on a Sandy Regosol. Biochar 4(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00192-9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xie, K., Cakmak, I., Wang, S., Zhang, F. & Guo, S. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between potassium and magnesium in higher plants. Crop J. 9(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.10.005 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fernando, W.G.A.P., Ambagala, I., Uduman, S.S., KAC, H.F. & Sandaruwan, M.K.F. Boron status of adult coconut palm under different fertilizer source combinations: A case study. In 10th YSF Symposium, 88 (2022).

  53. Nair, P.R. Intensive multiple cropping with coconuts in India. Principles, programmes and prospects. Verlag Paul Parey. 147 (1979).

  54. Foster, H.L. & Prabowo, N.E. Partition and transfer of nutrients in the reserve tissues and leaves of oil palm. In: Workshop on Nutrient Needs in Oil Palm, 17–18. (IPNI, 2006).

  55. Wahid, P. A., Kamala Devi, C. B. & Pillai, N. G. Inter-relationships among root CEC, yield and mono-and divalent cations in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Plant Soil 40, 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010517 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bandyopadhyay, A., Ghosh, D. K., Biswas, B., Parameswarappa, M. H. & Timsina, J. Fertigation effects on productivity, and soil and plant nutrition of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 19(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2018.1512439 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Monzon, J. P. et al. Agronomy explains large yield gaps in smallholder oil palm fields. Agric Syst. 210, 103689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103689 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Goh, K.J. & Po, S.B. Fertilizer recommendation systems for oil palm: estimating the fertilizer rates. In: Proceedings of MOSTA Best Practices Workshops-Agronomy and Crop Management, 1–37 (Malaysian Oil Scientists’ and Technologists’ Association, 2005).

  59. Mat, K. et al. Coconut palm: Food, feed, and nutraceutical properties. Animals 12(16), 2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162107 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lins, P. M. P., Viegas, I. D. J. M. & Ferreira, E. V. D. O. Nutrition and production of coconut palm cultivated with mineral fertilization in the state of Pará. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 43, e-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452021113 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ohler, J.G. Modern coconut management: palm cultivation and products. Londres: Intermediate Technology Publications. 458 (Food and Agriculture Organization, 1999).

  62. Rai, S., Singh, P. K., Mankotia, S., Swain, J. & Satbhai, S. B. Iron homeostasis in plants and its crosstalk with copper, zinc, and manganese. Plant Stress 1, 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2021.100008 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Almendros, P., González, D., Fernández, M. D., García-Gomez, C. & Obrador, A. Both Zn biofortification and nutrient distribution pattern in cherry tomato plants are influenced by the application of ZnO nanofertilizer. Heliyon 8(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09130 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Anjaneyulu, K., Raghupathi, H. B. & Chandraprakash, M. K. Compositional nutrient diagnosis norms (CND) for guava (Psidium guajava L.). J. Hortic. Sci. 3(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v3i2.573 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, R. W. Fertilizer responses by coconuts (Cocos nucifera) on two contrasting Jamaican soils. Exp. Agric. 5(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447970000435X (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Salgado, M. L. M. Notes on manuring of coconut palms. Coconut Res. Sch. Leaflet 12, 10 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mahboob, W., Yang, G. & Irfan, M. Crop nitrogen (N) utilization mechanism and strategies to improve N use efficiency. Acta Physiol. Plant. 45(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03527-6 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jeganathan, M. Studies on potassium-magnesium interaction in coconut (Cocos nucifera). In Plant Nutrition—Physiology and Applications: Proceedings of the 11th International Plant Nutrition Colloquium, 30 July–4 August 1989, Wageningen, 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0585-6_103 (The Springer Netherlands, 1990).

  69. Roihan, A. R. Effect of natural growth regulatory substance (PGR) and differences of planting media on chlorophyll content number of vegetables tomatoes and area of vegetables stomates microgreens broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.). Int. J. Appl. Biol. 5(2), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.20956/ijab.v5i2.14817 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gerendás, J. & Führs, H. The significance of magnesium for crop quality. Plant Soil 368, 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1555-2 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. de Mello Prado, R. Mineral Nutrition of Tropical Plants 1 (Springer, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71262-4_9.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Corley, R. Physiological Aspects of Nutrition. (Accessed 13 November 2023) (Elsevier Scientific Publishing, 1982).

  73. Bhat, R., Sujatha, S. & Jose, C. T. Role of nutrient imbalance on yellow leaf disease in smallholder arecanut systems on a laterite soil in India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 47(15), 1738–1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1206915 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Xu, X. et al. Effects of potassium levels on plant growth, accumulation and distribution of carbon, and nitrate metabolism in apple dwarf rootstock seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00904 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lu, L. et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal key metabolic pathways in response to potassium deficiency in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1112264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1112264 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rafflegeau, S., Michel-Dounias, I., Tailliez, B., Ndigui, B. & Papy, F. Unexpected N and K nutrition diagnosis in oil palm smallholdings using references of high-yielding industrial plantations. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30, 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010019 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Woittiez, L. S. et al. Fertilizer application practices and nutrient deficiencies in smallholder oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Exp. Agric. 55(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000182 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bhadiyatar, A. A., Patel, J. M., Patel, P. M. & Malav, J. K. Effect of potassium and sulphur on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by summer groundnut in loamy sand. Pharma Innovation J. 11(2), 2698–2703 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Mathew, J. et al. Standardization of critical boron level in soil and leaves of coconut palms grown in a tropical entisol. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 18(2), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162018005001203 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Crisostomo, S. D., Cruz, C. D. D., Quilloy, R. B. & Reano, C. E. Narrowing the yield gap of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) through integrated nutrient management in the Philippines: an on-farm experiment approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1235(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1235/1/012008 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nanditha, R. J. & Ravi, C. S. Breeding for biotic and abiotic stresses in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). e ISSN 3(7), 48–54 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ramjegathesh, R. et al. Root (wilt) disease of coconut palms in South Asia–an overview. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 45(20), 2485–2493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2012.729772 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Subramanian P., Thamban C., Josephrajkumar A., Vinayaka Hegde, Hebbar K.B., Ravi Bhat & Niral V. Coconut Development Board. 62 (CPCRI Publication, 2020).

  84. Mathew, J. et al. A comparative assessment of nutrient partitioning in healthy and root (wilt) disease affected coconut palms grown in an entisol of humid tropical Kerala. Trees 35(2), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02064-w (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Lawson-Balagbo, L. M., Gondim, J. M. G. C., De Moraes, G. J., Hanna, R. & Schausberger, P. Refuge use by the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis: Fine scale distribution and association with other mites under the perianth. Biol. Control 43(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.010 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Karn, K. K. L. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the classification task. Patan Prospective J. 4(2), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.3126/ppj.v4i2.79148 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Arifuzzaman, M., Hasan, M. R., Toma, T. J., Hassan, S. B. & Paul, A. K. An advanced decision tree-based deep neural network in nonlinear data classification. Technologies 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11010024 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Raj, K. K. et al. Response of soybean genotypes to iron limiting stress in calcareous vertisol under ambient and elevated CO2 and temperature conditions. J. Environ. Biol. 42(2), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/42/2/MRN-1226 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Raj, K. K. et al. Evidences for the use of 14C content in the root exudates as a novel application of radiocarbon labelling for screening iron deficiency tolerance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) genotypes. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 326, 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07284-5 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Neeshma, N., Raj, K. K. Data set of developing cnd norms for coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in Southern Laterites of Kerala, Mendeley Data, V1. https://doi.org/10.17632/bwjh84dnk4.1 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the technical support provided by the “Geospatial Mapping Facility for Soil Resource Monitoring and Management” of the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Vellayani. We extend heartfelt gratitude to the farmers who provided samples during the survey, as well as the Agricultural Officers of various Krishi Bhavans for maintaining liaison with the contact farmers. Moreover, we express deepest gratitude to Mr. Jothish Kumar C for his unwavering support in completing this work. Furthermore, we extend sincere gratitude to Mr. Ajay Prakash and Ms. Ashna Anna Shibu for their commendable contribution to the successful accomplishment of the work.

Funding

The technical and infrastructure facilities provided by Kerala Agricultural University are acknowledged. Financial grant-in-aid support was not received for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, Thiruvananthapuram, India

    Neeshma N., Kiran Karthik Raj, Rani B, Naveen Leno, Visveswaran S & Fathima Fairoosa K. T.

  2. Department of Agricultural Statistics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, Thiruvananthapuram, India

    Pratheesh P. Gopinath

Authors
  1. Neeshma N.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kiran Karthik Raj
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pratheesh P. Gopinath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rani B
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naveen Leno
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Visveswaran S
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fathima Fairoosa K. T.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Field survey, sample collection, data gathering, analysis, and initial draft of the manuscript were performed by Neeshma N. Dr. Kiran Karthik Raj played a key role in guiding the conception, design, execution and documentation of the study. Dr. Pratheesh P Gopinath conducted rigorous statistical analysis. Critical suggestions and revisions were made by Dr. Rani. B, Dr. Naveen Leno, Dr. Visveswaran S and Fathima Fairoosa K. T. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiran Karthik Raj.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Supplementary Material 2 (download PDF )

Supplementary Material 3 (download PDF )

Supplementary Material 4 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

N., N., Raj, K.K., Gopinath, P.P. et al. Disambiguation of multiple nutrient deficiency stresses in coconut using compositional nutrient diagnostic norms powered by machine learning algorithms. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40501-x

Download citation

  • Received: 27 August 2024

  • Accepted: 13 February 2026

  • Published: 16 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40501-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • CND norms
  • Coconut
  • Laterites
  • Nutrient imbalance
  • Diagnosis
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing