Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Protein trafficking and synaptic demand configure complex and dynamic synaptome architectures of individual neurons
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 March 2026

Protein trafficking and synaptic demand configure complex and dynamic synaptome architectures of individual neurons

  • Oksana Sorokina1,
  • Edita Bulovaite2,3,
  • Anatoly Sorokin4,
  • Seth G. N. Grant2,3,5,6 &
  • …
  • J. Douglas Armstrong1,6,7 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 561 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biophysics
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Excitatory synapses are the most abundant synapse type in the brain. Being essential for behaviour and implicated in hundreds of brain disorders, these synapses exhibit striking structural and functional diversity. Synaptome mapping at single-synapse resolution reveals that synaptic protein diversity is spatially organised along the dendritic tree of individual neurons and varies with age and cell type. However, the cell biological mechanisms underlying the generation of these complex spatial synaptic patterns remain poorly understood. Potential mechanisms include somatic and dendritic protein synthesis, protein trafficking, and local regulatory mechanisms such as activity-dependent degradation. Here we developed computational models to test how combinations of these processes account for empirical synaptome data. We found that a combination of molecular transport mechanisms and local synaptic demand for proteins was sufficient to explain very complex profiles of synaptic protein distributions observed in young, mature and old mice and in different cell types. Our findings suggest the highly complex and dynamic synaptome architecture of the brain is an emergent property of a minimal set of cell biological processes. Our model sets the stage for simulations of brain tissue incorporating molecularly diverse neuronal and synaptic types in a synaptome and connectome architecture.

Data availability

All research code is available on a GitHub repository (https://digitalresearchservices.ed.ac.uk/resources/eddie).

References

  1. Cajal, D. S. R. Y. Nueva concepta de la histologia de los centros nervosos. Annals of Surgery 18 122 (1893).

  2. Bayes, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2719 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank, R. A. W. et al. NMDA receptors are selectively partitioned into complexes and supercomplexes during synapse maturation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11264. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11264 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sorokina, O., Dominic, D., Bayés, À., Armstrong, J. D. & Grant, S. G. N. Synaptopathydb: a resource for studying the genetic and synaptic basis of nervous system disorders. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.27.661932 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayes, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2719 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, F. et al. Architecture of the mouse brain synaptome. Neuron 99, 781-799.e710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.007 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cizeron, M. et al. A brainwide atlas of synapses across the mouse life span. Science 369, 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3163 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Distler, U. et al. Proteomic analysis of brain region and sex-specific synaptic protein expression in the adult mouse brain. Cells https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020313 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bulovaite, E. et al. A brain atlas of synapse protein lifetime across the mouse lifespan. Neuron 110, 4057-4073.e4058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, K. et al. Sequential replacement of PSD95 subunits in postsynaptic supercomplexes is slowest in the cortex. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99303 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagle, S., Kraynyukova, N., Hafner, A. S. & Tchumatchenko, T. Computational insights into mRNA and protein dynamics underlying synaptic plasticity rules. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 125, 103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2023.103846 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle, M. & Kiebler, M. A. Mechanisms of dendritic mRNA transport and its role in synaptic tagging. EMBO J. 30, 3540–3552. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.278 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, A. H., O’Donnell, C., Sejnowski, T. J. & O’Leary, T. Dendritic trafficking faces physiologically critical speed-precision tradeoffs. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20556 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McDougal, R. A., Hines, M. L. & Lytton, W. W. Reaction-diffusion in the NEURON simulator. Front. Neuroinform. 7, 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00028 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Migliore, M. & Migliore, R. Know your current I(h): Interaction with a shunting current explains the puzzling effects of its pharmacological or pathological modulations. PLoS One 7, e36867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036867 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, L. D. et al. Metabolic turnover of synaptic proteins: Kinetics, interdependencies and implications for synaptic maintenance. PLoS One 8, e63191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063191 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Revest, J. M. et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors. Mol. Psychiatr. 14, 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.15 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, T. P., Song, Y., MacGillavry, H. D., Blanpied, T. A. & Raghavachari, S. Protein crowding within the postsynaptic density can impede the escape of membrane proteins. J. Neurosci. 36, 4276–4295. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3154-15.2016 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bressloff, P. C. & Earnshaw, B. A. Diffusion-trapping model of receptor trafficking in dendrites. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 75, 041915. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041915 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sartori, F. et al. Statistical laws of protein motion in neuronal dendritic trees. Cell Rep. 33, 108391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108391 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Welte, M. A. Bidirectional transport along microtubules. Curr. Biol. 14, R525-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.045 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hirokawa, N. & Takemura, R. Molecular motors and mechanisms of directional transport in neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1624 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newby, J. M. & Bressloff, P. C. Quasi-steady state reduction of molecular motor-based models of directed intermittent search. Bull. Math. Biol. 72, 1840–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9513-8 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kiebler, M. A. & Bauer, K. E. RNA granules in flux: dynamics to balance physiology and pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00859-1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Setou, M., Nakagawa, T., Seog, D. H. & Hirokawa, N. Kinesin superfamily motor protein KIF17 and mLin-10 in NMDA receptor-containing vesicle transport. Science 288, 1796–1802. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5472.1796 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yoo, K.-S. et al. Postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) is transported by KIF5 to dendritic regions. Mol. Brain 12, 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-019-0520-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reig-Viader, R. et al. Synaptic proteome diversity is shaped by the levels of glutamate receptors and their regulatory proteins. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.04.588090 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, X. A., Rizzo, V. & Puthanveettil, S. V. Pathologies of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases. Transl. Neurosci. 3, 355–372. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13380-012-0044-7 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Louros, S. R. & Osterweil, E. K. Perturbed proteostasis in autism spectrum disorders. J. Neurochem. 139, 1081–1092 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bulovaite, E. et al. A brain atlas of synapse protein lifetime across the mouse lifespan. Neuron https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu, F. et al. Architecture of the mouse brain synaptome. Neuron 99, 781-799 e710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.007 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Adams, R. et al. SBSI: An extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology. Bioinformatics 29, 664–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt023 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank D. Maizels for artwork, and M. Kiebler for comments on the manuscript. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Funding

OS, JDA and SGNG were supported by BBSRC Grant number BB/X009343/1, ‘Development of a computational model of synaptome architecture’. EB and SGNG were supported by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (885069 SYNAPTOME).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Informatics, Institute for Machine Learning, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK

    Oksana Sorokina & J. Douglas Armstrong

  2. Genes to Cognition Programme, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK

    Edita Bulovaite & Seth G. N. Grant

  3. Institute of Neuroscience and Cardiovascular Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK

    Edita Bulovaite & Seth G. N. Grant

  4. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, 904-0497, Japan

    Anatoly Sorokin

  5. Euan MacDonald Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK

    Seth G. N. Grant

  6. Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (SIDB), Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK

    Seth G. N. Grant & J. Douglas Armstrong

  7. Computational Biomedicine Institute (IAS-5 / INM-9), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, 52425, Germany

    J. Douglas Armstrong

Authors
  1. Oksana Sorokina
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edita Bulovaite
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anatoly Sorokin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seth G. N. Grant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Douglas Armstrong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OS led the model development; EB led bioimage analysis; AS helped with scientific coding; SGNG and JDA worked on conceptual development and project management. All authors contributed to the writing and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Douglas Armstrong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sorokina, O., Bulovaite, E., Sorokin, A. et al. Protein trafficking and synaptic demand configure complex and dynamic synaptome architectures of individual neurons. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40513-7

Download citation

  • Received: 24 September 2025

  • Accepted: 13 February 2026

  • Published: 02 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40513-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Synapse
  • Synaptome
  • Dendrite
  • Neuron
  • Simulation
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing