Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Functional training versus conventional physiotherapy for postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a randomized controlled trial
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 March 2026

Functional training versus conventional physiotherapy for postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a randomized controlled trial

  • Kuannv Yang1,2,
  • Jinna Hu1,2,
  • Jingyi Wang1,2,
  • Xihui Wang1,2,
  • Xiaoqi Yu1,2 &
  • …
  • Yangzheng Li1,2,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1405 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of functional training in alleviating postpartum pelvic girdle pain (PGP). A total of 40 patients diagnosed with postpartum PGP who received outpatient rehabilitation treatment in our department between July 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group (n = 20 in each group) using a random number table. The control group received routine pelvic floor physical therapy, while the experimental group received additional functional training based on the standard treatment protocol. The two groups were compared in terms of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) scores, surface electromyographic (sEMG) values of the pelvic floor muscles based on the Glazer protocol—specifically the mean and root mean square (RMS) values across five phases (pre-resting, phasic contraction, tonic contraction, endurance contraction, post-resting), and the angle difference in the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test. All 40 patients completed the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, including age, height, weight, BMI, parity, and neonatal birth weight (P > 0.05). The experimental group showed a significant decrease in the pre-resting and post-resting phases and a substantial increase in phasic contraction, tonic contraction, or endurance contraction phases of the Glazer’s sEMG assessment (P < 0.001). In contrast, the control group showed a significant decrease only in the pre-resting and post-resting phases (P < 0.001), with no substantial increase in phasic contraction, tonic contraction, or endurance contraction phases (P > 0.05). Before treatment, the control group had significantly higher values in phasic contraction, tonic contraction, and endurance contraction phases compared to the experimental group; however, no significant differences were found between groups after treatment (P > 0.05). The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in PGQ, VAS, and ASLR angle after treatment (P < 0.001), with greater efficacy than the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in PGQ and VAS scores prior to treatment, but the experimental group performed better after treatment (P < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were found in ASLR angle before or after treatment (P > 0.05). Functional training can significantly improve postpartum pelvic girdle pain and enhance pelvic floor muscle function.

Similar content being viewed by others

Exploring the application of an integrated health behavior change-based nursing model in pelvic floor muscle self-training

Article Open access 24 December 2025

Pelvic floor muscle exercise practice and its determinants among postpartum women in Central Ethiopia: as a strategy for preventing pelvic floor disorders

Article Open access 26 November 2025

Aging-related changes in neuromuscular control strategies and their influence on postural stability

Article Open access 17 August 2025

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Bergström, C., Persson, M. & Mogren, I. Pregnancy-related low back pain and pelvic girdle pain approximately 14 months after pregnancy – pain status, self-rated health and family situation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 14, 48 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uddin, J., Shumi, S. S. & Flatt, J. D. Prevalence and predictors of musculoskeletal pain among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. Healthcare 13, 2524 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elden, H., Gutke, A., Kjellby-Wendt, G., Fagevik-Olsen, M. & Ostgaard, H.-C. Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: A longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 17, 276 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoseph, E. T. et al. Pregnancy-related spinal biomechanics: A review of low back pain and degenerative spine disease. Bioengineering 12, 858 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olsson, C. & Nilsson-Wikmar, L. Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 83, 351–357 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quaghebeur, J., Petros, P., Wyndaele, J.-J. & De Wachter, S. Pelvic-floor function, dysfunction, and treatment. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 265, 143–149 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceprnja, D., Chipchase, L., Liamputtong, P. & Gupta, A. This is hard to cope with”: The lived experience and coping strategies adopted amongst Australian women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 96 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arab, A. M., Shanbehzadeh, S., Rasouli, O., Amiri, M. & Ehsani, F. Automatic activity of deep and superficial abdominal muscles during stable and unstable sitting positions in individuals with chronic low back pain. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 22, 627–631 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Newman, D. P. & Soto, A. T. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: Diagnosis and treatment. Am. Fam. Physician 105, 239–245 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leung, C. J., Tao, F., Senter, C., Ramirez, F. D. & Wong, S. E. Pregnancy-related hip and pelvis musculoskeletal conditions, risk factors, and prevention. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 18, 585–598 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson, C. A. et al. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine 27, 399–405 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mens, J. M. A. & Pool-Goudzwaard, A. The transverse abdominal muscle is excessively active during active straight leg raising in pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: An observational study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 18, 372 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen, L. K., Backhausen, M., Hegaard, H. K. & Juhl, M. Physical exercise and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A nested case–control study within the danish national birth cohort. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 6, 198–203 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davenport, M. H. et al. Exercise for the prevention and treatment of low back, pelvic girdle and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 53, 90–98 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aldabe, D. et al. Management of women with pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: An international delphi study. Physiotherapy 115, 66–84 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. ElDeeb, A. M., Abd-Ghafar, K. S., Ayad, W. A. & Sabbour, A. A. Effect of segmental stabilizing exercises augmented by pelvic floor muscles training on women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: A randomized controlled trial. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 32, 693–700 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Majchrzycki, M. et al. Application of osteopathic manipulative technique in the treatment of back pain during pregnancy. Ginekol. Pol. 86, 224–228 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Teymuri, Z., Hosseinifar, M. & Sirousi, M. The effect of stabilization exercises on pain, disability, and pelvic floor muscle function in postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97, 885–891 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Puri, S. N., Fating, T. & Dhage, P. P. The impact of functional stability exercises on alleviating pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A review. Cureus 15, e48769 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ehsani, F., Sahebi, N., Shanbehzadeh, S., Arab, A. M. & ShahAli, S. Stabilization exercise affects function of transverse abdominis and pelvic floor muscles in women with postpartum lumbo-pelvic pain: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 31, 197–204 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fetanat, S., ShahAli, S., Dadgoo, M., Noorizadeh Dehkordi, S. & Naghian Fesharaki, M. Effect of motor control training and breathing exercises on pain, disability and core muscle activity in women with postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A study protocol for randomised controlled trial study. BMJ Open 15, e093691 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ostgaard, H. C., Zetherström, G., Roos-Hansson, E. & Svanberg, B. Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine 19, 894–900 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cong, H. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 470 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glazer, H. I., Romanzi, L. J. & Polaneczky, M. Pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography. Reliability and clinical predictive validity.. J. Reprod. Med. 44(9), 779–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829909075592 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fagevik Olsén, M. et al. Validation of self-administered tests for screening for chronic pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 22, 237 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vermani, E., Mittal, R. & Weeks, A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: A review. Pain Pract. : Off. J. World Inst. Pain 10, 60–71 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Addula, S. R., Khan, Z., Ramaswamy, Y. & Veeramachaneni, P. Blockchain-enabled healthcare optimization: enhancing security and decision-making using the mother optimization algorithm. 0–8.

  28. Santos, F. F. et al. Prevention of low back and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with GRADE recommendations. Physiotherapy 118, 1–11 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vesting, S., Gutke, A. & de Baets, L. Educating women to prevent and treat low back and pelvic girdle pain during and after pregnancy: A systematized narrative review. Ann. Med. 57, 2476046 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. O’Sullivan, P. B. & Beales, D. J. Diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain disorders, part 2: Illustration of the utility of a classification system via case studies. Man. Ther. 12, e1-12 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Okanishi, N., Kito, N., Akiyama, M. & Yamamoto, M. Spinal curvature and characteristics of postural change in pregnant women. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 91, 856–861 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ribeiro Lira, S. O., de Soares Sousa, V. P. & Viana, E. Therapeutic exercise versus other modalities for prevention and treatment of low back, pelvic girdle, and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: A review protocol. PLoS One 17, e0274471 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heo, M.-Y., Kim, K., Hur, B.-Y. & Nam, C.-W. The effect of lumbar stabilization exercises and thoracic mobilization and exercises on chronic low back pain patients. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27, 3843–3846 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hodges, P. W., Sapsford, R. & Pengel, L. H. M. Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol. Urodyn. 26, 362–371 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oleksy, Ł et al. The reliability of pelvic floor muscle bioelectrical activity (sEMG) assessment using a multi-activity measurement protocol in young women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 765 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cai, S. et al. Effects of functional magnetic stimulation combined with pelvic floor muscle training on cerebral hemodynamics and brain functional connectivity in women with postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Womens Health 17, 4631–4647 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shiri, R., Coggon, D. & Falah-Hassani, K. Exercise for the prevention of low back and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Pain (lond Engl) 22, 19–27 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Son, M. S. et al. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization on diaphragm movement, postural control, balance and gait performance in cerebral palsy. Neurorehabilitation 41, 739–746 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moher, D. et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int. J. Surg. (Lond Engl). 10, 28–55 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Copay, A. G., Subach, B. R., Glassman, S. D., Polly, D. W. & Schuler, T. C. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 7, 541–546 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kelly, A. M. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg. Med. J. 18, 205–207 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China

    Kuannv Yang, Jinna Hu, Jingyi Wang, Xihui Wang, Xiaoqi Yu & Yangzheng Li

  2. Pelvic Floor Disease Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Center of SRRSH, Hangzhou, China

    Kuannv Yang, Jinna Hu, Jingyi Wang, Xihui Wang, Xiaoqi Yu & Yangzheng Li

  3. Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

    Yangzheng Li

Authors
  1. Kuannv Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinna Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jingyi Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xihui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoqi Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yangzheng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y-K.N. recruited subjects; revised the protocol; data curation; performed the analysis; and wrote (original draft) the manuscript. H.-J.N. recruited subjects; provided experimental stimulus materials; wrote (review and editing) the manuscript. W.-X.H. contributed to data analysis. W.J.Y. wrote (review and editing) the manuscript. L.-Y.Z. supervised the entire study, contributed to the research idea, designed the protocol, Y.-X.Q revised the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangzheng Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download ZIP )

Supplementary Material 2 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, K., Hu, J., Wang, J. et al. Functional training versus conventional physiotherapy for postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41258-z

Download citation

  • Received: 22 October 2025

  • Accepted: 18 February 2026

  • Published: 03 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41258-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Surface electromyography (sEMG)
  • Postpartum
  • Pelvic girdle pain
  • Functional training
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing