Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Experimental performance comparison of fixed and single-axis subfields in a large-scale outdoor photovoltaic power plant
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Experimental performance comparison of fixed and single-axis subfields in a large-scale outdoor photovoltaic power plant

  • Bouramdane Abderraouf1,
  • Louazene Mohammed Lakhdar1,
  • Benmir Abdelkader1,
  • Larouci Benyekhlef1,2,3,
  • Salah K. Elsayed4,
  • Abdulrahman Babqi4,
  • Daniel Limenew Meheretie5 &
  • …
  • Walid S. E. Abdellatif6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 900 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering

Abstract

This study analyzes the power production (PP) and energy yield of four 100 kW PV subfields, consisting of monocrystalline and polycrystalline technologies, with fixed and single-axis tracking systems. All subfields are installed at a 30° inclination, close to the region’s optimal angle. Actual performance data were recorded every four minutes in OUED-NECHOU, Ghardaïa, over four experimental days in 2016, each representing a different season. The results indicate that single-axis tracking subfields consistently outperformed fixed systems throughout the diurnal cycle by generating more power and enhancing overall performance. However, on May 1st, the fixed mc-Si and pc-Si subfields reached peak outputs of 95.67 kW and 84.06 kW, respectively, surpassing the motorized subfields, which recorded 88.35 kW and 83.01 kW. Conversely, on July 1st, the single-axis tracking systems achieved their highest daily energy generation, with the mc-Si subfield producing 787.94 kWh/day and the pc-Si single-axis system generating 715.17 kWh/day. Further analysis of mean power output augmentation demonstrated that single-axis tracking subfields consistently outperformed their fixed counterparts, which served as the baseline across all experimental days, with the highest gains observed in east–west tracking systems. On July 1st, the mc-Si tracking system achieved a 19.22% increase over the fixed mc-Si subfield, while the pc-Si tracking subfield exceeded its fixed counterpart by a remarkable gain of 21.44%. Moreover, tracking systems exhibited a clear advantage in maximizing solar energy capture, leading to higher energy production. Finally, the impact of weather conditions, including solar irradiance, temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity, on PV subfield power generation was experimentally analyzed.

Similar content being viewed by others

Performance evaluation of grid connected photovoltaic pilot plant in saharan climate using experimental and numerical analysis

Article Open access 12 September 2025

Analysis of effects of elevation on the power output and efficiency of ground-mounted photovoltaic modules

Article Open access 27 January 2026

Performance evaluation and degradation analysis of grid connected photovoltaic systems for energy efficient buildings in tropical climates

Article Open access 07 November 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Haddad, B., Liazid, A. & Ferreira, P. A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renew. Energy 107, 462–472 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saiah, S. B. D. & Stambouli, A. B. Prospective analysis for a long-term optimal energy mix planning in Algeria: Towards high electricity generation security in 2062. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 26–43 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huan, Z., Chuanyu, S. & Mingming, G. Progress in profitable Fe-based flow batteries for broad-scale energy storage. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 13 (2024).

  4. Stambouli, A. B., Khiat, Z., Flazi, S. & Kitamura, Y. A review on the renewable energy development in Algeria: Current perspective, energy scenario and sustainability issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 4445–4460 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma, V. & Chandel, S. S. Performance analysis of a 190 kWp grid interactive solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy 55, 476–485 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dahmoun, M. E. H. et al. Performance evaluation and analysis of grid-tied large-scale PV plant in Algeria. Energy Sustain. Dev. 61, 181–195 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ascencio-Vásquez, J., Osorio-Aravena, J. C., Brecl, K., Muñoz-Cerón, E. & Topič, M. Typical daily profiles, a novel approach for photovoltaics performance assessment: Case study on large-scale systems in Chile. Sol. Energy 225, 225–374 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bentouba, S., Bourouis, M., Zioui, N., Pirashanthan, A. & Velauthapillai, D. Performance assessment of a 20 MW photovoltaic power plant in a hot climate using real data and simulation tools. Energy Rep. 7, 7297–7314 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, S. B. S. & Sudhakar, K. Performance evaluation of 10 MW grid-connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy Rep. 1, 184–192 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Touili, S. S., Alami Merrouni, A., El Hassouani, Y. & Amrani, A. I. Performance analysis of large-scale grid-connected PV plants in the MENA region. Int. J. Eng. Res. Afr. 42, 139–148 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez-Uceda, F. J., Ramirez-Faz, J., Varo-Martinez, M. & Fernández-Ahumada, L. M. New omnidirectional sensor based on open-source software and hardware for tracking and backtracking of twin-axis solar trackers in photovoltaic plants. Sensors 21, 1–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lazaroiu, G. G. C., Longo, M., Roscia, M. & Pagano, M. Comparative analysis of fixed and sun-tracking low-power PV systems considering energy consumption. Energy Convers. Manag. 92, 143–148 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nsengiyumva, W., Chen, S., Hu, L. & Chen, X. Recent advancements and challenges in solar tracking systems (STS): A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 250–279 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, C. H., Wang, H. C. & Chang, H. Y. Dual-axis solar tracker with satellite compass and inclinometer for automatic positioning and tracking. Energy Sustain. Dev. 66, 308–318 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zaghba, L. et al. Intelligent MPPT control of stationary and dual-axis tracking grid-connected photovoltaic system. Sci. Digital Library 1, 199–205 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zaghba, L., Khennane, M., Fezzani, A., Borni, A. & Mahammed, I. H. Experimental outdoor performance evaluation of photovoltaic plant in a Sahara environment (Algerian desert). Int. J. Ambient Energy 43, 314–324 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vaziri Rad, M. A., Oopshekan, A., Rahdan, P., Kasaeian, A. & Mahian, O. A comprehensive study of techno-economic and environmental features of different solar tracking systems for residential photovoltaic installations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109923 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumba, K. et al. Solar tracking systems: Advancements, challenges and future directions: A review. Energy Rep. 12, 3566–3583 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumba, K. et al. Performance evaluation of a second-order lever single axis solar tracking system. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 12(5), 1219–1229 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ponce-Jara, M. A., Pazmino, I., Moreira-Espinoza, Á., Gunsha-Morales, A. & Rus-Casas, C. Assessment of single-axis solar tracking system efficiency in equatorial regions: A case study of Manta, Ecuador. Energies 17(16), 3946 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pendem, S. R. & Mikkili, S. Modeling, simulation and performance analysis of solar PV array configurations (series, series–parallel and honey-comb) to extract maximum power under partial shading condition. Energy Rep. 4, 274–287 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, N. M., Subathra, M. P. & Moses, J. E. On-grid solar photovoltaic system: components, design considerations, and case study. In 4th International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems, Chennai, India, 616–619 (2018).

  23. Bahanni, C., Adar, M., Boulmrharj, S., Khaidar, M. & Mabrouki, M. Analysis of weather impact on the yield of PV plants installed in two antagonistic cities in Morocco. In 5th International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries, Marrakech, Morocco, 1–6 (2020).

  24. Kawajiri, K., Oozekia, T. & Genchi, Y. Effect of temperature on PV potential in the world. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 9030–9035 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bahanni, C., Adar, M., Boulmrharj, S., Khaidar, M. & Mabrouki, M. Performance comparison and impact of weather conditions on different photovoltaic modules in two different cities. Industr. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 25, 1275–1286 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amelia, A. R. et al. Investigation of the effect of temperature on photovoltaic (PV) panel output performance. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 6, 2088–5334 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karami, E. et al. Performance analysis and comparison of different photovoltaic module technologies under different climatic conditions in Casablanca. J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl. 7, 1–6 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Malvoni, M., Kumar, N. M., Chopra, S. S. & Hatziargyriou, N. Performance and degradation assessment of large-scale grid-connected solar photovoltaic power plant in tropical semi-arid environment of India. Sol. Energy 203, 101–113 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Maghalseh, M. Experimental study to investigate the effect of dust, wind speed and temperature on the PV module performance. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 12, 123–129 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar, N. M., Gupta, R. P., Mathew, M., Jayakumar, A. & Singh, N. K. Performance, energy loss, and degradation prediction of roof-integrated crystalline solar PV system installed in Northern India. Case Stud. Thermal Eng. 13, 2019.

  31. Correa-Betanzo, C., Calleja, H. & De León-Aldaco, S. Module temperature models assessment of photovoltaic seasonal energy yield. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 27, 9–16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olukan, T. A. & Emziane, M. A comparative analysis of PV module temperature models. Energy Procedia 62, 694–703 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Balta, M., Sahin, S., Akgul, S., Kurt, U. & Ozkan, A. Investigation of effects of dust, wind and relative nutrients in solar power plants: Amasya example. J. Eng. Res. Appl. Sci. 6, 628–633 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Bashir, A., Al-Dweri, M., Al-Ghandoor, A., Hammad, B. & Al-Kouz, W. Analysis of effects of solar irradiance, cell temperature and wind speed on photovoltaic systems performance. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 10, 353–359 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ramli, M. A. et al. On the investigation of photovoltaic output power reduction due to dust accumulation and weather conditions. Renew. Energy 99, 836–844 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dawoud, M. & Lim, S. C. Performance comparison of fixed and single-axis tracker photovoltaic system in large-scale solar power plants in Malaysia. Ind. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 21, 10–17 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lagouch, A., Maouedj, R. & Benatiallah, A. A 5-MWp grid-connected photovoltaic plant’s performance analysis and challenges under Algerian Sahara conditions. Int. J. Ambient Energy https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2024.2304732 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aoun, N. Energy and exergy analysis of a 20-MW grid-connected PV plant operating under harsh climatic conditions. Clean Energy 8, 281–298 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar, N. K., Subramaniam, V. & Murugan, E. Performance analysis of large-scale grid-connected PV plants in the MENA Region. Mater. Today. Proc. 5, 1076–1081 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, R., Kumar, S., Gehlot, A. & Pachauri, R. An imperative role of sun trackers in photovoltaic technology: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 3263–3278 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qader, V., Ali, O. & Hasan, N. An experimental comparison between fixed and single-axis tracking photovoltaic solar panel performance: Zakho City as case study. Al-Rafidain Eng. J. 28, 272–279 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kabir, M. H., Jihad, M. H. A. & Chowdhury, S. Analysis of solar panel power investigation using fixed-axis, single-axis and dual-axis solar tracker. Procedia Comput. Sci. 282, 708–714 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rezk, H., Gomaa, M. R. & Mohamed, M. A. Energy performance analysis of on-grid solar photovoltaic system—a practical case study. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 9 (2019).

  44. Gomaa, M. R., Hammad, W., Al-Dhaifallah, M. & Rezk, H. Performance enhancement of grid-tied PV system through proposed design cooling techniques: An experimental study and comparative analysis. Sol. Energy 211, 1110–1127 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hashim, S. M. & Hassan, R. I. Impact of high temperature on PV productivity in hot desert climates. Green Technol. Resil. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44173-022-00009-9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. https://www.google.com/earth

  47. Kalu, C., Ezenugu, I. A. & Umoren, A. M. Comparative study of performance of three different photovoltaic technologies. Mater. Softw. Eng. 2, 19–29 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Allouhi, A. et al. Grid-connected PV systems installed on institutional buildings: Technology comparison, energy analysis and economic performance. Energy Build. 130, 188–201 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Al-Otaibi, A., Al-Qattan, A., Fairouz, F. & Al-Mulla, A. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic systems on Kuwaiti schools’ rooftop. Energy Convers. Manag. 95, 110–119 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Marion, B. & Smith, B. Photovoltaic system derived data for determining the solar resource and for modeling the performance of other photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 147, 147–357 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gougui, A., Djafour, A., Khelfaoui, N. & Boutelli, H. Empirical models validation to estimate global solar irradiance on a horizontal plane in Ouargla, Algeria. In AIP Conference Proceedings (2018).

  52. Sidibba, S. & Bah, E. Characterization and modeling of solar radiation on the ground, application to the estimate of solar potential available on the coast of Nouakchott. Mater. Dev. 4, 1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. de Brichambaut, C. P. Estimation of energy resources in France. Notebooks of the A.F.E.D.E.S, No. 1 (1975).

  54. Bayrakçı, H. C., Demircan, C. & Keçebaş, A. The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 2771–2782 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Namrata, K., Sharma, S. P. & Seksena, S. B. L. Empirical models for the estimation of global solar radiation with sunshine hours on horizontal surface for Jharkhand (India). Appl. Sol. Energy 52, 164–172 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Takilalte, A., Harrouni, S., Yaiche, M. R. & Mora-López, L. New approach to estimate 5-min global solar irradiation data on tilted planes from horizontal measurement. Renew. Energy 145, 2477–2488 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Moummi, A., Hamani, N., Moummi, N. & Mokhtari, Z. Estimation du rayonnement solaire par deux approches semi-empiriques dans le site de Biskra. In Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting on Energetical Physics, Béchar, Algeria, November 2006.

  58. El Mghouchi, Y., Chham, E., Krikiz, M. S., Ajzoul, T. & El Bouardi, A. On the prediction of the daily global solar radiation intensity on south-facing plane surfaces inclined at varying angles. Energy Convers. Manage. 120, 397–411 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bensaha, A. A., Benkouider, F. & Bekkouche, S. M. A. Estimation du rayonnement solaire en ciel clair par des modèles empiriques: Application au site de Ghardaïa (Algérie). In Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on the Apport of the Simulation in Technological Innovation, Ghardaïa, Algeria, November 2017.

  60. Hamani, N. Modélisation du flux solaire incident et de la température de sortie dans un capteur solaire à eau avec effet de concentration du rayonnement solaire incident. Doctoral dissertation, Université Mohamed Khider, Biskra, Algeria (2005).

  61. Benbouza, N., Moghalles, M. M. S., El Ayad, A. N. & Amel, B. Optimization of the solar radiation received by photovoltaic panels using solar tracking systems: Study case in south of Algeria. In Proceedings of the 5th International AEGEAN Symposium on Innovation Technologies and Engineering, Izmir, Turkey, February 2022.

  62. Boukelia, T. E., Mecibah, M. S. & Meriche, I. E. General models for estimation of the monthly mean daily diffuse solar radiation (Case study: Algeria). Energy Convers. Manage. 81, 211–219 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Despotovic, M., Nedic, V., Despotovic, D. & Cvetanovic, S. Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 56, 246–260 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Capderou, M. Atlas solaire de l’Algérie. Modèles Théoriques et Expérimentaux, Vol. 1 (Office des Publications Universitaires, Algeria, 1987).

  65. Cubukcu, M. & Gumus, H. Performance analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic plant in eastern Turkey. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 39, 100724 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pirzadi, M. & Ghadimi, A. A. Performance evaluation of first Iranian large-scale photovoltaic power plant. J. Electr. Eng. 51, 19–30 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Veerendra Kumar, D. J. et al. Performance evaluation of 1.1 MW grid-connected solar photovoltaic power plant in Louisiana. Energy 15, 3420 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bendaas, I. et al. Performance evaluation of large-scale photovoltaic power plant in Saharan climate of Algeria based on real data. Energy Sustain. Dev. 76, 101293 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jamil, I., Lucheng, H., Habib, S., Aurangzeb, M. & Ahmed, E. M. Performance ratio analysis based on energy production for large-scale solar plant. IEEE Access 10, 5715–5735 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Karami, E., Rafi, M., Ridah, A., Hartiti, B. & Thevenin, P. Analysis of measured and simulated performance data of different PV modules of silicon in Casablanca. In Second International Conference on Smart Applications and Data Analysis for Smart Sites, 27–28 February 2018.

  71. Zaghba, L., Khennane, M., Mekhilef, S., Fezzani, A. & Borni, A. Experimental outdoor performance assessment and energy efficiency of 11.28 kWp grid-tied PV systems with sun tracker installed in Saharan climate: A case study in Ghardaia, Algeria. Sol. Energy 243, 174–192 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ameur, A., Sekkat, A., Loudiyi, K. & Aggour, M. Performance evaluation of different photovoltaic technologies in the region of Ifrane, Morocco. Energy Sustain. Dev. 52, 96–103 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hafez, A. Z., Shazly, J. H. & Eteiba, M. B. Comparative evaluation of optimal energy efficiency designs for solar tracking systems. In Proceedings Third International Conference on Advances in Applied Science and Environmental Engineering, 134–141 (2015).

  74. Hussein, L. A., Ayadi, O. & Fathi, M. Performance comparison for sun-tracking mechanism photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) solar panels with fixed system PV panels in Jordan. In Proceedings 12th International Renewable Engineering Conference, Amman, Jordan, Apr. 2021 (IEEE).

  75. Elkholy, A., Fahmy, F. H., El-Ela Abou, A. A., Nafeh, A. E. S. A. & Spea, S. R. Experimental evaluation of 8 kW grid-connected photovoltaic system in Egypt. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 3, 217–229 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Dabou, R. et al. Monitoring and performance analysis of grid connected photovoltaic under different climatic conditions in south Algeria. Energy Convers. Manage. 130, 200–206 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Panagea, I. S., Tsanis, I. K. & Koutroulis, A. G. Climate change impact on photovoltaic energy output: The case of Greece. Clim. Change Fut. Sustain. 11, 85–106 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schwingshackl, C. et al. Wind effect on PV module temperature: Analysis of different techniques for an accurate estimation. Energy Proc. 40, 77–86 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kaplani, E. & Kaplanis, S. Thermal modelling and experimental assessment of the dependence of PV module temperature on wind velocity and direction, module orientation and inclination. Sol. Energy 107, 443–460 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zainuddin, H. et al. Preliminary investigations on the effect of humidity on the reception of visible solar radiation and the effect of humidity and wind speed on PV module output. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010, 55–58 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Al-Ghezi, M. K., Ahmed, R. T. & Chaichan, M. T. The influence of temperature and irradiance on performance of the photovoltaic panel in the middle of Iraq. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 11, 501–513 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Du, B., Hu, E. & Kolhe, M. Performance analysis of water cooled concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 6732–6736 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Gol, A. & Ščasný, M. Techno-economic analysis of fixed versus sun-tracking solar panels. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 12, 615–626 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Demirdelen, T., Alıcı, H., Esenboğa, B. & Güldürek, M. Performance and economic analysis of designed different solar tracking systems for Mediterranean climate. Energies 16, 4197 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ayadi, O., Rinchi, B., Al-Dahidi, S., Abdalla, M. E. B. & Al-Mahmodi, M. Techno-economic assessment of bifacial photovoltaic systems under desert climatic conditions. Sustainability 16, 6982 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

Funding

This work is funded and supported by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Taif University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Electrical Engineering (LAGE), Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, 30000, Ouargla, Algeria

    Bouramdane Abderraouf, Louazene Mohammed Lakhdar, Benmir Abdelkader & Larouci Benyekhlef

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, University Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Ouargla, Algeria

    Larouci Benyekhlef

  3. Smart Grid Development Laboratory, ESGEEO, Oran, Algeria

    Larouci Benyekhlef

  4. Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia

    Salah K. Elsayed & Abdulrahman Babqi

  5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Debre Markos University, P. BOX 269, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

    Daniel Limenew Meheretie

  6. Electrical Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Suez University, Suez, 43527, Egypt

    Walid S. E. Abdellatif

Authors
  1. Bouramdane Abderraouf
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louazene Mohammed Lakhdar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benmir Abdelkader
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Larouci Benyekhlef
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Salah K. Elsayed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Abdulrahman Babqi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Limenew Meheretie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Walid S. E. Abdellatif
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bouramdane Abderraouf, Louazene Mohammed Lakhdar, Benmir Abdelkader, Larouci Benyekhlef: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation. Salah K. Elsayed, Abdulrahman Babqi, Daniel Limenew Meheretie, Walid S. E. Abdellatif: Data curation, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Writing—Review & Editing, Project administration, Funding Acquisition.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bouramdane Abderraouf or Daniel Limenew Meheretie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abderraouf, B., Lakhdar, L.M., Abdelkader, B. et al. Experimental performance comparison of fixed and single-axis subfields in a large-scale outdoor photovoltaic power plant. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41570-8

Download citation

  • Received: 01 June 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41570-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Experimental simulation
  • Fixed PV systems
  • Optimal inclination angle
  • Photovoltaic sub-fields
  • Power production
  • Single-axis tracking systems
  • Weather conditions
  • Performance evaluation
  • Power output
  • Power gain
  • Energy yield
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing