Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Integrative mendelian randomization approaches for therapeutic target prioritisation in immune-mediated diseases
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 March 2026

Integrative mendelian randomization approaches for therapeutic target prioritisation in immune-mediated diseases

  • Maria K. Sobczyk1 &
  • Tom R. Gaunt1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1051 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Data integration
  • Data mining
  • Drug development
  • Epidemiology
  • Immunological disorders
  • Medical genetics

Abstract

Immune-mediated diseases (IMD) encompass a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders with aetiology related to immune system dysfunction, signifying a disease area with great potential for drug repurposing. In this study, we employed the genetically informed Mendelian Randomization (MR) method with two distinct exposure types: immune blood cell abundance and protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) to validate and repurpose 834 drug targets which have been investigated for IMD treatment. Utilizing two-sample MR, we first established causal relationships between major peripheral immune cell types and 14 IMD. Robust associations, particularly with eosinophils, were confirmed across diseases such as asthma, eczema, sinusitis, and rheumatoid arthritis, revealing 59 high-confidence relationships. Intragenic variants associated with causal immune cell types were then extracted to create instruments for 371 existing IMD drug targets (“intermediate trait” MR). In parallel, we leveraged four large blood plasma protein QTL datasets to obtain complementary instruments for 361 targets (“pQTL” MR). In the intermediate trait MR analysis, we identified 811 gene-IMD associations (p-value < 0.05; 137 pairs below Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), 169 of which were supported by strong colocalisation evidence (PPH4 ≥ 0.8). In the pQTL MR analysis, we similarly found 841 protein-IMD associations (p-value < 0.05; 90 pairs below Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), 83 of which were confirmed with colocalization. Comparison with a list of approved drugs indicated low sensitivities across disease outcomes for both exposure types (intermediate trait MR: 0.49 ± 0.23 SD, pQTL MR: 0.28 ± 0.12 SD). Drug targets identified in the pQTL and intermediate trait MR analyses show limited overlap (13% at nominal p-value and 36% at Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), presenting a comprehensive source of drug repurposing opportunities when the two approaches are combined.

Data availability

We accessed the following immune cell GWAS summary statistics via OpenGWAS (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/)111: ebi-a-GCST90002292, ebi-a-GCST004634, ebi-a-GCST90002380, ebi-a-GCST90002298, ebi-a-GCST004617, ebi-a-GCST90002382, ebi-a-GCST004614, ebi-a-GCST004608, ebi-a-GCST90002316, ebi-a-GCST90002389, ebi-a-GCST90002340, ebi-a-GCST90002394, ebi-a-GCST004626, ebi-a-GCST90002351, ebi-a-GCST004623, ebi-a-GCST90002399, ebi-a-GCST004620, ebi-a-GCST004624, ebi-a-GCST004613, ebi-a-GCST90002374. We accessed the following immune-mediated disease GWAS summary statistics via OpenGWAS (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/)111: ebi-a-GCST90014325, ebi-a-GCST006862, ebi-a-GCST004132, ebi-a-GCST004131, ieu-b-18, ebi-a-GCST90019016, ebi-a-GCST002318, ebi-a-GCST003156, ebi-a-GCST010681, ebi-a-GCST004133. We obtained the following immune-mediated disease GWAS summary statistics from FinnGen ver. 9 (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results)42: M13_ANKYLOSPON, J10_CHRONSINUSITIS, L12_ATOPIC and NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas)112: GCST90244787, GCST90027899, GCST90010715. UKBB pQTL dataset58 was accessed via [https://metabolomips.org/ukbbpgwas/](https:/metabolomips.org/ukbbpgwas), deCODE pQTL dataset56 was accessed via [https://www.decode.com/summarydata/](https:/www.decode.com/summarydata) , ARIC pQTL dataset55 was accessed via [http://nilanjanchatterjeelab.org/pwas/](http:/nilanjanchatterjeelab.org/pwas).

References

  1. He, M. et al. Immune-Mediated Diseases Associated With Cancer Risks. JAMA Oncol. 8, 209–219 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Gabalawy, H., Guenther, L. C. & Bernstein, C. N. Epidemiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: incidence, prevalence, natural history, and comorbidities. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 85, 2–10 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Netea, M. G. et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 375–388 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McInnes, I. B. & Gravallese, E. M. Immune-mediated inflammatory disease therapeutics: past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 680–686 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pisetsky, D. S. Pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19, 509–524 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Begley, C. G. et al. Drug repurposing: Misconceptions, challenges, and opportunities for academic researchers. Sci. Transl Med. 13, eabd5524 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petitdemange, A., Blaess, J., Sibilia, J., Felten, R. & Arnaud, L. Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 12, 1759720X20969261 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. David, T., Ling, S. F. & Barton, A. Genetics of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 193, 3–12 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson, M. R. et al. The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications. Nat. Genet. 47, 856–860 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Minikel, E. V., Painter, J. L., Dong, C. C. & Nelson, M. R. Refining the impact of genetic evidence on clinical success. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.23291765 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. King, E. A., Davis, J. W. & Degner, J. F. Are drug targets with genetic support twice as likely to be approved? Revised estimates of the impact of genetic support for drug mechanisms on the probability of drug approval. PLOS Genet. 15, 1–20 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gill, D. et al. Mendelian randomization for studying the effects of perturbing drug targets. Wellcome open. Res. 6, 16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies, N. M. & Holmes, M. V. & Davey Smith, G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: A guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362, (2018).

  14. Daghlas, I. & Gill, D. Mendelian randomization as a tool to inform drug development using human genetics. Camb. Prism Precis Med. 1, e16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt, A. F. et al. Genetic drug target validation using Mendelian randomisation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3255 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, H. et al. Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization in global biobank meta-analysis reveals multi-ancestry drug targets for common diseases. Cell Genomics 2, e100195 (2022).

  17. Rasooly, D. et al. Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify drug targets for heart failure. Nat. Commun. 14, 3826 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yao, M. et al. Deciphering proteins in Alzheimer’s disease: A new Mendelian randomization method integrated with AlphaFold3 for 3D structure prediction. Cell Genomics 4, (2024).

  19. Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I. & Schwenk, J. M. Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 19–37 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, J. et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 52, 1122–1131 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daghlas, I. et al. Genetic Evidence for Repurposing of GLP1R (Glucagon-Like Peptide‐1 Receptor) Agonists to Prevent Heart Failure. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 10, e020331 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Georgakis, M. K. et al. Interleukin-6 Signaling Effects on Ischemic Stroke and Other Cardiovascular Outcomes. Circ. Genomic Precis Med. 13, e002872 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cronjé, H. T. et al. Genetic evidence implicating natriuretic peptide receptor-3 in cardiovascular disease risk: a Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 21, 158 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, G. et al. Exploring the association and causal effect between white blood cells and psoriasis using large-scale population data. Front. Immunol. 14, 1043380 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pongdee, T., Bielinski, S. J., Decker, P. A., Kita, H. & Larson, N. B. White blood cells and chronic rhinosinusitis: a Mendelian randomization study. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 18, 98 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schuster, C. et al. The Autoimmunity-Associated Gene CLEC16A Modulates Thymic Epithelial Cell Autophagy and Alters T Cell Selection. Immunity 42, 942–952 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. He, D., Liu, L., Shen, D., Zou, P. & Cui, L. The Effect of Peripheral Immune Cell Counts on the Risk of Multiple Sclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Front. Immunol. 13, 867693 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zeng-Yun-Ou, Z., Zhong-Yu, J. & Wei, L. Bidirectional associations between eosinophils, basophils, and lymphocytes with atopic dermatitis: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study. Front. Immunol. 13, e1001911 (2022).

  29. Guyatt, A. et al. Mendelian randomisation of eosinophils and other cell types in relation to lung function and disease. Thorax 78, 496–503 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, H. Y., DeKruyff, R. H. & Umetsu, D. T. The many paths to asthma: phenotype shaped by innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Immunol. 11, 577–584 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hammad, H. & Lambrecht, B. N. The basic immunology of asthma. Cell 184, 1469–1485 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Facheris, P., Jeffery, J., Del Duca, E. & Guttman-Yassky, E. The translational revolution in atopic dermatitis: the paradigm shift from pathogenesis to treatment. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 20, 448–474 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walsh, C. M. et al. Neutrophils promote CXCR3-dependent itch in the development of atopic dermatitis. Elife 8, e48448 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Crow, M. K. Pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus: risks, mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 82, 999–1014 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baecher-Allan, C., Kaskow, B. J. & Weiner, H. L. Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron 97, 742–768 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Williams, D. M. Clinical Pharmacology of Corticosteroids. Respir Care. 63, 655–670 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cronstein, B. N. & Aune, T. M. Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 145–154 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Allison, A. C. & Eugui, E. M. Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action. Immunopharmacology 47, 85–118 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Astle, W. J. et al. The allelic landscape of human blood cell trait variation and links to common complex disease. Cell 167, 1415–1429 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, M. H. et al. Trans-ethnic and Ancestry-Specific Blood-Cell Genetics in 746,667 Individuals from 5 Global Populations. Cell 182, 1198–1213e14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vuckovic, D. et al. The Polygenic and Monogenic Basis of Blood Traits and Diseases. Cell 182, 1214–1231e11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kurki, M. I. et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 613, 508–518 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Demenais, F. et al. Multiancestry association study identifies new asthma risk loci that colocalize with immune-cell enhancer marks. Nat. Genet. 50, 42–53 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Valette, K. et al. Prioritization of candidate causal genes for asthma in susceptibility loci derived from UK Biobank. Commun. Biol. 4, 700 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Budu-Aggrey, A. et al. European and multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of atopic dermatitis highlights importance of systemic immune regulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 6172 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chang, X. et al. A genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies new eosinophilic esophagitis loci. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 149, 988–998 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stuart, P. E. et al. Transethnic analysis of psoriasis susceptibility in South Asians and Europeans enhances fine mapping in the MHC and genome wide. Hum. Genet. Genomics Adv. 3, 100069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. López-Isac, E. et al. Combined genetic analysis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis clinical subtypes identifies novel risk loci, target genes and key regulatory mechanisms. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 80, 321–328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Okada, Y. et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 506, 376–381 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. de Lange, K. M. et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 256–261 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patsopoulos, N. A. et al. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science 365, eaav7188 (2019).

  52. Bentham, J. et al. Genetic association analyses implicate aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immunity genes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 47, 1457–1464 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Forgetta, V. et al. Rare Genetic Variants of Large Effect Influence Risk of Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes 69, 784–795 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Burgess, S., Davies, N. M. & Thompson, S. G. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet. Epidemiol. 40, 597–608 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, J. et al. Plasma proteome analyses in individuals of European and African ancestry identify cis-pQTLs and models for proteome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01051-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ferkingstad, E. et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1712–1721 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pietzner, M. et al. Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases. Sci. (80-). 374, eabj1541 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sun, B. B. et al. Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06592-6 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Delaneau, O. et al. Integrating sequence and array data to create an improved 1000 Genomes Project haplotype reference panel. Nat. Commun. 5, 3934 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, s13742-015-0047-8 (2015).

  61. Thormann, A. et al. Flexible and scalable diagnostic fi ltering of genomic variants using G2P with Ensembl VEP. Nat. Commun. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10016-3 (2019).

  62. Yuan, Z. et al. Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Commun. 11, 3861 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Holmes, M. V., Richardson, T. G., Ference, B. A. & Davies, N. M. Davey Smith, G. Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18, 435–453 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06563-x (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hemani, G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife 7, e34408 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Verbanck, M., Chen, C. Y., Neale, B. & Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50, 693–698 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C. & Burgess, S. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 40, 304–314 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bowden, J. et al. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 1961–1974 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wallace, C. Eliciting priors and relaxing the single causal variant assumption in colocalisation analyses. PLOS Genet. 16, e1008720 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zuber, V. et al. Combining evidence from Mendelian randomization and colocalization: Review and comparison of approaches. Am. J. Hum. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.001 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wallace, C. Eliciting priors and relaxing the single causal variant assumption in colocalisation analyses. PLoS Genet. 16, 1–20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mullen, A., Blunck, M., Kalbfleisch, E., Möller, E. & Rohbeck, H. G. Assessment, from an industrial user perspective, of some major competitor information files on pharmaceutical development products. J. Inf. Sci. 23, 9–23 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bhattacharya, S. et al. ImmPort: disseminating data to the public for the future of immunology. Immunol. Res. 58, 234–239 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Breuer, K. et al. InnateDB: systems biology of innate immunity and beyond—recent updates and continuing curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1228–D1233 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Chepelev, I., Harley, I. T. W. & Harley, J. B. Modeling of horizontal pleiotropy identifies possible causal gene expression in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Lupus 1, e1234578 (2023).

  76. Sobczyk, M. K., Richardson, T. G., Leyden, G. M. & Gaunt, T. R. Distinct pathway-based effects of blood pressure and body mass index on cardiovascular traits: comparison of novel Mendelian Randomization approaches. medRxiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297593

  77. Kennedy, W. P. et al. Efficacy and safety of pateclizumab (anti-lymphotoxin-α) compared to adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a head-to-head phase 2 randomized controlled study (The ALTARA Study). Arthritis Res. Ther. 16, 467 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Folci, M., Ramponi, G., Arcari, I., Zumbo, A. & Brunetta, E. Eosinophils as Major Player in Type 2 Inflammation: Autoimmunity and Beyond BT - Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 14: Stem Cells in Lineage Specific Differentiation and Disease. in (ed Turksen, K.) 197–219 (Springer International Publishing, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2021_640. (2021).

  79. Caldwell, J. M., Paul, M. & Rothenberg, M. E. Novel immunologic mechanisms in eosinophilic esophagitis. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 48, 114–121 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Elias, P. M. & Steinhoff, M. “Outside-to-Inside” (and Now Back to“Outside”) Pathogenic Mechanisms in Atopic Dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 1067–1070 (2008).

  81. Egawa, G. & Kabashima, K. Multifactorial skin barrier deficiency and atopic dermatitis: Essential topics to prevent the atopic march. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 350–358e1 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Chen, H., Wu, X., Xu, C., Lin, J. & Liu, Z. Dichotomous roles of neutrophils in modulating pathogenic and repair processes of inflammatory bowel diseases. Precis Clin. Med. 4, 246–257 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hirahara, K., Aoki, A. & Nakayama, T. Pathogenic helper T cells. Allergol. Int. 70, 169–173 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sakaguchi, S. et al. Regulatory T Cells and Human Disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 38, 541–566 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Park, C. O. & Kupper, T. S. The emerging role of resident memory T cells in protective immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat. Med. 21, 688–697 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lee, D. S. W., Rojas, O. L. & Gommerman, J. L. B cell depletion therapies in autoimmune disease: advances and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 179–199 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Gu, J. et al. Assessing the causal relationship between immune traits and systemic lupus erythematosus by bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 298, 1493–1503 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Swart, J. F., de Roock, S. & Prakken, B. J. Understanding inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: How immune biomarkers guide clinical strategies in the systemic onset subtype. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 2068–2077 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chen, M. et al. Overlap of allergic, eosinophilic and type 2 inflammatory subtypes in moderate-to-severe asthma. Clin. Exp. allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 51, 546–555 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lawlor, D. A. & Tilling, K. Davey Smith, G. Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 1866–1886 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Giambartolomei, C. et al. A Bayesian framework for multiple trait colocalization from summary association statistics. Bioinformatics 34, 2538–2545 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wallace, C. A more accurate method for colocalisation analysis allowing for multiple causal variants. PLoS Genet 17, e1009440 (2021).

  93. Schoeler, T. et al. Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1216–1227 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Yarmolinsky, J., Bull, C. J., Walker, V. M., Nounu, A. & Smith, G. D. Mendelian randomization applied to pharmaceutical use: the case of metformin and lung cancer. Int. J. Epidemiol. 49, 1410–1411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zheng, J. et al. Evaluating the efficacy and mechanism of metformin targets on reducing Alzheimer’s disease risk in the general population: a Mendelian randomisation study. Diabetologia 65, 1664–1675 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Paternoster, L., Tilling, K. & Davey Smith, G. Genetic epidemiology and Mendelian randomization for informing disease therapeutics: Conceptual and methodological challenges. PLOS Genet. 13, e1006944 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Vignesh, P., Rawat, A., Sharma, M. & Singh, S. Complement in autoimmune diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta. 465, 123–130 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zhao, J. H. et al. Genetics of circulating inflammatory proteins identifies drivers of immune-mediated disease risk and therapeutic targets. Nat. Immunol. 24, 1540–1551 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Yazar, S. et al. Single-cell eQTL mapping identifies cell type-specific genetic control of autoimmune disease. Science 376, eabf3041 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kang, J. B. et al. Mapping the dynamic genetic regulatory architecture of HLA genes at single-cell resolution. Nat. Genet. 55, 2255–2268 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Harb, H. & Chatila, T. A. Mechanisms of Dupilumab. Clin. Exp. allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 50, 5–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Langowski, J. et al. NKTR-358: a selective, first-in-class IL-2 pathway agonist which increases number and suppressive function of regulatory T cells for the treatment of immune inflammatory disorders. Arthritis Rheumatol. 69, suppl 10 (2017).

  103. Silverberg, J. et al. A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rezpegaldesleukin in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 191, ljae266.097 (2024).

  104. Ferreira, R. C. et al. Functional IL6R 358Ala Allele Impairs Classical IL-6 Receptor Signaling and Influences Risk of Diverse Inflammatory Diseases. PLOS Genet. 9, 1–12 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rosa, M. et al. A Mendelian randomization study of IL6 signaling in cardiovascular diseases, immune-related disorders and longevity. npj Genomic Med. 4, 1–10 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Taylor, P. C. et al. What have we learnt from the inhibition of IL-6 in RA and what are the clinical opportunities for patient outcomes? Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 16, 1759720X241283340 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bachus, H. et al. IL-6 prevents Th2 cell polarization by promoting SOCS3-dependent suppression of IL-2 signaling. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 20, 651–665 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Group, T. L. M. S. S. & of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group, T. U. TNF neutralization in MS. Neurology 53, 457 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Atassi, K. T. G., Lio, P. A. & J. Z. N. J. M. & Off-Label studies on anakinra in dermatology: a review. J. Dermatolog Treat. 33, 73–86 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hwang, T. J. et al. Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results. JAMA Intern. Med. 176, 1826–1833 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Elsworth, B. et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.244293 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Sollis, E. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D977–D985 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) as part of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC_UU_00032/03). This study was also supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK

    Maria K. Sobczyk & Tom R. Gaunt

  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Tom R. Gaunt

Authors
  1. Maria K. Sobczyk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom R. Gaunt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MKS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editingTG: Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition, Resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria K. Sobczyk.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The article uses previously published GWAS summary statistics. No separate ethical approval is required for this study. All subjects provided informed consent in the original studies. No human subjects were directly involved in this study.

Competing interests

TRG receives funding from Biogen and GlaxoSmithKline for unrelated research. M.K.S. declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sobczyk, M.K., Gaunt, T.R. Integrative mendelian randomization approaches for therapeutic target prioritisation in immune-mediated diseases. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41818-3

Download citation

  • Received: 03 May 2024

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 03 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41818-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Immune-mediated disease
  • Immune cells
  • Protein QTL
  • Drug target prioritisation
  • Mendelian randomization
  • Molecular epidemiology
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research