Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Quantum inspired feature engineering for explainable EEG signal classification
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 March 2026

Quantum inspired feature engineering for explainable EEG signal classification

  • Fahad A. Alotaibi1,
  • Mehmet Said Nur Yagmahan2,
  • Khalid A. Alobaid1,
  • Mousa Jari1,
  • Omer Faruk Goktas3,
  • Mehmet Baygin2,
  • Sengul Dogan4 &
  • …
  • Turker Tuncer4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1296 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

In this research, our main objective is to extract more informative features by deploying a simple and effective framework. One of the cheapest data-gathering methods from the brain is electroencephalography signal collection. The main aim of this approach is to obtain maximum information from electroencephalography signals. Therefore, we have presented a quantum-inspired feature extraction function and evaluated its classification ability. In this approach, we have employed six electroencephalography signal datasets as a testbed, aiming to depict the general classification capability of the introduced electroencephalography signal classification model. Firstly, a quantum entangled particle pattern has been proposed, which is a transformer-based feature extraction function. To investigate the classification performance of the introduced quantum entangled particle pattern, a new-generation explainable feature engineering framework has been introduced. The quantum entangled particle pattern-centric explainable feature engineering model extracts features using the quantum entangled particle pattern feature extraction function. By employing cumulative weighted iterative neighborhood component analysis, the most distinctive features extracted by quantum entangled particle pattern have been selected. The algorithm-centric k-nearest neighbor classifier has been applied to obtain classification results. Directed lobish has been utilized to generate interpretable results. To obtain both classification and interpretable results, the selected features and their identities have been used as inputs for centric k-nearest neighbors and directed lobish consecutively. The introduced quantum entangled particle pattern-related explainable feature engineering approach attained over 90% classification accuracy on the six electroencephalography signal datasets with 10-fold cross-validation. Additionally, this model generates a connectome diagram to provide interpretable results for each dataset.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are publicly available and were obtained from third-party sources. The original sources of the datasets are cited in the manuscript. No new data were generated in this study.

References

  1. Sharma, R. & Meena, H. K. Emerging Trends in EEG Signal Processing: A Systematic Review. SN Comput. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hameed, I., Khan, D. M., Ahmed, S. M., Aftab, S. S. & Fazal, H. Enhancing motor imagery EEG signal decoding through machine learning: A systematic review of recent progress. Comput. Biol. Med. 185, 109534 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maristany, A. J., Sa, B. C., Murray, C., Subramaniam, A. B. & Oldak, S. E. Psychiatric manifestations of neurological diseases: a narrative review. Cureus 16 (2024).

  4. Vakitbilir, N. et al. Multivariate Modelling and Prediction of High-Frequency Sensor-Based Cerebral Physiologic Signals: Narrative Review of Machine Learning Methodologies. Sens. (Basel Switzerland). 24, 8148 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellos, C., Stefanou, K., Tzallas, A., Stergios, G. & Tsipouras, M. Methods and Approaches for User Engagement and User Experience Analysis Based on Electroencephalography Recordings: A Systematic Review. Electronics 14, 251 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edelman, B. J. et al. Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces: state of the art and trends. IEEE Reviews Biomedical Engineering (2024).

  7. Samal, P. & Hashmi, M. F. Role of machine learning and deep learning techniques in EEG-based BCI emotion recognition system: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 50 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Saegh, A., Dawwd, S. A. & Abdul-Jabbar J. M 59–66 (IEEE).

  9. Gao, X., Gui, K., Wu, X., Metcalfe, B. & Zhang, D. Effects of Different Preprocessing Pipelines on Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. IEEE J. Biomedical Health Informatics (2025).

  10. Basheer, N. M. & Al-Saegh, A. Segmentation of Medical MRI Images Using Nested U-Net with Attention Mechanism and Fuzzy Pooling. Al-Rafadain Eng. Journal 30 (2025).

  11. Rahman, K., Ghani, A., Misra, S. & Rahman, A. U. A deep learning framework for non-functional requirement classification. Sci. Rep. 14, 3216 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mhapsekar, R. U., O’Shea, N., Davy, S. & Abraham, L. Hybrid Blended Deep Learning Approach for Milk Quality Analysis. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intelligence (2024).

  13. Kumar, S. & Sharma, A. Advances in non-invasive EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: Signal acquisition, processing, emerging approaches, and applications. Signal Process. Strategies, 281–310 (2025).

  14. Swathi, G., Altalbe, A., Kumar, R. P. & QuCNet Quantum-Inspired Convolutional Neural Networks for Optimized Thyroid Nodule Classification. IEEE Access (2024).

  15. Arif, M., Rehman, F. U., Sekanina, L. & Malik, A. S. A comprehensive survey of evolutionary algorithms and metaheuristics in brain EEG-based applications. Journal Neural Engineering (2024).

  16. Marappan, S. & Gajendran, S. Quantum Machine Learning Architecture. Harnessing Quantum Crypt. Next-Generation Secur. Solutions, 153 (2024).

  17. Ullah, U. & Garcia-Zapirain, B. Quantum machine learning revolution in healthcare: a systematic review of emerging perspectives and applications. IEEE Access (2024).

  18. Olvera, C., Ross, O. M. & Rubio, Y. EEG-based motor imagery classification with quantum algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 247, 123354 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aishwarya, S., Abeer, V., Sathish, B. B. & Subramanya, K. Quantum computational techniques for prediction of cognitive state of human mind from EEG signals. J. Quantum Comput. 2, 157 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bouazizi, S. & Ltifi, H. Enhancing accuracy and interpretability in EEG-based medical decision making using an explainable ensemble learning framework application for stroke prediction. Decis. Support Syst. 178, 114126 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mersha, M., Lam, K., Wood, J., AlShami, A. & Kalita, J. Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey of needs, techniques, applications, and future direction. Neurocomputing, 128111 (2024).

  22. Górriz, J. M. et al. Computational approaches to explainable artificial intelligence: advances in theory, applications and trends. Inform. Fusion. 100, 101945 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lötsch, J., Kringel, D. & Ultsch, A. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in biomedicine: Making AI decisions trustworthy for physicians and patients. BioMedInformatics 2, 1–17 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Y. H., Huang, S. & Huang, Y. D. Motor imagery EEG classification for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using fractal dimension and Fisher’s criterion-based channel selection. Sensors 17, 1557 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sengur, A., Akbulut, Y., Guo, Y. & Bajaj, V. Classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease based on convolutional neural network and reinforcement sample learning algorithm. Health Inform. Sci. Syst. 5, 1–7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ramakrishnan, J. et al. Brain–computer interface for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients using deep learning network. Neural Comput. Applications, 1–15 (2022).

  27. LATİFOĞLU, F., BULUCU, F. O. & Ileri, R. Detection of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease by variational modedecomposition and convolution neural network methods from event-relatedpotential signals. Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 29, 2840–2854 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samanta, K. et al. in. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 3337–3342 (IEEE). (2023).

  29. Makam, K. K., Singh, V. K. & Pachori, R. B. ALS Detection Framework Based on Automatic Singular Spectrum Analysis and Quantum Convolutional Neural Network from EMG Signals. IEEE Sens. Letters (2024).

  30. Saba-Sadiya, S., Chantland, E., Alhanai, T., Liu, T. & Ghassemi, M. M. Unsupervised EEG artifact detection and correction. Front. Digit. health. 2, 608920 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abdi-Sargezeh, B., Foodeh, R., Shalchyan, V. & Daliri, M. R. EEG artifact rejection by extracting spatial and spatio-spectral common components. J. Neurosci. Methods. 358, 109182 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mukherjee, P. & Halder Roy, A. A deep learning-based approach for distinguishing different stress levels of human brain using EEG and pulse rate. Comput. Methods Biomech. BioMed. Eng. 27, 2303–2324 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, H., Song, S., Cho, B. H. & Jang, D. P. Deep learning-based stress detection for daily life use using single-channel EEG and GSR in a virtual reality interview paradigm. Plos one. 19, e0305864 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Afify, H. M., Mohammed, K. K. & Hassanien, A. E. Stress detection based EEG under varying cognitive tasks using convolution neural network. Neural Comput. Applications, 1–15 (2025).

  35. Jagtap, S. & Yadav, D. Enhancing EEG-based Stress detection: Integrated techniques and optimization strategies. J. Integr. Sci. Technol. 13, 1003–1003 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Daadaa, Y. & EmotionNet Dissecting Stress and Anxiety Through EEG-based Deep Learning Approaches. International J. Adv. Comput. Sci. & Applications 15 (2024).

  37. Halder, R. & Chatterjee, R. CNN-BiLSTM model for violence detection in smart surveillance. SN Comput. Sci. 1, 201 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Abundez, I. M. et al. Threshold Active Learning Approach for Physical Violence Detection on Images Obtained from Video (Frame-Level) Using Pre-Trained Deep Learning Neural Network Models. Algorithms 17, 316 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Asad, M., Yang, J., He, J., Shamsolmoali, P. & He, X. Multi-frame feature-fusion-based model for violence detection. Visual Comput. 37, 1415–1431 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Haiura, I. A. & Iftene, A. Detecting Violence in Videos using Convolutional Neural Networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 246, 2497–2506 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zülfikar, A. & Mehmet, A. Empirical mode decomposition and convolutional neural network-based approach for diagnosing psychotic disorders from eeg signals. Appl. Intell. 52, 12103–12115 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, Z. et al. Deep learning based automatic diagnosis of first-episode psychosis, bipolar disorder and healthy controls. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 89, 101882 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shubhangi, D., Gadgay, B., Sultana, A. & Waheed, M. in International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Medical Sciences (ICETEMS). 52–57 (IEEE). 52–57 (IEEE). (2022).

  44. Elujide, I. et al. Application of deep and machine learning techniques for multi-label classification performance on psychotic disorder diseases. Inf. Med. Unlocked. 23, 100545 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhadra, R., Singh, P. K. & Mahmud, M. HyEpiSeiD: a hybrid convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit model for epileptic seizure detection from electroencephalogram signals. Brain Inf. 11, 21 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rivera, M. J., Sanchis, J., Corcho, O., Teruel, M. A. & Trujillo, J. Evaluating CNN Methods for Epileptic Seizure Type Classification Using EEG Data. IEEE Access (2024).

  47. Holguin-Garcia, S. A. et al. A comparative study of CNN-capsule-net, CNN-transformer encoder, and Traditional machine learning algorithms to classify epileptic seizure. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 24, 60 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, J. et al. A scheme combining feature fusion and hybrid deep learning models for epileptic seizure detection and prediction. Sci. Rep. 14, 16916 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gill, T. S., Zaidi, S. S. H. & Shirazi, M. A. Attention-based deep convolutional neural network for classification of generalized and focal epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 155, 109732 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Taloba, A. I. & Matoog, R. Detecting respiratory diseases using machine learning-based pattern recognition on spirometry data. Alexandria Eng. J. 113, 44–59 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kazi, K. S. L. & Mahant, M. A. in Digitalization and the Transformation of the Healthcare Sector 205–236IGI Global Scientific Publishing, (2025).

  52. Biju, A. K. V. N., Thomas, A. S. & Thasneem, J. Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere—a bibliometric analysis. Qual. Quant. 58, 849–878 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lubbad, M. et al. Machine learning applications in detection and diagnosis of urology cancers: a systematic literature review. Neural Comput. Appl. 36, 6355–6379 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kim, N. et al. Deep learning models to predict the editing efficiencies and outcomes of diverse base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 484–497 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Huang, X., Rymbekova, A., Dolgova, O., Lao, O. & Kuhlwilm, M. Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 61–78 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen, F., Li, S., Han, J., Ren, F. & Yang, Z. Review of lightweight deep convolutional neural networks. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 31, 1915–1937 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ng, H. W. & Guan, C. Subject-independent meta-learning framework towards optimal training of eeg-based classifiers. Neural Netw. 172, 106108 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Panwar, N., Pandey, V. & Roy, P. P. Eeg-cognet: A deep learning framework for cognitive state assessment using eeg brain connectivity. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 98, 106770 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xu, C., Song, Y., Zheng, Q., Wang, Q. & Heng, P. A. Unsupervised multi-source domain adaptation via contrastive learning for eeg classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 261, 125452 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Qiu, S. et al. MFDFormer: A Unified Multiscale Frequency Domain MetaFormer Framework for EEG-based Chronic Pain Recognition. IEEE Internet Things Journal (2025).

  61. Irfan, M. et al. Multidomain Selective Feature Fusion and Stacking Based Ensemble Framework for EEG-Based Neonatal Sleep Stratification. IEEE J. Biomedical Health Informatics (2025).

  62. Busch, D. et al. A blueprint for large language model-augmented telehealth for HIV mitigation in Indonesia: A scoping review of a novel therapeutic modality. Health Inf. J. 31, 14604582251315595 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Steyvers, M. et al. What large language models know and what people think they know. Nature Mach. Intelligence, 1–11 (2025).

  64. Pfister, R. & Jud, H. Understanding and Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence: OpenAI’s o3 Is Not AGI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07458 (2025).

  65. Pergantis, P., Bamicha, V., Skianis, C. & Drigas, A. A. I. Chatbots and Cognitive Control: Enhancing Executive Functions Through Chatbot Interactions: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 15, 47 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Xie, W., Ma, W. & Sun, X. An efficient re-parameterization feature pyramid network on YOLOv8 to the detection of steel surface defect. Neurocomputing 614, 128775 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bai, Y. et al. TOPS-speed complex-valued convolutional accelerator for feature extraction and inference. Nat. Commun. 16, 292 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vaswani, A. Attention is all you need. Advances Neural Inform. Process. Systems (2017).

  69. Ngo, T. D. et al. An EEG & eye-tracking dataset of ALS patients & healthy people during eye-tracking-based spelling system usage. Sci. Data. 11, 664 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Le, T. H. et al. EEGET-ALS Dataset, Figshare, (2024). https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/dataset/EEGET-ALS_Dataset/24485689/1?file=46933189., .

  71. Tuncer, T. et al. Directed Lobish-based explainable feature engineering model with TTPat and CWINCA for EEG artifact classification. Knowl. Based Syst. 305, 112555 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cambay, V. Y. et al. QuadTPat: Quadruple Transition Pattern-based explainable feature engineering model for stress detection using EEG signals. Sci. Rep. 14, 27320 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bektas, O. et al. ChMinMaxPat: Investigations on Violence and Stress Detection Using EEG Signals. Diagnostics 14, 2666 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tasci, G. et al. Zipper Pattern: An Investigation into Psychotic Criminal Detection Using EEG Signals. Diagnostics 15, 154 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tasci, I. et al. Epilepsy detection in 121 patient populations using hypercube pattern from EEG signals. Inform. Fusion. 96, 252–268 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Dhiman, R. Electroencephalogram channel selection based on pearson correlation coefficient for motor imagery-brain-computer interface. Measurement: Sens. 25, 100616 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Uhlhaas, P. J. & Singer, W. Neuronal dynamics and neuropsychiatric disorders: toward a translational paradigm for dysfunctional large-scale networks. Neuron 75, 963–980 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Breakspear, M. Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 340–352 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cao, M. et al. EEG-based emotion recognition model using fuzzy adjacency matrix combined with convolutional multi-head graph attention mechanism. Cluster Comput. 28, 274 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lohia, N., Mathew, C. & Shankel, G. Applying Transfer Learning and Existing EEG Datasets to Identify Patients With ALS. SMU Data Sci. Rev. 8, 4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jain, S. in 17th International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE). 88–93 (IEEE). 88–93 (IEEE). (2024).

  82. Ince, U. et al. CubicPat: Investigations on the Mental Performance and Stress Detection Using EEG Signals. Diagnostics 15, 363 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lih, O. S. et al. EpilepsyNet: Novel automated detection of epilepsy using transformer model with EEG signals from 121 patient population. Comput. Biol. Med. 164, 107312 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Chollet, F. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1251–1258.

  85. Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).

  86. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A. & Chen, L. C. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4510–4520.

  87. Dişli, F. et al. Epilepsy Diagnosis from EEG Signals Using Continuous Wavelet Transform-Based Depthwise Convolutional Neural Network Model. Diagnostics 15, 84 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hüseyin, Ü. et al. A New Approach to Automatic Epilepsy Detection from EEG Signals Using Archimedean Spiral and Swin Transformer. (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through Ongoing Research Funding program (ORF-2026-1392).

Funding

This research study and the Article Processing Charge (APC) were supported by Ongoing Research Funding program (ORF-2026-1392), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Applied Computer Sciences (CACS), King Saud University, Riyadh, 11543, Saudi Arabia

    Fahad A. Alotaibi, Khalid A. Alobaid & Mousa Jari

  2. Department of Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Mehmet Said Nur Yagmahan & Mehmet Baygin

  3. Department of Electronics and Automation, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey

    Omer Faruk Goktas

  4. Department of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey

    Sengul Dogan & Turker Tuncer

Authors
  1. Fahad A. Alotaibi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehmet Said Nur Yagmahan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khalid A. Alobaid
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mousa Jari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omer Faruk Goktas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mehmet Baygin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sengul Dogan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Turker Tuncer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG, MB, SD, TT; methodology, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG, MB, SD, TT; software, SD, TT; validation, OFG, MB, SD, TT; formal analysis, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG; investigation, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ; resources, OFG, MB; data curation, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ; writing—original draft preparation, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG, MB, SD, TT; writing—review and editing, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG, MB, SD, TT; visualization, FAA, MSNY, KAA, MJ, OFG, MB, SD, TT; supervision, TT; project administration, TT.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sengul Dogan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alotaibi, F.A., Yagmahan, M.S.N., Alobaid, K.A. et al. Quantum inspired feature engineering for explainable EEG signal classification. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41821-8

Download citation

  • Received: 12 January 2026

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 06 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41821-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Quantum entangled particle pattern
  • Quantum-inspired feature extraction
  • Electroencephalography signal classification
  • Directed Lobish
  • explainable artificial intelligence
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics