Abstract
The incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is increasing worldwide. With advancements in society and technology, the variety of thyroid endoscopic surgeries is expanding. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via the trans-subclavian approach (GETTSA) has been used for many years; yet, relevant research data are limited. This study aimed to assess the reliability of GETTSA by comparing it with conventional open thyroid surgery (COT). Clinical data were collected from 488 patients who underwent unilateral PTC surgery at Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital. Based on propensity score matching, relevant data were compared between the two procedures using the chi-square test, independent-sample t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. COT and GETTSA significantly differed with respect to Thyroid Cancer-Specific Quality of Life (P < 0.001), scar appearance (P = 0.031), swallowing function (P = 0.001), operative time (P < 0.001), hospital fees (P < 0.001), number of central lymph node dissections (P < 0.001), drainage volume on the first postoperative day (P = 0.017), and parathyroid autotransplantation(P = 0.019). However, no notable differences in the number of lymph node metastases (P = 0.155), length of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.181), or transient vocal cord paralysis (P = 0.478) were observed between COT and GETTSA. Additionally, no complications (secondary surgery, tracheal fistula, poor healing, or postoperative bleeding) occurred in either group. In conclusion, GETTSA is a reliable surgical procedure with the help of carbon nanoparticles; however, attention should be paid to protecting the parathyroid glands.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Miranda-Filho, A. et al. Thyroid cancer incidence trends by histology in 25 countries: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 9, 225–234 (2021).
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., Wang, P., Xue, S. & Chen, G. Comparisons of different approaches and incisions of thyroid surgery and selection strategy. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 14, 1166820 (2023).
Choi, Y. et al. Impact of postthyroidectomy scar on the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients. Ann. Dermatol. 26, 693–699 (2014).
Kasemsiri, P. et al. Comparison of quality of life between patients undergoing trans-oral endoscopic thyroid surgery and conventional open surgery. BMC Surg. 20, 18 (2020).
Shimizu, K., Akira, S. & Tanaka, S. Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J. Surg. Oncol. 69, 178–180 (1998).
Huang, X. M. et al. Endoscopic surgery by infraclavicular approach for larger benign thyroid tumors. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 91, 993–995 (2011).
Zhang, D. G. et al. Modified gasless trans-subclavian approach endoscopic lateral neck dissection for treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a series of 31 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 61, 801–806 (2023).
Zhu, X. M. et al. Comparison of clinical effects of endoscopic thyroidectomy using the modified gasless transsubclavian approach and traditional open surgery for cN0 unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 61, 807–811 (2023).
Husson, O. et al. Development of a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire (THYCA-QoL) for thyroid cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. (Stockholm Sweden). 52, 447–454 (2013).
Oh, M. Y. et al. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach as a safe and feasible alternative to open thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. (London England). 109, 2467–2477 (2023).
Dong, F., Yang, A. & Ouyang, D. Retroauricular Single-Site Endoscopic Thyroidectomy-A Balanced Endoscopic Approach for Thyroid Excision. JAMA Surg. 158, 548–549 (2023).
Kwak, H. Y. et al. Learning curve for gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using the trans-axillary approach: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon’s experience. Int. J. Surg. (London England). 12, 1273–1277 (2014).
Ikeda, Y. et al. Total endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillary or anterior chest approach. Biomed. Pharmacother. 56 (Suppl 1), 72s–78s (2002).
Lee, M. C., Park, H., Lee, B. C., Lee, G. H. & Choi, I. J. Comparison of quality of life between open and endoscopic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer. Head Neck. 38 (Suppl 1), E827–831 (2016).
Juarez, M. C. et al. Objectively measuring social attention of thyroid neck scars and transoral surgery using eye tracking. Laryngoscope 129, 2789–2794 (2019).
Xu, T. et al. A prospective study comparing the gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy trans-axillary approach to conventional open thyroidectomy: health and quality of life outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 38, 1995–2009 (2024).
Liu, Y. H., Xue, L. B., Zhang, S., Yang, Y. F. & Li, J. Appearance characteristics of incision, satisfaction with the aesthetic effect, and quality of life in of thyroid cancer patients after thyroidectomy. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 36, 784–792 (2021).
Li, S. L. et al. Quantitative comparison of three thyroidectomy approaches in neck muscles, voice, and swallowing functions. Asian J. Surg. 47, 1734–1739 (2024).
Lin, P. et al. Comparative study of gasless endoscopic selective lateral neck dissection via the anterior chest approach versus conventional open surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg. Endosc. 35, 693–701 (2021).
Ge, J. N. et al. A propensity score matching analysis of gasless endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomy with five-settlement technique versus conventional open thyroidectomy in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Surg. Endosc. 37, 9255–9262 (2023).
Li, Y. et al. Comparison of the endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach and open thyroidectomy: A propensity score matched cohort study of 302 patients in the treatment of papillary thyroid non-microcarcinoma. Front. Oncol. 13, 1081835 (2023).
Liu, Z. et al. Comparison of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach and open thyroidectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes and safety in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 170, 1680–1686 (2021).
Haugen, B. R. et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid Off. J. Am. Thyroid Assoc. 26, 1-133 (2016).
Mehanna, H. et al. Differences in the recurrence and mortality outcomes rates of incidental and nonincidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 329 person-years of follow-up. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99, 2834–2843 (2014).
Yan, S., Zhao, W., Wang, B. & Zhang, L. Standardization of simple auxiliary method beneficial to total endoscopic thyroidectomy on patients with PTC, based on retrospective study of 356 cases. Endocrine 61, 51–57 (2018).
Zuniga, S. & Sanabria, A. Prophylactic central neck dissection in stage N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Archives otolaryngology–head neck Surg. 135, 1087–1091 (2009).
Jiang, W. J. et al. Comparison of total endoscopic thyroidectomy with conventional open thyroidectomy for treatment of papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg. Endosc. 34, 1891–1903 (2020).
Wang, Z. et al. Application of carbon nanoparticles combined with refined extracapsular anatomy in endoscopic thyroidectomy. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1131947 (2023).
Huang, X. M. et al. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an anterior chest approach–a review of 219 cases with benign tumor. World J. Surg. 35, 1281–1286 (2011).
Owaki, T., Nakano, S., Arimura, K. & Aikou, T. The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function. Endoscopy 34, 575–579 (2002).
Zhu, J. et al. Expert consensus statement on parathyroid protection in thyroidectomy. Ann. Transl Med. 3, 230 (2015).
Ezzy, M. & Alameer, E. Predictors and Preventive Strategies of Bleeding After Thyroid Surgery. Cureus 15, e47575 (2023).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for the English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: Yang, Han, Ma, Zheng. Acquisition of data: Yang, Han, Gu, Wu, Sun, Wei, Liu. Analysis and interpretation of data: Yang, Ma, Gu, Wu, Sun, Wei, Liu. Drafting the article: Yang, Han. Critically revising the article: Ma, Sun, Zheng. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: Yang, Han, Ma, Zheng. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Zheng.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, R., Han, P., Ma, C. et al. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via the trans-subclavian approach versus conventional open thyroid surgery for unilateral thyroid cancer. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42491-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42491-2
