Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Understanding tens of thousands of pockmarks and domes using machine learning (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean Sea)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 March 2026

Understanding tens of thousands of pockmarks and domes using machine learning (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean Sea)

  • André Lion1,
  • Maria-Angela Bassetti1,
  • Serge Berné1 &
  • …
  • Romain Jatiault1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 634 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ocean sciences
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

A broad spectrum of seabed deformation structures, including pockmarks and domes, related to various processes, have been observed on continental margins worldwide. This study provides the first regional-scale inventory and quantitative characterization of pockmarks and domes potentially linked to subsurface fluid-escape processes on the continental shelf and upper slope in the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Using high-resolution multibeam bathymetry and seismic reflection data, approximately 29,000 pockmarks and domes were identified. Morphometric and seismic analyses reveal distinct groups that differ in size, shape, and spatial organization. Among them a widespread population of domes rooted on the Holocene maximum flooding surface, which represent ~ 85% of the occurrences. The remaining 15% are pockmarks, divided into five main subtypes. Spatial association of domes and pockmarks suggests a genetic relationship between dome formation and subsequent collapse (pockmarks). Machine learning–based spatial modeling extends the estimated total to ~ 80,000 between 10 and 1000 m water depth, including zones not covered by swath-bathymetric surveys. Among various controlling factors, sediment thickness, water depth, and grain-size variability exert primary controls on the distribution of pockmarks and domes. These results demonstrate that seabed deformations in the Gulf of Lions are spatially organized, reflecting the interplay between fluid-related processes, stratigraphic architecture, and sediment properties.

Similar content being viewed by others

Evidence of pockmarks and seafloor gas venting in the northwestern Arabian Sea

Article Open access 21 January 2025

High resolution optical and acoustic remote sensing datasets of the Puck Lagoon

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Integrated geophysical healthy assessment for eco development and coastal sustainability in Ras Gamila, Egypt

Article Open access 23 November 2025

Data availability

Geophysical data: The raw public data, acquired by IFREMER vessels, are openly available on the SISMER website at [https://data.ifremer.fr/#/home]. Other raw geophysical data that support the findings of this study are available upon request to MAB with the permission of third party owners (see Supplementary Table 1). The surface sedimentological data that support the findings of this study are openly available on SEANOE website at [https://doi.org/10.17882/81430]. The interpretations that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AL, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Van Rensbergen, P., Hillis, R. R., Maltman, A. J. & Morley, C. K. Subsurface Sediment Mobilization Vol. 216 (The Geological Society, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andresen, K. J. Fluid flow features in hydrocarbon plumbing systems: What do they tell us about the basin evolution?. Mar. Geol. 332–334, 89–108 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suess, E. Marine cold seeps and their manifestations: Geological control, biogeochemical criteria and environmental conditions. Int. J. Earth Sci. 103, 1889–1916 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gay, A. et al. Isolated seafloor pockmarks linked to BSRs, fluid chimneys, polygonal faults and stacked Oligocene-Miocene turbiditic palaeochannels in the Lower Congo Basin. Mar. Geol. 226, 25–40 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Judd, A. & Hovland, M. Seabed Fluid Flow: The Impact on Geology, Biology and the Marine Environment (Cambridge University Press, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535918.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vaknin, I., Aharonov, E., Holtzman, R. & Katz, O. Gas seepage and pockmark formation from subsurface reservoirs: Insights from table-top experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 129, e2023JB028255 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kvenvolden, K. A. Gas hydrates—Geological perspective and global change. Rev. Geophys. 31, 173–187 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whiticar, M. J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 161, 291–314 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tissot, B. P. & Welte, D. H. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence (Springer, 1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87813-8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. King, L. H. & MacLean, B. Pockmarks on the Scotian Shelf. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 3141–3148 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pilcher, R. & Argent, J. Mega-pockmarks and linear pockmark trains on the West African continental margin. Mar. Geol. 244, 15–32 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spatola, D., Rovere, M., Casalbore, D. & Chiocci, F. L. Pockmarks of the Mediterranean region seas: A comprehensive geodatabase for marine geomorphological analysis. Sci. Data 12, 1049 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. León, R. et al. Pockmarks on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar: Formation from overpressured shallow contourite gas reservoirs and internal wave action during the last glacial sea-level lowstand?. Geo-Mar. Lett. 34, 131–151 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barry, M., Boudreau, B. & Johnson, B. Gas domes in soft cohesive sediments. Geology 40, 379–382 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diercks, A.-R. et al. High-resolution seismo-acoustic characterization of Green Canyon 600, a perennial hydrocarbon seep in Gulf of Mexico deep water. Mar Geophys Res 40, 357–370 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hovland, M. & Judd, A. G. The global production of methane from shallow submarine sources. Cont. Shelf Res. 12, 1231–1238 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Napoli, S. et al. Comprehensive global inventory of submarine mud volcanoes. Sci Data 12, 382 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naudts, L. et al. Geological and morphological setting of 2778 methane seeps in the Dnepr paleo-delta, northwestern Black Sea. Mar. Geol. 227, 177–199 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rise, L., Bellec, V. K., Chand, S. & Bøe, R. Pockmarks in the southwestern Barents Sea and Finnmark fjords. https://nynjg.geologi.no/publications/pockmarks-in-the-southwestern-barents-sea-and-finnmark-fjords/ (2014).

  20. Cartwright, J., Huuse, M. & Aplin, A. Seal bypass systems. AAPG Bull. 91, 1141–1166 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Garcia, A. et al. Shallow gas off the Rhone prodelta. Gulf of Lions. Marine Geol. 234, 215–231 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mascle, A., Vially, R., Deville, E., Biju-Duval, B. & Roy, J. P. The petroleum evaluation of a tectonically complex area: The western margin of the Southeast Basin (France). Mar. Pet. Geol. 13, 941–961 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lofi, J., Berné, S., Tesson, M., Seranne, M. & Pezard, P. Giant solution-subsidence structure in the Western Mediterranean related to deep substratum dissolution. Terra Nova 24, 181–188 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Widhen, F. et al. Long-term evolution of a carbonate reservoir submitted to fresh, saline and thermal waters interactions—Jurassic carbonates in the coastal area of the Gulf of Lion margin (southern France). Bull. Soc. Géol. France 194, 7 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baztan, J. et al. Axial incision: The key to understand submarine canyon evolution (in the western Gulf of Lion). Mar. Pet. Geol. 22, 805–826 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lofi, J. et al. Plio-Quaternary prograding clinoform wedges of the western Gulf of Lion continental margin (NW Mediterranean) after the Messinian Salinity Crisis. Mar. Geol. 198, 289–317 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rabineau, M. et al. Paleo sea levels reconsidered from direct observation of paleoshoreline position during Glacial Maxima (for the last 500,000 yr). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 252, 119–137 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bassetti, M. A. et al. The 100-ka and rapid sea level changes recorded by prograding shelf sand bodies in the Gulf of Lions (western Mediterranean Sea). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q11R05 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bassetti, M. A. et al. Sand bodies at the shelf edge in the Gulf of Lions (Western Mediterranean): Deglacial history and modern processes. Mar. Geol. 234, 93–109 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tesson, M. et al. Quaternary “Compound” incised valley in a microtidal environment, Roussillon Continental Shelf, Western Gulf of Lions, France. J. Sediment. Res. 81, 708–729 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Berné, S. et al. A “natural sand plant” at the shelf edge in the low-energy Gulf of Lions, western Mediterranean Sea. Geology 52, 911–916 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berné, S., Lericolais, G., Marsset, T., Bourillet, J. F. & de Batist, M. Erosional shelf sand ridges and lowstand shorefaces: Examples from tide and wave dominated environments of France. J. Sediment. Res. 68, 540–555 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Swift, D. J. P. Delaware Shelf Valley: Estuary retreat path, not drowned river valley. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84, 2743–2748 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Swift, D. J. P., Sears, P. C., Bohlke, B. & Hunt, R. Evolution of a shoal retreat massif, North Carolina Shelf: Inferences from areal geology. Mar. Geol. 27, 19–42 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Berné, S., Jouet, G., Bassetti, M. A., Dennielou, B. & Taviani, M. Late Glacial to Preboreal sea-level rise recorded by the Rhone deltaic system (NW Mediterranean). Mar. Geol. 245, 65–88 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bassetti, M. A. et al. Holocene hydrological changes in the Rhône River (NW Mediterranean) as recorded in the marine mud belt. Clim. Past 12, 1539–1553 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zecchin, M., Catuneanu, O. & Caffau, M. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of clastic shelves IX: Methods for recognizing maximum flooding conditions in shallow-marine settings. Mar. Pet. Geol. 156, 106468 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Aloïsi, J. C. Sur un modèle de sédimentation deltaïque: Contribution à la connaissance des marges passives. (1986).

  39. Bourrin, F. Variabilité et devenir des apports sédimentaires par les fleuves côtiers : Cas du système Têt-littoral roussillonnais dans le golfe du Lion. (Perpignan, 2007).

  40. Piégay, H. et al. OSR—Observatoire Des Sédiments Du Rhône. 12 Années de Recherche Pour La Connaissance et La Gestion Hydro-Sédimentaire Du Fleuve. Bilans et Perspectives Scientifiques. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00808/92047/ (2022).

  41. Gay, A., Cavailhès, T., Grauls, D., Marsset, B. & Marsset, T. Repeated fluid expulsions during events of rapid sea-level rise in the Gulf of Lion, Western Mediterranean Sea. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 188, 24 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Riboulot, V., Thomas, Y., Berné, S., Jouet, G. & Cattaneo, A. Control of Quaternary sea-level changes on gas seeps. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4970–4977 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krämer, K. et al. Abrupt emergence of a large pockmark field in the German Bight, Southeastern North Sea. Sci. Rep. 7, 5150 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Conrad, O. et al. System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 1991–2007 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Uber Technologies. Uber’s H3 Hexagonal Hierarchical Geospatial Indexing System. Github https://github.com/uber/h3 (2023).

  46. Jouet, G. Enregistrements stratigraphiques des cycles climatiques et glacio-eustatiques du Quaternaire terminal. Modélisations de la marge continentale du Golfe du Lion. (Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 2007).

  47. EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. EMODnet Digital Bathymetry (DTM 2024). EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. https://doi.org/10.12770/CF51DF64-56F9-4A99-B1AA-36B8D7B743A1 (2024).

  48. Augris, C. et al. Seabed substrate database from a compilation of sediment samples taken during oceanographic campaigns carried out in the Gulf of Lion by Ifremer, CEFREM, IRSN, CEREGE, FOB, MIO, LECOB, The Conseil Général de l’Hérault and Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse Water Agency. Results of grain size analysis performed on samples. SEANOE https://doi.org/10.17882/81430 (2013).

  49. Shi, Y., et al. Light Gradient Boosting Machine. (Microsoft, 2025).

  50. Lundberg, S. & Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 (2017).

  51. Taner, M. T. & Sheriff, R. E. Application of amplitude, frequency, and other attributes to stratigraphic and hydrocarbon determination: Section 2. Application of seismic reflection configuration to stratigraphic interpretation. (1977).

  52. Hernandez-Molina, F. J. et al. The infralittoral prograding wedge: A new large-scale progradational sedimentary body in shallow water environments. Geo-Mar. Lett. 20, 109–117 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Brooke, C. M., Trimble, T. J. & Mackay, T. A. Mounded shallow gas sands from the Quaternary of the North Sea: Analogues for the formation of sand mounds in deep water Tertiary sediments?. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 94, 95–101 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cathles, L. M., Su, Z. & Chen, D. The physics of gas chimney and pockmark formation, with implications for assessment of seafloor hazards and gas sequestration. Mar. Pet. Geol. 27, 82–91 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Koch, S. et al. Gas-controlled seafloor doming. Geology 43, 571–574 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Loher, M. et al. Seafloor sealing, doming, and collapse associated with gas seeps and authigenic carbonate structures at Venere mud volcano, Central Mediterranean. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 137, 76–96 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ollivier, P., Claude, C., Radakovitch, O. & Hamelin, B. TIMS measurements of 226Ra and 228Ra in the Gulf of Lion, an attempt to quantify submarine groundwater discharge. Mar. Chem. 109, 337–354 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schattner, U., Lazar, M., Souza, L. A. P., ten Brink, U. & Mahiques, M. M. P. Pockmark asymmetry and seafloor currents in the Santos Basin offshore Brazil. Geo-Mar. Lett. 36, 457–464 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Böttner, C. et al. The enigmatic pockmarks of the sandy southeastern North Sea. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 25, e2024GC011837 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pau, M., Gisler, G. & Hammer, Ø. Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamics in pockmarks using particle tracking velocimetry. Geo-Mar. Lett. 34, 11–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Coughlan, M. et al. Geological settings and controls of fluid migration and associated seafloor seepage features in the North Irish Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 123, 104762 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank OFB (notably Grégory Agin), IFREMER (Gwénaël Jouet), Shom (Yann Le Faou), RTE (Jules Lacombe), EDF (Thierry Denois), DGEC (Guillaume Poirier) and Engie (Samuel Lemière) for providing access to data, as well as Genavir and Technoambiente teams for data acquisition. Additional seismic data were acquired by the DEM’EAUX project, funded by the French Government, Région Occitanie, Agence de l’Eau, Perpignan Métropôle and département des Pyrénées Orientales. We are grateful to Marina Rabineau and Estelle Leroux for access to the AMMED cruise dataset, and to Olivier Raynal and Bertil Hébert (CEFREM) for their participation in data acquisition. We also thank Lies Loncke (CEFREM) for valuable suggestions.

Funding

This research did receive funding. André Lion received funding from French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Space. André Lion received funding from Office Français de la Biodiversité.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, CNRS, University of Perpignan, Perpignan, France

    André Lion, Maria-Angela Bassetti, Serge Berné & Romain Jatiault

Authors
  1. André Lion
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria-Angela Bassetti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Serge Berné
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Romain Jatiault
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AL contributed to conceptualization, data analysis, interpretation and writing. SB contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition and analysis, interpretation and writing. MAB contributed to conceptualization, interpretation and writing. RJ contributed to conceptualization, interpretation and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Lion.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lion, A., Bassetti, MA., Berné, S. et al. Understanding tens of thousands of pockmarks and domes using machine learning (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean Sea). Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42740-4

Download citation

  • Received: 12 December 2025

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 24 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42740-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Pockmarks
  • Domes
  • Gulf of Lions–northwest Mediterranean Sea
  • Machine learning
  • Cold seeps
  • Maximum flooding surface
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Marine geology

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene