Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Torque regulation is affected by joint angle during isometric contraction in young male adults
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 March 2026

Torque regulation is affected by joint angle during isometric contraction in young male adults

  • J. H. Oliveira1,2,
  • J. S. Gomes3,
  • P. Bauer3,
  • P. Pezarat-Correia3 &
  • …
  • J. R. Vaz2,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 542 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Electromyography – EMG
  • Physiology

Abstract

Research demonstrates that the magnitude of torque variability is influenced by joint angle. However, complexity-based measures seem to provide distinct information than the traditional magnitude-based measures of variability, being more sensitive to detect subtle changes in physiological outputs’ dynamics. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of joint angle on torque complexity and intermuscular coordination. Twenty-five male adults performed a sustained isometric knee extensor task at 110% of their end-test torque for 30 s at five different joint angles. Torque complexity and variability were assessed using Sample Entropy (SampEn) and Coefficient of Variation (CV), respectively, while intermuscular coordination was evaluated through Co-Contraction Index (CCi). Results revealed that SampEn at OA−30º was significantly lower than at OA (p = 0.014) and OA + 15º (p = 0.022), indicating reduced torque complexity at shortened muscle lengths. CV and CCi exhibited similar behaviors by presenting a trend for a U-shape relationship with joint angle. Our findings suggest a decrease in the individuals’ capacity to regulate the torque production with the shortening of the knee extensors which can possibly be explained by the mechanical properties of the muscle and central and peripheral neuromuscular factors or, most importantly, by the complex interaction between all the mechanisms involved in torque regulation.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

All Matlab® R2023a codes are deposited in Zenodo repository [65] and available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Goldberger, A. L. et al. Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 2466–2472 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lipsitz, L. A. & Goldberger, A. L. Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging: Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA 267, 1806–1809 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Enoka, R. M. et al. Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J. Electromyograph Kinesiol. 13, 1–12 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forrest, S. M., Challis, J. H. & Winter, S. L. The effect of signal acquisition and processing choices on ApEn values: Towards a ‘gold standard’ for distinguishing effort levels from isometric force records. Med. Eng. Phys. 36, 676–683 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaillancourt, D. E. & Newell, K. M. Ageing and the time and frequency structure of force output variability. J. Appl. Physiol. 94, 903–912 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vaillancourt, D. E. & Newell, K. M. Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol. Aging 23, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00247-0 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Slifkin, A. B. & Newell, K. M. Noise, information transmission, and force variability. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 837–851 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravi, D. K. et al. Rhythmic auditory stimuli modulate movement recovery in response to perturbation during locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb237073 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral fatigue and muscle blood flow occlusion on the complexity of knee-extensor torque output in humans. Exp. Physiol. 103, 956–967 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Loss of knee extensor torque complexity during fatiguing isometric muscle contractions occurs exclusively above the critical torque. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 310, R1144–R1153 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hausdorff, J. M. et al. Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations. J. Appl. Physiol. 80, 1448–1457 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cavanaugh, J. T. et al. Detecting altered postural control after cerebral concussion in athletes with normal postural stability. Br. J. Sports Med. 39, 805–811 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fiogbe, E. et al. Complexity of knee extensor torque: effect of aging and contraction intensity. J. Strength. Cond Res. 00, 1–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira, J. et al. Changes in torque complexity and maximal torque after a fatiguing exercise protocol. Sports Biomech. 23, 1–13. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2022.2067588

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Physiological complexity: influence of ageing, disease and neuromuscular fatigue on muscle force and torque fluctuations. Exp. Physiol. 106, 2046–2059 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Fatigue reduces the complexity of knee extensor torque fluctuations during maximal and submaximal intermittent isometric contractions in man. J. Physiol. 593, 2085–2096 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Relationship between muscle metabolic rate and muscle torque complexity during fatiguing intermittent isometric contractions in humans. Physiol. Rep. 7, e14240 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Fatigue reduces the complexity of knee extensor torque during fatiguing sustained isometric contractions. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 19, 1349–1358 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer, P. et al. Torque Regulation Is Influenced by the Nature of the Isometric Contraction. Sensors 23, 726 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slifkin, A. B. & Newell, K. M. Variability and noise in continuous force production. J. Mot Behav. 32, 141–150 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Newman, S. A., Jones, G. & Newham, D. J. Quadriceps voluntary activation at different joint angles measured by two stimulation techniques. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 89, 496–499 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Becker, R. & Awiszus, F. Physiological alterations of maximal voluntary quadriceps activation by changes of knee joint angle. Muscle Nerve. 24, 667–672 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sosnoff, J. J., Voudrie, S. J. & Ebersole, K. T. The effect of knee joint angle on torque control. J. Mot Behav. 42, 5–10 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pethick, J., Winter, S. L. & Burnley, M. Physiological complexity: Influence of ageing, disease and neuromuscular fatigue on muscle force and torque fluctuations. Exp. Physiol. 106, 2046–2059. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP089711 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rose, M. H., Løkkegaard, A., Sonne-Holm, S. & Jensen, B. R. Tremor Irregularity, Torque Steadiness and Rate of Force Development in Parkinson’s Disease. Mot. Control. 17, 203–216 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vaillancourt, D. E. & Newell, K. M. The dynamics of resting and postural tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 2046–2056 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vaillancourt, D. E., Slifkin, A. B. & Newell, K. M. Regularity of force tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 1594–1603 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Latash, M. L. Muscle coactivation: definitions, mechanisms, and functions. Rev. Progress Motor Control Latash ML. 120, 88–104 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Berret, B., Verdel, D., Burdet, E. & Jean, F. Co-contraction embodies uncertainty: An optimal feedforward strategy for robust motor control. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1012598 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Milner, T. E. Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction. Exp. Brain Res. 143, 406–416 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dideriksen, J. L., Negro, F. & Farina, D. The optimal neural strategy for a stable motor task requires a compromise between level of muscle cocontraction and synaptic gain of afferent feedback. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 1895–1911 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hirokawa, S., Solomonow, M., Luo, Z., Lu, Y. & D’Ambrosia, R. Muscular co-contraction and control of knee stability. J. Electromyog Kinesiol. 1, 199–208 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Danion, F. & Galléa, C. The relation between force magnitude, force steadiness, and muscle co-contraction in the thumb during precision grip. Neurosci. Lett. 368, 176–180 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baratta, R., Solomonow, M., Zhou, B. H., Letson, D. & Chuinard, R. Muscular coactivation: The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am. J. Sports Med. 16, 113–122 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, R., Delahunt, E., Ditroilo, M., Lowery, M. M. & De Vito, G. Effect of knee joint angle and contraction intensity on hamstrings coactivation. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 1668–1676 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qi, Z. Influence of knee joint position on co-contractions of agonist and antagonist muscles during maximal voluntary isometric contractions: Electromyography and cybex measurement. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 19, 125–130 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Araujo, L. G. et al. Twenty-four-hour rhythms of muscle strength with a consideration of some methodological problems. Biol. Rhythm Res. 42, 473–490 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Burnley, M. Estimation of critical torque using intermittent isometric maximal voluntary contractions of the quadriceps in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 106, 975–983 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hermens, H. J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C. & Rau, G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 361–374 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stergiou, N. Innovative Analyses of Human Movement (Human Kinetics, 2004).

  41. Richman, J. S. & Moorman, J. R. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 278, H2039–H2049 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raffalt, P. C., Yentes, J. M., Freitas, S. R. & Vaz, J. R. Calculating sample entropy from isometric torque signals: Methodological considerations and recommendations. Front. Physiol. 14, 1173702 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yentes, J. M. et al. The appropriate use of approximate entropy and sample entropy with short data sets. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 349–365 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cavanaugh, J. T., Guskiewicz, K. M. & Stergiou, N. A nonlinear dynamic approach for evaluating postural control: new directions for the management of sport-related cerebral concussion. Sports Med. 35, 935–950 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rudolph, K. S., Axe, M. J. & Snyder-Mackler, L. Dynamic stability after ACL injury: Who can hop? Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 8, 262–269 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bernstein, N. A. The Co-Ordination and Regulation of Movements (Pergamon, 1967).

  47. Christova, P., Kossev, A. & Radicheva, N. Discharge rate of selected motor units in human biceps brachii at different muscle lengths. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 8, 287–294 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hager, R., Poulard, T., Nordez, A., Dorel, S. & Guilhem, X. G. Influence of joint angle on muscle fascicle dynamics and rate of torque development during isometric explosive contractions. J. Appl. Physiol. 129, 569–579 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kennedy, P. M. & Cresswell, A. G. The effect of muscle length on motor-unit recruitment during isometric plantar flexion in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 136, 58–64 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rassier, D. E., Macintosh, B. R. & Herzog, W. Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 86, 1445–1457 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Proske, U. & Morgan, D. L. Do cross-bridges contribute to the tension during stretch of passive muscle? J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil. 20, 433–442 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ando, R. Association of the rate of torque development and joint angle with passive muscle stiffness. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 124, 2665–2673 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Knudson, D. V. The Biomechanics of Stretching. J. Exerc. Sci. Physiotherapy. 2, 3–12 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Herzog, W. & Ter Keurs, H. E. D. J. Force-length relation of in-vivo human rectus femoris muscles. Eur. J. Physiol. 411, 642–647 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Solomonow, M. et al. The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am. J. Sports Med. 15, 207–213 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Santos, P. D. G., Vaz, J. O. R., Correia, J., Neto, T. & Pezarat-Correia, P. Long-term neurophysiological adaptations to strength training: A systematic review with cross-sectional studies. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 37, 2091–2105 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Boonstra, T. W. & Breakspear, M. Neural mechanisms of intermuscular coherence: implications for the rectification of surface electromyography. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 796–807 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Boonstra, T. W., van Wijk, B. C. M., Praamstra, P. & Daffertshofer, A. Corticomuscular and bilateral EMG coherence reflect distinct aspects of neural synchronization. Neurosci. Lett. 463, 17–21 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cudicio, A., Martinez-Valdes, E., Cogliati, M., Orizio, C. & Negro, F. The force-generation capacity of the tibialis anterior muscle at different muscle–tendon lengths depends on its motor unit contractile properties. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 122, 317–330 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Glover, I. S. & Baker, S. N. Cortical, corticospinal, and reticulospinal contributions to strength training. J. Neurosci. 40, 5820–5832 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hali, K., Zero, A. M. & Rice, C. L. Effect of ankle joint position on triceps surae contractile properties and motor unit discharge rates. Physiol. Rep. 8, e14680 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Carr, J. C. & King, A. C. Sex differences in the fractal dynamics of force control during maximal handgrip. Neurosci. Lett. 820, 137588 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Harrison, S., Clark, N. C., Ansdell, P. & Pethick, J. Sex differences in knee extensor torque control. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 72, 102806 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Brown, R. E., Edwards, D. L. & Jakobi, J. M. Sex differences in force steadiness in three positions of the forearm. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 110, 1251–1257 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Oliveira, J., Sá Gomes, J., Bauer, P., Pezarat Correia, P. & Vaz, R. J. Torque regulation is affected by joint angle during isometric contraction in young male adults: Matlab codes. Zenodo (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. by project referenceUID/4585/2025 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04585/2025) . João R. Vaz was partly supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. under grant number UIDB/00447/2020 to CIPER - Centro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (unit:447). João R. Vaz was partly funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM) under grant number UIDB/04585/2020. João H. Oliveira, João S. Gomes and Philipp Bauer were supported with PhD scholarships from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia with grant numbers 2021.08271.BD, 2022.10952.BD and UI/BD/154379/2023, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    J. H. Oliveira

  2. CIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    J. H. Oliveira & J. R. Vaz

  3. Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511, Almada, Portugal

    J. S. Gomes, P. Bauer, P. Pezarat-Correia & J. R. Vaz

Authors
  1. J. H. Oliveira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. S. Gomes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Bauer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Pezarat-Correia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. R. Vaz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.H.O.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Project administration; J.R.V.: Conceptualization, Methodology; Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration; J.S.G.: Validation, Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization; P.P.C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration; Philipp Bauer: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Vaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Faculty of Human Kinetics (approval number #3/2022). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, J.H., Gomes, J.S., Bauer, P. et al. Torque regulation is affected by joint angle during isometric contraction in young male adults. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42754-y

Download citation

  • Received: 18 December 2024

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 10 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42754-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • Variability
  • Entropy
  • Force control
  • Muscle length
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing