Table 1 Summary of literature review.
From: Integrated ATC enhancement and load growth forecasting via WOA-based optimal DSTATCOM placement
Ref | Key findings / contributions |
|---|---|
Accurate ATC estimation is essential to maintain system security and ensure optimal use of transmission capacity. Short-term load forecasting improves timing and deployment of DSTATCOM reactive support, helping maintain voltages during contingencies | |
Overestimation of ATC can lead to cascading outages (e.g., 2003 Northeast blackout), demonstrating the danger of optimistic ATC estimates | |
Underestimation of ATC causes unused capacity and financial inefficiencies in power markets | |
FACTS devices (e.g., SVC, TCSC) alleviate transmission bottlenecks, and improve system flexibility for better DER integration | |
A TCSC location-optimization method: 4.17% reduction in losses and 23.02% increase in loadability, directly improving ATC | |
Cooperative-strategy differential evolution achieves ~ 15% reduction in sum-of-squared errors and ~ 12% increase in estimation accuracy versus conventional methods | |
Jaya-enabled Flower Pollination Technique outperforms GWO and PSO for TCSC placement — faster convergence and improved placement effectiveness | |
Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) for hybrid power-flow and FACTS controller placement reduces real power loss and generation cost while maintaining stability | |
Salp Swarm Optimization for FACTS placement enhances voltage stability and loadability, thereby increasing ATC and reducing congestion | |
DSTATCOM improves power quality and reduces transmission losses; optimal siting is critical to maximizing ATC benefits | |
Immune Algorithm (IA) applied to DSTATCOM placement considers cost minimization and loss reduction | |
Brattle Group finding: FACTS technologies can potentially double transfer capability for parts of the U.S. Southwest Power Pool | |
U.S. DOE analysis: dynamic line ratings and power-flow controllers can substantially reduce renewable curtailment | |
(Related DOE studies) Dynamic ratings and controllers could reduce renewable energy curtailment by ~ 43%, aiding consumer benefits in high-renewable grids | |
In Kazakhstan, improving ATC supports larger renewable integration and reduces dependence on carbon-intensive generation in pursuit of carbon neutrality | |
Python-based energy system simulation enables scenario analysis (e.g., line expansion + renewables) for assessing ATC under different futures | |
3% annual load growth scenario sourced from Western Australian regional planning (represents moderate/slow growth contexts) | |
6% annual load growth scenario used to represent extreme but plausible developments (e.g., mining or major industrial start-ups) | |
3% (CEA India) and 6% (NREL / developing-economy peaks) scenarios used to ensure robustness across policy-aligned and high-demand projections | |
Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) — suitable for complex power-system optimization in deregulated environments (inspired by humpback whale hunting) | |
Mathematical ATC-forecasting expressions developed to relate load increments to ATC while considering voltage stability objectives | |
Additional formulations for ATC forecasting that incorporate objectives such as loss minimization and ATC maximization | |
N-1 contingency analysis: outage of IEEE-14 line 2–4 produced > 40% ATC drop, while peripheral line outages gave < 5% change; behavior consistent with PTDF/LODF sensitivities | |
Novelty claim: application of WOA to optimal DSTATCOM placement for ATC enhancement in deregulated systems (includes load growth scenarios) | |
Suggested future work: hybrid WOA variants (e.g., stochastic sinusoidal inertia weights, modified WOA) to improve convergence and accuracy for placement problems | |
IEEE 14-bus test system description: 14 buses, 5 generators, 4 transformers, 16 transmission lines, 11 load points — used as primary testbed | |
IEEE 14-bus system data summary: total losses ≈ 13.39 MW & 30.12 MVAR; base 100 MVA; load = 259.3 MW & 73.7 MVAR; voltage levels and the most dissipative line (Bus 1–2) noted |