Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Nasal and oral breathing modes reconfigure brain network dynamics between stabilizing integration and promoting fragmentation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Nasal and oral breathing modes reconfigure brain network dynamics between stabilizing integration and promoting fragmentation

  • Sadeq Mohammadi1,
  • Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh1,2 &
  • Mohammad Reza Raoufy3,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Breathing rhythmically coordinates neural oscillations across the brain, yet how the breathing mode (nasal vs. oral) modulates large-scale functional networks over time remains unclear. Building on prior static connectivity findings, this study applied dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) analysis using a hidden Markov model (HMM) to resting-state fMRI data from 20 healthy adults during nasal and oral breathing, focusing on the 0.1–0.2 Hz frequency band. Three recurrent brain states were identified: (1) a weakly connected, segregated state; (2) a globally integrated state dominated by default mode, frontoparietal, salience, and limbic networks; and (3) a partially segregated intermediate state. Compared with oral breathing, nasal breathing stabilized the integrated state, increasing its lifetime (p-FDR = 0.03) and reducing switching rates (p-FDR = 0.002). Oral breathing showed greater fractional occupancy of the intermediate state (p-FDR = 0.03) and a higher probability of transitions from integration to fragmentation (p-FDR = 0.02). Graph-theoretic analysis also revealed that nasal breathing supported a configuration with higher efficiency and lower modularity. Taken together, this study provides the first respiration-entrained, HMM-based dFC analysis of resting-state fMRI, demonstrating that nasal breathing entrains a stable, globally coherent state, whereas oral breathing disrupts this stability and promotes fragmented network organization.

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Tort, A. B., Laplagne, D. A., Draguhn, A. & Gonzalez, J. Global coordination of brain activity by the breathing cycle. Nat Rev. Neurosci. 1–21 (2025).

  2. Heck, D. H. et al. Recent insights into respiratory modulation of brain activity offer new perspectives on cognition and emotion. Biol. Psychol. 170, 108316 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tort, A. B., Brankačk, J. & Draguhn, A. Respiration-entrained brain rhythms are global but often overlooked. Trends Neurosci. 41, 186–197 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heck, D. H. et al. Breathing as a fundamental rhythm of brain function. Front. Neural Circuits. 10, 115 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zelano, C. et al. Nasal respiration entrains human limbic oscillations and modulates cognitive function. J. Neurosci. 36, 12448–12467 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grosmaitre, X., Santarelli, L. C., Tan, J., Luo, M. & Ma, M. Dual functions of mammalian olfactory sensory neurons as odor detectors and mechanical sensors. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 348–354 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karalis, N. & Sirota, A. Breathing coordinates cortico-hippocampal dynamics in mice during offline states. Nat. Commun. 13, 467 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Folschweiller, S. & Sauer, J. F. Respiration-Driven Brain Oscillations in Emotional Cognition. Front. Neural Circuits. 15, 761812 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herrero, J. L., Khuvis, S., Yeagle, E., Cerf, M. & Mehta, A. D. Breathing above the brain stem: volitional control and attentional modulation in humans. J. Neurophysiol. (2018).

  10. Goheen, J., Anderson, J. A., Zhang, J. & Northoff, G. From lung to brain: respiration modulates neural and mental activity. Neurosci. Bull. 39, 1577–1590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammadi, S., Hossein-Zadeh, G. A. & Raoufy, M. R. Breathing mode selectively modulates brain-wide functional connectivity. PLoS One 20, e0334165 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klimesch, W. The frequency architecture of brain and brain body oscillations: an analysis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 48, 2431–2453 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vidaurre, D., Smith, S. M. & Woolrich, M. W. Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 12827–12832 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allen, E. A. et al. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb. Cortex 24, 663–676 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lurie, D. J. et al. Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 30–69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchison, R. M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 80, 360–378 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vidaurre, D. et al. Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data. Neuroimage 126, 81–95 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baker, A. P. et al. Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity. elife 3, e01867 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geng, L. et al. Depression links to unstable resting-state brain dynamics: insights from hidden markov models and functional network variability. Psychol. Med. 55, e200 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, X. et al. Reconfiguration of brain network dynamics in bipolar disorder: a hidden Markov model approach. Translational Psychiatry. 14, 507 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kottaram, A. et al. Brain network dynamics in schizophrenia: Reduced dynamism of the default mode network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 2212–2228 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, X. et al. Frequency-specific alterations of the resting-state BOLD signals in nocturnal enuresis: an fMRI study. Sci. Rep. 11, 12042 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sterling, M. General health questionnaire–28 (GHQ-28). J. Physiother 57, 259 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldberg, D. P. & Hillier, V. F. A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol. Med. 9, 139–145 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parkitny, L. & McAuley, J. The depression anxiety stress scale (DASS). J. Physiother. 56, 204 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lovibond, P. F. & Lovibond, S. H. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav. Res. Ther. 33, 335–343 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods. 16, 111–116 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gorgolewski, K. et al. Nipype. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.596855 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.852659 (2018).

  30. Gorgolewski, K. et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front. Neuroinform 5, 13 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17, 825–841 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cox, R. W. & Hyde, J. S. Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data. NMR Biomedicine: Int. J. Devoted Dev. Applic. Magn. Reson. Vivo 10, 171–178 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Glasser, M. F. et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179–194 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63–72 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L., Grossman, M. & Gee, J. C. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med. Image Anal. 12, 26–41 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nieto-Castanon, A. & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. CONN functional connectivity toolbox: RRID SCR_009550, release 22. (2022).

  38. Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. & Nieto-Castanon, A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2, 125–141 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Penny, W. D., Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J. T., Kiebel, S. J. & Nichols, T. E. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images (Elsevier, 2011).

  40. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15, 273–289 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qiu, Z. et al. Altered brain dynamics in chronic neck and shoulder pain revealed by hidden Markov model. Sci. Rep. 15, 18018 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. (2011).

  43. Tian, Y., Margulies, D. S., Breakspear, M. & Zalesky, A. Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1421–1432 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31, 968–980 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schaefer, A. et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex. 28, 3095–3114 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bonkhoff, A. K. et al. Acute ischaemic stroke alters the brain’s preference for distinct dynamic connectivity states. Brain 143, 1525–1540 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vidaurre, D. et al. Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task. Neuroimage 180, 646–656 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rubinov, M. & Sporns, O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 1059–1069 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Latora, V. & Marchiori, M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 198701 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  51. E Newman, M. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 8577–8582 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Xia, M., Wang, J. & He, Y. BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One. 8, e68910 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. González, J. et al. Breathing modulates gamma synchronization across species. Pflugers Arch. 475, 49–63 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Del Negro, C. A., Funk, G. D. & Feldman, J. L. Breathing matters. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 351–367 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Salimi, M. et al. Nasal airflow promotes default mode network activity. Respir Physiol. Neurobiol. 307, 103981 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shine, J. M. et al. The dynamics of functional brain networks: integrated network states during cognitive task performance. Neuron 92, 544–554 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Salimi, M. et al. Nasal air puff promotes default mode network activity in mechanically ventilated comatose patients: a noninvasive brain stimulation approach. Neuromodulation 25, 1351–1363 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zaccaro, A., Piarulli, A., Melosini, L., Menicucci, D. & Gemignani, A. Neural correlates of non-ordinary states of consciousness in pranayama practitioners: the role of slow nasal breathing. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 16, 803904 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou, G. et al. Human hippocampal connectivity is stronger in olfaction than other sensory systems. Prog Neurobiol. 201, 102027 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bayrak, Ö., Polastri, M. & Pehlivan, E. Effects of nasal and oral breathing on respiratory muscle and brain function: A review. Thorac. Res. Pract. 26, 145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kuroishi, R. C. S., Garcia, R. B., Valera, F. C. P., Anselmo-Lima, W. T. & Fukuda, M. T. H. Deficits in working memory, reading comprehension and arithmetic skills in children with mouth breathing syndrome: analytical cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med. J. 133, 78–83 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ghazvineh, S., Mooziri, M., Salimi, A., Mirnajafi–Zadeh, J. & Raoufy, M. R. Olfactory epithelium electrical stimulation mitigates memory and synaptic deficits caused by mechanical ventilation. Sci. Rep. 15, 12197 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ghazvineh, S. et al. Rhythmic air-puff into nasal cavity modulates activity across multiple brain areas: A non-invasive brain stimulation method to reduce ventilator-induced memory impairment. Respir Physiol. Neurobiol. 287, 103627 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Salimi, M. et al. Olfactory bulb stimulation mitigates Alzheimer’s-like disease progression. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 30, e70056 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Khodadadi, M. et al. Effect of low frequency stimulation of olfactory bulb on seizure severity, learning, and memory in kindled rats. Epilepsy Res. 188, 107055 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bastani, M. et al. Deep brain stimulation of the olfactory bulb alleviates depressive-like behaviors and alters prefrontal cortex hippocampal coherence. Brain Res. 149902 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge NBML for providing data acquisition facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioelectric, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Sadeq Mohammadi & Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh

  2. School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran

    Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh

  3. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Raoufy

  4. Institute for Brain Sciences and Cognition, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Raoufy

Authors
  1. Sadeq Mohammadi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Reza Raoufy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MR.R. conceptualized the study. S.M. and GA.HZ. designed the study. S.M. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. GA.HZ. supervised the study. All authors discussed and interpreted the results, reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, S., Hossein-Zadeh, GA. & Raoufy, M.R. Nasal and oral breathing modes reconfigure brain network dynamics between stabilizing integration and promoting fragmentation. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43617-2

Download citation

  • Received: 14 November 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43617-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Breathing
  • Brain function
  • Brain networks
  • Resting-state fMRI
  • Dynamic functional connectivity
  • Hidden Markov model
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing