Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
EffectorFisher: association of disease phenotype with pangenomic protein-isoform profiles for improved prediction of fungal pathogenicity effectors
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 March 2026

EffectorFisher: association of disease phenotype with pangenomic protein-isoform profiles for improved prediction of fungal pathogenicity effectors

  • Mohitul Hossain1,
  • Naomi Gray1,
  • Pavel Misiun1,
  • Kristina Gagalova3,
  • Eiko Furuki1,
  • Kasia Clarke1,
  • Leon Lenzo1,
  • Hossein Golzar2,
  • Manisha Shankar2,
  • Huyen Phan1 &
  • …
  • James Hane1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1060 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Genetics
  • Microbiology
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Plant-pathogenic fungi cause crop disease via a range of secreted effector proteins that interact with specific receptors of host plant cells. Effector identification can enable the diagnosis of disease outcomes and enable selection or breeding of disease-resistant crop cultivars. Bioinformatic methods have been developed to predict proteins with ‘effector-like’ properties, but the resulting number of candidates tends to be larger than can be feasibly validated and may contain numerous false positives. Challenges to effector discovery include the obfuscating effects of genome-wide mutations common to Fungi, such as Repeat-Induced Point (RIP) mutations. Refining effector predictions by incorporating disease phenotyping into genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have had mixed success for a handful of pathogen species. But the utility of GWAS approaches may be limited by low ‘signal-to-noise’ caused by widespread RIP-like SNP mutations across the genomes of most fungal pathogens. This study presents an alternative method for effector candidate refinement called ‘EffectorFisher’. EffectorFisher extends the output of Predector – a tool that automates and combines results of several bioinformatic tools commonly used in effector discovery – to apply pangenome-derived protein-isoform profiling to remove candidate effector protein isoforms with weak association with virulent phenotypes. This method was benchmarked using corresponding pangenome and phenotype data for two model wheat pathogens, each with multiple known effectors: the necrotroph Parastagonospora nodorum and the hemibiotroph Zymoseptoria tritici. Compared to prior methods based on effector-like protein properties, EffectorFisher improved predicted rankings of known effectors and reduced the total number of effector candidates. We present EffectorFisher (https://github.com/ccdmb/EffectorFisher-core) as a useful tool for refining effector predictions with phenotype data, which is broadly applicable to many fungal pathogen species, and is capable of predicting effectors involved in both gene-for-gene and inverse gene-for-gene effector-receptor interactions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Quantitative pathogenicity and host adaptation in a fungal plant pathogen revealed by whole-genome sequencing

Article Open access 02 March 2024

An automated and combinative method for the predictive ranking of candidate effector proteins of fungal plant pathogens

Article Open access 05 October 2021

A thousand-genome panel retraces the global spread and adaptation of a major fungal crop pathogen

Article Open access 24 February 2023

Data availability

EffectorFisher code is available from [https://github.com/ccdmb/EffectorFisher-core](https:/github.com/ccdmb/EffectorFisher-core). Genome sequence data for Parastagonospora nodorum was obtained for: (a) reference isolates SN15 [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA686477], LDN03-Sn4 (Sn4), Sn2000, and Sn79-1087 39 [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA398070], (b) 14 isolates from multiple regions (Western Australia, Iran, Europe and the United States) [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA686477, PRJNA398070, PRJNA476481, PRJNA170816, PRJNA170815], and (c) 136 isolates from Western Australia [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA1130627]. Genome sequence data for Zymoseptoria tritici was obtained for (a) 132 isolates collected across multiple regions (Australia, Israel, Switzerland, United States) [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA890236, PRJNA327615], and (b) reference isolate IPO323 [NCBI BioProject: PRJNA19047]. Disease phenotype datasets used in this study were sourced from (a) a prior study of P. nodorum ([https://doi.org:10.3389/fpls.2019.01785] (https:/doi.org:10.3389/fpls.2019.01785)) (b) a prior study of Z. tritici by ([https://doi.org: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13117] (https:/doi.org: https:/doi.org/10.1111/eva.13117)) (available from: [https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.j3tx95 × 9 m] (https:/datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.j3tx95 × 9 m)).

References

  1. Dean, R. et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher, M. C. et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10947 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, D. A. B., Moolhuijzen, P. M. & Hane, J. K. Remote homology clustering identifies lowly conserved families of effector proteins in plant-pathogenic fungi. Microb. Genomics. 7 https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000637 (2021).

  4. Jones, D. A. B. et al. An automated and combinative method for the predictive ranking of candidate effector proteins of fungal plant pathogens. Sci. Rep. 11, 19731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99363-0 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kanja, C. & Hammond-Kosack, K. E. Proteinaceous effector discovery and characterization in filamentous plant pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 1353–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12980 (2020). https://doi.org:

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, G. et al. Fungal effectors: past, present, and future. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 81, 102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2024.102526 (2024). https://doi.org:.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fenton, A., Antonovics, J. & Brockhurst, M. A. Inverse-Gene‐for‐Gene Infection Genetics and Coevolutionary Dynamics. Am. Nat. 174, E230–E242. https://doi.org/10.1086/645087 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, D. A. B., Bertazzoni, S., Turo, C. J., Syme, R. A. & Hane, J. K. Bioinformatic prediction of plant–pathogenicity effector proteins of fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 46, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2018.01.017 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. McHale, L., Tan, X., Koehl, P. & Michelmore, R. W. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: Adaptable guards. Genome Biol. 7, 212. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-212 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friesen, T. L., Meinhardt, S. W. & Faris, J. D. The Stagonospora nodorum-wheat pathosystem involves multiple proteinaceous host-selective toxins and corresponding host sensitivity genes that interact in an inverse gene-for-gene manner. Plant J. 51, 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03166.x (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sperschneider, J. & Dodds, P. N. EffectorP 3.0: Prediction of apoplastic and cytoplasmic effectors in fungi and oomycetes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 35, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-08-21-0201-r (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kale, S. D. et al. External lipid PI3P mediates entry of eukaryotic pathogen effectors into plant and animal host cells. Cell 142, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.008 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, R. H. Y. & Tyler, B. M. Mechanisms and evolution of virulence in oomycetes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 50, 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172912 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leonelli, L. et al. Structural Elucidation and Functional Characterization of the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis Effector Protein ATR13. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002428 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stassen, J. H. M. et al. Effector identification in the lettuce downy mildew Bremia lactucae by massively parallel transcriptome sequencing. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00780.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lévesque, C. A. et al. Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire. Genome Biol. 11, 1–22 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang, R. H., Tripathy, S., Govers, F. & Tyler, B. M. RXLR effector reservoir in two Phytophthora species is dominated by a single rapidly evolving superfamily with more than 700 members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 4874–4879 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Urban, M. et al. PHI-base – The multi-species pathogen–host interaction database in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D826–D838. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1084 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lu, T., Yao, B. & Zhang, C. DFVF: Database of fungal virulence factors. Database (Oxford) 2012, bas032. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bas032 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blum, M. et al. InterPro: The protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D444–D456. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1082 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Testa, A. C., Oliver, R. P. & Hane, J. K. OcculterCut: A comprehensive survey of AT-rich regions in fungal genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 2044–2064. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw121 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, D. A. B. et al. Repeat-induced point mutations driving Parastagonospora nodorum genomic diversity are balanced by selection against non-synonymous mutations. Commun. Biol. 7, 1614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07327-7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grandaubert, J. et al. Transposable element-assisted evolution and adaptation to host plant within the Leptosphaeria maculans-Leptosphaeria biglobosa species complex of fungal pathogens. BMC Genomics 15, 1–27 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shiller, J. et al. A large family of AvrLm6-like genes in the apple and pear scab pathogens, Venturia inaequalis and Venturia pirina. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 980 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rozano, L., Mukuka, Y. M., Hane, J. K. & Mancera, R. L. Ab initio modelling of the structure of ToxA-like and MAX fungal effector proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 6262 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rozano, L., Jones, D. A. B., Hane, J. K. & Mancera, R. L. Template-based modelling of the structure of fungal effector proteins. Mol. Biotechnol. 66, 784–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-023-00703-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. de Guillen, K. et al. Structure analysis uncovers a highly diverse but structurally conserved effector family in phytopathogenic fungi. PLoS. Pathog. 11, e1005228 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, S., Turgeon, B. G. & Edwards, M. C. A ToxA-like protein from Cochliobolus heterostrophus induces light-dependent leaf necrosis and acts as a virulence factor with host selectivity on maize. Fungal Genet. Biol. 81, 12–24 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Teufel, F. et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1023–1025 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sperschneider, J. & Dodds, P. N. EffectorP 3.0: Prediction of apoplastic and cytoplasmic effectors in fungi and oomycetes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 35, 146–156 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sperschneider, J., Dodds, P. N., Singh, K. B. & Taylor, J. M. ApoplastP: Prediction of effectors and plant proteins in the apoplast using machine learning. New Phytol. 217, 1764–1778 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kristianingsih, R. & MacLean, D. Accurate plant pathogen effector protein classification ab initio with deepredeff: An ensemble of convolutional neural networks. BMC. Bioinformatics 22, 372 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Urban, M. et al. PHI-base–The multi-species pathogen–host interaction database in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D826–D838 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D418–D427 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jones, D. A. et al. An automated and combinative method for the predictive ranking of candidate effector proteins of fungal plant pathogens. Sci. Rep. 11, 19731 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jones, D. A. B. & Raffaele, S. Structural and Transcriptional Diversity in the Repertoire of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Effector Candidates. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. Mpmi08250101r https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-08-25-0101-r (2026).

  38. Uffelmann, E. et al. Genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 1, 59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00056-9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Richards, J. K. et al. Local adaptation drives the diversification of effectors in the fungal wheat pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum in the United States. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008223 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kariyawasam, G. K. et al. The Parastagonospora nodorum necrotrophic effector SnTox5 targets the wheat gene Snn5 and facilitates entry into the leaf mesophyll. New Phytol. 233, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17602 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong, Z. et al. A small secreted protein in Zymoseptoria tritici is responsible for avirulence on wheat cultivars carrying the Stb6 resistance gene. New Phytol. 214, 619–631 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Amezrou, R. et al. Quantitative pathogenicity and host adaptation in a fungal plant pathogen revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Commun. 151933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46191-1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Singh, N. K., Tralamazza, S. M., Abraham, L. N., Glauser, G. & Croll, D. Genome-wide association mapping reveals genes underlying population-level metabolome diversity in a fungal crop pathogen. BMC Biol. 20, 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01422-z (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dutta, A., McDonald, B. A. & Croll, D. Combined reference-free and multi-reference based GWAS uncover cryptic variation underlying rapid adaptation in a fungal plant pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011801 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, C. et al. GWAS reveals a rapidly evolving candidate avirulence effector in the Cercospora leaf spot pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol. 25, e13407. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13407 (2024). https://doi.org:

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hartmann, F. E. et al. Recombination suppression and evolutionary strata around mating-type loci in fungi: documenting patterns and understanding evolutionary and mechanistic causes. New. Phytol. 229, 2470–2491. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17039 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Menat, J., Armstrong-Cho, C. & Banniza, S. Lack of evidence for sexual reproduction in field populations of Colletotrichum lentis. Fungal Ecol. 20, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.11.001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hane, J. K., Williams, A. H., Taranto, A. P., Solomon, P. S. & Oliver, R. P. Repeat-induced point mutation: a fungal-specific, endogenous mutagenesis process, in Genetic Transformation Systems in Fungi 2:55–68 Springer, (2014).

  49. Jones, D. A. et al. Repeat-induced point mutations driving Parastagonospora nodorum genomic diversity are balanced by selection against non-synonymous mutations. Commun. Biology. 7, 1614 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tan, K. C. et al. Quantitative variation in effector activity of ToxA isoforms from Stagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 25, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-10-11-0273 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brandes, N., Linial, N. & Linial, M. PWAS: proteome-wide association study—linking genes and phenotypes by functional variation in proteins. Genome Biol. 21, 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02089-x (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao, T. et al. A proteome-wide association study identifies putative causal proteins for breast cancer risk. Br. J. Cancer. 131, 1796–1804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02879-1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, J., Li, X. & Luo, X. J. Proteome-wide Association Study Provides Insights Into the Genetic Component of Protein Abundance in Psychiatric Disorders. Biol. Psychiatry. 90, 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.022 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cheng, B. et al. Integrated analysis of proteome-wide and transcriptome-wide association studies identified novel genes and chemicals for vertigo. Brain Commun. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac313 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Goodwin, S. B. et al. Finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola reveals dispensome structure, chromosome plasticity, and stealth pathogenesis. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002070 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Van de Wouw, A. P. et al. Evolution of linked avirulence effectors in Leptosphaeria maculans is affected by genomic environment and exposure to resistance genes in host plants. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001180 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bertazzoni, S., Jones, D. A. B., Phan, H. T., Tan, K.-C. & Hane, J. K. Chromosome-level genome assembly and manually-curated proteome of model necrotroph Parastagonospora nodorum Sn15 reveals a genome-wide trove of candidate effector homologs, and redundancy of virulence-related functions within an accessory chromosome. BMC Genomics 22, 382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07699-8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dagvadorj, B., Outram, M. A., Williams, S. J. & Solomon, P. S. The necrotrophic effector ToxA from Parastagonospora nodorum interacts with wheat NHL proteins to facilitate Tsn1-mediated necrosis. Plant J. 110, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15677 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Liu, Z. et al. The Tsn1–ToxA interaction in the wheat–Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat–tan spot system. Genome 49, 1265–1273 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu, Z. et al. The cysteine rich necrotrophic effector SnTox1 produced by Stagonospora nodorum triggers susceptibility of wheat lines harboring Snn1. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002467 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, Z. et al. SnTox3 acts in effector triggered susceptibility to induce disease on wheat carrying the Snn3 gene. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000581 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Richards, J. K. et al. A triple threat: The Parastagonospora nodorum SnTox267 effector exploits three distinct host genetic factors to cause disease in wheat. New Phytol. 233, 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17601 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Jones, D. A. B. et al. A specific fungal transcription factor controls effector gene expression and orchestrates the establishment of the necrotrophic pathogen lifestyle on wheat. Sci. Rep. 9, 15884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52444-7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fradgley, N. et al. A large-scale pedigree resource of wheat reveals evidence for adaptation and selection by breeders. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000071 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Aboukhaddour, R. et al. A revised nomenclature for ToxA haplotypes across multiple fungal species. Phytopathology 113, 1180–1184. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-01-23-0017-sc (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Alassimone, J. et al. The Zymoseptoria tritici Avirulence factor AvrStb6 accumulates in Hyphae Close to Stomata and triggers a wheat defense response hindering fungal penetration. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 37, 432–444 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stephens, C. et al. Remarkable recent changes in the genetic diversity of the avirulence gene AvrStb6 in global populations of the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Mol. Plant Pathol. 22, 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dutta, A., Croll, D., McDonald, B. A. & Barrett, L. G. Maintenance of variation in virulence and reproduction in populations of an agricultural plant pathogen. Evol. Appl. 14, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13117 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Amezrou, R. et al. A secreted protease-like protein in Zymoseptoria tritici is responsible for avirulence on Stb9 resistance gene in wheat. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011376 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Meile, L. et al. A fungal avirulence factor encoded in a highly plastic genomic region triggers partial resistance to Septoria tritici blotch. New Phytol. 219, 1048–1061 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Karki, S. J. et al. A small secreted protein from Zymoseptoria tritici interacts with a wheat E3 ubiquitin ligase to promote disease. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa489 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ben M’Barek, S. et al. FPLC and liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry identify candidate necrosis-inducing proteins from culture filtrates of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Fungal Genet. Biol. 79, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.03.015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kettles, G. J., Bayon, C., Canning, G., Rudd, J. J. & Kanyuka, K. Apoplastic recognition of multiple candidate effectors from the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici in the nonhost plant Nicotiana benthamiana. New Phytol. 213, 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14215 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Thynne, E. et al. An array of Zymoseptoria tritici effectors suppress plant immune responses. Mol. Plant Pathol. 25, e13500. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kettles, G. J. et al. Characterization of an antimicrobial and phytotoxic ribonuclease secreted by the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. New Phytol. 217, 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14786 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Karki, S. J. et al. The Zymoseptoria tritici effector Zt-11 contributes to aggressiveness in wheat. PLoS One 19, e0313859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313859 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tian, H. et al. Three LysM effectors of Zymoseptoria tritici collectively disarm chitin-triggered plant immunity. Mol. Plant Pathol. 22, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13055 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jones, D. A. et al. A specific fungal transcription factor controls effector gene expression and orchestrates the establishment of the necrotrophic pathogen lifestyle on wheat. Sci. Rep. 9, 15884 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bringans, S. et al. Deep proteogenomics; high throughput gene validation by multidimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry of proteins from the fungal wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 301 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Jones, D. A., Moolhuijzen, P. M. & Hane, J. K. Remote homology clustering identifies lowly conserved families of effector proteins in plant-pathogenic fungi. Microb. Genomics 7, 000637 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bertazzoni, S. et al. Accessories make the outfit: Accessory chromosomes and other dispensable DNA regions in plant-pathogenic fungi. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31, 779–788 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hane, J. K. et al. A novel mode of chromosomal evolution peculiar to filamentous Ascomycete fungi. Genome Biol. 12, 1–16 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Syme, R. A., Hane, J. K., Friesen, T. L. & Oliver, R. P. Resequencing and comparative genomics of Stagonospora nodorum: Sectional gene absence and effector discovery. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 3, 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.004994 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Syme, R. A. et al. Pan-Parastagonospora comparative genome analysis—effector prediction and genome evolution. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2443–2457 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Chen, H. et al. Combined pangenomics and transcriptomics reveals core and redundant virulence processes in a rapidly evolving fungal plant pathogen. BMC Biol. 21, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01520-6 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A. & Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 70, e102 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Meng, G., Li, Y., Yang, C. & Liu, S. MitoZ: A toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e63–e63 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Levy Karin, E., Mirdita, M. & Söding, J. MetaEuk—Sensitive, high-throughput gene discovery, and annotation for large-scale eukaryotic metagenomics. Microbiome 8, 48 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Phan, H. T. T. et al. Low amplitude boom-and-bust cycles define the Septoria Nodorum Blotch interaction. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01785 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Shaw, P. D., Graham, M., Kennedy, J., Milne, I. & Marshall, D. F. Helium: Visualization of large scale plant pedigrees. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 259 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Klopfenstein, D. V. et al. GOATOOLS: A Python library for Gene Ontology analyses. Sci. Rep. 8, 10872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28948-z (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Van der Auwera, G. A. & O’Connor, B. D. Genomics in the cloud: using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra (O’Reilly Media, 2020).

  98. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wang, J. & Zhang, Z. GAPIT Version 3: Boosting power and accuracy for genomic association and prediction. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.005 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kefei Chen from AAGI for valuable feedback on the GWAS analysis. Data analysis was performed using the computational resources of the Pawsey Setonix Supercomputer at the Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre (Setonix Supercomputer, 2023). This project was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) and Curtin University as part of the co-investment in the Centre for Crop and Disease Management (CCDM) phase III project: “Advanced Bioinformatics Approaches” [CUR00023]. M. Hossain and N. Gray were supported by Research Training Program (RTP) grants provided by the Australian Government Department of Education. Additional support for M. Hossain was provided by a GRDC Research Scholarship [CUR2301-006RSX], with support from the WA Agricultural Research Collaboration (WAARC).

Funding

This project was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) and Curtin University as part of the co-investment in the Centre for Crop and Disease Management (CCDM) phase III project: “Advanced Bioinformatics Approaches” [CUR00023]. M. Hossain and N. Gray were supported by Research Training Program (RTP) grants provided by the Australian Government Department of Education. Additional support for M. Hossain was provided by a GRDC Research Scholarship [CUR2301-006RSX], with support from the WA Agricultural Research Collaboration (WAARC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Crop and Disease Management (CCDM), Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Mohitul Hossain, Naomi Gray, Pavel Misiun, Eiko Furuki, Kasia Clarke, Leon Lenzo, Huyen Phan & James Hane

  2. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Perth, Australia

    Hossein Golzar & Manisha Shankar

  3. Analytics for the Australian Grain Industry (AAGI), Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Kristina Gagalova

Authors
  1. Mohitul Hossain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naomi Gray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pavel Misiun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristina Gagalova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eiko Furuki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kasia Clarke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Leon Lenzo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hossein Golzar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Manisha Shankar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Huyen Phan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. James Hane
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JH and MH conceived the study, wrote the manuscript, and developed the code. HP, EF, KC, LL, MS and HG provided isolates and materials used in this study. PM, KG and NG assisted with code development and testing. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Hane.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Supplementary Material 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 4 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 6 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 7 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 8 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 9 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 10 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 11 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 12 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 13 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 14 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 15 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossain, M., Gray, N., Misiun, P. et al. EffectorFisher: association of disease phenotype with pangenomic protein-isoform profiles for improved prediction of fungal pathogenicity effectors. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43646-x

Download citation

  • Received: 02 August 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 11 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43646-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology