Table 5 Ablation results on TUSZ dataset.

From: PSD-LW-DCN: a generalizable power spectral density based lightweight deep convolutional neural network for seizure detection

Dataset	\(\varvec{\alpha }\)	\(\varvec{\beta }\)	\(\varvec{\gamma }\)	\(\varvec{\delta }\)	\(\varvec{\theta }\)	Acc (%)	Sen (%)	Spe (%)	AUC	F1
TUSZ	\(\checkmark\)					69.48	65.46	73.96	0.78	0.66
		\(\checkmark\)				70.56	66.56	74.53	0.79	0.67
			\(\checkmark\)			68.12	62.25	71.36	0.76	0.64
				\(\checkmark\)		71.31	65.24	76.21	0.80	0.70
					\(\checkmark\)	74.12	72.24	81.31	0.83	0.71
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)				76.43	70.11	83.31	0.85	0.73
	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)			74.83	67.89	83.85	0.83	0.71
		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)			78.61	70.82	85.56	0.87	0.79
	\(\checkmark\)			\(\checkmark\)		74.82	70.64	81.56	0.84	0.75
		\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)		75.16	72.27	85.03	0.86	0.76
			\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		76.12	69.12	84.42	0.85	0.73
				\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	74.27	70.14	79.33	0.82	0.71
	\(\checkmark\)				\(\checkmark\)	76.34	72.45	80.61	0.85	0.73
		\(\checkmark\)			\(\checkmark\)	79.63	72.15	86.25	0.88	0.80
			\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	78.32	71.35	85.29	0.87	0.79
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)			79.25	71.17	87.43	0.87	0.79
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)		80.43	72.43	87.26	0.88	0.80
	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		81.18	73.21	86.43	0.88	0.80
		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		81.31	74.24	87.34	0.89	0.81
	\(\checkmark\)			\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	78.82	72.45	85.18	0.88	0.78
		\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	77.10	71.22	84.17	0.87	0.78
			\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	79.76	71.42	84.58	0.88	0.79
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)			\(\checkmark\)	78.87	70.80	86.45	0.87	0.78
	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	78.36	72.15	86.43	0.88	0.79
		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	79.41	74.81	87.02	0.89	0.80
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		81.60	76.54	86.87	0.89	0.80
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	82.11	76.77	87.12	0.90	0.81
	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	81.25	75.88	85.60	0.89	0.80
		\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	80.78	74.63	85.34	0.88	0.80
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)		\(\checkmark\)	82.90	76.65	86.37	0.90	0.81
	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	\(\checkmark\)	83.21	78.02	88.39	0.91	0.81

Note:\(\checkmark\)indicates whether to use this frequency band.

Back to article page

Table 5 Ablation results on TUSZ dataset.

Search

Quick links