Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A retrospective clinical risk prediction model for co‑infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with COVID‑19 based on restricted cubic splines
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

A retrospective clinical risk prediction model for co‑infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with COVID‑19 based on restricted cubic splines

  • Kailong Ye1 na1,
  • Yanling Su2 na1,
  • Xiaoqing Hu1 na1,
  • Xiu Chen3,
  • Bin Song1,
  • Qinghua Zhang1,
  • Hui Lin1,
  • Linmiao Zeng1,
  • Yiqun Dai1 &
  • …
  • Jianhong Xiao1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 566 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Microbiology
  • Risk factors

Abstract

Co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) represents a clinically significant complication that often leads to prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality risk, and a higher demand for mechanical ventilation. This study constructed a risk prediction model for early identification of SARS-CoV-2 and MP co-infections. We retrospectively analyzed SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023. Patients were stratified into co-infection and mono-infection groups based on MP antibody results. LASSO regression screened 55 variables, followed by multicollinearity checks. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) analyzed nonlinear relationships between continuous variables and infection risk. Conventional logistic and integrated RCS-logistic models were constructed and compared. LASSO identified seven predictors: age, globulin, anion gap, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid, prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT). Multivariate analysis showed globulin, anion gap, uric acid, and TT were independent risk factors, whereas BUN was protective. RCS revealed significant nonlinear associations between globulin, PT, and TT levels. The RCS-logistic model outperformed the conventional linear model, with a higher AUC of 0.827, better calibration (Brier score = 0.169), and greater net clinical benefit on decision curve analysis. This model enables early risk assessment and optimizes treatment, offering a methodological reference for predicting co-infections with emerging respiratory pathogens.

Similar content being viewed by others

Using random forest and biomarkers for differentiating COVID-19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections

Article Open access 30 September 2024

Model based on the automated AI-driven CT quantification is effective for the diagnosis of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

Article Open access 13 July 2024

Co-infections observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients using a rapid diagnostic test

Article Open access 11 August 2021

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Huang, A. C. C., Huang, C. G., Yang, C. T. & Hu, H. C. Concomitant infection with COVID-19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Biomed. J. 43, 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.07.002 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suzuki, R. et al. Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Nature 603, 700–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04462-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=c.

  4. Ruiz-Bastián, M., Falces-Romero, I., Ramos-Ramos, J. C., de Pablos, M. & García-Rodríguez, J. Bacterial co-infections in COVID-19 pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital: Surfing the first wave. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 101, 115477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115477 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoque, M. N. et al. Diversity and genomic determinants of the microbiomes associated with COVID-19 and non-COVID respiratory diseases. Gene Rep. 23, 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101200 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoque, M. N. et al. Microbial co-infections in COVID-19: Associated microbiota and underlying mechanisms of pathogenesis. Microb. Pathog. 156, 104941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104941 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lansbury, L., Lim, B., Baskaran, V. & Lim, W. S. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 81, 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ai, T. et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases. Radiology 296, E32–E40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rangroo, R. et al. The severity of the co-infection of mycoplasma pneumoniae in COVID-19 patients. Cureus 14, e24563. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24563 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paget, C. & Trottein, F. Mechanisms of bacterial superinfection post-influenza: A role for unconventional T cells. Front. Immunol. 10, 336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00336 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jia, L. et al. Mechanisms of severe mortality-associated bacterial co-infections following influenza virus infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00338 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dhanoa, A., Fang, N. C., Hassan, S. S., Kaniappan, P. & Rajasekaram, G. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infections: the effects of bacterial coinfection. Virol. J. 8, 501. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-501 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, E. Y. et al. The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 10, 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12398 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, M. et al. Bacterial coinfection is associated with severity of avian influenza A (H7N9), and procalcitonin is a useful marker for early diagnosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 84, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.10.018 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zha, L. et al. Clinical features and outcomes of adult COVID-19 patients co-infected with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J. Infect. 81, e12–e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.010 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, L. et al. D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18, 1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14820 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang, N., Li, D., Wang, X. & Sun, Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18, 844–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14768 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bryce, C. et al. Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: The Mount Sinai COVID-19 autopsy experience. Mod. Pathol. 34, 1456–1467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00793-y (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiersinga, W. J. & van der Poll, T. Immunopathophysiology of human sepsis. EBioMedicine 86, 104363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.10436 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Qiu, J., Ge, J., Cao, L. & D-dimer The risk factor of children’s severe mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Front. Pediatr. 10, 828437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.828437 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, Q., Hu, T., Wu, L. & Chen, L. Clinical features and biomarkers for early prediction of refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Emerg. Med. Int. 2024, 9328177. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9328177 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kant, R. et al. Critical insights from recent outbreaks of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: decoding the challenges and effective interventions strategies. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 147, 107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107200 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nicolson, G. L. Pathogenic mycoplasma infections in chronic illnesses: General considerations in selecting conventional and integrative treatments. Int. J. Clin. Med. 10, 477–522. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2019.1010041 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Achanti, A. & Szerlip, H. M. Acid-base disorders in the critically ill patient. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04500422 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zemlin, A. E. et al. The association between acid-base status and clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit with an emphasis on high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 60, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632221134687 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, Y., Qu, J. & Zhen, P. Non-linear association between anion gap and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A cohort study from MIMIC IV database. J. Thorac. Dis. 17, 4662–4671. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2024-1964 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allegrini, S., Garcia-Gil, M., Pesi, R., Camici, M. & Tozzi, M. G. The good, the bad and the new about uric acid in cancer. Cancers. 14, 4959. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194959 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aydin Bahat, K. The effect of uric acid level on the severity of COVID-19. Acta Clin. Croat. 63, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2024.63.02.1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pan, C., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Li, M. & Qu, S. The study of routine laboratory factors in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: serum uric acid may have anti-inflammatory effect. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 35, e24026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24026 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Primorac, D. et al. Adaptive immune responses and immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Front. Immunol. 13, 848582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.848582 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ghahramani, S. et al. Laboratory features of severe vs. non-severe COVID-19 patients in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Med. Res. 25, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00432-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Papagiouvanni, I. et al. COVID-19 and liver injury: An ongoing challenge. World J. Gastroenterol. 29, 257–271. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i2.257 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yu, Y., Ji, R., Xia, Y. & Liu, F. Multicenter analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors for liver injury in severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 45, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000005037 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chaabane, N., Coupez, E., Buscot, M. & Souweine, B. Acute respiratory distress syndrome related to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 20, 89–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2016.11.016 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ding, W. et al. Clinical features and risk factors for severe macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia induced by 23 S rRNA A2063G mutation: A retrospective observational study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 44, 2475–2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05215-4 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Kailong Ye, Yanling Su and Xiaoqing Hu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China

    Kailong Ye, Xiaoqing Hu, Bin Song, Qinghua Zhang, Hui Lin, Linmiao Zeng, Yiqun Dai & Jianhong Xiao

  2. Department of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Fujian Children’s Hospital (Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center), College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

    Yanling Su

  3. Department of Obstetrics, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China

    Xiu Chen

Authors
  1. Kailong Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanling Su
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoqing Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiu Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bin Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qinghua Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hui Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Linmiao Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yiqun Dai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jianhong Xiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KY, YS, XH, YD and JX conceived and designed the study. XC, BS, QZ, HL and LZ performed the data analyses. KY, YS, XH wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiqun Dai or Jianhong Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University in Ningde (Approval No. K2026011501). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, K., Su, Y., Hu, X. et al. A retrospective clinical risk prediction model for co‑infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with COVID‑19 based on restricted cubic splines. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44539-9

Download citation

  • Received: 06 February 2026

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44539-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae
  • Co-infection
  • Clinical risk prediction model
  • Restricted cubic splines
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research