Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The explainability of radiomic-based machine learning models for brain glioma grading on amide proton transfer-weighted images
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 March 2026

The explainability of radiomic-based machine learning models for brain glioma grading on amide proton transfer-weighted images

  • Xuan Gao1 &
  • Jing Wang1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 741 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience
  • Oncology

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate radiomic-based machine learning models for glioma grading on amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) images using explainability algorithms. A total of 102 patients who underwent preoperative MR examinations, including FLAIR, T1-weighted, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced, and APTw images, were included. Two groups of APTw images were analyzed: one corresponding to contrast-enhanced regions of gliomas and the other corresponding to both contrast-enhanced and peritumoral edematous regions of gliomas. Radiomic features were extracted from these regions. Random forest, support vector machine, naïve bayes classifier, and logistic regression models were trained to distinguish grade 4 from non-grade 4 gliomas. These models were analyzed by Shapley values, permutation importance, and the method of anchors. The results of model explainability analysis revealed that the grading performance of these models relied on radiomic features highlighting the heterogeneity of radiologic phenotypes.

Data availability

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

References

  1. Deng, H. Z. et al. Advances in diffuse glioma assessment: preoperative and postoperative applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1424316 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, S. et al. Applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging in identifying genetic markers in gliomas. NMR Biomed. 36, e4731 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suh, C. H. et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI in distinguishing high- and low-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 61, 525–534 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sotirios, B., Demetriou, E., Topriceanu, C. C. & Zakrzewska, Z. The role of APT imaging in gliomas grading: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. 133, 109353 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zou, T. et al. Differentiating the histologic grades of gliomas preoperatively using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTW) and intravoxel incoherent motion MRI. NMR Biomed. 31 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3850 (2018).

  6. Guo, H. et al. Diagnostic performance of gliomas grading and IDH status decoding A comparison between 3D amide proton transfer APT and four diffusion-weighted MRI models. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 56, 1834–1844 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, S. et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted magnetic resonance image-guided stereotactic biopsy in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas. Eur. J. Cancer. 83, 9–18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, S. et al. Identifying Recurrent Malignant Glioma after Treatment Using Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MR Imaging: A Validation Study with Image-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 552–561 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sartoretti, E. et al. Amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based radiomics allows for the differentiation of gliomas from metastases. Sci. Rep. 11, 5506 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, M. et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and derived radiomics in the classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas. Eur. Radiol. 34, 2986–2996 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reyes, M. et al. On the Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2, e190043 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonato, B., Nanni, L. & Bertoldo, A. Advancing Precision: A Comprehensive Review of MRI Segmentation Datasets from BraTS Challenges (2012–2025). Sens. (Basel). 25 (6), 1838 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Griethuysen, J. J. M. et al. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer Res. 77, e104 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In NIPS’17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 4768–4777 (Curran Associates, Inc, 2017).

  16. Fisher, A., Rudin, C. & Dominici, F. All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20, 1–81 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ribeiro, M., Singh, S., Guestrin, C. & Anchors High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 32, (2018).

  18. Zhou, J. et al. Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors. Magn. Reson. Med. 88, 546–574 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Filimonova, E., Pashkov, A., Borisov, N., Kalinovsky, A. & Rzaev, J. Utilizing the amide proton transfer technique to characterize diffuse gliomas based on the WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumors. Neuroradiol. J. 37, 490–499 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank Zhang Lan and Qin Qian for their help for the lesion delineations in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.82371945).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Xuan Gao & Jing Wang

Authors
  1. Xuan Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xuan Gao conceived this study and participated in the literature search, study design, data analysis, data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. Jing Wang participated in data collection and provided critical revision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, X., Wang, J. The explainability of radiomic-based machine learning models for brain glioma grading on amide proton transfer-weighted images. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44963-x

Download citation

  • Received: 09 September 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 22 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44963-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Glioma
  • Grading
  • Machine learning
  • Explainability
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer