Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Heterologous RBMRNA-405 mRNA booster enhances humoral immunity post-inactivated COVID-19 vaccination: a randomized clinical trial in adults and older through 12 months
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 March 2026

Heterologous RBMRNA-405 mRNA booster enhances humoral immunity post-inactivated COVID-19 vaccination: a randomized clinical trial in adults and older through 12 months

  • Xiaolan Yong1Ā na1,
  • Jianxing He2Ā na1,
  • Caroline Zhang4,
  • Yongji Wang5,
  • Yoko Ou3 &
  • …
  • Biliang Zhang3,6Ā 

Scientific Reports , ArticleĀ number:Ā  (2026) Cite this article

  • 466 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • RNA vaccines
  • Viral infection

Abstract

To address the urgent need for effective immunization strategies against SARS-CoV-2 variants, particularly in older adults who are more vulnerable to severe disease, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine RBMRNA-405 as a third-dose booster in adults aged 18 years and older previously vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine. In a single-center, randomized, positive-controlled phase I study in China, 60 healthy participants were assigned (2:1) to receive either a heterologous booster (RBMRNA-405) or a homologous booster (CoronaVac). Primary endpoints assessed solicited local and systemic adverse events within 14 days post-vaccination, while secondary endpoints evaluated long-term safety and humoral immunogenicity via anti-Spike IgG ELISA and live-virus neutralization. Local pain at the injection site was the most common adverse event, primarily mild-to-moderate, with no serious vaccine-related adverse events reported. RBMRNA-405 induced 3.30-fold higher neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.1 and 17.66-fold higher anti-Spike IgG titers compared to CoronaVac on day 14 post-boost (P < 0.0001), with robust responses in older adults, where age-related immune decline necessitates tailored immunization strategies.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Main ID: NCT05897190. Date of Registration: 28/05/2023.

Data availability

Anonymized individual participant data will be made available when the study is complete, on reasonable requests made to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform. The trial protocol and statistical analysis plan will also be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. World Health Organization 2023 data.who.int, WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard > Vaccines [Dashboard] (2024). https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/vaccines.

  2. Mallapaty, S. China’s COVID vaccines have been crucial - now immunity is waning. Nature 598 (7881), 398–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02796-w (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Tanriover, M. D. et al. Efficacy and safety of an inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac): interim results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in Turkey. Lancet 398 (10296), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01429-X (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. World Health Organization. Interim recommendations for use of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, developed by Sinovac (version 15 March 2022). WHO (2021). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-Sinovac-CoronaVac-2021.1.

  5. Chavda, V. P. et al. Fast-track development of vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: The shots that saved the world. Front. Immunol. 13, 961198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.961198 (2022).

  6. Rabaan, A. A. et al. A comprehensive review on the current vaccines and their efficacies to Combat SARS-CoV-2 variants. Vaccines (Basel). 10 (10), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101655 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Collier, A. Y. et al. Differential kinetics of immune responses elicited by Covid-19 vaccines. N Engl. J. Med. 385 (21), 2010–2012. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2115596 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Pegu, A. et al. Durability of mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science 373 (6561), 1372–1377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj4176 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Lipsitch, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals: measurement, causes and impact. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00662-4 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Menegale, F. et al. Evaluation of waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine–induced immunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open. 6 (5), e2310650. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10650 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Zhang, C. & Zhang, B. RNA therapeutics: updates and future potential. Sci. China Life Sci. 66 (1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-022-2171-2 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Wu, N. et al. Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022. Lancet Respir. Med. 11 (5), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00015-2 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Krause, P. R. et al. Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses. Lancet 398 (10308), 1377–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02046-8 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Choi, A. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant mRNA vaccine boosters in healthy adults: an interim analysis. Nat. Med. 27 (11), 2025–2031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01527-y (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Clemens, S. A. C. et al. Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study. Lancet 399 (10324), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Kanokudom, S. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the third booster dose with inactivated, viral vector, and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in fully immunized healthy adults with inactivated vaccine. Vaccines (Basel). 10 (1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10010086 (2022). Published 2022 Jan 6.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. PĆ©rez-Then, E. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants following heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 booster vaccination. Nat. Med. 28 (3), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01705-6 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Cheng, S. M. S. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.1 following homologous and heterologous CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination. Nat. Med. 28 (3), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01704-7 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Zuo, F. et al. Heterologous immunization with inactivated vaccine followed by mRNA-booster elicits strong immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 2670. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30340-5 (2022).

  20. Ma, Q. et al. SARS-CoV-2 bivalent mRNA vaccine with broad protection against variants of concern. Front. Immunol. 14, 1195299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1195299 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Ma, Q. et al. Immunization with a prefusion SARS- CoV-2 spike protein vaccine (RBMRNA-176) protects against viral challenge in mice and nonhuman primates. Vaccines 10 (10), 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101698 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Lederer, K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines foster potent antigen-specific germinal center responses associated with neutralizing antibody Gener. Immun. 53(6), 1281–1295e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.009 (2020).

  23. Mudd, P. A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination elicits a robust and persistent T follicular helper cell response in humans. Cell 185 (4), 603–613e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.026 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Gao, Y. et al. Ancestral SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells cross-recognize the Omicron variant. Nat. Med. 28 (3), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01700-x (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Tauzin, A. et al. Strong humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Spike after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination with a 16-week interval between doses. Cell. Host Microbe. 30 (1), 97–109e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.004 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Atmar, R. L. et al. Homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccinations. N. Engl. J. Med. 386 (11), 1046–1057. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2116414 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Sablerolles, R. S. G. et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of vaccine boosters after Ad26.COV2.S priming. N. Engl. J. Med. 386 (10), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116747 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Munro, A. et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines given as fourth-dose boosters following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 and a third dose of BNT162b2 (COV-BOOST): a multicentre, blinded, phase 2, randomised trial. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 22 (8), 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00271-7 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Moreira, E. D. et al. Safety and efficacy of a third dose of BNT162B2 COVID-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 386 (20), 1910–1921. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2200674 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  30. PĆ©rez-Then, E. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants following heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 booster vaccination. Nat. Med. 28 (3), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01705-6 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Mallah, S. I. et al. Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 prime-boost vaccinations: homologous BBIBP-CorV versus heterologous BNT162b2 boosters in BBIBP-CorV-primed individuals. Vaccine 41 (12), 1925–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.032 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Filardi, B. A. et al. Age-dependent impairment in antibody responses elicited by a homologous CoronaVac booster dose. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, 6023. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.ade6023 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Jara, A. et al. Effectiveness of homologous and heterologous booster doses for an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a large-scale prospective cohort study. Lancet Global Health. 10 (6), e798–e806. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00112-7 (2022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Pastore, G. et al. Homologous or heterologous administration of mRNA or adenovirus-vectored vaccines show comparable immunogenicity and effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 23 (1), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2333952 (2024).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Trombetta, C. M. et al. Evaluation of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages six months after different vaccination regimens in Italy. Acta Trop. 248, 107042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.107042 (2023).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Bayart, J. L. et al. Waning of IgG, total and neutralizing antibodies 6 months post-vaccination with BNT162b2 in healthcare workers. Vaccines 9 (10), 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101092 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Dan, J. M. et al. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science 371, 6529. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf4063 (2021).

  38. Iyer, A. et al. Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients. Sci. Immunol. 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abe0367 (2020).

  39. Goldberg, Y. et al. Waning immunity after the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel. N Engl. J. Med. 385, e85. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114228 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  40. Choi, E. M. COVID-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 115 (5), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab045 (2021).

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants who volunteered for this study. We also acknowledge the contributions of clinical staff and nurses who provided help with sampling in the clinical trial.

Funding

Argorna Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. This study was an investigator-initiated trial (IIT). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Xiaolan Yong and Jianxing He contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chengdu Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Chengdu, China

    Xiaolan Yong

  2. National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China

    Jianxing He

  3. Argorna Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China

    Yoko OuĀ &Ā Biliang Zhang

  4. RiboBio Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China

    Caroline Zhang

  5. Beijing Key Tech Statistical Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing, China

    Yongji Wang

  6. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    Biliang Zhang

Authors
  1. Xiaolan Yong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  2. Jianxing He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  3. Caroline Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  4. Yongji Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  5. Yoko Ou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  6. Biliang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMedĀ Google Scholar

Contributions

X.Y. was the principal investigator and J.H. was the co-principal investigator. X.Y. and J.H. conceived the trial and contributed to the protocol and design of the study. X.Y. led the implementation of the study. Y.W. performed the statistical analysis and has verified the underlying data. Y.O. and C.Z. drafted the original manuscript. X.Y., J.H., and B.Z. reviewed and revised the original draft. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biliang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This study was an investigator-initiated trial (IIT). The sponsor/funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the trial report. This trial was sponsored by Argorna Pharmaceuticals, which provided the study vaccine RBMRNA-405. RBMRNA-405 was co-developed by Argorna and RiboBio. YO and BZ are employees of Argorna. CZ is an employee of RiboBio. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yong, X., He, J., Zhang, C. et al. Heterologous RBMRNA-405 mRNA booster enhances humoral immunity post-inactivated COVID-19 vaccination: a randomized clinical trial in adults and older through 12 months. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45429-w

Download citation

  • Received: 10 June 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 25 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45429-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • COVID-19 vaccine
  • mRNA vaccine
  • Heterologous boost
  • Safety
  • Immunogenicity
  • Older adults
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Vaccination and immunization strategies

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing