Table 1 Quantitative comparisons on the KITTI and NYUv2 datasets. Bold type indicates the best performance and underline indicates the second best performance.

From: RGB-conditioned frequency domain refinement for sparse-to-dense depth completion

Method

Param. [M]

KITTI

NYUv2

RMSE [mm] \(\downarrow\)

MAE [mm] \(\downarrow\)

iRMSE [1/km] \(\downarrow\)

iMAE [1/km] \(\downarrow\)

RMSE [m] \(\downarrow\)

REL\(\downarrow\)

\(\varvec{\delta _{1.25}}\uparrow\)

\(\varvec{\delta _{1.25^2}}\uparrow\)

\(\varvec{\delta _{1.25^3}}\uparrow\)

DeepLiDAR20

53.4

887.00

215.38

2.51

1.10

0.115

0.022

99.3

99.9

100.0

DySPN38

26

878.50

228.60

2.50

1.00

0.090

0.012

99.6

99.9

100.0

SpAgNet47

51

844.79

218.39

2.39

0.91

0.114

0.015

99.3

99.9

100.0

NLSPN48

25.8

771.80

197.30

2.00

0.80

0.092

0.012

99.6

99.9

100.0

GuideNet15

73.5

777.78

221.59

2.39

1.00

0.101

0.015

99.5

99.9

100.0

CFormer49

83.5

741.44

194.99

2.03

0.85

0.091

0.012

99.6

99.9

100.0

LRRU45

21

729.50

188.80

1.90

0.80

0.091

0.011

99.6

99.9

100.0

OGNI-DC50

83.4

747.64

182.29

1.81

0.79

0.087

0.011

99.6

99.9

100.0

Ours

36.3

721.46

184.53

1.86

0.79

0.085

0.011

99.6

99.9

100.0