Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Curtain grouting volume prediction using a Bayesian-optimized stacking ensemble model with SHAP analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Curtain grouting volume prediction using a Bayesian-optimized stacking ensemble model with SHAP analysis

  • Yahui Ma1,
  • Zhanquan Yuan2,
  • Bo Xiong3,
  • Hongwei Lei1 &
  • …
  • Weiquan Zhao1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 71 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

Curtain grouting is widely used to control seepage in large-scale water conservancy and hydropower projects, and accurate prediction of grouting volume is essential for ensuring construction quality and cost control. This study proposes a grouting volume prediction model combining Bayesian optimization (BO) with a stacking ensemble learning framework. The model was developed using a dataset of 778 valid grouting records and incorporated seven key input features: hole sequence, hole depth, section length, hole diameter, pre-grouting permeability, initial water-cement ratio, and grouting pressure. Within this framework, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest were employed as base learners, with BO applied for global hyperparameter optimization. Ridge regression served as the meta-learner to construct the Bayesian-optimized stacking ensemble (BO-Stacking) model. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to quantify feature contributions and enhance model interpretability. The results show that the BO-Stacking model outperformed the benchmark models, achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.92, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 70.19 L, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 187.07 L. Scatter analysis further indicated strong agreement between predicted and measured values. SHAP analysis quantified the relative contributions of geological conditions, construction parameters, and slurry properties to grouting volume. Overall, the proposed approach improves predictive performance of grouting volume under complex geological conditions and provides support for construction planning and quality management.

Similar content being viewed by others

Enhancing wellbore stability through machine learning for sustainable hydrocarbon exploitation

Article Open access 09 October 2025

Development of the machine learning and deep learning models with SHAP strategy for predicting groundwater levels in South Korea

Article Open access 10 October 2025

Comparative performance evaluation of machine learning models for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular soils

Article Open access 21 October 2025

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request to the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

References

  1. Xu, Z. H. et al. Latest research progress and future development direction of grouting numerical simulation in underground engineering. J. Basic. Sci. Eng. 33, 903–922 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, P. et al. Discrete element analysis of grouting reinforcement and slurry diffusion in overburden strata. Appl. Sci. 15, 8464 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xia, K. Grouting Technology Collection (China Water & Power Press, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arash, M., Dolatshahi, A. & Shahriar, K. Three-dimensional simulation analysis of the impact of excavation on non-level crossing tunnels. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33078-4 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lan, F. et al. Research on surrounding rock deformation characteristics and support optimization measures for tunnel TBM crossing through fault fracture zones. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35748-3 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, D. et al. Probabilistic stability analyses of two-layer undrained slopes. Comput. Geotech. 182, 107178 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. et al. Fracture evolution of granite under cyclic thermal shocks: effects of liquid nitrogen cooling on strength, toughness, and acoustic emission characteristics. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 70, 104507 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, M. et al. Experimental study on the structural failure characteristics and load-bearing mechanism of anchored fractured rock mass. Sci. Rep. 16, 4537 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, H. et al. Mechanism and application of reaming anchorage of inverted wedge-shaped hole bottom in argillaceous cemented roadway. Sci. Rep. 16, 5094 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sohrabi-Bidar, A., Rastegar-Nia, A. & Zolfaghari, A. Estimation of the grout take using empirical relationships (case study: Bakhtiari dam site). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 75, 425–438 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X. et al. Nonlinear flow characteristics of cement grout in fractures with varying geometries. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30580-7 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rastegarnia, A. et al. Assessment of relationship between grouted values and calculated values in the Bazoft Dam site. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 35, 1299–1310 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rouhani, M. M. et al. Cerchar abrasiveness index prediction based on rock properties leveraging hybrid soft computing techniques. Sci. Rep. 15, 37499 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thangavel, P. et al. Investigation of cold formed steel angle compression through high throughput design FEA and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 15, 19222 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rouhani, M. M. & Dolatshahi, A. Predicting mode I fracture toughness of CCNBD quasi-brittle specimens using hybrid gradient boosting algorithms. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 140, 104966 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rouhani, M. M. et al. Intelligent prediction of flyrock hazards in surface mining using optimized gradient boosting models. Nat. Resour. Res. 35, 1–23 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sunkpho, J. et al. Sustainable use of red mud in concrete: Assessing mechanical strength, durability, and performance through machine learning models. Green. Technol. Sustain. 4 (2), 100283 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katuwal, T. B., Panthi, K. K. & Basnet, C. B. Machine learning approach for prediction of TBM performance and risk of jamming in Himalayan geology using a cross-project tunnelling database. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34273-z (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong, D. H. et al. Advancements in intelligent dam engineering construction in the intelligence era. J. Hydraul Eng. 56, 1–19 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, K. et al. Grouting flow hybrid prediction model based on CEEMDAN–Transformer. J. Hydraul Eng. 54, 806–817 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ouyang, S. M. et al. Grouting volume prediction for underground water-sealed caverns based on TPE–GBT model. Mod. Tunn. Technol. 61, 138–145 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tong, F. et al. A hybrid ICEEMDAN-BO-GRU model for real-time grouting parameter prediction. Appl. Soft Comput. 185, 113912 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shi, Z. Z. et al. Surrogate model for dam foundation grouting volume prediction based on improved multiple kernel extreme learning machine. Water Resour. Hydropower Eng. 52, 57–66 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun, D. et al. Intelligent prediction of grouting in fractured rock masses. Intelligent Geoengineering 2, 66–79 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu, Y. S. et al. Research on an ISSA-Stacking ensemble learning surrogate model of dam foundation grouting volume prediction. J. Tianjin Univ. Sci. Technol. 57, 174–185 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, R. et al. Explainable rock mass classification under imbalanced TBM data using ensemble learning. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 162, 112641 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abdulrahman, S. et al. Hybrid-optimized ensemble models for predicting compressive strength of fly ash and slag concrete. Mater. Today Commun. 38, 113762 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sagi, O. & Rokach, L. Ensemble learning: A survey. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8, e1249 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang, Y. et al. Multi-output prediction of TBM operation parameters using stacking ensemble algorithms. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 152, 105952 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794ACM, (2016).

  31. Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 3146–3154 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald, G. C. Ridge regression. WIREs Comput. Stat. 1, 93–100 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar, D. R. et al. Application of random forest and optimization techniques in forecasting the axial load capacity of lipped channel cold-formed steel sections. J. Soft Comput. Civ. Eng. 10, e1950 (2026).

  35. Liashchynskyi, P. Grid search, random search, and genetic algorithm for hyperparameter optimization. Preprint at (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06059

  36. Wang, X. et al. Recent advances in Bayesian optimization. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 1–36 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jabar, A. B. & Thangavel, P. ANN-PSO modelling for predicting buckling of self-compacting concrete column containing RHA properties. Matéria 28, e20230102 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Negi, G. et al. Grey wolf optimizer: a review and applications. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 12, 1–8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. McGovern, A. et al. Making the black box more transparent. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 2175–2199 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 4765–4774 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rouhani, M. M. & Dolatshahi, A. Advanced hybrid models for predicting dynamic compressive strength of rocks: Exploring various input scenarios and introducing novel empirical approaches. Results Eng. 28, 107947 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhe, Y. et al. Prediction model for grouting volume using borehole image features and explainable artificial intelligence. Constr. Build. Mater. 470, 140626 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rouhani, M. M., Namin, F. S. & Chakeri, H. Screw conveyor speed prediction for EPB-TBM excavations using hybrid deep learning models. Results Eng. 28, 108064 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mishra, D. et al. A review of ensemble learning methods. Int. J. Res. Publ Rev. 6, 3795 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pinheiro, J. M. H. et al. The impact of feature scaling in machine learning: Effects on regression and classification tasks. IEEE Access 13, 199903–199931 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Winter, E. The Shapley value. In Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications Vol. 3 (eds Aumann, R. J. & Hart, S.) 2025–2054 (Elsevier, 2002).

  47. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Willmott, C. J. & Matsuura, K. Advantages of the mean absolute error over the root mean square error. Clim. Res. 30, 79–82 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sedgwick, P. Pearson’s correlation coefficient. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4483 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by China Gezhouba Group Co., Ltd. (CGGC).

Funding

This work is funded by China Energy Engineering Corporation Limited (CEEC) through the Intelligent Grouting System Research and Development Program (CEEC2024-KJZX-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China

    Yahui Ma, Hongwei Lei & Weiquan Zhao

  2. China Gezhouba Group Co., Ltd, Yichang, 443000, China

    Zhanquan Yuan

  3. China Gezhouba Group Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd, Yichang, 443000, China

    Bo Xiong

Authors
  1. Yahui Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhanquan Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Xiong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongwei Lei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weiquan Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yahui Ma: Conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, writing—original draft. Zhanquan Yuan: Project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing. Bo Xiong: Resources, supervision. Hongwei Lei: Methodology, software. Weiquan Zhao: Funding acquisition, investigation, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiquan Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Yuan, Z., Xiong, B. et al. Curtain grouting volume prediction using a Bayesian-optimized stacking ensemble model with SHAP analysis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45538-6

Download citation

  • Received: 13 January 2026

  • Accepted: 19 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45538-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Curtain grouting
  • Grouting volume prediction
  • Stacking ensemble
  • Bayesian optimization
  • SHAP
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing