Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Assessment of levels spatiotemporal differences and health risks of environmental radioactivity in the soil of Chongqing China
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 March 2026

Assessment of levels spatiotemporal differences and health risks of environmental radioactivity in the soil of Chongqing China

  • Qiang Huang1 na1,
  • Xue Zhao3 na1,
  • Bo Fang2,
  • Qiang Tan1,
  • Qiuhao Zhang4,
  • Li Chen2,
  • Cuilan Fang2,
  • Hengyan Du4 &
  • …
  • Jun Diao2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 377 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Risk factors

Abstract

This study investigated the spatio-temporal variations of soil radionuclides in Chongqing (2016–2023) and assessed their associated health risks. Using descriptive, correlation, and mixed-effects model analyses, the activity concentrations and distribution of soil radionuclides (137Cs, 238U, ²³²Th, 226Ra and40 K) were examined. AEDE, Raeq, ELCR, ADR were calculated. Spatially, after controlling for temporal variation, the Urban New Area showed higher 226Ra and 238U than the Urban Core Area, while the Southeast Wuling Mountain Area had higher 226Ra, 137Cs and 238U. Temporally, after controlling for regional variation, 40K (2023, 2021), ²³²Th (2018–2023) and 238U (2021) all exhibited higher activity concentrations than in 2016. The calculated health risk indices (AEDE, Raeq, ELCR, ADR) were above global averages, indicating a need for targeted soil management. Specifically, levels of 226Ra and 238U in the Urban New Area, and of 226Ra, 137Cs, 232Th and 238U in the Southeast Wuling Mountain Area, require prioritization.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available from Annual Report of Chongqing’s Radiation Environment. Data are located in controlled access data storage at Chongqing Radiation Environment Supervision and Management Station, Chongqing, China. The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Mbonu, C. C. et al. Assessment of terrestrial radionuclide exposure and contamination rates within the Mbaitoli area, Nigeria. Sci. Rep. 15, 28702 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nhon, D. H. et al. Radioactive concentrations and natural radionuclide risks in Ha Long Bay and Ba Che Estuary sediments, Vietnam. Environ. Monit. Assess. 197, 695 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erzin, S. et al. Natural radioactivity levels and related risk assessment in soil and rock samples from the Çine submassif, defining Western Anatolia, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 197, 919 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hasan, S., Iasir, A. R. M., Ghosh, T. K., Sen Gupta, B. & Prelas, M. A. Characterization and adsorption behavior of strontium from aqueous solutions onto chitosan-Fuller’s Earth beads. Healthcare. 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7010052(2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kato, T., Yamada, K. & Hongyo, T. Area dose-response and radiation origin of childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima based on thyroid dose in UNSCEAR 2020/2021: High 131I exposure comparable to Chernobyl. Cancers. 15, 4583.https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184583 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Su, J. et al. Monte Carlo calculation of artificial radionuclide radiation dose rates for marine species in the Western Pacific. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 158, 479–486 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhong, N., Li, L., Yang, X. & Zhao, Y. Analytical methods for the determination of (90)Sr and (239,240)Pu in environmental samples. Molecules. 27, 1912.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061912 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Machraoui, S., Labidi, S. & Purushotham, M. M. Assessment of gamma absorbed doses and radiological risk indexes from soil radioactivity around the phosphate area in south Tunisia. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 200, 387–395 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maglas, N. N. M. et al. Natural radioactivity level in Yemen: A systematic review of radiological studies. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 210, 111343 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmad, A. Y., Al-Ghouti, M. A., AlSadig, I. & Abu-Dieyeh, M. Vertical distribution and radiological risk assessment of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil samples. Sci. Rep. 9, 12196 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, P. et al. Radiocesium distribution caused by tillage inversion affects the soil-to-crop transfer factor and translocation in agroecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 831, 154897 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elizabeth, D. E., Janice, W., Nicholas, I. J. & Joyce, P. External radiation exposure and mortality in a cohort of uranium processing workers. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152, 91–95.https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/152.1.91 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Darby, S. et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ 330, 223 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rashid, N. S. A. et al. Assessment of Uranium and Thorium Co-contaminant Exposure from Incidental Concrete Dust Ingestion. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 41, 10 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sartayev, Y. et al. Internal radiation exposure from 137Cs and its association with the dietary habits of residents from areas affected by the Chernobyl nuclear accident, Ukraine: 2016–2018. PLoS One. 18, e0291498 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. (IEA. (2023).

  17. Aközcan Pehlivanoğlu, S., Mancini, S., Özden, S., Guida, M. & Falanga, M. Characterization of a typical urban soil in terms of natural radionuclide content. The case study of a university campus. Heliyon 10, e37145 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oladejo, O. F., Olukotun, S. F., Rufai, A. B. & Mathuthu, M. Assessment of radiation hazards from natural radionuclide activity in quarry sites and surrounding soils in Osun State, Southwest Nigeria. Sci. Rep. 15, 19345 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes (United Nations, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lasheen, E. S. R. et al. Radiological hazards and natural radionuclide distribution in granitic rocks of Homrit Waggat Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Materials. 15, 4069.https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Salman, A. Y., Kadhim, S. A., Hussain, H. M. & Sharrad, F. I. Assessing the excess lifetime cancer risk from water in the Euphrates River, Najaf, Iraq. Health Phys. 129, 245–255.https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001959 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, B. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 60, Pergamon Press, 1991. Eur. J. Radiol. 15, 93 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Renborg, L. et al. Rapid decline of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of axonal injury and neuroinflammation after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV. J. Neurovirol. 31, 574–584.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13365-025-01287-2 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tang, F., Zhu, Y., Jayawardena, D., Jin, G. & Jiang, Y. Sleep quality and cognitive functioning among Chinese older adults living in the US: a mixed-effects model analysis. BMC Geriatr. 25, 52 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Faheem, M. & Mujahid, S. A. Matiullah Assessment of radiological hazards due to the natural radioactivity in soil and building material samples collected from six districts of the Punjab province-Pakistan. Radiat. Meas. 43, 1443–1447 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hamzah, Z., Rahman, S. A. A., Saat, A. & Hamzah, M. S. EVALUATION OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY IN SOIL IN DISTRICT OF KUALA KRAI, KELANTAN. Malaysian J. Anal. ences. 16, 335 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Turhan, S. K. et al. T. Distribution of terrestrial and anthropogenic radionuclides in Turkish surface soil samples. Geoderma: Int. J. Soil. Science. 187, 117–124 (2012).

  28. Rafique, M. & Jabbar..., A. Radiometric analysis of rock and soil samples of Leepa Valley; Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 298, 2049–2056 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma, R. L. et al. Natural Radioactivity, Radon Exhalation Rates and Radiation Doses in the Soil Samples Collected from the Vicinity of Kolaghat Thermal Power Plant, West Bengal, India. Indian J. Pure & Appl. Physics. 61, 8 (2023).

  30. Kürküolu, M. E., Kahraman, F. A., Dizman, S. & Cengiz, G. B. Evaluation of radioactivity and radiological parameters in soil samples in Isparta, Türkiye. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 56, 4007–4017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2024.05.002 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muhammad, A. N., Ismail, A. F. & Garba, N. N. Natural radioactivity in food crops and soil and estimation of the concomitant dose from tin mining areas in Nigeria. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 18, 2366507 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maglas, N. N. M. et al. Natural radioactivity level in Yemen: A systematic review of radiological studies. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 210, 111343 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Machraoui, S., Labidi, S. & Purushotham, M. M. Assessment of gamma absorbed doses and radiological risk indexes from soil radioactivity around the phosphate area in south Tunisia. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 200, 387–395.https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncad299 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Natarajan, T. et al. Natural radionuclides and radiological risk assessment in the stream and river sediments of a high background natural radiation area Kanyakumari, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 196, 330 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jain, V. et al. Non-linear dose response of DNA double strand breaks in response to chronic low dose radiation in individuals from high level natural radiation areas of Kerala Coast. Genes Environ. 45, 16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang, B. et al. Dietary exposure of radionuclides and heavy metals in adult residents in a high background natural radiation area using duplicate diet method. Sci. Rep. 12, 16676 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, C., Benotto, M., Ungar, K. & Chen, J. Environmental monitoring and external exposure to natural radiation in Canada. J. Environ. Radioact. 243, 106811 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khan, I. U., Sun, W. & Lewis, E. Review of low-level background radioactivity studies conducted from 2000 to date in People Republic of China. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 13, 406–415 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Song, G., Chen, D., Tang, Z., Zhang, Z. & Xie, W. Natural radioactivity levels in topsoil from the Pearl River Delta Zone, Guangdong, China. J. Environ. Radioact. 103, 48–53 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tan, S. et al. Output characteristics and driving factors of non-point source nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the Three Gorges reservoir area (TGRA) based on migration process: 1995–2020. Sci. Total Environ. 875, 162543 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Teku, D. & Workie, M. D. Longitudinal analysis of soil erosion dynamics using the RUSLE model in Ethiopia’s Lake Ziway watershed: Implications for agricultural sustainability and food security. Front. Environ. Sci. 12, 1506001.https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1506001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lovrenčić Mikelić, I., Oreščanin, V. & Barišić, D. 40K, 226Ra, 232Th, 238U and 137Cs relationships and behaviour in sedimentary rocks and sediments of a karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Croatia) and related rocks and sediments’ differentiation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 51497–51510 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rodriguez, V. G. et al. Radiological Analyses of 226Ra and 238U in Surface Water and Sediments from the Jackpile Member of the Morrison Formation, Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico. Environ Sci. Technol. 10, 1021 (2024).

  44. Dinh, M. A. et al. Concentration and distribution characteristics of gross alpha, 238U, 234U and 226Ra in freshwater of some rivers and artificial lakes in Southeast Vietnam. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 225, 112064 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bellotti, E., Broggini, C., Di Carlo, G., Laubenstein, M. & Menegazzo, R. Search for time modulations in the decay constant of 40K and 226Ra at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory. Phys. Lett. B 780, 61–65 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Popoola, O. J., Olubi, O. E., Bamidele, S. E. & Adepoju, A. O. Geochemical distribution, pollution evaluation, and radiological health hazards of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil and stream sediments from Idanre area, Southwest Nigeria. Discov. Geosci. 3, 169 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, J. & Li, H. The impact of big data management capabilities on the performance of manufacturing firms in Asian economy during COVID-19: The mediating role of organizational agility and moderating role of information technology capability. Front. Psychol. 13, 833026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paquet, F. et al. ICRP Publication 137: Occupational intakes of radionuclides: Part 3. Ann. ICRP 46, 1–486 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang et al. Natural radioactivity assessment of surface sediments in the Yangtze Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 114, 602–608 (2017).

  50. Ilori, A. O. & Chetty, N. A review of the occurrence of naturally occurring radioactive materials and radiological risk assessment in South African soils. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 34, 2969–2982 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ghias, S. et al. Assessment of the radiological doses and health risk from natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in wheat samples near nuclear facilities in Dera Ghazi Khan. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 334, 1497–1507 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Du, P. & Walling, D. E. Using 137 Cs measurements to investigate the influence of erosion and soil redistribution on soil properties. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69, 717–726 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Huang, C. et al. Environmental correlates of the distribution characteristics of artificial radionuclides (137Cs, 239 + 240Pu, 237Np) in the Northeast China. J. Hazard. Mater. 490, 137759 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all staff who collected and detected samples and recorded and managed the data in the Chongqing Radiation Environment Supervision and Management Station, as well as all staff of subordinate institutions who provided assistance in this study.

Funding

This research was supported by the Chongqing Science and Health Joint medical research Project (No. 2025MSXM056). This research was also supported by the Chongqing Center for Disease Control, Prevention and Chongqing Jiulongpo District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing Radiation Environment Supervision and Management Station and Chongqing Medical University.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Qiang Huang and Xue Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing, China

    Qiang Huang & Qiang Tan

  2. Chongqing Jiulongpo District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing, China

    Bo Fang, Li Chen, Cuilan Fang & Jun Diao

  3. Chongqing Radiation Environment Supervision and Management Station, Chongqing, China

    Xue Zhao

  4. School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Qiuhao Zhang & Hengyan Du

Authors
  1. Qiang Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xue Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiang Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qiuhao Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cuilan Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hengyan Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Diao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Qiang Huang and Xue Zhao cleaned and analyzed the data and wrote the initial draft. Jun Diao made significant contributions to conceive the study, revised the manuscript and submitted. Hengyan Du, Bo Fang, Qiang Tan, Qiuhao Zhang, Li Chen and Cuilan Fang reviewed the draft and provided critical suggestions, which helped improve the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed on the final version of the manuscript to be submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Diao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Q., Zhao, X., Fang, B. et al. Assessment of levels spatiotemporal differences and health risks of environmental radioactivity in the soil of Chongqing China. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45598-8

Download citation

  • Received: 28 August 2025

  • Accepted: 20 March 2026

  • Published: 25 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45598-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Chongqing
  • Soil radionuclides
  • Spatio-temporal variations
  • Health risks
  • Radium equivalent
  • Dose rate
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing