Table 3 Ablation study results for different model configurations.
From: Decoding garden design language via semantic segmentation for social aesthetic interaction
Configuration | mIoU (%) | Pixel Accuracy (%) | Style accuracy (%) | Aesthetic RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Resnet50 only | 72.5 | 89.6 | – | – |
Resnet50 + aesthetic head | 72.9 | 89.8 | 71.2 | 0.423 |
Resnet50 + design module | 76.8 | 91.4 | – | – |
Full model | 79.4 | 92.6 | 78.5 | 0.371 |
