Abstract
To evaluate, in vitro, the microbiological contamination and surface roughness of orthodontic attachments finished using different excess-removal procedures. Thirty composite resin attachments were fabricated and allocated into three groups (n = 10/group): G1- no removal of excess resin; G2—excess removed using a No. 15 scalpel blade; and G3—excess removed using a 24-blade low-speed bur (Orthometric). All specimens underwent non-contact 3D profilometry to determine baseline surface roughness (Sa). Samples were then exposed for 24 h at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions to a mixed inoculum (5 × 105 CFU/mL) consisting of Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 and Candida albicans ATCC 90028. Post-exposure assessments included biofilm acidogenicity, CFU quantification, and repeat 3D profilometry. There were no significant differences in pH values among G1, G2, and G3. CFU counts differed significantly among groups, with the highest microbial load in G1 (709.70 ± 221.8), followed by G2 (342.65 ± 84.8) and G3 (78.3 ± 38.7) (p < 0.05). Initial surface roughness showed similarity between G2 and G3, both significantly smoother than G1 (p < 0.05). After biofilm formation, G3 exhibited the lowest Sa values, G2 showed intermediate values, and G1 remained the roughest; all groups differed significantly (p < 0.05). Orthodontic attachment finishing protocols significantly affects surface roughness and subsequent microbial accumulation. Leaving excess resin increases roughness and biofilm formation, whereas finishing with a 24-blade low-speed bur produces smoother surfaces and minimizes microbial contamination.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akcan, C. A. et al. Evaluation of wear amounts of different composite resin attachments used in clear aligner treatment over a 6-month period: A retrospective study. Angle Orthod. (2026).
Rossini, G., Parrini, S., Castroflorio, T., Deregibus, A. & Debernardi, C. L. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 85, 881–889 (2015).
Alshammari, R. R., Alshihah, N. & Aldweesh, A. Mechanical properties of different types of composite resin used as clear aligner attachments: An in vitro study. Saudi. Dent. J. 37, 12 (2025).
Cao, L. et al. Antibacterial and fluorescent clear aligner attachment resin modified with chlorhexidine loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles and zinc oxide quantum dots. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 141, 105817 (2023).
Candan, M. & Ünal, M. The effect of various asthma medications on surface roughness of pediatric dental restorative materials: An atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study. Microsc. Res. Tech. 84, 271–283 (2021).
Guler, S. & Unal, M. The evaluation of color and surface roughness changes in resin based restorative materials with different contents after waiting in various liquids: An SEM and AFM study. Microsc. Res. Tech. 81, 1422–1433 (2018).
Fausto da Veiga Jardim, A., Curado de Freitas, J. & Estrela, C. Surface wear and adhesive failure of resin attachments used in clear aligner orthodontic treatment. J. Orofac. Orthop. 85, 52–62 (2024).
Pasaoglu Bozkurt, A., Demirci, M., Erdogan, P. & Kayalar, E. Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 167, 47–62 (2025).
Zarrinnia, K., Eid, N. M. & Kehoe, M. J. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: An in vitro qualitative study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 108, 284–293 (1995).
Fratila, C. R. et al. Accuracy evaluation of indirect bonding techniques for clear aligner attachments using 3D-printed models: An in silico and physical model-based study. Mater. 18, 780 (2025).
Janiszewska-Olszowska, J. et al. Effect of orthodontic debonding and residual adhesive removal on 3D enamel microroughness. PeerJ 4, e2558 (2016).
CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S22. Wayne PA in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.
Bollen, C. M. L., Lambrechts, P. & Quirynen, M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent. Mater. 13, 258–269 (1997).
Jung, M., Eichelberger, K. & Klimek, J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multi-step polishing. Oper. Dent. 32, 347–355 (2007).
Jefferies, S. R. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: A state-of-the-art review. Dent. Clin. North Am. 51, 379–397 (2007).
Julien, K. C., Buschang, P. H. & Campbell, P. M. Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 83, 641–647 (2013).
Eliades, T., Eliades, G. & Brantley, W. A. Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 108, 351–360 (1995).
Martínez Gil-Ortega, A. et al. Effect of surface wettability and energy on bacterial adhesion to dental aligners: A comparative in vitro study. Bioengineering 12, 898 (2025).
Sanches, C. V. G. et al. In vitro evaluation of biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans in orthodontic aligners. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 30, e2524192 (2025).
Jeon, D. M., An, J. S., Lim, B. S. & Ahn, S. J. Orthodontic bonding procedures significantly influence biofilm composition. Prog. Orthod. 21, 14 (2020).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors received no funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JBMM: wrote the main manuscript text, IBSB: methodology, JVFC: methodology, KLFL: methodology, MTSA: supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mota, J.B., Justino, I.B., Câmara, J.V.F. et al. Finishing protocols of orthodontic attachments determine surface roughness and susceptibility to microbial colonization in vitro. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46360-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46360-w
