Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Caesarean section may be associated with suspected motor developmental delay at 3 years of age in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 April 2026

Caesarean section may be associated with suspected motor developmental delay at 3 years of age in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study

  • Ikuyo Sanzen1,2,3,
  • Kenta Matsumura2,3,4,
  • Hitomi Inano3,5,
  • Akiko Tsuchida2,3,
  • Junko Sakai3,
  • Kanako Shimada3,
  • Hidekuni Inadera2,3 &
  • the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health care
  • Medical research
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

The number of births by caesarean section (CS) is increasing worldwide. In line with this trend, there is growing interest in the neurodevelopmental outcome of children born by CS. This study examined the relationship between the mode of delivery and suspected neurodevelopmental delay in young children. A total of 53,716 mother–child pairs participating in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, a representative Japanese cohort study of children, were included in the analysis of the association between CS and suspected developmental delay, as assessed by the Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition, in 3-year-old children. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). No significant overall relationship was found between mode of delivery and suspected developmental delay. In an analysis by sex, CS was associated with increased risk of suspected gross motor developmental delay (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07–1.49) in boys and increased risk of suspected fine motor developmental delay (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11–1.63) in girls. These results suggest that there may be a relationship between CS and suspected motor developmental delay at the age of 3 years.

Data availability

Data are unsuitable for public deposition due to ethical restrictions and the legal framework of Japan. It is prohibited by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No. 57 of 30 May 2003, amended 9 September 2015) to publicly deposit data containing personal information. Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects enforced by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also restrict the open sharing of epidemiologic data. All inquiries about access to data should be sent to jecs-en@nies.go.jp. The person responsible for handling enquiries sent to this e-mail address is Dr Shoji F. Nakayama, JECS Programme Office, National Institute for Environmental Studies.

References

  1. Betran, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A.-B., Souza, J. P. & Zhang, J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob. Health 6, e005671 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angolile, C. M., Max, B. L., Mushemba, J. & Mashauri, H. L. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: a call to action. Health Sci. Rep. 6, e1274 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Betran, A. P. et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS ONE 11, e0148343 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access (2021).

  5. World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-15.02 (2015).

  6. Caesarean Birth. NICE guideline. NG192. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192 (2025).

  7. Jenabi, E., Khazaei, S., Bashirian, S., Aghababaei, S. & Matinnia, N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: A systematic review. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 33, 3867–3872 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kristensen, K. & Henriksen, L. Cesarean section and disease associated with immune function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 587–590 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Decker, E. et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics 125, e1433–e1440 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cardwell, C. R. et al. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia 51, 726–735 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak, A., Szymański, J. K., Ciebiera, M., Sarecka-Hujar, B. & Jakie, G. Pediatrics consequences of caesarean section—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 8031 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keag, O. E., Norman, J. E. & Stock, S. J. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 15, e1002494 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, T. et al. Association of cesarean delivery with risk of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in the offspring. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e1910236 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bellman, M., Byrne, O. & Sege, R. Developmental assessment of children. BMJ 346, e8687 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lissauer T & Clayden G. Illustrated Textbook of Paediatrics. 4th Edition. (Mosby, 2012)

  16. Choo, Y. Y., Agarwal, P., How, C. H. & Yeleswarapu, S. P. Developmental delay: Identification and management at primary care level. Singapore Med. J. 60, 119–123 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al Khalaf, S. Y. et al. The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 50, 1557–1567 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polidano, C., Zhu, A. & Bornstein, J. C. The relation between cesarean birth and child cognitive development. Sci. Rep. 7, 11483 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida, T., Matsumura, K., Hatakeyama, T., Inadera, H., The Japan Environment, Children’s Study Group. Association between Cesarean section and neurodevelopmental disorders in a Japanese birth cohort: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. BMC Pediatr. 23, 306 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sansavini, A. et al. Developmental language disorder: early predictors, age for the diagnostic tools. A scoping review. Brain Sci. 11, 654 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holzinger, D., Weber, C., Barbaresi, W., Beitel, C. & Fellinger, J. Language screening in 3-year-olds: Development and validation of a feasible and effective instrument for pediatric primary care. Front. Pediatr. 9, 752141 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuo, T., Matsuo, C., Matsuoka, H. & Kio, K. Detection of strabismus and amblyopia in 1.5- and 3-year-old children by a preschool vision-screening program in Japan. Acta Med. Okayama 61, 9–16 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kawamoto, T. et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Public Health 14, 25 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michikawa, T. et al. Baseline profile of participants in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J. Epidemiol. 28, 99–104 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mezawa, H. et al. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J. Epidemiol. 29, 247–256 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Squires, J., Bricker, D., Elizabeth, T., Jantina, C. & Robert, N. Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Third Edition (ASQ-3) (Brookes Publishing, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mezawa, H. et al. Psychometric profile of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Japanese translation. Pediatr. Int. 61, 1086–1095 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Minatoya, M. et al. Cat and dog ownership in early life and infant development: a prospective birth cohort study of Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 205 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsumura, K. et al. Prospective association of air purifier use during pregnancy with the neurodevelopment of toddlers in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Sci. Rep. 11, 19454 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Levy, S. E., Mandell, D. S. & Schultz, R. T. Autism. Lancet 374, 1627–1638 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hampton, S. Autistic Mothers and the Perinatal Period: Maternal Experiences and Infant Development. (University of Cambridge Repository, 2020).

  32. Grace, T., Bulsara, M., Robinson, M. & Hands, B. Early life events and motor development in childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal study. Acta Paediatr. 105, e219–e227 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yokoyama, Y. et al. Validity of short and long self-administered food frequency questionnaires in ranking dietary intake in middle-aged and elderly Japanese in the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT) protocol area. J. Epidemiol. 26, 420–432 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Matsumura, K. et al. Cesarean section and parenting stress: results from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Eur. Psychiatry 66, e18 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arendt, R. E. et al. The influence of rotary vestibular stimulation upon motor development of nonhandicapped and Down syndrome infants. Res. Dev. Disabil. 12, 333–348 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Urbančič, N. B., Battelino, S. & Vozel, D. Appropriate vestibular stimulation in children and adolescents—a prerequisite for normal cognitive, motor development and bodily homeostasis—a review. Children 11, 2 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clark, D. L., Kreutzberg, J. R. & Chee, F. K. Vestibular stimulation influence on motor development in infants. Science 196, 1228–1229 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wachs, T. D., Georgieff, M., Cusick, S. & McEwen, B. S. Issues in the timing of integrated early interventions: Contributions from nutrition, neuroscience, and psychological research. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1308, 89–106 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: The impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Westfall, S. et al. Microbiome, probiotics and neurodegenerative diseases: deciphering the gut brain axis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 3769–3787 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 11971–11975 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rodrigues, S. M. L. & Silva, P. M. M. Vaginal delivery versus elective cesarean section and the impact on children’s skill development. Rev. Enf. Ref. 4, 107–116 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zaigham, M., Hellström-Westas, L., Domellöf, M. & Andersson, O. Prelabour caesarean section and neurodevelopmental outcome at 4 and 12 months of age: an observational study. BMC. Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 564 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yazıcı, M. & Livanelioglu, A. Investigation of the effects of cesarean section on general movements of the newborn. J. Curr. Pediatr. 17, 374–386 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Massa, A. et al. Mode of delivery and behavioral and neuropsychological outcomes in children at 10 years of age. J. Perinat. Med. 52, 1010–1019 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Adams, R. C., Tapia, C., Council on Children With Disabilities. Early intervention, IDEA Part C services, and the medical home: collaboration for best practice and best outcomes. Pediatrics 132, e1073–e1088 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Barger, B., Rice, C., Wolf, R. & Roach, A. Better together: Developmental screening and monitoring best identify children who need early intervention. Disabil. Health J. 11, 420–426 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lipkin, P. H., Okamoto, J., Council on Children with Disabilities, Council on School Health. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for children with special educational needs. Pediatrics 136, e1650–e1662 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the study participants and researchers who have contributed to the JECS. We are also grateful to the members of the JECS Group as of 2025: Michihiro Kamijima (Principal Investigator, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan), Shin Yamazaki (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan), Maki Fukami (National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan), Reiko Kishi (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), Chiharu Ota (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), Koichi Hashimoto (Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan), Kenichi Sakurai (Chiba University, Chiba, Japan), Shuichi Ito (Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan), Ryoji Shinohara (University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan), Hidekuni Inadera (University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan), Takeo Nakayama (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Ryo Kawasaki (Osaka University, Suita, Japan), Yasuhiro Takeshima (Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan), Hideki Nagashima (Tottori University, Yonago, Japan), Narufumi Suganuma (Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan), Mayumi Tsuji (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan), and Kimitoshi Nakamura (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government. The funding source played no role in the study’s design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit this paper for publication.

Author information

Author notes
  1. A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Toyama Prefectural University, Toyama, Japan

    Ikuyo Sanzen

  2. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

    Ikuyo Sanzen, Kenta Matsumura, Akiko Tsuchida & Hidekuni Inadera

  3. Toyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

    Ikuyo Sanzen, Kenta Matsumura, Hitomi Inano, Akiko Tsuchida, Junko Sakai, Kanako Shimada & Hidekuni Inadera

  4. Graduate School of Health Sciences, Aomori University of Health and Welfare, Aomori, Japan

    Kenta Matsumura

  5. Department of Nursing Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

    Hitomi Inano

  6. Principal Investigator, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan

    Michihiro Kamijima

  7. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan

    Shin Yamazaki

  8. National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan

    Maki Fukami

  9. Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    Reiko Kishi

  10. Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

    Chiharu Ota

  11. Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan

    Koichi Hashimoto

  12. Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

    Kenichi Sakurai

  13. Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan

    Shuichi Ito

  14. University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan

    Ryoji Shinohara

  15. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Takeo Nakayama

  16. Osaka University, Suita, Japan

    Ryo Kawasaki

  17. Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan

    Yasuhiro Takeshima

  18. Tottori University, Yonago, Japan

    Hideki Nagashima

  19. Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan

    Narufumi Suganuma

  20. University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan

    Mayumi Tsuji

  21. Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan

    Kimitoshi Nakamura

Authors
  1. Ikuyo Sanzen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenta Matsumura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hitomi Inano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akiko Tsuchida
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junko Sakai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kanako Shimada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hidekuni Inadera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group

  • Michihiro Kamijima
  • , Shin Yamazaki
  • , Maki Fukami
  • , Reiko Kishi
  • , Chiharu Ota
  • , Koichi Hashimoto
  • , Kenichi Sakurai
  • , Shuichi Ito
  • , Ryoji Shinohara
  • , Hidekuni Inadera
  • , Takeo Nakayama
  • , Ryo Kawasaki
  • , Yasuhiro Takeshima
  • , Hideki Nagashima
  • , Narufumi Suganuma
  • , Mayumi Tsuji
  •  & Kimitoshi Nakamura

Contributions

I.S., K.M. and H.I. drafted the paper. K.M. and H.I. analysed the data. I.S., K.M., and H.I. conceived and designed the study. I.S., K.M., A.T., J.S., H.I., K.S., H.I., and the JECS Group critically reviewed the draft and checked the analyses. The JECS Group collected the data and obtained funding. All authors approved the submission of the manuscript in its current form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidekuni Inadera.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanzen, I., Matsumura, K., Inano, H. et al. Caesarean section may be associated with suspected motor developmental delay at 3 years of age in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46955-3

Download citation

  • Received: 14 November 2025

  • Accepted: 28 March 2026

  • Published: 14 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46955-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Caesarean section
  • Mode of delivery
  • Neurodevelopmental delay
  • The Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition
  • Birth cohort study
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing