Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prognostic significance and immune correlation of STING expression and promoter methylation in renal cell carcinoma
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 April 2026

Prognostic significance and immune correlation of STING expression and promoter methylation in renal cell carcinoma

  • Shirong Ding1,4,
  • Mengge Ding1,
  • Ao’ran Hu1,
  • Yishu Guo1,
  • Qi Meng4,
  • Kun Ye5,
  • Min Lu1,
  • Chaoyuan Liu1,
  • Fang Ma1,
  • Qian Long2,4 &
  • …
  • Xianling Liu1,3 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 1177 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Tumour biomarkers
  • Tumour immunology
  • Urological cancer

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) typically shows resistance to immunotherapy and is associated with poor prognosis. Recent studies have revealed a role for DNA methylation in immune infiltration in different cancers, but its pattern in RCC is not well understood. In this study, we analyzed the relationships among STING promoter methylation, mRNA expression, overall survival, and immune cell infiltration in a TCGA cohort and validated the findings in an independent cohort. Additionally, we assessed these correlations in an RCC cohort from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) using immunohistochemistry and pyrosequencing. Our findings revealed significant hypomethylation of the STING promoter in RCC tumor tissues compared with normal tissues, which strongly correlated with increased STING mRNA expression across all three RCC cohorts. Additionally, hypomethylation of the STING promoter hypomethylation was associated with advanced clinicopathological features and poor overall survival. Moreover, we found a significant relationship between STING promoter methylation and both immune cell infiltration and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Our findings in the SYSUCC cohort confirmed that STING promoter methylation was related to CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration in RCC tumor tissues. These results suggest that methylation of the STING promoter plays a pivotal role in regulating its expression and influencing the tumor microenvironment. STING promoter methylation and expression are linked to clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival, and immune cell infiltration in RCC. We propose that further validation of STING promoter methylation represents a biomarker for predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in RCC.

Similar content being viewed by others

Targeting STING elicits GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis and boosts anti-tumor immunity in renal cell carcinoma

Article 04 January 2026

Regulatory T cells and matrix-producing cancer associated fibroblasts contribute on the immune resistance and progression of prognosis related tumor subtypes in ccRCC

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Tumor-infiltrating immune cell status predicts successful response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma

Article Open access 27 November 2022

Data availability

TCGA cohort: The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). Gene expression, DNA methylation (Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip), and related clinical data for clear‑cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) were obtained from TCGA and processed using the ChAMP R package. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table S1. An overview of the study workflow is presented in Figure S1. CPTAC cohort and GEO datasets: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the following repositories: gene expression and methylation data of 100 RCC samples from the CPTAC repository (https://proteomics.cancer.gov/data-portal); methylation datasets GSE70303 and GSE105260 are available in the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession numbers GSE70303 and GSE105260, respectively. The processed data used in this study are provided in Supplementary Tables S2, S3, S4, and S5. SYSUCC cohort: For validation of cg16983159 methylation in RCC, a total of 98 samples including 14 adjacent normal tissues and 84 tumor tissues were collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). The patients underwent surgery from 2009 to 2015 at SYSUCC, and clinical follow-up information was collected for analysis. The basic information of all the datasets included in our study is provided in Table S6.

References

  1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 72 (1), 7–33 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henske, E. P., Cheng, L., Hakimi, A. A., Choueiri, T. K. & Braun, D. A. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 41 (8), 1383–1388 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saal, J. et al. Integrating on-treatment modified glasgow prognostic score and imaging to predict response and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 9 (8), 1048–1055 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gebrael, G., Fortuna, G. G. & Agarwal, N. Developing an ideal risk stratification model for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 9 (8), 1033–1035 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carney, E. F. Mutational signatures of ccRCC vary between geographical regions. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 20 (7), 429 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chakiryan, N. H. & Strother, M. C. Adjuvant pembrolizumab in renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl. J. Med. 391 (2), 185–186 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wirbel, C. et al. Multi-system involvement-including purpura fulminans-as an adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Lancet 403 (10446), 2818–2819 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choueiri, T. K. et al. Integrative analyses of tumor and peripheral biomarkers in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 14 (3), 406–423 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saliby, R. M. et al. Impact of renal cell carcinoma molecular subtypes on immunotherapy and targeted therapy outcomes. Cancer Cell. 42 (5), 732–735 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hage Chehade, C. & Agarwal, N. Molecular subtypes as potential biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 42 (5), 736–738 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf, M. M., Rathmell, W. K. & de Cubas, A. A. Immunogenicity in renal cell carcinoma: shifting focus to alternative sources of tumour-specific antigens. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19 (7), 440–450 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lanng, K. R. B., Lauridsen, E. L. & Jakobsen, M. R. The balance of STING signaling orchestrates immunity in cancer. Nat. Immunol. 25 (7), 1144–1157 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cao, L. L. & Kagan, J. C. Targeting innate immune pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 56 (10), 2206–2217 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maxwell, M. B. et al. ARID1A suppresses R-loop-mediated STING-type I interferon pathway activation of anti-tumor immunity. Cell 187 (13), 3390–3408 (2024). e3319.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, S. et al. STING-induced regulatory B cells compromise NK function in cancer immunity. Nature 610 (7931), 373–380 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, J. et al. Non-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability. Nature 620 (7976), 1080–1088 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leuzzi, G. et al. SMARCAL1 is a dual regulator of innate immune signaling and PD-L1 expression that promotes tumor immune evasion. Cell 187 (4), 861–881e832 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ritchie, C., Carozza, J. A. & Li, L. Biochemistry, cell biology, and pathophysiology of the innate immune cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 91, 599–628 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shim, H. S. et al. TERT activation targets DNA methylation and multiple aging hallmarks. Cell (2024).

  20. Schreiberhuber, L. et al. Cervical cancer screening using DNA methylation triage in a real-world population. Nat. Med. (2024).

  21. Hoang, D. T. et al. Prediction of DNA methylation-based tumor types from histopathology in central nervous system tumors with deep learning. Nat. Med. 30 (7), 1952–1961 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, M. J. et al. Mutant IDH1 inhibition induces dsDNA sensing to activate tumor immunity. Science 385 (6705), eadl6173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, B., Qi, H. & Ma, W. MGMT promoter methylation and chemotherapy outcomes in low-grade and anaplastic gliomas. JAMA Oncol. 9 (12), 1734–1735 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vos, L. et al. PD-1, CTLA4, PD-L1 and PD-L2 DNA methylation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Immunotherapy 12 (12), 903–920 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sukowati, C. et al. PD-L1 Downregulation and DNA methylation inhibition for molecular therapy against cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J. Mol. Sci 24 (17). (2023).

  26. Hoffmann, F. et al. CTLA4 DNA methylation is associated with CTLA-4 expression and predicts response to immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Epigenetics. 15 (1), 112 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yalcinkaya, M. et al. BRCC3-mediated NLRP3 deubiquitylation promotes inflammasome activation and atherosclerosis in Tet2 clonal hematopoiesis. Circulation 148 (22), 1764–1777 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, B. et al. m(6)A regulator-mediated methylation modification patterns and tumor microenvironment infiltration characterization in gastric cancer. Mol. Cancer. 19 (1), 53 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanzelmann, S., Castelo, R. & Guinney, J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFbeta attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554 (7693), 544–548 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Senbabaoglu, Y. et al. Tumor immune microenvironment characterization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma identifies prognostic and immunotherapeutically relevant messenger RNA signatures. Genome Biol. 17 (1), 231 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg, J. E. et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet 387 (10031), 1909–1920 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heeke, S. et al. Tumor- and circulating-free DNA methylation identifies clinically relevant small cell lung cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell. 42 (2), 225–237 (2024). e225.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liang, W. W. et al. Integrative multi-omic cancer profiling reveals DNA methylation patterns associated with therapeutic vulnerability and cell-of-origin. Cancer Cell. 41 (9), 1567–1585 (2023). e1567.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mattox, A. K. et al. The origin of highly elevated cell-free DNA in healthy individuals and patients with pancreatic, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 13 (10), 2166–2179 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Genome-wide mutation profiles. from cell-free DNA for early cancer detection. Nat. Genet. 55 (8), 1261–1262 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, S. G. et al. Integrated analyses highlight interactions between the three-dimensional genome and DNA, RNA and epigenomic alterations in metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. (2024).

  38. Esnault, C. et al. G4access identifies G-quadruplexes and their associations with open chromatin and imprinting control regions. Nat. Genet. 55 (8), 1359–1369 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lv, J. et al. The tumor immune microenvironment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment. Nat. Med. 29 (6), 1424–1436 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, H. et al. PRMT5 control of cGAS/STING and NLRC5 pathways defines melanoma response to antitumor immunity. Sci. Transl. Med. 12(551). (2020).

  41. Hogg, S. J., Beavis, P. A., Dawson, M. A. & Johnstone, R. W. Targeting the epigenetic regulation of antitumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19 (11), 776–800 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lopez-Moyado, I. F., Ko, M., Hogan, P. G. & Rao, A. TET enzymes in the immune system: From DNA demethylation to immunotherapy, inflammation, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 42 (1), 455–488 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dai, E. et al. Epigenetic modulation of antitumor immunity for improved cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer. 20 (1), 171 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dejaegher, J. et al. DNA methylation based glioblastoma subclassification is related to tumoral T-cell infiltration and patient survival. Neuro Oncol. 23 (2), 240–250 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Braun, D. A. et al. Beyond conventional immune-checkpoint inhibition - novel immunotherapies for renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18 (4), 199–214 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Meier, P., Legrand, A. J., Adam, D. & Silke, J. Immunogenic cell death in cancer: targeting necroptosis to induce antitumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 24 (5), 299–315 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Klebanoff, C. A., Chandran, S. S., Baker, B. M., Quezada, S. A. & Ribas, A. T cell receptor therapeutics: immunological targeting of the intracellular cancer proteome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22 (12), 996–1017 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liu, Q. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of small cell lung cancer identifies biological insights and subtype-specific therapeutic strategies. Cell 187 (1), 184–203e128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, H., Yang, S., Guo, Q., Sheng, J. & Mao, Z. ATP-responsive manganese-based bacterial materials synergistically activate the cGAS-STING pathway for tumor immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 36 (23), e2310189 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hong, C. et al. cGAS-STING drives the IL-6-dependent survival of chromosomally instable cancers. Nature 607 (7918), 366–373 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li, W. et al. cGAS-STING-mediated DNA sensing maintains CD8(+) T cell stemness and promotes antitumor T cell therapy. Sci Transl Med 12(549). (2020).

  52. Li, X. et al. Arsenic trioxide augments immunogenic cell death and induces cGAS-STING-IFN pathway activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. Death Dis. 15 (4), 300 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li, M. et al. PREX2 contributes to radiation resistance by inhibiting radiotherapy-induced tumor immunogenicity via cGAS/STING/IFNs pathway in colorectal cancer. BMC Med. 22 (1), 154 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yi, Y. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells increase the natural killer resistance of circulating tumor cells via intercellular signaling of cGAS-STING-IFNbeta-HLA. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 11 (21), e2400888 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lv, M. et al. Manganese is critical for antitumor immune responses via cGAS-STING and improves the efficacy of clinical immunotherapy. Cell. Res. 30 (11), 966–979 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yi, L. et al. A hybrid nanoadjuvant simultaneously depresses PD-L1/TGF-beta1 and activates cGAS-STING pathway to overcome radio-immunotherapy resistance. Adv. Mater. 36 (15), e2304328 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou, S., Cheng, F., Zhang, Y., Su, T. & Zhu, G. Engineering and delivery of cGAS-STING immunomodulators for the immunotherapy of cancer and autoimmune diseases. Acc. Chem. Res. 56 (21), 2933–2943 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of Liu’s laboratory for their advice and assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by the funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82303526 and 82403073), the Natural Science Foundation of the Hunan Province of China (grant number: 2024JJ6590, 2023JJ40842 and 2022JJ40704), the Education and Teaching Reform Research Project of Central South University (grant number: 2022JY197), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number: 2023M743946 and 2023M733955), the Open Funds of State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China (grant number: HN2024-04 and NH2024-07) and the Scientific Research Launch Project for new employees of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (grant number: QH20230256 and QH20230268).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China

    Shirong Ding, Mengge Ding, Ao’ran Hu, Yishu Guo, Min Lu, Chaoyuan Liu, Fang Ma & Xianling Liu

  2. Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China

    Qian Long

  3. Department of Oncology, Guilin Hospital of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Guilin, China

    Xianling Liu

  4. Department of Clinical Research, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Shirong Ding, Qi Meng & Qian Long

  5. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China

    Kun Ye

Authors
  1. Shirong Ding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengge Ding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ao’ran Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yishu Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi Meng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kun Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Min Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chaoyuan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fang Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qian Long
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xianling Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.L., Q.L., and S.D. conceived and designed the project. S.D., Q.L., M.D., A.H., Y.G., K.Y., and Q.M. analyzed and interpreted the data. S.D., M.L., C.L., and F.M. wrote the main manuscript text. S.D. and Q.L. prepared figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qian Long or Xianling Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

Public data was obtained from the TCGA and CPTAC were used. Clinical specimens were obtained from the Tumor Bio-bank of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The study protocol for the SYSUCC cohort was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (B2020-310-01). All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, S., Ding, M., Hu, A. et al. Prognostic significance and immune correlation of STING expression and promoter methylation in renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47187-1

Download citation

  • Received: 10 June 2025

  • Accepted: 30 March 2026

  • Published: 06 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47187-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • Epigenetics
  • Biomarker
  • STING
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Tumor immune microenvironment
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer