Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Extent of sediment concentration trends associated with climate and human factors across global rivers
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Extent of sediment concentration trends associated with climate and human factors across global rivers

  • Rajaram Prajapati1,2,
  • John Gardner1,3 &
  • Punwath Prum1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Hydrology

Abstract

Suspended sediment concentration (SSC) is a key indicator of river ecosystems, influencing aquatic habitat quality, biogeochemical cycling, reservoir sustainability, and the persistence of downstream coastal land. Despite its global significance, long-term assessments of SSC trends have been limited in spatial scope. Leveraging > 88,000,000 satellite-derived SSC estimates, we analyzed trends over a 38-year period (1984–2022) across > 200,000 river segments globally. Our analysis reveals significant SSC trends in one-third of rivers, with 27% exhibiting declines and 7% showing increases. Basins with more widespread declining SSC trends are in temperate and arid regions and the extent of change is primarily associated with dam regulation and forest recovery. In contrast, increasing trends are concentrated in tropical basins, where deforestation and high rainfall causes erosion. These findings highlight the value of a spatially and temporally coherent, global riverine SSC database for documenting and pinpointing environmental change in unmonitored rivers.

Data availability

The Global River Sediment Database (GloRivSed) database contains surface suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) derived from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 Level 1 Collection 1 surface reflectance from all rivers in the world that are ~ 60 meters wide or greater9 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15485524. Private Link to Zenodo Land cover data were from European Space Agency (ESA) WorldCover52 https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/18478/. Dam data were collected from Global Reservoir and Dam (GRanD) Database28 https://www.globaldamwatch.org/grand/. Hydrological datasets were from Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC)54 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pete-Falloon/publication/252683891_New_Global_River_Routing_Scheme_in_the_Unified_Model/links/56b05e5e08ae8e37214d7b2a/New-Global-River-Routing-Scheme-in-the-Unified-Model.pdf. Rainfall erosivity data were from Global Rainfall Erosivity Database (GloREDa)15 https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/global-rainfall-erosivity. Climate classes were referred from Köppen-Geiger climate classification55 https://www.gloh2o.org/koppen/. Lithology data were from Global Lithological Map56 https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.788537. Aridity data were from Global Aridity Index57 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Global_Aridity_Index_and_Potential_Evapotranspiration_ET0_Climate_Database_v2/7504448/5. Rainfall data were collected from Global Rainfall data ERA5 Copernicus Climate58 https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5. Elevation data were from MERIT elevation dataset59 http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yamadai/MERIT_Hydro/.

References

  1. Best, J. Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers. Nat. Geosci. 12(1), 7–21 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Syvitski, J. P. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J. & Green, P. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308, 376–380 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkinson, B. H. & McElroy, B. J. The impact of humans on continental erosion and sedimentation. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 119, 140–156 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Anthropogenic sediment retention: Major global impact from registered river impoundments. Glob. Planet. Change 39, 169–190 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babiński, Z. Y. The relationship between suspended and bed load transport in river channels. In Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the 7th Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 182–188 (2005).

  6. Shin, J., Grabowski, R. C. & Holman, I. Indicators of suspended sediment transport dynamics in rivers. Hydrol. Res. 54, 978–994 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walling, D. E. & Fang, D. Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob. Planet. Change 39, 111–126 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wohl, E. Legacy effects on sediments in river corridors. Earth Sci. Rev. 147, 30–53 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prajapati, R., Gardner, J., Pavelsky, T. & Talchabhadel, R. Longitudinal recovery of suspended sediment downstream of large dams in the US. Water Resour. Res. 60 (2024).

  10. Dethier, E. N. et al. A global rise in alluvial mining increases sediment load in tropical rivers. Nature 620, 787–793 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner, J. et al. Human activities change suspended sediment concentration along rivers. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 064032 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J. et al. Recent intensified erosion and massive sediment deposition in Tibetan Plateau rivers. Nat. Commun. 15, (2024).

  13. Dethier, E. N., Renshaw, C. E. & Magilligan, F. J. Rapid changes to global river suspended sediment flux by humans. Science 376, 1447–1452 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, X. et al. Changes in global fluvial sediment concentrations and fluxes between 1985 and 2020. Nat. Sustain. 8, 142–151 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Panagos, P. et al. Global rainfall erosivity assessment based on high-temporal resolution rainfall records. Sci. Rep. 7, (2017).

  16. Liu, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, Y. & Pereira, P. Global rainfall erosivity changes between 1980 and 2017 based on an erosivity model using daily precipitation data. Catena (Amst.) 194, 104768 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trabucco, A. & Zomer, R. J. Global aridity index and potential evapotranspiration (ET0) climate database v2. CGIAR Consortium Spat. Inform. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Altenau, E. H. et al. The surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) mission river database (SWORD): A global river network for satellite data products. Water Resour Res 57, e2021WR030054 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dethier, E. N., Renshaw, C. E. & Magilligan, F. J. Toward improved accuracy of remote sensing approaches for quantifying suspended sediment: Implications for suspended-sediment monitoring. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005033 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Balasubramanian, S. V. et al. Robust algorithm for estimating total suspended solids (TSS) in inland and nearshore coastal waters. Remote Sens. Environ. 246, 111768 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer, H. & Pebesma, E. Machine learning-based global maps of ecological variables and the challenge of assessing them. Nat. Commun. 13, 2208 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer, H., Reudenbach, C., Hengl, T., Katurji, M. & Nauss, T. Improving performance of spatio-temporal machine learning models using forward feature selection and target-oriented validation. Environ. Model. Softw. 101, 1–9 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prum, P., Gardner, J. & Lucchese, L. Global model for riverine suspended sediment concentration from Landsat. Sci. Rep. (2025).

  24. Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science 361, 585–588 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roy, D. P., J., J., Mbow, C., Frost, P. & Loveland, T. Accessing free Landsat data via the Internet: Africa’s challenge. Remote Sens. Lett. 1, 111–117 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frasson, R. P. et al. Global relationships between river width, slope, catchment area, meander wavelength, sinuosity, and discharge. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 3252–3262 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, T.-Y., Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Xiao, Y. & Wang, P. Horton’s law of stream widths in China and its association with climate. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 48, 101471 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. East, A. E. et al. Measuring and attributing sedimentary and geomorphic responses to modern climate change: Challenges and opportunities. Earths Future 10, (2022).

  29. Schattman, R. E., Niles, M. T. & Aitken, H. M. Water use governance in a temperate region: Implications for agricultural climate change adaptation in the Northeastern United States. Ambio 50, 942–955 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lazurko, A. et al. Assessing sand dams for contributions to local water security and drought resilience in the semi-arid eastern Shashe catchment, Zimbabwe. Reg. Environ. Change 24, 36 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moragoda, N. et al. Modeling and analysis of sediment trapping efficiency of large dams using remote sensing. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033296 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, L. et al. Global trends in water and sediment fluxes of the world’s large rivers. Sci. Bull. (Beijing). 65, 62–69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lehner, B. et al. Global Reservoir and Dam (GRanD) Database. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/pfs/grand.html (2011).

  34. Narayanan, A., Cohen, S. & Gardner, J. R. Riverine sediment response to deforestation in the Amazon basin. Earth Surf. Dyn. 12, 581–599 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jautzy, T., Maltais, M. & Buffin-Bélanger, T. Interannual evolution of hydrosedimentary connectivity induced by forest cover change in a snow-dominated mountainous catchment. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 2318–2335 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Q. et al. Forest cover change and water yield in large forested watersheds: A global synthetic assessment. Ecohydrology https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1838 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Juracek, K. E. & Fitzpatrick, F. A. Geomorphic responses of fluvial systems to climate change: A habitat perspective. River Res. Appl. 38, 757–775 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidt, J. C. & Wilcock, P. R. Metrics for assessing the downstream effects of dams. Water Resour. Res. 44, 4404 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Claverie, M., Vermote, E. F., Franch, B. & Masek, J. G. Evaluation of the Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ surface reflectance products. Remote Sens. Environ. 169, 390–403 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vermote, E., Justice, C., Claverie, M. & Franch, B. Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 46–56 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gardner, J. R. et al. The color of rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, (2021).

  42. Jones, J. W. Improved automated detection of subpixel-scale inundation—Revised Dynamic Surface Water Extent (DSWE) Partial Surface Water Tests. Remote Sensing 11, 374 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Foga, S. et al. Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sens. Environ. 194, 379–390 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu, Z., Wang, S. & Woodcock, C. E. Improvement and expansion of the Fmask algorithm: Cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7, 8, and Sentinel 2 images. Remote Sens. Environ. 159, 269–277 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Topp, S. N. et al. Shifting patterns of summer lake color phenology in over 26,000 US lakes. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. National Water Quality Monitoring Council. National Water Quality Monitoring Council Total suspended solids [Dataset]. (2022).

  47. European Environment Agency. European Environment Agency Waterbase. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/datahub/datahubitem-view/208518d1-ffe3-4981-9cae-13264cd9c32c (2022).

  48. HYBAM. HYdro-geochemistry of the AMazonian Basin. https://hybam.obs-mip.fr (2022).

  49. Brazilian Water Agency. Brazilian hydrological data. https://www.snirh.gov.br/hidroweb/serieshistoricas (2022).

  50. UN Environment Programme. Global Freshw. Qual. Database https://gemstat.org/ (2022).

  51. Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R. & Moosdorf, N. A brief overview of the GLObal RIver Chemistry Database, GLORICH. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 10, 23–27 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cao, Z. et al. Landsat observations of chlorophyll-a variations in Lake Taihu from 1984 to 2019. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 106, 102642 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ghatkar, J. G., Singh, R. K. & Shanmugam, P. Classification of algal bloom species from remote sensing data using an extreme gradient boosted decision tree model. Int. J. Remote Sens. 40, 9412–9438 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang, Y. et al. Improving remote sensing estimation of Secchi disk depth for global lakes and reservoirs using machine learning methods. GIScience & Remote Sensing 59, 1367–1383 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mann, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods. (1948).

  57. Zanaga, D. et al. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/18478/ (2022).

  58. Grill, G. et al. An index-based framework for assessing patterns and trends in river fragmentation and flow regulation by global dams at multiple scales. Environmental Research Letters https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Falloon, P., Betts, R. & Bunton, C. New Global River Routing Scheme in the Unified Model http://hydro.iis.u (2007).

  60. Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5, 180214 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hartmann, J. & Moosdorf, N. The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the earth surface. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, (2012).

  62. Hersbach, H. et al. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5 (2023).

  63. Yamazaki, D. et al. MERIT Hydro: A high-resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resour. Res. 55, 5053–5073 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding to Rajaram Prajapati from NASA-Earth Science New Investigator Program Grant 80NSSC21K0921. Funding to John Gardner from NSF-EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant 1806983.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Environmental Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Rajaram Prajapati, John Gardner & Punwath Prum

  2. SmartPhones4Water (S4W), Chico, CA, USA

    Rajaram Prajapati

  3. Department of Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    John Gardner

Authors
  1. Rajaram Prajapati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Gardner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Punwath Prum
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.P. and J.G. conceived the study and designed the methodology. R.P. collected and analyzed the data and prepared the figures. R.P. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajaram Prajapati.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prajapati, R., Gardner, J. & Prum, P. Extent of sediment concentration trends associated with climate and human factors across global rivers. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47267-2

Download citation

  • Received: 30 December 2025

  • Accepted: 31 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47267-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Suspended sediment
  • Satellite remote sensing
  • Rivers
  • Landsat
  • Global change
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene