Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Association between hospital frailty risk score and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: results from MIMIC-IV database
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 April 2026

Association between hospital frailty risk score and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: results from MIMIC-IV database

  • Yali Xu1,
  • Xiya Wang1,
  • Andong Li1,
  • Shubin Guo1 &
  • …
  • Xue Mei1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 167 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research
  • Nephrology
  • Risk factors

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between frailty assessed by the HFRS and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis.

Method

A retrospective analysis of septic ICU patients from the MIMIC-IV database assessed frailty through the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Patients were categorized into non-frail (HFRS < 5, n = 4,882), pre-frail (5 ≤ HFRS < 15, n = 3,134), and frail (HFRS ≥ 15, n = 2,575) groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression combined with restricted cubic splines (RCS) was employed to evaluate the association between HFRS (categorical and continuous) and mortality. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) validated the results, and subgroup analyses explored frailty-mortality correlations in different patient groups.

Results

A total of 10,591 patients were included, with 4,737 (44.7%) males and median age of 68.9[57.6, 79.6] years. Altogether, 3,024 (28.6%) experienced mortality during hospitalization. Elevated frailty levels were associated with increased in-hospital mortality, consistent across both continuous and categorical HFRS analyses. A linear association between HFRS and mortality risk was indicated by results from RCS. After controlling for potential confounders, both pre-frail and frail statuses were significantly correlated with higher in-hospital mortality risk (pre-frailty, RR = 1.15, 95% CI: [1.06, 1.26], P = 0.002; frailty, RR = 1.29, 95% CI: [1.17, 1.42], P < 0.001). Furthermore, frailty was significantly positively correlated with longer hospital and ICU stays. These findings were confirmed by IPW.

Conclusion

Elevated frailty assessed via HFRS was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and prolonged hospital and ICU stays in sepsis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Frailty assessed by administrative tools and mortality in patients with pneumonia admitted to the hospital and ICU in Wales

Article Open access 28 June 2021

External validation of the hospital frailty risk score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation

Article Open access 26 August 2022

Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and mortality in patients with heart failure complicated by sepsis

Article Open access 28 December 2024

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data screening codes used in our analyses, provided by the authors of the MIMIC-IV database, are available on GitHub at (https://github.com/MIT-LCP/ mimic-code).

Abbreviations

MIMIC-IV:

Medical information mart for intensive care IV

HFRS:

Hospital frailty risk score

ICD:

International classification of diseases

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

MBP:

Mean blood pressure

SpO2 :

Saturation of peripheral oxygen

INR:

International normalized ratio

PT:

Prothrombin time

APTT:

Activated partial thromboplastin time

GCS:

Glasgow coma scale

LODS:

Logistic organ dysfunction system

SAPS II:

Simplified acute physiology score II

CRRT:

Continuous renal replacement therapy

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

CI:

Confidence interval

IPW:

Inverse probability weighting

RCS:

Restricted cubic splines

SDM:

Standardized mean difference

References

  1. Singer, M. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8), 801–810 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cecconi, M., Evans, L., Levy, M. & Rhodes, A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet 392(10141), 75–87 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rudd, K. E. et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395(10219), 200–211 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, K. E. et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451(7181), 990–993 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rhee, C. et al. Prevalence, Underlying Causes, and Preventability of Sepsis-Associated Mortality in US Acute Care Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2(2), e187571 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoogendijk, E. O. et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet 394(10206), 1365–1375 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theou, O., Blodgett, J. M., Godin, J. & Rockwood, K. Association between sedentary time and mortality across levels of frailty. CMAJ 189(33), E1056–E1064 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soysal, P. et al. Inflammation and frailty in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 31, 1–8 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darvall, J. N. et al. Impact of frailty on persistent critical illness: a population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 48(3), 343–351 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Torvik, M. A. et al. Patient characteristics in sepsis-related deaths: prevalence of advanced frailty, comorbidity, and age in a Norwegian hospital trust. Infection 51(4), 1103–1115 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Proietti, M. et al. Frailty prevalence and impact on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,187,000 patients. Ageing Res. Rev. 79, 101652 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, A. et al. Aging and Inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 14(6), a041197 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, D. H. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 391(6), 538–548 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381(9868), 752–762 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, L., Zeng, X., He, F. & Huang, X. Inflammatory biomarkers of frailty: A review. Exp. Gerontol. 179, 112253 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Afilalo, J. et al. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63(8), 747–762 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fehlmann, C. A. et al. Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: A scoping review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 17(8), 2407–2418 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Navarrete-Villanueva, D. et al. Frailty and physical fitness in elderly people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 51(1), 143–160 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lansbury, L. N. et al. Use of the electronic Frailty Index to identify vulnerable patients: A pilot study in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 67(664), e751–e756 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. McAlister, F. A., Savu, A., Ezekowitz, J. A., Armstrong, P. W. & Kaul, P. The hospital frailty risk score in patients with heart failure is strongly associated with outcomes but less so with pharmacotherapy. J. Intern. Med. 287(3), 322–332 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kwok, C. S. et al. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score and its association with in-hospital mortality, cost, length of stay and discharge location in patients with heart failure short running title: Frailty and outcomes in heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1(300), 184–190 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. McAlister, F. & van Walraven, C. External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score and comparison with the Hospital-patient One-year Mortality Risk Score to predict outcomes in elderly hospitalised patients: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual. Saf. 28(4), 284–288 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ushida, K., Shimizu, A., Hori, S., Yamamoto, Y. & Momosaki, R. Hospital Frailty Risk Score predicts outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 100, 104658 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kandula, R. A. et al. Utility of Hospital Frailty Risk Score in predicting postoperative outcomes of sinonasal malignancies. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 14(6), 1097–1100 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar, V., Barkoudah, E., Jin, D. X., Banks, P. & McNabb-Baltar, J. Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) predicts adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with chronic pancreatitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 68(7), 2890–2898 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hao, B. et al. A comparison of three approaches to measuring frailty to determine adverse health outcomes in critically ill patients. Age Ageing 52(6), afad096. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad096 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. De Biasio, J. C. et al. Frailty in critical care medicine: A review. Anesth. Analg. 130(6), 1462–1473 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brummel, N. E. et al. Frailty and Subsequent Disability and Mortality among Patients with Critical Illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 196(1), 64–72 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fernando, S. M. et al. Frailty and Associated Outcomes and Resource Utilization Among Older ICU Patients With Suspected Infection. Crit Care Med. 47(8), e669–e676 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dent, E. et al. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet 394(10206), 1376–1386 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fan, J. et al. Frailty index and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Chinese adults: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 5(12), e650–e660 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu M, Gong Y, Yin X. Association of Frailty With Risk of Incident Hospital-Treated Infections in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8):glae146.

  33. Muscedere, J. et al. The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 43(8), 1105–1122 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, Q., Shang, N., Gao, Q., Guo, S. & Yang, T. Prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with frailty and malnutrition among older patients with sepsis-a cross-sectional study in the emergency department. BMC Geriatr. 25(1), 377 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, H. Y. et al. Preexisting Clinical Frailty Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 50(5), 780–790 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Patrizio, E. et al. Assessing the mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis: the role of frailty and acute organ dysfunction. Aging Clin Exp Res. 34(10), 2335–2343 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dong, J., Chen, R., Song, X., Guo, Z. & Sun, W. Quality of life and mortality in older adults with sepsis after one-year follow up: A prospective cohort study demonstrating the significant impact of frailty. Heart Lung 60, 74–80 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. de Souto Barreto, P., Rolland, Y., Maltais, M. & Vellas, B. Associations of multidomain lifestyle intervention with frailty: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Med. 131(11), 1382.e7-1382.e13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Apóstolo, J. et al. Effectiveness of interventions to prevent pre-frailty and frailty progression in older adults: A systematic review. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 16(1), 140–232 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gilbert, T. et al. Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. Lancet 391(10132), 1775–1782 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Renedo, D. et al. Higher Hospital Frailty Risk Score is associated with increased risk of stroke: Observational and genetic analyses. Stroke 54(6), 1538–1547 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lim, Z. et al. Delirium is significantly associated with Hospital Frailty Risk Score derived from administrative data. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 38(1), e5872 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Detsky, M. E. et al. Using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to assess mortality risk in older medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit. CMAJ Open 11(4), E607–E614 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Veronese, N. et al. Prevalence of multidimensional frailty and pre-frailty in older people in different settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 72, 101498 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all those who contributed to the completion of this work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine Clinical Research Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, No. 8, Gongrentiyuchang South Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China

    Yali Xu, Xiya Wang, Andong Li, Shubin Guo & Xue Mei

Authors
  1. Yali Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiya Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andong Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shubin Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xue Mei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YLX Contributed to data curation, conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript writing. XYW and ADL Contributed to methodology and data curation. XM reviewed the initial draft. SBG supervised and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the fi6nal manuscript and are responsible for its content.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shubin Guo or Xue Mei.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University. The dataset used in this research was obtained from the MIMIC-IV 3.1 database. We have completed the CITI Program courses on "Human Research and Data" and "Specimen-Only Research" to apply for access to the database (Record ID: 66067288). The individual patient information in this database was anonymized, and therefore, ethical review and informed consent requirements were waived. All methods employed in our study were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 2. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Wang, X., Li, A. et al. Association between hospital frailty risk score and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: results from MIMIC-IV database. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47654-9

Download citation

  • Received: 04 November 2025

  • Accepted: 01 April 2026

  • Published: 11 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47654-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing