Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Perceptions and motivations toward critical thinking among health science students in northern Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 April 2026

Perceptions and motivations toward critical thinking among health science students in northern Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

  • Mohammed Ubaidullah Sayeed1,
  • Aseel Awad Alsaidan2,
  • Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu2,
  • Mubarak Alruwaili3,
  • Mohammed Saleh Al-anazi4,
  • Abdulaziz Naseer Alsamarh4,
  • Mohammad Abdulhamid Alanazi4,
  • Muhannad Fulayyih Alshrari4 &
  • …
  • Abdulaziz Saleh Albalawi4 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 709 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Critical thinking (CT) is a vital competency for future healthcare providers, as it enables effective decision-making, problem-solving, and the delivery of patient care in increasingly complex clinical environments. This study examined perceptions, motivations, and factors associated with CT. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 330 medical and other health science students using a validated questionnaire. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the two domains. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of perception and motivation toward CT. The majority of participants demonstrated low to medium levels of perception of and motivation toward CT. More than 60% of students reported receiving frequent institutional support, whereas only 58% reported receiving support from their academic advisors for CT development. Female students had significantly higher perception scores (p = 0.029), and nursing students demonstrated higher perception levels than medical students (p = 0.016). Obese students exhibited lower perception (p = 0.012) and motivation scores (p = 0.008). Strategies to improve students’ perceptions of and motivation toward CT are recommended to foster the advanced clinical reasoning skills required for high-quality healthcare delivery. These strategies include enhancing opportunities for interprofessional collaboration and integrating practice-oriented CT activities.

Similar content being viewed by others

Cinemeducation to teach patient safety: an experience in medical students

Article Open access 03 May 2024

Healthcare students attitudes opinions perceptions and perceived obstacles regarding ChatGPT in Saudi Arabia: a survey‑based cross‑sectional study

Article Open access 01 October 2024

Students’ perception of healthcare services and factors affecting their utilization at a Nigerian University: a cross-sectional study

Article Open access 12 October 2024

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Diamond-Fox, S. & Bone, H. Advanced practice: Critical thinking and clinical reasoning. Br. J. Nurs. 30, 526–532. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.9.526 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halpern, D. F., Dunn, D. S. & Critical thinking a model of intelligence for solving real-world problems. J. Intell. 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020022 (2021).

  3. Berg, C., Philipp, R. & Taff, S. D. Scoping review of critical thinking literature in healthcare education. Occup. Ther. Health Care 37, 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2021.1879411 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, C. V. Concept-based curriculum: Design and implementation strategies. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 17. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2019-0066 (2020).

  5. Ramanathan, R., Shanmugam, J., Gopalakrishna, S. M., Palanisami, K. & Narayanan, S. Exploring the learners’ perspectives on competency-based medical education. J. Educ. Health Promot. 10, 109. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_866_20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falcó-Pegueroles, A., Rodríguez-Martín, D., Ramos-Pozón, S. & Zuriguel-Pérez, E. Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue. Nurs. Philos. 22, e12332. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12332 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. AlOtaibi, N. G. et al. Assessing perceptions about critical thinking, motivation learning strategies in online psychiatric and mental health nursing education among Egyptian and Saudi undergraduate nursing students. BMC Nurs. 22, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01264-2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaur, M. & Mahajan, R. Inculcating critical thinking skills in medical students: Ways and means. Int. J. Appl. Basic. Med. Res. 13, 57–58. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_214_23 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stretton, T., Cochrane, T., Sevigny, C., Stander, J. & Merolli, M. Co-designing critical thinking in health professional education: A 360 immersive environment case study. Virtual Real. 29, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01115-2 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vision20230. Health Sector Transformation Program. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/vision-2030/vrp/health-sector-transformation-program/ (2021).

  11. Suleiman, A. K. & Ming, L. C. Transforming healthcare: Saudi Arabia’s vision 2030 healthcare model. J. Pharm. Policy Pract. 18, 2449051. https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2449051 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giuliani, M. et al. Motivations for and challenges in the development of global medical curricula: A scoping review. Acad. Med. 96, 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003383 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bansal, S. & Pagidas, K. Strength of motivation and academic performance of medical students: A longitudinal study. BMC Med. Educ. 25, 1154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07733-3 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kasalaei, A., Amini, M., Nabeiei, P., Bazrafkan, L. & Mousavinezhad, H. Barriers of critical thinking in medical students’ curriculum from the viewpoint of medical education experts: A qualitative study. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 8, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.83053.1080 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shakurnia, A., Fazelinia, T. & Khajeali, N. The trend of critical thinking disposition in medical students and its relationship with their academic performance. J. Educ. Health Promot. 10, 479. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_55_21 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Almansour, A. M. The level of emotional intelligence among Saudi nursing students: A cross-sectional study. Belitung Nurs. J. 9, 471–477. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2794 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Athari, Z. S., Sharif, S. M., Nasr, A. R. & Nematbakhsh, M. Assessing critical thinking in medical sciences students in two sequential semesters: Does it improve? J. Educ. Health Promot. 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.106644 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ossa, C. J., Rivas, S. F. & Saiz, C. Relation between metacognitive strategies, motivation to think, and critical thinking skills. Front. Psychol. 14, 1272958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272958 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parejo-Jiménez, N., Expósito-López, J., Chacón-Cuberos, R. & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. Critical thinking and motivation in vocational training and baccalaureate: A comparison study of students of Spanish nationality, unaccompanied foreign minors and young care leavers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095272 (2022).

  20. Karakuş, İ. University students’ cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions. Front. Psychol. 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420272 (2024).

  21. Facione, P. A. The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal logic 20 (2000).

  22. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deng, X. N. & Yi, S. Individual motivation and self-perception of excel skills learning: An empirical study of first-generation college students and their peers. J. Account. Educ. 70, 100947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100947 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galindo-Domínguez, H., Bezanilla, M. J., Campo, L., Fernández-Nogueira, D. & Poblete, M. in Frontiers Education 1127705 (Frontiers Media SA).

  25. BF, A. L. et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards evidence-based medicine among northern Saudi primary care physicians: A cross-sectional study. Healthc. (Basel). 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112285 (2022).

  26. Juttla, P. K., Ndiritu, M., Milliano, F., Odongo, A. O. & Mwancha-Kwasa, M. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional survey from Kiambu County, Kenya. PLoS One 19, e0297335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297335 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vojdani, S. et al. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian medical students toward complementary and alternative medicine: A cross-sectional survey. Health Sci. Rep. 8, e70539. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70539 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hong, S., Lee, J., Jang, Y., & Lee, Y. A cross-sectional study: What contributes to nursing students’ clinical reasoning competence? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18, 6833 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leal, P. et al. Teaching and learning clinical reasoning in nursing education: A student training course. Healthcare 12, 1219 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alhowaymel, F. M. et al. Empowering future nurses: Enhancing self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement through talent management educational intervention. BMC Nurs. 24, 875. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03512-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, L. & Zin, Z. M. The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: A systematic review. Front. Educ. 8, 1139987 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, Y. & Pásztor, A. Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Think. Skills Creativity. 45, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steinert, Y. Faculty development: From rubies to oak. Med. Teach. 42, 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1688769 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carlson, E. R. & McGowan, E. Faculty development for the twenty-first century: Teaching the teachers. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 34, 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2022.02.004 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gilfillan, J., Irvine-Brown, L., Di Tommaso, A., Malfitano, A. P. S. & Farias, L. (Not) knowing what you know: Exploring educators’ perceptions of critical thinking in occupational therapy. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 31, 2405189. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2024.2405189 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison, J. Student nurses’ gender role is a predictor of caring behaviours and critical thinking. Evid. Based Nurs. 22, 89. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103029 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, N. Y., Hsu, W. Y., Hung, C. A., Wu, P. L. & Pai, H. C. The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 89, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhuang, H. et al. Depression, anxiety, stress symptoms among overweight and obesity in medical students, with mediating effects of academic burnout and internet addiction. Sci. Rep. 15, 16566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01793-7 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dakanalis, A. et al. Overweight and obesity is associated with higher risk of perceived stress and poor sleep quality in young adults. Med. (Kaunas). 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060983 (2024).

  40. Cheng, M. M. W. & Leung, J. S. C. in Education in the 21st Century: STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking. 119–135 (eds Berry, A.) (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

  41. Skurvydas, A. et al. Do physical activity, BMI, and wellbeing affect logical thinking? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116631 (2022).

  42. Anderson, A. S. & Good, D. J. Self-perceptions of critical thinking skills in university students are associated with BMI and exercise. J. Am. Coll. Health 70, 1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1803879 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. El-Demerdash, D., Elsayed, S. H. & Ata, A. A. Relation between critical thinking and motivation to learn among nursing students at Zagazig University. Zagazig Nurs. J. 15, 158–167 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aldekhyyel, R. N., Alhumaid, N. & Alismail, D. S. Saudi women’s views on healthcare leadership in the era of Saudi 2030 health transformation. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 17, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.S439146 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, Y. & Pásztor, A. Moderated mediating effects of gender among the components of critical thinking disposition in undergraduate students. Heliyon 9, e14664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14664 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Albarracín-Vivo, D., Encabo-Fernández, E. & Jerez-Martínez, I. & Hernández-Delgado, L. Gender differences and critical thinking: A study on the written compositions of primary education students. Societies 14 (2024).

  47. Shubina, I., Kwiatek, P. & Kulakli, A. The relationships between critical thinking and creativity among university students in contemporary education: Empirical analysis of gender differences. New. Educ. Rev. 65, 87–98 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Berger, K. et al. Motivation for critical thinking in nursing students in Chile. Hispanic Health Care Int. 19, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540415320970110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dwyer, C. P. An Evaluative review of barriers to critical thinking in educational and real-world settings. J. Intell. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060105 (2023).

  50. Swart, R. Critical thinking instruction and technology enhanced learning from the student perspective: A mixed methods research study. Nurse Educ. Pract. 23, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.003 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Algouzi, S., Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M. & Enhancing EFL students’ critical thinking skills using a technology-mediated self-study approach: EFL graduates and labor market in perspective. PLoS One 18, e0293273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293273 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jaramillo Gómez, D. L. et al. Determining factors for the development of critical thinking in higher education. J. Intell. 13 (2025).

  53. Bayram, A. et al. Nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses, critical thinking motivations, and problem-solving skills during distance learning: A multicentral study. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl. 33, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12362 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Bashayer Farhan ALruwali for her immense contribution to this manuscript preparation. Furthermore, we would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

“This work was funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No. (DGSSR-2023-01-02529).”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed Ubaidullah Sayeed

  2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

    Aseel Awad Alsaidan & Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

    Mubarak Alruwaili

  4. College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed Saleh Al-anazi, Abdulaziz Naseer Alsamarh, Mohammad Abdulhamid Alanazi, Muhannad Fulayyih Alshrari & Abdulaziz Saleh Albalawi

Authors
  1. Mohammed Ubaidullah Sayeed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aseel Awad Alsaidan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mubarak Alruwaili
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammed Saleh Al-anazi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Abdulaziz Naseer Alsamarh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohammad Abdulhamid Alanazi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Muhannad Fulayyih Alshrari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abdulaziz Saleh Albalawi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concepts, M.U.S., A.A.A., M.A. and M.S.A.; methods, M.U.S., A.N.A, M.A.A., M.F.A. and A.S.A.; software, A.S.A. and M.A.; validation, M.U.S., A.N.A., M.F.A. and A.S.A.; data analysis, M.U.S., A.A.A., M.A. and M.S.A; investigation, M.A., M.A.A. and A.S.A.; data curation, M.S.A., A.N.A, M.A.A., M.F.A. and A.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U.S., A.A.A., M.A. and M.S.A.; writing—review and edit-ing, A.N.A., M.A.A., M.F.A. and A.S.A.; visualization, M.F.A. and A.S.A.; supervision, M.U.S.; project administration, M.U.S., A.A.A. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Ubaidullah Sayeed.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 3 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayeed, M.U., Alsaidan, A.A., Thirunavukkarasu, A. et al. Perceptions and motivations toward critical thinking among health science students in northern Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49924-y

Download citation

  • Received: 20 August 2025

  • Accepted: 17 April 2026

  • Published: 21 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49924-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Critical thinking
  • Perceptions
  • Motivations
  • Health profession education
  • Saudi Arabia
  • University students
  • Predictors
  • Clinical reasoning
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing