Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 April 2026

A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification

  • Hüseyin Tayyip Altay1,
  • Özge Demir2,
  • Fatih Ekinci3,
  • Mehmet Serdar Güzel4,
  • Eda Kumru5,
  • Ilgaz Akata6,
  • Koray Acıcı7 &
  • …
  • Mustafa Sevindik8 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 1040 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Accurate differentiation of visually similar cherry leaf diseases remains a major challenge in precision agriculture due to overlapping symptom patterns and environmental variability. This study presents a comprehensive deep learning–based framework for multi-class cherry leaf disease classification, integrating systematic architectural comparison, statistical validation, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) analysis. Contrary to the common assumption that increased architectural complexity enhances performance, our results show that dual-backbone architectures consistently fail to outperform single-backbone models. A dataset comprising 4,995 cherry leaf images across five categories—brown spot, leaf scorch, healthy leaf, purple leaf spot, and shot hole disease—was used to evaluate multiple convolutional neural network architectures under fully standardized conditions. ResNet50 achieved the highest classification accuracy (98.20%), followed by EfficientNetB2 (98.00%) and DenseNet121 (97.50%), while the best dual-backbone model reached only 97.30% despite increased complexity. Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a significant discrepancy between overall accuracy and macro-averaged recall (p = 0.00195, r = 0.89), demonstrating that accuracy systematically overestimates class-wise detection performance in multi-class scenarios. Grad-CAM–based explainability analysis further revealed that DenseNet-based models produce compact and semantically coherent activation maps aligned with disease-relevant regions, whereas dual-backbone architectures exhibit fragmented attention patterns associated with feature redundancy and gradient interference. These findings indicate that interpretability fidelity does not scale with architectural complexity and that coherent single-backbone feature hierarchies provide a superior balance between performance, interpretability, and generalization. The proposed framework offers both methodological and practical insights for developing reliable and scalable artificial intelligence systems in agricultural disease diagnostics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Deep learning-based disease detection in potato and mango leaves: a comparative study of CNN, AlexNet, ResNet, and EfficientNet

Article Open access 24 December 2025

Deep learning-based automatic diagnosis of rice leaf diseases using ensemble CNN models

Article Open access 29 July 2025

Artificial intelligence for sustainable farming with dual branch convolutional graph attention networks in rice leaf disease detection

Article Open access 27 March 2025

Data availability

The image dataset used in this study was obtained from a publicly available secondary source hosted on the Kaggle platform. Specifically, cherry leaf images were accessed from the Cherry Leaf Disease on PlantCity Dataset (2025), which is derived from the PlantCity image collection. The dataset is openly available at: [https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/codewithsk/cherry-leaf-disease-on-plantcity-2025]All images were used in accordance with Kaggle’s open data usage policy and were subsequently curated, preprocessed, and partitioned into training, validation, and testing subsets for model development and evaluation. No new data were generated during the current study.

References

  1. Ferentinos, K. P. Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 145, 311–318 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacelar, E. et al. Impacts of climate change and mitigation strategies for some abiotic and biotic constraints influencing fruit growth and quality. Plants 13, 1942 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, S. & Chauhan, O. in Fruits and Vegetables Technologies: Postharvest Processing and Packaging 103–173 (Springer, 2025).

  4. Seethapathy, P., Gothandaraman, R., Gurudevan, T. & Malik, I. A. in Handbook of plum fruit 133–176 (CRC, 2022).

  5. Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P. & Salathé, M. Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 215232 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zainab, Z. & Mahum, R. Plant disease detection using deep learning techniques. ICCK J. Image Anal. Process. 1, 36–44 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shorten, C. & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J. big data. 6, 1–48 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pacal, I. et al. A systematic review of deep learning techniques for plant diseases. Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 304 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Upadhyay, A. et al. Deep learning and computer vision in plant disease detection: a comprehensive review of techniques, models, and trends in precision agriculture. Artif. Intell. Rev. 58, 92 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, C. et al. An advancing GCT-Inception-ResNet-V3 model for arboreal pest identification. Agronomy 14, 864 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaya, Y. & Gürsoy, E. A review of deep learning architectures for plant disease detection​. Turkish J. Biology. 49, 459–497 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radhakrishnan, M., Monish, N., Dev, P. S., Kesavan, N. & Thomas, N. S. Implementation of explainable Ai in deep learning methods for multiclass classification of plant diseases in mango lLeaves. ELCVIA Electron. Lett. Comput. Vis. image Anal. 24, 104–117 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan, S. et al. DBA-ViNet: an effective deep learning framework for fruit disease detection and classification using explainable AI. BMC Plant Biol. 25, 965 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goyal, A. & Lakhwani, K. Integrating advanced deep learning techniques for enhanced detection and classification of citrus leaf and fruit diseases. Sci. Rep. 15, 12659 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Zyl, C., Ye, X. & Naidoo, R. Harnessing eXplainable artificial intelligence for feature selection in time series energy forecasting: A comparative analysis of Grad-CAM and SHAP. Appl. Energy. 353, 122079 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ercan, U. et al. Identification and Classification of Snack-Type Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Genotypes Using Seed Morphology and Machine Learning Techniques. Foods 14, 4069 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naveen, K. & Parvathi, R. AI powered multi feature fusion framework for retrieving images using color, texture and shape descriptors. Scientific Reports (2025).

  18. Khan, M. S., Nisa, K., Ahmad, I., Zubair, M. & Alshammari, K. PlantCity: A Comprehensive Image Based on Multi Crop Leaves in Pakistan. Data Brief, 112130 https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/codewithsk/cherry-leaf-disease-on-plantcity-2025 (2025). (accessed on 10 January 2026).

  19. Khomkham, B. & Pankaseam, Y. Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Model Based on Modified MobileNetV3 for Plant Disease Classification. SN Comput. Sci. 6, 1028 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, Z., Bakar, E. B. A. & Razak, N. B. A. & Akhtar, M. N. Corrosion image classification method based on EfficientNetV2. Heliyon 10 (2024).

  21. Nandhini, S. & Ashokkumar, K. An automatic plant leaf disease identification using DenseNet-121 architecture with a mutation-based henry gas solubility optimization algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 34, 5513–5534 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sumon, R. I. et al. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Precise Emotion Recognition in Domestic Animals Using EfficientNetB5 Architecture. Eng 6, 9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peng, C., Liu, Y., Yuan, X. & Chen, Q. Research of image recognition method based on enhanced inception-ResNet-V2. Multimedia Tools Appl. 81, 34345–34365 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed, S. F. et al. Deep learning modelling techniques: current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 13521–13617 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taye, M. M. Theoretical understanding of convolutional neural network: Concepts, architectures, applications, future directions. Computation 11, 52 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rajanand, A. & Singh, P. ErfReLU: adaptive activation function for deep neural network. Pattern Anal. Appl. 27, 68 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jabir, B. & Falih, N. Dropout, a basic and effective regularization method for a deep learning model: A case study. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 24, 1009–1016 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kayaalp, K. A deep ensemble learning method for cherry classification. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 250, 1513–1528 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reyad, M., Sarhan, A. M. & Arafa, M. A modified Adam algorithm for deep neural network optimization. Neural Comput. Appl. 35, 17095–17112 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anam, M. K., Defit, S., Haviluddin, H., Efrizoni, L. & Firdaus, M. B. Early stopping on CNN-LSTM development to improve classification performance. J. Appl. Data Sci. 5, 1175–1188 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Torghabeh, F. A., Modaresnia, Y. & Khalilzadeh, M. M. Effectiveness of learning rate in dementia severity prediction using VGG16. Biomedical Engineering: Appl. Basis Commun. 35, 2350006 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dudala, J. M. in 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA). 1–7 (IEEE).

  33. Sevindik, M. et al. A Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures, Fusion Strategies, and Explainable AI for Fine-Grained Macrofungi Classification. Biology 14, 1733 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Korkmaz, A. F. et al. Combination Ensemble and Explainable Deep Learning Framework for High-Accuracy Classification of Wild Edible Macrofungi. Biology 14, 1644 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kumru, E. et al. Explainable convolutional neural network architectures for high-performance taxonomic classification of gasteroid macrofungi. Sci. Rep. 15, 40196 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kumru, E. et al. Deep Ensemble Learning and Explainable AI for Multi-Class Classification of Earthstar Fungal Species. Biology 14, 1313 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, Y., Khorshidi, H. A. & Aickelin, U. A review on over-sampling techniques in classification of multi-class imbalanced datasets: insights for medical problems. Front. Digit. health. 6, 1430245 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jelni, O. S., Radhitya, M. L., Wardhana, G. W., Kusuma, N. W. J. & Desmayani, N. M. M. R. Sentiment Analysis of BRImo Reviews on Google Play Store Using SVM and KNN. Indonesian J. Data Sci. 6, 548–562 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Saheed, Y. K., Balogun, B. F., Odunayo, B. J. & Abdulsalam, M. Microarray gene expression data classification via Wilcoxon sign rank sum and novel Grey Wolf optimized ensemble learning models. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 20, 3575–3587 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1, 80–83 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilcoxon, F. Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 3, 119–122 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lovakov, A. & Agadullina, E. R. Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 51, 485–504 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kansal, K., Chandra, T. B. & Singh, A. ResNet-50 vs. EfficientNet-B0: multi-centric classification of various lung abnormalities using deep learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 235, 70–80 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Debnath, A. et al. A smartphone-based detection system for tomato leaf disease using efficientNetV2B2 and its explainability with artificial intelligence (AI). Sensors 23, 8685 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Simangunsong, P. B. N., Sihombing, P., Efendi, S. & Fahmi, F. in 2024 7th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI). 907–911 (IEEE).

  46. Hemavarshini, S. & Arun, R. A. in 2024 International Conference on Electronic Systems and Intelligent Computing (ICESIC). 18–22 (IEEE).

  47. Salam, A. et al. Mulberry leaf disease detection using CNN-based smart android application. IEEE Access. 12, 83575–83588 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Naskinova, I. Transfer learning with NASNet-Mobile for Pneumonia X-ray classification. Asian-European J. Math. 16, 2250240 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fauzi, D. R. Comparison of CNN Models Using EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, and ResNet50 for Traffic Density with Transfer Learning. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Inf. 1, 22–30 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jesupriya, J., Mageswari, P. U. & Alli, A. in 2025 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (IITCEE). 1–9 (IEEE).

  51. Tripathi, A., Singh, T., Nair, R. R. & Duraisamy, P. Improving early detection and classification of lung diseases with innovative MobileNetV2 framework. IEEE Access (2024).

  52. Mutasodirin, M. A. & Falakh, F. M. Efficient weather classification using densenet and efficientnet. Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT. 9, 173–179 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. An, Q., Chen, W. & Shao, W. A deep convolutional neural network for pneumonia detection in X-ray images with attention ensemble. Diagnostics 14, 390 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Riska, S. Y., Sulistyo, D. A. & Maharani, F. S. S. High-accuracy classification of banana varieties using ResNet-50 and DenseNet-121 architectures. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 39, 322–335 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ramzan, M., Bustaman, A., Sarwinda, D. & Ullah, N. in 2024 7th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI). 1089–1094 (IEEE).

  56. Feng, S., Li, Z., Zhang, B., Chen, T. & Wang, B. DSF2-NAS: Dual-Stage Feature Fusion via Network Architecture Search for Classification of Multimodal Remote Sensing Images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sensing (2025).

  57. Ennab, M. & Mcheick, H. Advancing AI interpretability in medical imaging: a comparative analysis of pixel-level interpretability and Grad-CAM models. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 7, 12 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yu, X., Liu, M., Yu, S., Shi, X. & Wang, Q. The Dense Convolutional Network for Rice Disease Recognition Based on Transfer Learning. Curr. Sci. 5, 3595–3606 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, R. et al. MarsTerrNet: A U-Shaped Dual-Backbone Framework with Feature-Guided Loss for Martian Terrain Segmentation. Remote Sens. 18, 35 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Reddy, N. L. & Gopinath, M. Advanced deep learning framework for soil texture classification. Sci. Rep. 15, 34407 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kadir, M. A., Mosavi, A. & Sonntag, D. in IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES). 000111–000124 (IEEE). 000111–000124 (IEEE). (2023).

  62. Kainat, J. et al. Blended Features Classification of Leaf-Based Cucumber Disease Using Image Processing Techniques. Complexity 9736179 (2021). (2021).

  63. Kondaveeti, H. K. & Simhadri, C. G. Evaluation of deep learning models using explainable AI with qualitative and quantitative analysis for rice leaf disease detection. Sci. Rep. 15, 31850 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Georgiou, T., Liu, Y., Chen, W. & Lew, M. A survey of traditional and deep learning-based feature descriptors for high dimensional data in computer vision. Int. J. Multimedia Inform. Retr. 9, 135–170 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sahoo, L. et al. Transforming agriculture through artificial intelligence: Advancements in plant disease detection, applications, and challenges. J. Adv. Biology Biotechnol. 27, 381–388 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Manoj, H. et al. AI-driven drone technology and computer vision for early detection of crop disease in large agricultural areas. Scientific Reports (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Ethics declaration: Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Hüseyin Tayyip Altay

  2. Vocational School, Big Data Analytics Program, Beykoz University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Özge Demir

  3. Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Ankara University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey

    Fatih Ekinci

  4. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey

    Mehmet Serdar Güzel

  5. Department of Biology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Eda Kumru

  6. Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Ankara University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey

    Ilgaz Akata

  7. Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Koray Acıcı

  8. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey

    Mustafa Sevindik

Authors
  1. Hüseyin Tayyip Altay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Özge Demir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatih Ekinci
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehmet Serdar Güzel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eda Kumru
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ilgaz Akata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Koray Acıcı
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mustafa Sevindik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T.A., Ö.D., F.E. K.A., M.S., and E.K.; Methodology, M.S.G. and I.A.; Software, Ö.D., K.A., and T.A.; Validation, M.S.G., I.A. K.A., M.S., and F.E.; Formal Analysis, Ö.D., H.T.A. K.A., M.S., and E.K.; Investigation, Ö.D., F.E. and K.A.; Resources, Ö.D., M.S.G., F.E., K.A., I.A and T.A.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Ö.D., H.T.A., I.A. and F.E.; Writing – Review & Editing, M.S.G., M.S.,; Visualization, H.T.A., and F.E.; Supervision, M.S.G, I.A. and F.E.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Sevindik.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altay, H.T., Demir, Ö., Ekinci, F. et al. A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50104-1

Download citation

  • Received: 14 January 2026

  • Accepted: 20 April 2026

  • Published: 21 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50104-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Cherry leaf disease classification
  • Deep learning
  • Explainable artificial intelligence
  • Grad-CAM
  • Precision agriculture
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics