Table 2 Decomposition analysis for annual changes in the number of awards.
From: Is there gender bias in research grant success in social sciences?: Hong Kong as a case study
Year | Success rate | Submission rate | Number of staff | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
15/16–16/17 | ||||
Male | 4.0 | −0.4 | 0.4 | 4.0 |
Male (%) | 80.0 | −7.3 | 7.3 | 80.0 |
Female | 2.9 | −2.3 | 0.4 | 1.0 |
Female (%) | 57.2 | −45.4 | 8.2 | 20.0 |
Total | 6.9 | −2.6 | 0.8 | 5.0 |
Total (%) | 137.2 | −52.7 | 15.5 | 100.0 |
16/17–17/18 | ||||
Male | −0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Male (%) | 62.1 | −46.8 | −15.3 | 0.0 |
Female | −1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 |
Female (%) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
Total | −1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | −1.0 |
Total (%) | 162.1 | −46.8 | −15.3 | 100.0 |
17/18–18/19 | ||||
Male | −0.7 | 1.9 | −0.2 | 1.0 |
Male (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Female | −1.4 | 0.8 | −0.4 | −1.0 |
Female (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Total | −2.1 | 2.7 | −0.5 | 0.0 |
Total (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
18/19–19/20 | ||||
Male | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
Male (%) | 64.9 | 84.3 | 50.8 | 200.0 |
Female | −2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 |
Female (%) | −200.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | −100.0 |
Total | −1.4 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
Total (%) | −135.1 | 184.3 | 50.8 | 100.0 |
19/20–20/21 | ||||
Male | 4.4 | −1.4 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
Male (%) | 88.6 | −28.6 | 0.0 | 60.0 |
Female | 1.0 | 1.5 | −0.5 | 2.0 |
Female (%) | 19.3 | 30.3 | −9.5 | 40.0 |
Total | 5.4 | 0.1 | −0.5 | 5.0 |
Total (%) | 107.8 | 1.7 | −9.5 | 100.0 |
