Table 4 Regression result of Model 5 to 10.
From: A corpus-based interpretation of the discourse–cognitive–society triangle on Chinese court judgments
(5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cit1 | Cit2 | Cit3 | Cit1 | Cit2 | Cit3 | |
Law | 0.024* (0.013) | 0.020* (0.013) | 0.030* (0.017) | −0.039 (0.026) | ||
Reg | 0.061*** (0.010) | −0.014 (0.008) | 0.071*** (0.011) | −0.050 (0.017) | ||
Evi | 0.044** (0.017) | −0.008 (0.008) | 0.021* (0.011) | 0.019*** (0.017) | ||
Wor | −0.127 (0.149) | 0.003 (0.205) | 0.018 (0.341) | −0.133 (0.146) | 0.051 (0.193) | −0.016 (0.300) |
Phr | 0.116 (0.162) | −0.023 (0.240) | 1.132*** (0.373) | 0.250 (0.176) | −0.132 (0.233) | 1.572*** (0.362) |
Sen | 0.490** (0.226) | 0.375 (0.313) | −0.719 (0.525) | 0.384 (0.232) | 0.480 (0.307) | −1.004 (0.477) |
_cons | 1.031*** (0.256) | 0.094 (0.339) | 0.917 (0.617) | 1.133*** (0.284) | −0.388 (0.375) | 1.361** (0.583) |
N | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 |
R2 | 0.285 | 0.601 | 0.494 | 0.366 | 0.679 | 0.642 |
