Table 4 Results of regression analysis.

From: Choosing a better communication style: revealing the relationship between communication style and knowledge hiding behaviour

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Gender

0.113

0.133*

0.136*

0.169*

0.115

Age

−0.185*

−0.086

−0.076

−0.079

−0.064

Education

−0.014

−0.079

−0.073

0.011

−0.059

Position

−0.031

0.085

0.088*

0.090

0.037

FS

−0.030

0.033

0.037

0.017

0.051

FA

−0.141**

−0.137***

−0.143***

−0.129**

−0.136***

Ownership

0.037

−0.042

−0.041

−0.010

−0.051

Industry

−0.005

0.153**

0.158**

0.093*

0.131*

CoopC

 

−0.176*** (−3.562)

−0.179*** (−3.614)

−2.143 *** (−6.320)

 

CompC

 

0.619*** (16.958)

0.607*** (16.029)

 

1.380*** (6.480)

OC

  

0.062 (1.211)

−1.438*** (−3.990)

0.419*** (3.520)

CoopC × OC

   

0.309*** (4.850)

 

CompC × OC

    

−0.131*** (−3.400)

R2

0.051

0.585

0.587

0.320

0.584

Adjusted R2

0.028

0.573

0.573

0.298

0.571

F value

2.271

47.746***

43.598***

14.440***

43.270***

  1. The meaning of the abbreviations is the same as that in Table 2. CoopC × OC denotes the interaction of CoopC and OC, CompC × OC denotes the interaction of CompC and OC. t values are listed in the parentheses.
  2. *Significance at the level of 0.1; **significance at the level of 0.05; ***significance at the level of 0.01.
Back to article page