Table 6 Students’ perceptions of the teaching methods.
From: The effectiveness of translation technology training: a mixed methods study
Percentage (%) | Mean | SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very effective | Effective | Average | Ineffective | Very ineffective | Not used | |||
Q8: Students’ perceptions of the teaching methods | ||||||||
[1] PowerPoint presentations | 19.74% | 49.09% | 21.04% | 2.6% | 2.34% | 5.19% | 3.86 | 0.86 |
[2] Students’ in-class reports | 15.84% | 46.23% | 19.22% | 3.38% | 2.86% | 12.47% | 3.79 | 0.9 |
[3] Project-based teaching | 21.82% | 47.79% | 15.58% | 2.34% | 1.82% | 10.65% | 3.96 | 0.84 |
[4] Brainstorming | 16.62% | 35.84% | 20% | 5.45% | 3.38% | 18.7% | 3.7 | 1 |
[5] Flipped classroom | 12.21% | 32.47% | 24.68% | 5.97% | 2.86% | 21.82% | 3.58 | 0.97 |
[6] Project contests | 12.47% | 35.32% | 22.34% | 6.23% | 2.86% | 20.78% | 3.61 | 0.96 |
[7] Researching local language service provider | 16.62% | 36.36% | 20% | 6.49% | 2.86% | 17.66% | 3.7 | 0.99 |