Table 4 Hypothesis testing.

From: Modelling the significance of strategic orientation on green innovation: mediation of green dynamic capabilities

Hypothesis

Beta

CI

Min

CI

Max

t

Value

p

Value

Decision

H1

GEO → GDC

−0.008

−0.069

0.072

0.172

0.432

Not supported

H2

ITO → GDC

0.032

−0.023

0.113

0.625

0.266

Not supported

H3

MRO → GDC

0.038

−0.024

0.112

0.852

0.197

Not supported

H4

LRO → GDC

0.208

0.130

0.279

4.528

0.000

Supported

H5

GDC → GPI

0.197

0.134

0.276

4.529

0.000

Supported

H6

GDC → GPN

0.213

0.149

0.288

5.045

0.000

Supported

Specific indirect effects

      

H7a

GEO → GDC → GPI

−0.001

−0.013

0.017

0.165

0.435

Not supported

H8a

ITO → GDC → GPI

0.006

−0.005

0.024

0.646

0.259

Not supported

H9a

MRO → GDC → GPI

0.007

−0.005

0.024

0.823

0.205

Not supported

H10a

LRO → GDC → GPI

0.041

0.020

0.070

2.643

0.004

Supported

H7b

GEO → GDC → GPN

−0.002

−0.015

0.017

0.168

0.433

Not supported

H8b

ITO → GDC → GPN

0.007

−0.005

0.026

0.660

0.255

Not supported

H9b

MRO → GDC → GPN

0.008

−0.005

0.026

0.832

0.203

Not supported

H10b

LRO → GDC → GPN

0.044

0.021

0.074

2.745

0.003

Supported

  1. GEO green entrepreneurial orientation, ITO internationalisation orientation, MRO market orientation, LRO learning orientation, GDC green dynamic capability, GPI green product innovation, GPN green process innovation.