Fig. 3: The association between the subgroup’s engagement proportion and the overall engagement.
MIC scores are depicted using color, while the statistical significance of the Pearson correlation coefficients is indicated by markers (circles represent non-significant (p > 0.1) data points. In contrast, stars and diamonds represent statistically quasi-significant (p < 0.1) and significant (p < 0.05) data points, respectively). Two scoring metrics are employed to quantify the association between the relative information flow of the subgroup and the overall volatility. The dashed line represents the OLS linear regression line used to fit the Pearson correlation coefficients, with R2 = 0.876 and p < 0.001.
