Table 11 Robustness analysis of employees’ high job engagement configurations.
Solution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Configuration 1 | Configuration 2 | Configuration 3 | Configuration 4 | Configuration 5 | |
Openness to experience (KFX) |
|
|
|
| |
Neuroticism (SJZ) |
|
|
| ||
Agreeableness (YRX) |
|
|
|
|
|
Conscientiousness (JZX) |
|
|
|
|
|
Extraversion (WXX) |
|
|
|
| |
Self-efficacy (GS) |
|
|
| ||
Technostress creators (TC) |
|
|
|
| |
Consistency | 0.982 | 0.982 | 0.991 | 0.993 | 0.975 |
Raw coverage | 0.537 | 0.546 | 0.332 | 0.311 | 0.334 |
Unique coverage | 0.107 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.008 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.969 | ||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.679 | ||||
- Note: In the table, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.