Table 12 Robustness analysis of employees’ low job engagement configurations.
Solution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Configuration 1’ | Configuration 2’ | Configuration 3’ | Configuration 4’ | Configuration 5’ | |
Openness to experience (KFX) |
|
|
|
| |
Neuroticism(SJZ) |
|
|
|
|
|
Agreeableness (YRX) |
|
|
|
| |
Conscientiousness (JZX) |
|
|
|
|
|
Extraversion (WXX) |
|
|
|
| |
Self-efficacy (GS) |
|
|
|
|
|
Technostress creators (TC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency | 0.986 | 0.945 | 0.915 | 0.868 | 0.860 |
Raw coverage | 0.647 | 0.308 | 0.310 | 0.266 | 0.262 |
Unique coverage | 0.317 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 0.045 | 0.039 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.914 | ||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.804 | ||||
- Note: In the table, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “
” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “
” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.