Table 3 Sample characteristics by home ownership.

From: Sense of community and residential well-being among rural-urban migrants in China

 

Home ownership

Total

Chi-square

P

Shared accommodation

Own home

Age (n = 891), median (IQR)

36 (28–45)

25 (21–35.5)

35 (27–45)

184.7055

0.000***

Gender (n = 886)

   

8.1145

0.004***

Female

107 (12.08)

30 (3.39)

   

Male

654 (73.81)

95 (10.72)

   

Marital status (n = 882)

   

110.7963

0.000***

Single, n (%)

146 (16.55%)

79 (8.96%)

   

Married, n (%)

612 (69.39%)

45 (5.10%)

   

Hukou status (n = 889)

   

0.3073

0.579

Agricultural household, n (%)

568 (63.89%)

90 (10.12%)

   

Non-agricultural household, n (%)

196 (22.05%)

35 (3.94%)

   

Educational attainment (n = 890)

   

0.1447

0.704

Junior high school and below, n (%)

424 (47.64%)

67 (7.53%)

   

Senior middle school and above, n (%)

341 (38.31%)

58 (6.52%)

   

Converted residences (n = 870)

   

4.3144

0.038**

No, n (%)

97 (11.15%)

24 (2.76%)

   

Yes, n (%)

653 (75.06%)

96 (11.03%)

   

Household monthly income (n = 873), median(IQR)

4050 (3000–6000)

3000 (2000–4750)

4000 (3000–6000)

108.4244

0.001***

Number of bedrooms (n = 851), median(IQR)

1 (1–1)

1 (1–2)

1 (1–1.5)

40.4017

0.000***

Number of living rooms (n = 761), median(IQR)

0 (0–1)

0 (0–1)

0 (0–1)

4.3130

0.230

Number of housing facilities (n = 898), median(IQR)

2 (1–5)

2 (1–4)

2 (1–5)

18.4591

0.030**

Number of problem-solving channels (n = 882), median(IQR)

1 (1–3)

2 (1–3)

1 (1–3)

17.4297

0.042**

RWB score (n = 878), median(IQR)

37.5 (31–43)

34 (29–40.5)

37 (30–42)

77.5612

0.007***

SoC score (n = 878), median(IQR)

37 (32–42)

34 (29–38)

36 (31–41)

52.6875

0.201

  1. IQR and percentage are in parentheses.
  2. IQR interquartile range, SoC sense of community, RWB residential well-being.
  3. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.