Table 2 Agricultural carbon emissions and technology risk spillover of agricultural trade in the three major regions of China.

From: Risk spillovers of carbon emissions in international trade: the role of disembodied technology communications

N

West

C

F

N

Mid

C

F

N

East

C

F

4

Gansu

6.48

0.04

1

Anhui

4.38

0.23

2

Beijing

2.42

1.45

6

Guangxi

4.5

3.45

9

Hebei

4.35

2.3

3

Fujian

2.96

2.52

7

Guizhou

5.8

0.07

10

Henan

4.17

0.87

5

Guangdong

2.97

8.01

19

Ningxia

6.63

0.02

11

Heilongjiang

5.42

0.13

8

Hainan

2.75

0.04

20

Qinghai

11.92

0.01

12

Hubei

3.61

0.34

15

Jiangsu

3.51

8.82

23

Shaanxi

5.08

0.17

13

Hunan

3.7

0.12

17

Liaoning

3.24

3.05

25

Sichuan

3.91

0.24

14

Jilin

4.29

1.09

21

Shandong

3.59

9.55

27

Tibet

12.23

0.01

16

Jiangxi

4.05

0.14

24

Shanghai

7.69

1

28

Xinjiang

6.64

0.07

18

Inner Mongolia

6.55

0.1

26

Tianjin

3.14

2.87

29

Yunnan

5.57

0.2

22

Shanxi

5.97

0.14

30

Zhejiang

3.46

1.7

31

Chongqing

4.9

0.34

        

Mean

 

6.70

0.42

  

4.65

0.55

  

3.57

3.90

  1. Note: The N represents the code of each province in Fig. 2; The East, Mid and West represent the eastern, middle and western regions of China, respectively; The C and F represent the mean values of carbon emissions per unit of agricultural output (kg CO2e/CNY) and technology risk spillover of agricultural trade (100 million /USD) in each province from 1981 to 2019, respectively.
Back to article page